Open Access

Investigating the role of filamin C in Belgian patients with frontotemporal dementia linked to GRN deficiency in FTLD-TDP brains

  • Jonathan Janssens1, 2, 3,
  • Stéphanie Philtjens1, 2,
  • Gernot Kleinberger1, 2, 7, 8,
  • Sara Van Mossevelde1, 2,
  • Julie van der Zee1, 2,
  • Rita Cacace1, 2,
  • Sebastiaan Engelborghs2, 4,
  • Anne Sieben1, 2, 5,
  • Julia Banzhaf-Strathmann6,
  • Lubina Dillen1, 2,
  • Céline Merlin1, 2,
  • Ivy Cuijt1, 2,
  • Caroline Robberecht1, 2,
  • Bettina Schmid6, 8,
  • Patrick Santens5,
  • Adrian Ivanoiu9,
  • Mathieu Vandenbulcke10, 11,
  • Rik Vandenberghe10, 12,
  • Patrick Cras2, 13,
  • Peter P. De Deyn2, 4, 14,
  • Jean-Jacques Martin2,
  • Stuart Maudsley2, 3,
  • Christian Haass6, 7, 8,
  • Marc Cruts1, 2,
  • Christine Van Broeckhoven1, 2Email author and
  • on behalf of the Belgian Neurology (BELNEU) consortium
Acta Neuropathologica Communications20153:68

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-015-0246-7

Received: 21 October 2015

Accepted: 21 October 2015

Published: 10 November 2015

Abstract

TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) inclusions are pathological hallmarks of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Loss of TDP-43 in zebrafish engenders a severe muscle and vascular phenotype with a concomitant elevation of filamin C (FLNC) levels, an observation confirmed in the frontal cortex of FTLD-TDP patients. Here, we aimed to further assess the contribution of FLNC to frontotemporal dementia (FTD) etiology. We conducted a mutational screening of FLNC in a cohort of 529 unrelated Belgian FTD and FTD-ALS patients, and a control cohort of 920 unrelated and age-matched individuals. Additionally we performed an in-depth characterization of FLNC expression levels in FTD patients and a murine FTD model.

In total 68 missense variants were identified of which 19 (MAF < 1 %) were patient-only. Gene burden analysis demonstrated a significant association between the presence of rare variants in FLNC and disease (P = 0.0349, RR = 1.46 [95 % CI 1.03–2.07]). Furthermore, elevated FLNC expression levels, observed previously in FTLD-TDP patients, were mainly attributable to FTD patients with the progranulin (GRN) p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) loss-of-function mutation. Increased FLNC levels were, to a lesser extent, also identified in a FLNC p.V831I variant carrier and in FTD patients with the p.R159H mutation in valosin-containing protein (VCP). The GRN-associated increase of FLNC was confirmed in the frontal cortex of aged Grn knockout mice starting at 16–18 months of age. Combined quantitative proteomic and bioinformatic analyses of the frontal cortex of FTD patients possessing elevated FLNC levels, identified multiple altered protein factors involved in accelerated aging, neurodegeneration and synaptogenesis.

Our findings further support the involvement of aberrant FLNC expression levels in FTD pathogenesis. Identification of increased FLNC levels in aged Grn mice and impaired pathways related to aging and neurodegeneration, implies a potential role for FLNC in mediating or accelerating the aging process.

Keywords

Filamin C Genetics Frontotemporal lobar degeneration Granulin GRN Haploinsufficiency Proteomics

Introduction

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a progressive presenile dementia with degeneration of the frontal and anterior temporal lobes of the brain [1]. The clinical phenotype of FTD patients is heterogeneous and includes cognitive, behavioral and language impairments with a variable co-occurrence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [2]. Formation of insoluble protein deposits, largely composed of ubiquitinated, hyperphosphorylated TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), defines one of the major pathological subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD-TDP) as well as ALS patients, introducing a clinico-pathological continuum of TDP-43 proteinopathies [35]. TDP-43 is a multifunctional RNA-binding protein involved in different RNA-related processes including transcription and splicing regulation [6, 7].

