Skip to main content

Layer-specific gene expression in epileptogenic type II focal cortical dysplasia: normal-looking neurons reveal the presence of a hidden laminar organization



Type II focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) are malformations of cortical development characterised by the disorganisation of the normal neocortical structure and the presence of dysmorphic neurons (DNs) and balloon cells (BCs). The pathogenesis of FCDs has not yet been clearly established, although a number of histopathological patterns and molecular findings suggest that they may be due to abnormal neuronal and glial proliferation and migration processes.

In order to gain further insights into cortical layering disruption and investigate the origin of DNs and BCs, we used in situ RNA hybridisation of human surgical specimens with a neuropathologically definite diagnosis of Type IIa/b FCD and a panel of layer-specific genes (LSGs) whose expression covers all cortical layers. We also used anti-phospho-S6 ribosomal protein antibody to investigate mTOR pathway hyperactivation.


LSGs were expressed in both normal and abnormal cells (BCs and DNs) but their distribution was different. Normal-looking neurons, which were visibly reduced in the core of the lesion, were apparently located in the appropriate cortical laminae thus indicating a partial laminar organisation. On the contrary, DNs and BCs, labelled with anti-phospho-S6 ribosomal protein antibody, were spread throughout the cortex without any apparent rule and showed a highly variable LSG expression pattern. Moreover, LSGs did not reveal any differences between Type IIa and IIb FCD.


These findings suggest the existence of hidden cortical lamination involving normal-looking neurons, which retain their ability to migrate correctly in the cortex, unlike DNs which, in addition to their morphological abnormalities and mTOR hyperactivation, show an altered migratory pattern.

Taken together these data suggest that an external or environmental hit affecting selected precursor cells during the very early stages of cortical development may disrupt normal cortical development.


Focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) are malformations of cortical development that are frequently associated with intractable epilepsy and are characterised by cortical dyslamination and abnormal cell morphology[1]. The most recent classification[2] recognises three types of FCD, with Type II being divided into two subtypes on the basis of the presence of dysmorphic neurons (DNs) alone (type IIa) or DNs together with balloon cells (BCs; Type IIb).

In both cases, cortical architecture is profoundly altered particularly within the core of the lesion, where DNs and normal-sized pyramidal cells co-exist with an overall reduction in neuronal density[3, 4]. In addition to morphological changes (cytomegaly, abnormal dendritic arbors, and the loss of radial orientation), DNs are characterised by the aberrant expression of neuronal and glial markers with a prevalently neuronal-mature identity. BCs are also characterised by morphological anomalies such as voluminous cytoplasms, displaced nuclei and the co-expression of different mature/immature neuronal/glial markers with a prevalently glial-immature phenotype[57]. The lack of a clear cell-type specification may reflect alterations in normal neuronal and glial proliferation[2, 8] and subsequent migration.

The cytological similarities between Type II FCD and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), a genetic disorder due to mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 gene, and evidence of abnormal activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling cascade, have led to the hypothesis that this pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of DNs and BCs[7, 9, 10], the origin of which is still debated. It has been suggested that they may arise from radial glial progenitor cells in the Ventricular Zone (VZ)[11], but it is still unclear whether they derived from a single or multiple progenitor cell, or whether they arise at a particular moment or at different times during the proliferation phase[12].

One means of gaining further insights into the structural abnormalities of dysplastic cortex and clarifying the cellular origin of DNs and BCs is to evaluate the expression patterns of an appropriate panel of layer-specific genes (LSGs). Despite their specific functions such as transcription factors, calcium-binding proteins, receptors, etc.), these genes have the distinctive characteristic of being expressed in (mainly glutamatergic) cortical neurons with very high laminar specificity, and can thus be used as markers to identify different cortical layers. This not only allows specific neuronal subpopulations to be identified on the basis of their expression profiles, but also provides information concerning their birth dates and migration[13, 14]. Over the last few years, a number of studies have used LSGs to investigate cortical development under normal and pathological conditions in animal models[1518] and humans[1925].

The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of a panel of LSGs covering all cortical layers (Cux2, Rorβ, Er81, Nurr1 and CTGF) in surgical specimens from a cohort of 20 patients with a neuropathological diagnosis of Type IIa/b FCD in order to learn more about cortical layering disruption and the origin of DNs and BCs.


Patient and specimen selection

We collected specimens from 20 patients who underwent surgery to treat intractable epilepsy at the C. Munari Epilepsy Surgery Centre of Niguarda Hospital and the Department of Neurosurgery of Besta Neurological Institute (both in Milan, Italy). The protocols of the pre-surgical investigation procedures were the same at both centres, and included high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and video-electroencephalography (VEEG) monitoring in order to define the epileptogenic zone and surgical strategy. The following individual MRI aspects were considered: focal thickening of the cortex, blurring of the grey/white matter junction, abnormal signal intensity in the cortex and subcortical white matter, tapering of white matter signal changes towards the ventricle (trasmantle sign). The C. Munari Centre also used invasive pre-surgical procedures (i.e. stereo-EEG) after appropriate discussions when the imaging and non-invasive electroclinical data were discordant.

All of the resections were performed for strictly therapeutic reasons after informed consent had been obtained. The pre-surgical procedures for selecting candidates for epilepsy surgery have been described in detail elsewhere[26].

All of the patients had a neuropathological diagnosis of Type II FCD. The cortical specimens were divided into two groups: Type IIa (8 cases) and Type IIb (12 cases). Table 1 summarises the patients’ main clinical features.