Over the past ten years, considerable progress has been made in unraveling the genetic basis of the FTD-ALS continuum. Today, more than 10 genes are linked to FTD-ALS disorders at variable frequencies [8, 9]. A major part of the mutation spectrum described for FTLD-TDP patients is covered by loss-of-function mutations in progranulin (GRN) that codes for a multifunctional growth factor with neurotrophic properties in the central nervous system (CNS) [10] and a hexanucleotide repeat expansion mutation in C9orf72 [11]. Less frequently, mutations in TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TARDBP), valosin-containing protein (VCP), sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) and ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2) can lead to both familial and sporadic forms of FTD and ALS [8].

The high prevalence of TDP-43 pathology in FTD and ALS patients suggests that pathways disrupting TDP-43 integrity might be shared between patients with different clinical, pathological and genetic etiologies. In line with the molecular genetic findings, multiple pathways related to RNA-processing, protein aggregation and proteostasis are likely contributing to the multifactorial nature of FTD-ALS disorders [9]. Recently, an unexpected requirement of TDP-43 for muscle maintenance, vessel patterning and perfusion was found upon deletion of the TDP-43 homologues in zebrafish [12]. Several muscle-specific proteins were altered on proteomic analysis of this zebrafish model, underscoring the role of TDP-43 in muscle integrity. The most upregulated protein in TDP-43 knockout zebrafish and in the frontal cortex of FTLD-TDP patients, however, was filamin C (FLNC) [12]. Filamins are evolutionary conserved, multidomain actin-binding proteins involved in the organization of the cytoskeleton and plasma membrane stabilization. Besides cross-linking F-actin filaments, filamins scaffold also a wide range of signaling functions through interactions with more than 90 binding partners including intracellular signaling molecules, transmembrane receptors, and ion channels [13, 14]. The vertebrate filamin family consists of filamin A (FLNA), filamin B (FLNB) and filamin C (FLNC) which share ≈ 70 % homology over the entire protein sequence. Structurally, FLNC is a large homodimer of approximately 290-kDa subunits that consists of an N-terminal actin-binding domain (ABD), composed of two calponin homology domains (CH1 and CH2), followed by 24 Immunoglobulin (Ig)-like repeats [1517]. Two splice variants have been described for FLNC which differ from each other in the presence of exon 31 encoding the hinge region between Ig-like domains 15 and 16 (Fig. 1a). FLNC expression is largely restricted to cardiac and skeletal muscles, although other non-muscular cells, including neuronal cells, express lower but detectable levels of FLNC [1820]. In line with the expression pattern of FLNC, mutations identified in FLNC have been shown to be the underlying cause of different progressive muscular dystrophies, including distal and myofibrillar myopathy (DM and MFM, respectively), and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) [2123].
Fig. 1

FLNC variants identified in patients of the Belgian FTD cohort. a Schematic representation of the short and long isoform of FLNC, which differ from each other in the presence or absence of one exon (marked in red). b 19 FLNC variants identified in patients of the Belgian FTD cohort (marked in red) mapped on the domain structures of the FLNC gene. Represented variants were absent from 920 control individuals. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains are numbered from 1 to 24. CH1 and CH2: calponin homology domains. Assignment of FLNC variants to the corresponding domain structure was based on the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/)

In the present study, we showed that rare variants (MAF < 1 %) identified in the coding region of FLNC are significantly associated with a higher risk of developing FTD. We also performed an in-depth characterization of FLNC transcript and protein levels in FTD patients with different genetic etiologies and found that elevated FLNC levels observed in the frontal cortex of FTLD-TDP patients are mainly associated with the GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) loss-of-function mutation. Validation of this novel association was obtained using a constitutive Grn knockout (Grn−/−) mouse model [24]. To appreciate the pathophysiological relevance of increased FLNC levels, we analyzed the frontal cortex of FTD patients with different genetic etiologies for significantly altered gene-specific pathways using combined proteomic and bioinformatic approaches.