Table 1 Clinical and neuropathological findings

Immunohistochemical procedures

After surgical resection, the specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24–36 hours, and alternate 5 mm thick slabs were embedded in paraffin for routine neuropathology or cut into 50 μm thick serial sections by means of a vibratome (VT1000S, Leica, Heidelberg, Germany) and addressed for the present study. For the routine neuropathological investigations, 7 μm thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, thionin, Kluver-Barrera and Bielschowsky stains, and additional series were processed for immunohistochemistry (IHC). The vibratome sections were also stained with thionin and processed for IHC. The following primary antibodies were used: monoclonal antibodies against neuronal nuclear protein (NeuN, 1:3000, Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA), pan-neuronal specific for non-phosphorylated neurofilaments (SMI311R, 1:1000, Covance, San Diego, CA, USA) and microtubule associated protein-2a and b (MAP2, 1:200, Neomarkers, Freemont, CA, USA) as neuronal markers; monoclonal antibody against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 1:15000, Chemicon) as a glial marker; monoclonal antibody against intermediate filament protein vimentin (VIM, 1:3000, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) as a marker of BCs; and rabbit monoclonal antibody against phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (pS6 Ser235/236, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) as a marker indicative of mTOR pathway hyperactivation. The IHC procedures have been described in detail elsewhere[27].

In situ hybridisation

In all cases, vibratome sections adjacent to the IHC sections were processed for in situ hybridisation (ISH) experiments designed to detect Cux2, Rorβ, Er81, Nurr1 and CTGF mRNA expression. Free-floating sections were incubated with digoxigenin(DIG)-labelled riboprobes that specifically hybridise with each of the five mRNA of interest, and then with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (1:1000, Roche Diagnostics Mannheim, Germany). The procedure and riboprobe characteristics have been described in detail elsewhere[16, 20, 22, 28]. There were no apparent signals in control sections with the sense probes.

Quantitative analysis of ISH signals

To estimate the reduction of normal-looking neurons, we counted the number of positive cells for the different LSG in a single section for each sample using Image Pro Plus 7.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesta, MD, USA). For each LSG, we outlined at 10× objective two equal regions of interest (lesional area and, when present, adjacent perilesional area) including the specific layer. Using a 20× objective, all the immunopositive normal-looking neurons within this area were manually counted. The considered areas were: 1.44 mm2 for Cux2, 1.35 mm2 for Rorβ, 1.5 mm2 for Er81 and 1.1 mm2 for Nurr1. Differences between lesional and perilesional areas were assessed by means of a t test, with p-values of <0.05 being considered significant.

Double fluorescence ISH/IHC

It was not always possible to make a clear morphological distinction between LSG-positive DNs and BCs when BCs and giant round-shaped neurons coexisted in the same areas. In these cases, we used double fluorescence ISH/ICC combining Rorβ, Er81 and Nurr1 riboprobes with anti-SMI, anti-MAP2 (to identify DNs) and anti-vimentin antibodies (to identify BCs); the Cux2 riboprobe was not used because of its low fluorescent hybridisation signal. After the ISH procedures, the sections were incubated overnight with a mixture of rabbit anti-DIG antibody (1:100000, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and mouse anti-SMI (1:300) or anti-MAP2 (1:300) or anti-Vim antibodies (1:300), and then incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:200, Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA) and indocarbocyanine (Cy) 3-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:500, Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) at room temperature for 60 minutes. Finally, the sections were incubated with streptavidine-HRP (1:1000, PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA) at room temperature for 30 minutes, and then with biotinil tyramide fluorescinated in amplification reagent (1:50, PerkinElmer) at room temperature for three minutes. The fluorescent sections were examined using a Nikon D-Eclipse C1 confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an argon-ion laser system and mounted on a light inverted microscope Eclipse TE2000 (Nikon).

Er81 and Nurr1 cortical layer thickness in perilesional cortex

Sections of five samples of temporal cortex taken from different patients and processed using the Er81 and Nurr1 riboprobes were analysed in order to evaluate possible changes in cortical distribution in the perilesional zone. The thickness of the layers was calculated on the basis of the extent of the neurons labelled by each riboprobe, and was expressed as a percentage of the total depth of the cortical ribbon. Cortical thickness was measured only in the linear portion of the cortex, far from gyri and sulci. One section per case was considered, and three measures of each marker were made using scanned images at 20× magnification (Scanscope; Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA, USA). The data were compared with those obtained in a previous study in witch six normal temporal cortices were evaluated[22], and the differences were assessed by means of a t test, with p-values of <0.05 being considered significant.


Clinical aspects

Table 1 shows the patients’ clinical data. Their mean age at epilepsy onset was three years (range 0–10; SD 3) and mean seizure frequency at the time surgery was 95 per month (range 1–600; SD 145). Mean age at the time of surgery was 20 years (range 1–47; SD 15), when the mean duration of epilepsy was 16 years (range 1–43, SD 14). On the basis of the MRI diagnostic criteria recently described by Colombo et al.[29], the imaging investigation allowed a diagnosis of Type II FCD in 19 patients (95%), whereas only temporo-polar blurring was observed in one patient. Trasmantle sign was present in 12 patients. The mean follow-up was five years (range 1–13; SD 3). The surgical outcome was fairly good, with 16 patients in Engel class I (80%; seven with Type IIa FCD and nine with Type IIb); in particular, 13 patients are in Engel class Ia. The remaining four patients are in class II, III, and IV because of the incomplete resection of the lesion. Although the study population was small, the data concerning seizure outcome are in line with previous reports[29, 30], thus suggesting that the good results were independent of the subtype and the site and side of the excised lesion.

Neuropathological characteristics of FCD

The resections of the 20 patients (eight with Type IIa FCD and 12 with Type IIb) involved different cortical areas (see Table 1). The analysed specimen from 16 patients (seven with Type IIa and nine with Type IIb) was characterised by severe disruption of the laminar cortical structure. DNs were distributed throughout the cortical laminae except for layer I, sometime aggregated in neuronal clusters and, in six cases, were also present in the underlying white matter (Figure 1a,d,e). In four patients (one with Type IIa and three with Type IIb), the laminar structure was less severely affected, with fewer DNs mainly clustered in particular cortical layers (Figure 1b,f,g). However, it should be noted that other slabs from these cases used for histopathology rather than LSG detection showed profound disruption of the cortical architecture, suggesting the periphery of the lesion. Both the severely and less severely affected contained normal-looking neurons intermingled with DNs (Figure 1j,k,m,n). BCs (the hallmark of Type IIb FCD identified by means of vimentin immunopositivity) were always present in the white matter (Figure 1l), and dispersed throughout the cortex (in five cases) or clustered in layer I (three cases). Fifteen of the 20 specimens showed a normal perilesional cortex in which only rare and scattered DNs were detected (Figure 1c,h,i).