Materials and methods

Belgian FTD and control cohorts

The FTD patients and control cohorts were ascertained in the framework of the Belgian Neurology (BELNEU) consortium, a multicenter collaboration of dementia expertise centers located in Belgium, covering Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels [25]. Molecular genetic screening of FLNC was performed on 529 FTD patients with an average age at onset of 63.8 ± 10.3 years (45.5 % women). Index patients were evaluated and diagnosed according to standard protocols including detailed neurological examination, neuropsychological testing, neuroimaging, biochemical analyses, and electroencephalography (EEG) [26]. Clinical diagnosis of FTD was reached according to the international Lund and Manchester group criteria for FTD [1] and the international consensus criteria by Rascovsky et al. [27] for behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD). Post mortem neuropathological diagnosis of FTLD was available in 33 patients (6.2 %), including 3 FTD-ALS patients, 1 patient with mixed dementia and 25 FTD patients. A positive family history, i.e. at least one first degree relative with a FTD-ALS spectrum disease, was recorded for 30.4 % of the FTD cohort, while 33.8 % had a sporadic form of the disease. Familial history was unknown for 35.2 % of the patients included in this cohort. FTD patients included in this cohort had previously been screened for mutations in known FTD and ALS genes including MAPT, GRN, C9orf72, VCP, CHMP2B, TARDBP, FUS, and SQSTM1 [9], which revealed 5 MAPT mutations (0.9 %), 28 GRN mutations (5.3 %), 35 C9orf72 repeat expansion mutations (6.6 %), 6 VCP mutations (1.1 %), 1 CHMP2B mutation (0.2 %), 2 TARDBP mutations (0.4 %), 3 FUS mutations (0.6 %), and 10 SQSTM1 mutations (1.9 %).

The control cohort consisted of 920 unrelated and age-matched individuals, primarily community-dwelling volunteers or spouses of patients, with an average age at inclusion of 68.0 ± 13.2 years (60.8 % women). Subjective memory complaints, neurologic or psychiatric antecedents and a familial history of neurodegeneration were ruled out by means of an interview. Cognitive screening was performed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; cut-off score ≥26) [28] or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test (cut-off score >25) [29]. The spouses of patients were examined at the Memory Clinic at Middelheim or Hoge Beuken hospitals of the Hospital Network Antwerp, Belgium, and at the Memory Clinic of the hospital Gasthuisberg of the University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium.

All research participants or their legal guardian provided written informed consent for participation in genetic and clinical studies. Clinical study protocols and informed consent forms for patient ascertainment were approved by the local medical ethics committees of the collaborating neurological centers in Belgium. Genetic study protocols and informed consent forms were approved by the ethics committees of the University Hospital of Antwerp and the University of Antwerp, Belgium.

FLNC sequencing

The coding sequence of FLNC, including flanking intron-exon boundaries, was screened in the Belgian FTD and control cohorts using a massive parallel sequencing approach and a customized Multiplex Amplification of Specific Targets for Resequencing (MASTR) assay (Multiplicom; www.multiplicom.com). Exons 46-48 of FLNC were not covered in the MASTR assay due to more than 98 % sequence identity with the FLNC pseudogene (pseFLNC), located 53.6 kb downstream of the functional FLNC gene [30]. Primers for multiplex PCR were designed using the mPCR primer design tool (Multiplicom) [31]. Specific target regions were amplified using multiplex PCR, and equimolar pooled amplicons were purified using Agencourt AMPureXP beads (Beckman Coulter). Individual barcodes (Illumina Nextera XT) were incorporated in a universal PCR step prior to sample pooling. Bridge amplification and sequencing of barcoded samples was performed using an Illumina MiSeq platform, with the Illumina v2 reagent kit.

Alignment and mapping of the reads against the human genome reference sequence hg19 were performed with the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner [32]. Variant calling and annotation were performed using GATK (version 2.2) in combination with GenomeComb software [33, 34]. Identified variants were independently validated using direct Sanger sequencing on genomic DNA. FLNC codon numbering was based on GenBank Accession Number NM_001458.4 and amino acid substitutions are numbered according to GenPept Accession Number NP_001449.3 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

The potential pathogenecity of patient-only coding variants were predicted using SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/) [35], PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) [36] and SNAP2 (https://www.rostlab.org/services/SNAP/) [37] prediction software tools.