Figure 1

Histopathological features of surgical samples taken from patients with Type IIb FCD. a, d, e: Examples of a severe lesion (parietal lobe): a, d (SMI immunoreactivity, ir) and e (NeuN ir) highlight typical features of Type II FCD, which is characterised by the total disruption of cortical lamination and the presence of numerous DNs throughout the cortex intermingled with fewer normal-looking neurons. j, k: Details of the regions marked with asterisks in d and e, respectively, show DNs that are clearly distinguishable by their very large size and abnormal shape (arrows). In the same case, vimentin-positive BCs (l) are diffusely distributed in the subcortical white matter. b, f, g: Examples of a less severe lesion (frontal lobe). b, f (SMI ir) and g (NeuN ir) showing cortical areas in which lamination is relatively preserved and DNs (arrows) are scattered in restricted cortical layers (deep layers) intermingled with numerous normal-looking neurons. m, n: Details of the regions marked with asterisks in f and g, respectively, show DNs (arrow) and normal-looking neurons. c, h, i: Examples of perilesional cortex (temporal lobe). c, h (SMI ir) and i (NeuN ir) showing normal cortex adjacent to the principal lesion. Scale bars: 3.8 mm (a); 2.5 mm (b); 3.6 mm (c); 540 μm (d, e); 450 μm (f, g); 414 μm (h, i); 120 μm (j, k, m, n); 4.68 mm (l) and 50 μm for inset in l.

Layer-specific gene expression in FCD

The lamina-specific expression patterns of the considered genes have been previously demonstrated in normal temporal and frontal cortex tissue: briefly, Cux2 mRNA expression is observed in many cells in layers II and III; Rorβ mRNA is intensely expressed in layer IV and a few scattered cells in neighbouring layers; Er81 and Nurr1 mRNAs are respectively detected in neuronal subpopulations in layers V and VI; and CTGF mRNA is observed in a few cells in layer VI and the white matter[20, 22]. An additional figure shows these features in detail (see Additional file1).

In the pathological specimens used for this study, Cux2, Rorβ, Er81 and Nurr1 mRNAs were expressed in both abnormal and normal-looking neurons, which could be clearly distinguished on the basis of their differently sized bodies and nuclei (Figure 2a-d). CTGF mRNA expression was scanty and observed only in a few normal cells in the deep layers and in the white matter (data not shown).

Figure 2

Layer-specific gene (LSG) expression in normal-looking neurons and DNs. a-d: Adjacent sections, obtained from a parietal lobe, showing regions expressing Cux2 (a), Rorβ (b), Er81 (c) and Nurr1 (d). In particular, areas from superficial cortex (sup.ctx), middle cortex (mid.ctx) and the boundary between the deep cortex and the white matter (wm) are shown. For each LSG, normal-looking neurons (asterisks) and DNs (stars) are easily distinguishable by their different size and shape (see high magnification images). Confocal double immunofluorescence images combining immunoreactivity for neuronal markers (SMI311 and MAP2) with ISH for Er81 and Nurr1 showed the morphology of the normal-looking neurons (e, f) and DNs (g, h,). Scale bars: 200 μm (a-d) and 60 μm for high magnification images; 55 μm (e-h).

In the 16 specimens showing severe laminar disorganisation and containing an adjacent perilesional area, there was a clear-cut difference in the distribution and signal intensity of gene expression moving from the core of the lesion toward the perilesional area (Figure 3a,b). Within the core of the lesion, normal-looking neurons (identified on the basis of their normal size and shape) were observed within the appropriate cortical laminae: Cux2-positive cells in the upper cortex, Rorβ-positive cells in the middle of the cortex, and Er81- and Nurr1-positive cells in the deeper cortex (Figure 3d,g-j,l,n-q), thus suggesting normal laminar organisation even in the core of the lesion (compare Figure 3d with3c). Moreover, these neurons were visibly reduced in number in comparison with the adjacent perilesional area (particularly those that were positive for Rorβ), thus reflecting the reduced neuronal density inside the lesion (compare Figure 3g-j with Figure 4b-e). This data were further supported by quantitative analysis of normal-looking neurons cell density (see Additional file2). DNs (identified on the basis of their very large size and altered morphology) showed the variable expression of all of the LSGs except for CTGF, without any laminar specificity (Figure 3g,j,l,m,r). The distribution of the DNs labelled by different LSGs was uneven regardless of the subtype of FCD (Type IIa vs IIb) and the lobar involvement of the dysplastic lesion. The details of LSG expression in each case are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 3

LSG expression in Type II FCD (severe area). Typical LSG expression in a case of Type IIa FCD (occipital lobe) histopathologically characterised by a severe lesion with an adjacent perilesional area (a, SMI ir). b: Example of Er81 pattern showing intense expression in layer V of the perilesional cortex (arrowheads), and less intense and dispersed expression in the core of the lesion. c-e: Single ISH images of each gene in the severe lesion converted to pseudo-colour images (green for Cux2, fuchsia for Rorβ, yellow for Er81, and red for Nurr1) for overlay representation. The cortical distributions of normal-looking neurons (NNs, d) and DNs (e) are shown separately, and juxtaposed with normal cortex for purposes of comparison (c). Note the normal laminar distribution and reduced number of NNs in comparison with the dispersion of DNs. f-j: Adjacent sections from the same case as that shown in a (SMI ir) and f (thionin staining), showing the expression of Cux2 (g), Rorβ (h), Er81 (i) and Nurr1 (j) mRNAs in normal-looking neurons and DNs. k-r: Details of the regions marked with asterisks in f-j showing the morphological features of the NNs and DNs. Scale bars: 5.2 mm (a, b); 240 μm (c-e); 195 μm (f-j); 50 μm (k-r) .