Human and murine brain tissue

Human frontal cortex (BA10) was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen upon autopsy and stored at −80 °C for subsequent mRNA and protein analyses. FLNC expression levels were analyzed in brain tissue from 23 dementia patients including 1 FLNC p.V831I carrier, 7 carriers of a GRN loss-of-function mutation [10], 3 carriers of the VCP p.R159H mutation [38], 3 carriers of a C9orf72 repeat expansion [11], 4 patients with FTLD-TDP brain pathology but no mutation in any of the known causal FTD genes, and 1 patient with a mixed Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and FTLD-TDP brain pathology. In addition, we analyzed brain expression levels in 2 patients with AD, one patient with dementia with Lewy Bodies (LBD) and one Down syndrome patient, as well as in twelve age-matched control persons. A detailed overview of the patients with autopsy and neuropathological examination is provided in Table 1. A partial overlap in patients is present with samples included in the FLNC expression studies of Schmid et al. 2012 [26]; i.e. control individuals (n = 12), 5 FTD patients (2 GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) carriers, 2 C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers, 1 FTLD-TDP patient without known genetic cause, 2 AD patients and 1 LBD patient (FTD patient samples used in both studies are indicated with a "symbol a" in Table 1).
Table 1

Pathological and clinical characteristics of FTD, AD and DLB patients used in FLNC brain expression studies

DR number

Gender

Age at onset (years)

Age at death (years)

Family History

Clinical diagnosis

Mutation

Pathological diagnosis

DR287.1

F

65

71

F

FTD

GRN - p.A89Vfsa41

FTLD-TDP type A

DR2.3a

F

63

71

F

FTD

GRN - p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)

FTLD-TDP type A

DR8.1

F

62

68

F

FTD

GRN - p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)

FTLD-TDP type A

DR25.5a

M

70

73

F

FTD

GRN - p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)

FTLD-TDP type A

DR27.1

F

58

63

F

FTD

GRN - p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)

FTLD-TDP

DR28.1

M

56

62

F

FTD

GRN - p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)

FTLD-TDP type A

DR25.1

F

69

75

F

FTD

GRN - p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)

FTLD-TDP type A

DR40.1

F

44

56

F

FTD

VCP - p.R159H

FTLD-TDP type D

DR40.7

M

49

57

F

FTD

VCP - p.R159H

FTLD-TDP

DR7.4

M

63

68

F

FTD

VCP - p.R159H

FTLD-U

ADR1

M

52

62

F

FTD

FLNC - p.V831I

Pick’s disease

DR439.1

M

54

69

F

FTD

C9Orf72 - G4C2 expansion

FTLD-TDP type B

DR29.1a

F

50

55

F

FTD

C9Orf72 - G4C2 expansion

FTLD-UPS

DR14.1a

M

56

60

F

FTD

C9Orf72 - G4C2 expansion

FTLD-TDP type B

DR386.1

M

72

83

S

MXD

unknown

FTLD-TDP and AD

DR189.1

M

47

50

F

FTD

unknown

FTLD-TDP type B

DR87.1

F

79

88

S

FTD

unknown

FTLD TDP

DR864.1

M

59

62

S

FTD - ALS

unknown

FTLD-TDP type B

DR102.1a

F

72

79

S

FTD

unknown

FTLD-TDP

DR246.1a

M

62

72

F

DLB

unknown

LBD

DR865.1

M

75

86

U

AD

unknown

AD (III-IV Braak)

DR39.1a

F

61

75

F

AD

APP - c.-369C/G

AD-CAA

DS1.1a

-

-

-

S

Down Syndrome

47XX,+21 or 47XY,+21

AD-CAA

AD Alzheimer’s disease, APP amyloid precursor protein, CAA cerebral amyloid angiopathy, DLB dementia with Lewy bodies, UPS ubiquitin proteasome, system, DLBD diffuse Lewy body disease, F familial; S sporadic, U unknown, MXD mixed dementia, VCP valosin-containing protein