Figure 4

LSG expression in perilesional cortex. Typical LSG expression in perilesional cortex (frontal lobe) histopathologically characterised by a normal laminar organization and the absence of DNs (a, SMI ir). b-e: Adjacent sections from the same case as that shown in a showing the normal expression of Cux2 (b), Rorβ (c), Er81 (d) and Nurr1 (e). Scale bars: 295 μm (a-e).

Figure 5

Details of layer-specific gene expression in DNs and BCs. For each case, the presence of DNs positive for the different LSG is indicated by a black or grey cell (the white cells indicate no labelling): the black cells indicate that DN distribution is severely affected, and the grey cells indicate DNs distributed in their corresponding layers. In the case of BCs, the hatched cells indicate the presence of the different LSGs, and the white cells indicate no labelling (nr = not clearly recognisable). Abbreviations: BCs: balloon cells; DNs: dysmorphic neurons; FCD: focal cortical dysplasia; ID: patient identification number. *The site is the cortical area that underwent ISH analysis (O: occipital; T: temporal; F: frontal; P: parietal).

In the four less severely affected specimens, the DNs were prevalently localised in layers III or V/VI (Figure 6a, f). The DNs labelled for Cux2, Er81 and Nurr1 (Figure 6d,e,i,j) retained their correct laminar position (unlike in the severely affected areas), and the normal-looking neurons intensely labelled with LSGs were properly distributed throughout the cortical thickness (Figure 6b-e, and g-j) and their density was similar to that observed in the perilesional cortex as confirmed by quantitative analysis (see Additional file2).

Figure 6

LSG expression in Type II FCD (less severe area). Typical LSG expression in a case of Type IIb FCD (frontal lobe) histopathologically characterized by a less severe lesion with DNs localised only in the deep portion of the cortex (a, SMI ir). b-e: Adjacent sections from the same case as that shown in a showing the expression of Cux2 (b), Rorβ (c), Er81 (d) and Nurr1 (e). Note that Cux2 and Rorβ are expressed only in normal-looking neurons (NNs) in the appropriate cortical laminae (b, c), whereas Er81 and Nurr1 (d, e) are expressed in both NNs and DNs in the deep layers. f-j: Details of the regions marked with asterisks in b-e showing the morphological features of the NNs and DNs (arrows). Scale bars: 280 μm (a-e); 90 μm (f-j) .

In the 15 specimens that included perilesional cortex beside the core of the lesion, the laminar organisation was normal (Figure 4a) with the regular distribution of the LSGs in normal-looking neurons and no evidence of labelled DNs (Figure 4b-e). However, quantitative measurement of cortical thickness showed Er81-positive cells were more widespread throughout layer V than in the control cases (33,9 ± 8,1% for perilesional cortex versus 23,7 ± 3,8% for control cortex, p = 0,025).

Layer-specific gene expression in BCs

BCs were identified in 12 cases on the basis of their morphological features and vimentin immunolabelling, thus allowing a diagnosis of Type IIb FCD. They were mainly observed in the subcortical white matter (Figure 7a,b) but, in some cases, they were also distributed throughout the cortical thickness, and occasionally even invaded layer I. As in the case of the DNs, the Cux2, Rorβ, Er81 and Nurr1 riboprobes were variably expressed in BCs (Figure 7 c-j) with no specific labelling associated with their distribution in the different cortical layers or lobar involvement. These data were confirmed by the double fluorescent experiments using vimentin and the different LSGs (Figure 7k-p). Figure 5 shows the pattern of LSG expression in the BCs of each case.

Figure 7

Representative LSG expression in BCs. a, b. Example of Type IIb FCD (temporal lobe) characterised by a severe lesion with numerous DNs dispersed throughout the cortex (a, SMI ir), and the presence of BCs in the white matter (b, vimentin ir). Adjacent sections from the same case as that shown in a and b showing the expression of Cux2 (c), Rorβ (d), Er81 (g) and Nurr1 (h) in BCs in the white matter (boxed area in b). Note the heterogeneous expression of the LSGs in the BCs. e, f, i, j: Details of the regions marked with asterisks in c, d, g and h showing the morphological features of the BCs. Confocal double immunofluorescence images combining vimentin ir (red) with ISH for Er81 (k-m) and Nurr1 (n-p) confirmed the identification of the BCs. Scale bars:1, 41 mm (a); 1,27 (b); 357 μm (c, d, g, h); 92 μm (e, f, i, j); 70 μm k-p).

pS6 immunoreactivity in FCD

We observed immunoreactivity for pS6 in the DNs and BCs. Labelled DNs were detected in both the severely affected (Figure 8a,c) and less severely affected areas (Figure 8b,d,e), whereas no specific expression of pS6 was detected in the normal-looking neurons in either the core of lesion or the adjacent perilesional area.

Figure 8

Representative pS6 expression in Type II FCD. Examples of pS6 expression in samples of severe (a) and less severe (b, arrows) Type II FCD; in both cases, the immunoreactivity suggests the presence of mTOR pathway hyperactivation in DNs. c-e. Details of the regions marked with asterisks in a, b. Scale bars: 268 μm (a,b); 60 μm (c,d,e) .


Focal cortical dysplasias are among the most frequent brain malformations encountered in epileptic patients undergoing surgical treatment. In particular, Type II FCDs, which are often recognisable at the time of clinical screening, are characterised by an early onset of epilepsy, a high seizure frequency, and particular MRI and EEG (or SEEG) pictures[2932], and surgical treatment often leads to seizure freedom even over long follow-up periods[30]. The main neuropathological features of Type II FCDs have been established since the original description by Taylor et al.[1], and so their classification has not varied in successive classification systems[2, 33]. However, although many immunohistochemical studies have identified and characterised the various neuronal populations involved in Type II FCD, its aetiology and pathogenesis are unknown. The recent developmental and genetic classification of malformations of cortical development (MCD) published by Barkowich et al.[8] places Type II FCDs in the group of cortical malformations secondary to abnormal neuronal and glial proliferation, but the ontogenetic mechanisms and embryonic time window in which the derangement of cortical maturation and neuronal migration takes place remain unclear.

In order to gain more insights into the pathogenesis of cortical malformations, new LSG-based approaches have been proposed. Many different LSGs have been used in studies of animal and human specimens, and their expression profiles through the cortical layers have been defined; furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the expression and laminar location of most LSGs is preserved during phylogenesis and pre- and postnatal development[1618, 34]. On the basis of the assumption that, once specified during embryonic development, neuronal identity and laminar fate are apparently impervious to change even if cell migration is abnormal, it has been suggested that LSGs can be confidently used as markers to study cortical malformations[13, 35]. However, although many studies have investigated different types of MCD by means of LSGs, only a few have specifically concentrated on Type II FCD[21, 24, 25, 36].

The neuropathological hallmarks of Type II FCDs are disrupted cortical lamination, reduced cortical neuronal density, the presence of DNs and, in subtype IIb, the presence of BCs. In relation to these, the main findings of the present study are: i) although reduced in number, normal-looking neurons retain their correct laminar position even inside the core of the lesion, thus indicating a partial laminar organisation; ii) on the contrary, DNs and BCs are dispersed throughout the cortex and white matter without any laminar specificity, and show a highly variable LSG expression pattern; and iii) LSGs do not reveal any differences between Type IIa and IIb FCD.

The first and previously unknown finding is that the normal-looking neurons, albeit markedly fewer in comparison with the fairly normal adjacent cortex, can be found in the appropriate cortical laminae, which suggests that a certain proportion are properly generated and migrated. This implies that the genetic programme for neuronal migration is not disrupted per se and that the laminar disorganisation is mainly (if not exclusively) due to altered DN migration. Lower neuronal density in the region of the dysplasia than in the perilesional cortex is a consistent finding in Type II FCD, and may be due to different phenomena such as a local failure of cell proliferation or enhanced neuronal vulnerability in this area[3, 4, 37]; however, our data highlight for the first time that the number of normal-looking neurons is particularly reduced.

The second finding is that DNs are not only haphazardly displaced but (particularly within the core of the lesion) dispersed throughout the thickness of the cortex regardless of the LSG they express: for example, Nurr1-positive cells, which are normally found in the layer VI, were also present in the superficial part of the cortex, whereas Cux2-positive cells, which are normally found in layers II and III, were present in the depths of the cortical ribbon and white matter. Unfortunately, technical problems prevented us from using double-labelling in order to verify whether DNs express more than one LSG.

It is not possible to compare our findings with other published data concerning Type II FCD because the studies used different LSGs and different methodologies (IHC or ISH). Moreover, some published studies not specified the cell subtypes (i.e. normal-looking neurons vs DNs and BCs) expressing different LSGs[24, 25]. Furthermore, as the LSGs we used are preserved during development, we could not verify the hypothesis that some DNs may retain the expression of genes that are exclusively present pre-natally as previously suggested[21, 24, 25].

Our finding that different LSGs are expressed in DNs improperly located in different layers of the cortex ribbon suggest that, whatever the defect, it occurred in the early period of development. Recent developmental data[3841] indicate that radial glial cells (RGs) generate neurons by means of multiple rounds of self-renewal and asymmetric division, and that new-born neurons often use the parent cell’s radial fibre to migrate to the cortical plate[42]. Furthermore, it has been observed that primate corticogenesis is characterised by the appearance of a large sub-ventricular zone (SVZ) that seems to be important for the presence of resident progenitor cells that contribute to neuronal production and control neocortical size[43]. It has also been demonstrated that two sub-classes of human RGs co-exist in the ventricular zone (VZ) and the outer part of the SVZ (OSVZ), each of which act as neural stem cells in their respective locations and provide a mechanism favouring increased neuron production, which may be important for building a larger brain[44].

Although cortical neuron production begins in the VZ during gestational week 6 (GW6), the OSVZ does not arise until GW11, but then dramatically expands over the subsequent six GW to become the predominant germinal region in the neocortex. This suggests that OSVZ expansion and proliferation may increase the number of late-born neurons destined to became the future upper cortical layers, whereas the VZ generates the earliest-born neurons destined to form the deep cortical layers. On the basis of these developmental data, we can hypothesise that, during the early stages of cortical development (when the VZ is very actively proliferating and gives rise to the post-mitotic neurons that migrate to form the deep layers and the precursor cells for the SVZ), one hit is sufficient to modify the future lineage of some but not all progenitor cells in patients with Type II FCD.

Another finding of our study is that, like the DNs, the BCs expressed all of the LSGs regardless of their location and even they were found in all of the layers. These cells are immature, and their immunohistochemical profiles indicate the expression of vimentin, nestin and, in some cases, markers of precursor cells[6]. They seem to arise from radial cell precursors[11, 21, 45], but the fact that some of them co-express neuronal markers suggests aberrant cell-fate specification[5]. It is therefore conceivable that this abnormal differentiation may have been responsible for their labelling with our panel of LSGs, which are typically expressed in excitatory neurons. In any case, the fact that the distribution of LSGs in BCs was similar to that observed in DNs further supports the hypothesis that the primary hit inducing the malformation occurs during the early stages of development.

We did not identify any relationship between distinct patterns of LSG expression and FCD subtype or lobar involvement. The few published data in this regard are controversial insofar as some authors (using different LSGs) have found different distribution patterns and/or different numbers of immunopositive cells in Type IIa and IIb[24, 25], whereas only Fauser et al.[36] have found differences in lobar LSG expression.

The processes involved in cortical development (including neurogenesis, cell migration and differentiation) are highly synchronised and coordinated by extra- and intracellular signals that converge on cytoskeletal remodelling[46, 47], and it has been demonstrated that mutations in the genes encoding cytoskeletal proteins are involved in many malformations of cortical development[48]. Interestingly, one of the main histopathological features of Type II FCD is the presence of DNs characterised by the cytoplasmic engulfment of neurofilaments pushing the nucleus to the cell periphery and disrupting the regular distribution of chromatin. Similar DNs are found in patients with TSC in whom TSC1 or TSC2 gene mutations activate the mTOR cascade that affects many cell biological processes, including the regulation of actin dynamics[49].