Samples labeled with a were previously analyzed in FLNC expression studies published by Schmid et al. 2012 [12]

Human FLNC expression profiles obtained from FTD patients were validated using a progranulin knockout (Grn-/-) mouse model for FTD [24]. Mouse whole brain tissue was harvested at different ages, weighed and cut midsagittal according to a standard protocol [39]. Right hemispheres were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent mRNA and protein analysis. Left hemispheres were fixed in 2 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 18–20 h and prepared for paraffin embedding.

RNA extraction for semi-quantitative real-time PCR

Semi-quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to quantify expression levels of FLNC in the human frontal cortex and mouse right hemisphere. Total RNA was isolated from crunched frozen brain tissue using the RiboPure™ RNA Purification kit followed by a DNase treatment with the TURBO™ DNase kit (both Ambion, Life Technologies). The RNA integrity values (RIN) of patient and control samples ranged between 5 and 8.4. First-strand cDNA was synthesized utilizing the SuperScript® III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies) with random hexamer primers. qRT-PCR reactions were performed using the Fast SYBR® Green mix and run on an ABI ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (both Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies). Each sample was measured in duplicate and at least two independent experiments were performed. Quantification of mRNA levels was achieved with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-Actin (ACTB) as internal control genes. Normalization of the housekeeping genes was performed using geometric averaging of the expression levels, as described by Vandesompele et al. [40]. Primer pairs were designed using Primer Express software (Life Technologies). Primer sequences are available upon request.

Immunoblotting

Protein extractions of human and murine brains were prepared in modified radioimmuno-precipitation (RIPA) buffer [150 mM NaCl, 0.5 % sodium deoxycholate, 1 % NP-40, 50 mM Tris–HCl; pH 8.0] supplemented with 1 % sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), as described previously [41]. Buffers were supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1x Complete Protease inhibitor cocktail and 1x PhosSTOP, both Roche). Protein concentrations were determined with a Pierce™ bicinchoninic acid (BCA) colorimetric protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Equal amounts of protein were loaded and separated on 3–8 % NuPAGE® Tris-Acetate or 4–12 % NuPAGE® Bis-Tris gels (Life Technologies) and electrotransferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF, Hybond P; Amersham Biosciences). After protein transfer, membranes were blocked in 5 % skimmed milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1 % Tween® 20 (Merck). Membranes were probed with a range of primary antibodies listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Immunodetection was performed with host-specific secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and the ECL-plus chemiluminescent detection system (Thermo Scientific). Western blot results were visualized using the ImageQuant™ LAS4000 digital imaging system and quantified with ImageQuant™ TL software (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Quantitative data were normalized to GAPDH expression levels, as described earlier [39].

Cell culture

Human cervical carcinoma cells (HeLa; CCL-2; ATCC) were grown in Minimum Essential Medium Eagle (MEM, Life Technologies) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS, Life Technologies) and 500 U/500 μg penicillin/streptavidin. Human neuroblastoma (KELLY) cells (Sigma) were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Life Technologies) supplemented with 10 % FCS, 2 mM L-Glutamine and 500 U/500 μg penicillin/streptavidin. Cells were propagated in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5 % CO2.

RNA interference

GRN expression was silenced in HeLa and KELLY cells using three independent gene-specific siRNAs (Ambion, Life Technologies). A non-targeting control siRNA with scrambled sequences (Qiagen) and a negative control (only transfection reagent) were included for each siRNA experiment (sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2). Cells were transiently transfected with 20 nM of gene-specific or scrambled siRNA using siLentFect™ transfection reagent (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Cellular RNA and protein extractions were prepared 48 h post transfection according to standard protocols [41]. Briefly, cells were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and lysed in RIPA 1 % SDS buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1x Complete Protease inhibitor cocktail and 1x PhosSTOP, both Roche). Lysates were sonicated on ice, clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm and supernatant was used for subsequent immunoblotting experiments.