In line with other recent findings[7, 9, 10], our data show that the DNs were labelled with pS6 antibody, which suggests that the mTOR pathway may also be involved in Type II FCD. As no genetic impairment has been found in this disease, it can be hypothesised that an “external” phenomenon could hit some of the precursor cells acting on the neuronal cytoskeletal framework very early during cortical development (when the VZ is proliferating), and that this leads to cytological alterations and the subsequently aberrant migratory stream. This would explain the presence of normal-looking neurons that show no changes in migration patterns.

In agreement with this hypothesis, the presence of a localized central nervous system infection during fetal brain development has been proposed as a new pathogenic mechanism for Type II FCD. In fact, recent studies have shown the presence of papillomavirus in BCs (but, surprisingly, not in DNs), and the presence of herpes and cytomegalovirus infections in both BC and DNs[50, 51]. Moreover, human papillomavirus, the most common cause of cervical cancer in women, has been identified as an activator of the mTOR signalling cascade and the cytopathic effect of the infection on cervical epithelium results in balloon-like cells similar to those observed in Type II FCD. Although these data need further confirmation, they are in line with the hypothesis that an external or environmental hit affecting selected precursor cells during the very early stages of cortical development may interfere and disrupt normal cortical development as a result of mTOR activation.

One intriguing aspect of our findings is the presence of some DNs outside the core of the lesions (namely less severe lesion) that retained their correct laminar position in the cortical ribbon. Interestingly, like those associated with severe lesions, these DNs were also labelled with pS6 antibody. We do not have any definite explanation for this feature, but hypothesise that the high frequency of epileptic discharges characterising this form of dysplasia may induce a secondary pathological plasticity leading to morphological rearrangements, as suggested in various animal models[52].


This study shows the existence of hidden cortical lamination involving normal-looking neurons, which retain their ability to migrate correctly in the cortex, unlike DNs which, in addition to their morphological abnormalities and mTOR hyperactivation, show an altered migratory pattern. BCs also expressed all of the LSGs regardless of their location. Taken together these data suggest that an external or environmental hit affecting selected precursor cells during the very early stages of cortical development may disrupt normal cortical development.


  1. 1.

    Taylor DC, Falconer MA, Bruton CJ, Corsellis JA: Focal dysplasia of the cerebral cortex in epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1971, 34: 369–387. 10.1136/jnnp.34.4.369

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Blumcke I, Thom M, Aronica E, Armstrong DD, Vinters HV, Palmini A, Jacques TS, Avanzini G, Barkovich AJ, Battaglia G, Becker A, Cepeda C, Cendes F, Colombo N, Crino P, Cross JH, Delalande O, Dubeau F, Duncan J, Guerrini R, Kahane P, Mathern G, Najm I, Ozkara C, Raybaud C, Represa A, Roper SN, Salamon N, Schulze-Bonhage A, Tassi L, et al.: The clinicopathologic spectrum of focal cortical dysplasias: a consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Diagnostic Methods Commission. Epilepsia 2011, 52: 158–174. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02777.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thom M, Martinian L, Sen A, Cross JH, Harding BN, Sisodiya SM: Cortical neuronal densities and lamination in focal cortical dysplasia. Acta Neuropathol 2005, 110: 383–392. 10.1007/s00401-005-1062-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alonso-Nanclares L, Garbelli R, Sola RG, Pastor J, Tassi L, Spreafico R, DeFelipe J: Microanatomy of the dysplastic neocortex from epileptic patients. Brain 2005, 128: 158–173.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Englund C, Folkerth RD, Born D, Lacy JM, Hevner RF: Aberrant neuronal-glial differentiation in Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasia (type IIA/B). Acta Neuropathol 2005, 109: 519–533. 10.1007/s00401-005-1005-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sisodiya SM, Fauser S, Cross JH, Thom M: Focal cortical dysplasia type II: biological features and clinical perspectives. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8: 830–843. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70201-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yasin SA, Latak K, Becherini F, Ganapathi A, Miller K, Campos O, Picker SR, Bier N, Smith M, Thom M, Anderson G, Helen Cross J, Harkness W, Harding B, Jacques TS: Balloon cells in human cortical dysplasia and tuberous sclerosis: isolation of a pathological progenitor-like cell. Acta Neuropathol 2010, 120: 85–96. 10.1007/s00401-010-0677-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Barkovich AJ, Guerrini R, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Dobyns WB: A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development: update 2012. Brain 2012, 135: 1348–1369. 10.1093/brain/aws019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Miyata H, Chiang AC, Vinters HV: Insulin signaling pathways in cortical dysplasia and TSC-tubers: tissue microarray analysis. Ann Neurol 2004, 56: 510–519. 10.1002/ana.20234

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ljungberg MC, Bhattacharjee MB, Lu Y, Armstrong DL, Yoshor D, Swann JW, Sheldon M, D’Arcangelo G: Activation of mammalian target of rapamycin in cytomegalic neurons of human cortical dysplasia. Ann Neurol 2006, 60: 420–429. 10.1002/ana.20949

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lamparello P, Baybis M, Pollard J, Hol EM, Eisenstat DD, Aronica E, Crino PB: Developmental lineage of cell types in cortical dysplasia with balloon cells. Brain 2007, 130: 2267–2276. 10.1093/brain/awm175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hua Y, Crino PB: Single cell lineage analysis in human focal cortical dysplasia. Cereb Cortex 2003, 13: 693–699. 10.1093/cercor/13.6.693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hevner RF: Layer-specific markers as probes for neuron type identity in human neocortex and malformations of cortical development. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007, 66: 101–109. 10.1097/nen.0b013e3180301c06

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Molyneaux BJ, Arlotta P, Menezes JR, Macklis JD: Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8: 427–437. 10.1038/nrn2151