Sample preparation for iTRAQ labeling and mass spectrometry analysis

Human frontal cortex of 5 patients, including 2 FTD carriers of GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) (DR8.1 and DR2.3), 2 FTD carriers of VCP p.R159H (DR40.1 and DR40.7), 1 FLNC p.V831I carrier (ADR1) (Table 1), and of 3 control individuals, were extracted using the Qproteome Cell Compartment kit (Qiagen). Proteins extracted from the cytoplasmic compartment using Qproteome were used for subsequent mass spectrometry analyses. Following acetone precipitation of the cytoplasmic protein extracts, protein lysate concentrations were measured using the RC DC TM protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). A total protein concentration of 100 μg from each sample was reduced with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) and cysteine residues were blocked using the cysteine-alkylation reagent methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS). Next, samples were digested with sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega) and peptides were used for isobaric iTRAQ-8plex (isobaric mass-tag labeling for relative and absolute quantification; iTRAQ [42]) mass tag labeling, i.e. 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 or 121 labels, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Applied Biosystems). Controls and patients samples were labeled for 1 h at room temperature with isobaric reagents as follows: 3 control individuals (labels 113-115); 2 GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) carriers (labels 117-118), 2 VCP p.R159H carriers (labels 119-121) and a FLNC p.V831I carrier (label 116). Following labeling, the tagged peptides were pooled in equal volume ratios into one sample mix.

Labeled peptides were separated and resolved in two dimensions, first by strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography followed by nano-reversed phase (RP, C18) chromatography on a 2D nano liquid chromatography (LC) system (Ultimate 3000 RSL, Dionex, Thermo Scientific). The nano-LC system was connected online to a Thermo Fisher Q Exactive™ Plus Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (MS) system (Thermo Scientific).

Data-dependent acquisition (DDA) was obtained with a full MS scan and a subsequent data dependent MS2 (ddMS2) scan. The full MS scan had a resolving power of 70,000 and a scan range from 350 to 1500 m/z. The top 10 precursor ions were selected for ddMS2 higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation with a resolution of 17,500.

Data analysis, including identification and quantification of labeled peptides, was performed using the Proteome Discoverer software (v2.0, Thermo Scientific). Protein identification was performed using the most recently updated human UniProt/SwissProt database. Raw peptide identification was done using workflow settings for the Sequest HT search engine including a 10 ppm precursor mass tolerance, 0.02 Da fragment mass tolerance, and tolerance of maximum two missed trypsin cleavage sites. Only peptide spectrum matches (PSM) that contained all eight reporter ion channels were considered for quantification and reporter intensities were exported for further analysis.

Bioinformatic analyses of mass spectrometry data

Proteomic datasets generated from the Proteome Discoverer v2.0 software were analyzed using a multidimensional bioinformatic approach. The primary ratiometric iTRAQ data was processed and normalized by performing a log2 transformation on the signal ratios retrieved from the quantitative MS. Proteins demonstrating significant deviation limits outside plus or minus 2 standard deviations (SD; 95 % confidence limits) from the mean protein expression levels (based on normalized background analysis) were used for further analysis.

To facilitate the specific separation of complex datasets, and more specifically the significantly-regulated proteins, originating from either the FLNC, GRN or VCP mutation carriers (compared to control individuals), we employed the novel Venn diagram platform, VennPlex [43]. Our primary analyses were focused on significantly-regulated protein subsets containing proteins common to FLNC, GRN, and VCP carriers (FTD-common), but also protein subsets specific and unique to FLNC, GRN or VCP carriers. Classical functional annotation of these protein subsets was performed with Gene Ontology annotation (GO; http://geneontology.org/) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis (KEGG; http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) using the NIH DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 suite [44]. For both GO term annotation (biological process only) and KEGG pathway analyses we employed a cut-off of at least two proteins needing to be present to fully populate a particular GO term group or KEGG pathway with a probability of enrichment value of P ≤0.05. A hybrid score was employed to generate a single index for a specifically enriched GO term group or KEGG pathway. Hybrid scores are generated by the multiplication of the negative log10 of enrichment probability with the enrichment factor and the number of proteins populating the specific GO term group or KEGG pathway.