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ferrere A, Vitalis T, Gingras H, Gaspar P, Cases O: Expression of Cux-1 and Cux-2 in the developing somatosensory cortex of normal and barrel-defective mice. Anat Rec A: Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2006, 288: 158–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Watakabe A, Ichinohe N, Ohsawa S, Hashikawa T, Komatsu Y, Rockland KS, Yamamori T: Comparative analysis of layer-specific genes in Mammalian neocortex. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17: 1918–1933. 10.1093/cercor/bhl102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moroni RF, Inverardi F, Regondi MC, Watakabe A, Yamamori T, Spreafico R, Frassoni C: Expression of layer-specific markers in the adult neocortex of BCNU-Treated rat, a model of cortical dysplasia. Neuroscience 2009, 159: 682–691. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.064

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Moroni RF, Cipelletti B, Inverardi F, Regondi MC, Spreafico R, Frassoni C: Development of cortical malformations in BCNU-treated rat, model of cortical dysplasia. Neuroscience 2011, 175: 380–393.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ferland RJ, Batiz LF, Neal J, Lian G, Bundock E, Lu J, Hsiao YC, Diamond R, Mei D, Banham AH, Brown PJ, Vanderburg CR, Joseph J, Hecht JL, Folkerth R, Guerrini R, Walsh CA, Rodriguez EM, Sheen VL: Disruption of neural progenitors along the ventricular and subventricular zones in periventricular heterotopia. Hum Mol Genet 2009, 18: 497–516.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Garbelli R, Rossini L, Moroni RF, Watakabe A, Yamamori T, Tassi L, Bramerio M, Russo GL, Frassoni C, Spreafico R: Layer-specific genes reveal a rudimentary laminar pattern in human nodular heterotopia. Neurology 2009, 73: 746–753. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181af3397

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hadjivassiliou G, Martinian L, Squier W, Blumcke I, Aronica E, Sisodiya SM, Thom M: The application of cortical layer markers in the evaluation of cortical dysplasias in epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol 2010, 120: 517–528. 10.1007/s00401-010-0686-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rossini L, Moroni RF, Tassi L, Watakabe A, Yamamori T, Spreafico R, Garbelli R: Altered layer-specific gene expression in cortical samples from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2011, 52: 1928–1937. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03246.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Saito T, Hanai S, Takashima S, Nakagawa E, Okazaki S, Inoue T, Miyata R, Hoshino K, Akashi T, Sasaki M, Goto Y, Hayashi M, Itoh M: Neocortical layer formation of human developing brains and lissencephalies: consideration of layer-specific marker expression. Cereb Cortex 2011, 21: 588–596. 10.1093/cercor/bhq125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Arai A, Saito T, Hanai S, Sukigara S, Nabatame S, Otsuki T, Nakagawa E, Takahashi A, Kaneko Y, Kaido T, Saito Y, Sugai K, Sasaki M, Goto Y, Itoh M: Abnormal maturation and differentiation of neocortical neurons in epileptogenic cortical malformation: unique distribution of layer-specific marker cells of focal cortical dysplasia and hemimegalencephaly. Brain Res 2012, 1470: 89–97.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sakakibara T, Sukigara S, Saito T, Otsuki T, Takahashi A, Kaneko Y, Kaido T, Saito Y, Sato N, Kimura Y, Nakagawa E, Sugai K, Sasaki M, Goto Y, Itoh M: Delayed maturation and differentiation of neurons in focal cortical dysplasia with the transmantle sign: analysis of layer-specific marker expression. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2012, 71: 741–749. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318262e41a

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tassi L, Garbelli R, Colombo N, Bramerio M, Lo Russo G, Deleo F, Milesi G, Spreafico R: Type I focal cortical dysplasia: surgical outcome is related to histopathology. Epileptic Disord 2010, 12: 181–191. doi: 10.1684/epd.2010.0327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Garbelli R, Munari C, De Biasi S, Vitellaro-Zuccarello L, Galli C, Bramerio M, Mai R, Battaglia G, Spreafico R: Taylor’s cortical dysplasia: a confocal and ultrastructural immunohistochemical study. Brain Pathol 1999, 9: 445–461. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1999.tb00534.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hirokawa J, Watakabe A, Ohsawa S, Yamamori T: Analysis of area-specific expression patterns of RORbeta, ER81 and Nurr1 mRNAs in rat neocortex by double in situ hybridization and cortical box method. PLoS One 2008, 3: e3266. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003266

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Colombo N, Tassi L, Deleo F, Citterio A, Bramerio M, Mai R, Sartori I, Cardinale F, Lo Russo G, Spreafico R: Focal cortical dysplasia type IIa and IIb: MRI aspects in 118 cases proven by histopathology. Neuroradiology 2012, 54: 1065–1077. 10.1007/s00234-012-1049-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tassi L, Garbelli R, Colombo N, Bramerio M, Russo GL, Mai R, Deleo F, Francione S, Nobili L, Spreafico R: Electroclinical, MRI and surgical outcomes in 100 epileptic patients with type II FCD. Epileptic Disord 2012, 14: 257–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tassi L, Colombo N, Garbelli R, Francione S, Lo Russo G, Mai R, Cardinale F, Cossu M, Ferrario A, Galli C, Bramerio M, Citterio A, Spreafico R: Focal cortical dysplasia: neuropathological subtypes, EEG, neuroimaging and surgical outcome. Brain 2002, 125: 1719–1732. 10.1093/brain/awf175

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chassoux F, Devaux B, Landre E, Turak B, Nataf F, Varlet P, Chodkiewicz JP, Daumas-Duport C: Stereoelectroencephalography in focal cortical dysplasia: a 3D approach to delineating the dysplastic cortex. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 8):1733–1751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Palmini A, Najm I, Avanzini G, Babb T, Guerrini R, Foldvary-Schaefer N, Jackson G, Luders HO, Prayson R, Spreafico R, Vinters HV: Terminology and classification of the cortical dysplasias. Neurology 2004, 62: S2-S8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wang WZ, Hoerder-Suabedissen A, Oeschger FM, Bayatti N, Ip BK, Lindsay S, Supramaniam V, Srinivasan L, Rutherford M, Mollgard K, Clowry GJ, Molnar Z: Subplate in the developing cortex of mouse and human. J Anat 2010, 217: 368–380. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01274.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hevner RF, Daza RA, Rubenstein JL, Stunnenberg H, Olavarria JF, Englund C: Beyond laminar fate: toward a molecular classification of cortical projection/pyramidal neurons. Dev Neurosci 2003, 25: 139–151. 10.1159/000072263

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fauser S, Haussler U, Donkels C, Huber S, Nakagawa J, Prinz M, Schulze-Bonhage A, Zentner J, Haas CA: Disorganization of neocortical lamination in focal cortical dysplasia is brain-region dependent: evidence from layer-specific marker expression. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2013, 1: 47–5960–1-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Muhlebner A, Coras R, Kobow K, Feucht M, Czech T, Stefan H, Weigel D, Buchfelder M, Holthausen H, Pieper T, Kudernatsch M, Blumcke I: Neuropathologic measurements in focal cortical dysplasias: validation of the ILAE 2011 classification system and diagnostic implications for MRI. Acta Neuropathol 2012, 123: 259–272. 10.1007/s00401-011-0920-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lui JH, Hansen DV, Kriegstein AR: Development and evolution of the human neocortex. Cell 2011, 146: 18–36. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.030

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bystron I, Blakemore C, Rakic P: Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9: 110–122. 10.1038/nrn2252

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hansen DV, Lui JH, Parker PR, Kriegstein AR: Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature 2010, 464: 554–561. 10.1038/nature08845

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fietz SA, Kelava I, Vogt J, Wilsch-Brauninger M, Stenzel D, Fish JL, Corbeil D, Riehn A, Distler W, Nitsch R, Huttner WB: OSVZ progenitors of human and ferret neocortex are epithelial-like and expand by integrin signaling. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13: 690–699. 10.1038/nn.2553

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Noctor SC, Flint AC, Weissman TA, Dammerman RS, Kriegstein AR: Neurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex. Nature 2001, 409: 714–720. 10.1038/35055553

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Haubensak W, Attardo A, Denk W, Huttner WB: Neurons arise in the basal neuroepithelium of the early mammalian telencephalon: a major site of neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101: 3196–3201. 10.1073/pnas.0308600100

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lukaszewicz A, Savatier P, Cortay V, Giroud P, Huissoud C, Berland M, Kennedy H, Dehay C: G1 phase regulation, area-specific cell cycle control, and cytoarchitectonics in the primate cortex. Neuron 2005, 47: 353–364. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.032

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cepeda C, Andre VM, Levine MS, Salamon N, Miyata H, Vinters HV, Mathern GW: Epileptogenesis in pediatric cortical dysplasia: the dysmature cerebral developmental hypothesis. Epilepsy Behav 2006, 9: 219–235. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Heng JI, Chariot A, Nguyen L: Molecular layers underlying cytoskeletal remodelling during cortical development. Trends Neurosci 2010, 33: 38–47. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Reiner O, Sapir T: Polarity regulation in migrating neurons in the cortex. Mol Neurobiol 2009, 40: 1–14. 10.1007/s12035-009-8065-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Guerrini R, Dobyns WB, Barkovich AJ: Abnormal development of the human cerebral cortex: genetics, functional consequences and treatment options. Trends Neurosci 2008, 31: 154–162. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.12.004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Costa-Mattioli M, Monteggia LM: mTOR complexes in neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci 2013, 16: 1537–1543. 10.1038/nn.3546

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Chen J, Tsai V, Parker WE, Aronica E, Baybis M, Crino PB: Detection of human papillomavirus in human focal cortical dysplasia type IIB. Ann Neurol 2012, 72: 881–892. 10.1002/ana.23795

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Liu S, Lu L, Cheng X, Xu G, Yang H: Viral infection and focal cortical dysplasia. Ann Neurol 2013. doi: 10.1002/ana.24037

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Colciaghi F, Finardi A, Frasca A, Balosso S, Nobili P, Carriero G, Locatelli D, Vezzani A, Battaglia G: Status epilepticus-induced pathologic plasticity in a rat model of focal cortical dysplasia. Brain 2011, 134: 2828–2843. 10.1093/brain/awr045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The study was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health, the Fondazione Banca del Monte di Lombardia (FBML), the Associazione “Paolo Zorzi” per le Neuroscienze, and EU grant FP7 (Desire) No. 602531. We would like to thank Dr. A. Watakabe and Dr. T. Yamamori for providing the riboprobes, and Dr C. Frassoni for critically reading the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Garbelli.

Additional information

Competing interest

The authors declares that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

LSG expression in normal human temporal cortex.

Additional file 1: Description of data: Adjacent sections from the temporal cortex showing the typical expression of Cux2 (b), Rorβ (c), Er81 (d) and Nurr1 (e) mRNAs. The laminar localization of each mRNA is determined by the adjacent NeuN-immunostained section and is indicated by Roman numerals (a). Scale bars: 385 μm (a-e). (PDF 744 KB)

Normal-looking neurons cell density.

Additional file 2: a: Histogram showing the cell density of normal-looking neurons (NNs) positive for LSG in samples characterised by severe disruption of the cortical structure; note the significant reduction of NNs in lesional versus perilesiona areas. Conversely, in less affected samples (b), no differenced in NNs cell density is reported in lesional versus perilesional areas. Statistical significance is indicated by asterisks. (PDF 34 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossini, L., Medici, V., Tassi, L. et al. Layer-specific gene expression in epileptogenic type II focal cortical dysplasia: normal-looking neurons reveal the presence of a hidden laminar organization. acta neuropathol commun 2, 45 (2014).

Download citation


  • Layer-specific genes
  • Focal cortical dysplasia
  • Epilepsy
  • Neuronal migration
  • Dysmorphic neurons