Biomedical natural language processing (NLP) text analysis was performed on the common and unique significantly-regulated protein datasets using Textrous! [45, 46]. Textrous! utilizes NLP techniques, including latent semantic indexing (LSI), sentence splitting, word tokenization, parts-of-speech tagging, and noun-phrase chunking, to mine the MEDLINE-database (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), PubMed Central articles (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man catalog (OMIM®, http://www.omim.org/), and the Mammalian Phenotype Browser obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (http://www.informatics.jax.org/searches/MP_form.shtml). Textrous! has the ability to generate output data even with very small input datasets for the selection, ranking, clustering, and visualization of English words obtained from the input user data. Significant data word clouds were created from Textrous!-based semantic noun and noun-phrase outputs using the web-based application Wordle (http://www.wordle.net/) [45]. The text size of the word clouds is directly proportional to the input word frequency. Analyses of word frequencies from Textrous! noun-phrase outputs were made using WriteWords (http://www.writewords.org.uk/word_count.asp).

LSI analysis was performed using GeneIndexer (Computable Genomix), as described previously [47, 48]. In brief, GeneIndexer correlates the strength of association, using LSI, between specific proteins in a dataset with user-defined interrogation text terms. GeneIndexer employs a comprehensive human or murine scientific text database of ≥2 × 106 scientific abstracts to perform this text-protein correlation analysis. The possible LSI cosine similarity correlation scores for a gene to be associated with an input interrogation term range from 0 to 1, with the stronger correlation scores approaching 1. A correlation score of ≥0.1 indicates at least an implicit correlation, between the specific gene and the user-defined input interrogation term.

Statistical analyses

We determined rare, low frequency and frequent variants as genetic variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) below 1 %; between 1-5 % and above 5 %, respectively. Rare variant gene burden analysis was performed by collapsing rare alleles and comparing the overall frequency of rare variant alleles between patients and control groups using chi-squared (χ 2) statistics. For two controls, more than one FLNC variant was identified in the CDS and these variants were counted as one mutated allele as no relatives were available for phase determination of the variants. The odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as well. A two-sided p-value P <0.05 was considered as significant.

Expression studies were performed in duplicate and repeated at least two times with results reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P values for description of statistical significance of differences were calculated by Mann–Whitney U testing using the GraphPad Prism 5 Software. Values were considered to be significant if *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 or ***P <0.001.

Results

Identification of rare FLNC variants in Belgian FTD patients

We sequenced the coding sequence (CDS) of FLNC in the Belgian FTD (n = 529) and control (n = 920) cohorts and identified a total of 68 different genetic variants that affected the coding sequence of FLNC. We observed 19 missense variants (MAF <1 %) in 21 patients, which were absent from control individuals (Fig. 1b, Table 2). The clinical diagnosis of the FLNC carriers was predominantly FTD, except for the 2 patients with p.D710N and p.T2025I, who were diagnosed with FTD-ALS and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) (Table 2). Eight carriers had a positive family history of disease, but their families lacked information preventing co-segregation analysis with disease. The patient-only variants were found across the actin binding domain and different Immunoglobin (Ig)-like domains of FLNC without indications of clustering in specific functional domains (Fig. 1b, Table 2). Comparative genomics analysis indicated that the majority of FLNC variants predicted substitution of evolutionary conserved amino acid residues in FLNC (Additional file 2: Figure S1). For 5 FLNC variant carriers with FTD, another genetic causal or risk variant had previously been identified (Table 2), 2 with a C9orf72 repeat expansion, 2 with a GRN loss-of-function mutation and 1 with the TREM2 p.R47H risk allele (Table 2).
Table 2

Rare FLNC missense variations identified in Belgian FTD patients

Patient

Variant

Functional domain

Gender

Clinical diagnosis

Sub-diagnosis

Family History

Age at onset (years)

dbSNP

Mutation in known gene

DR554.1

p.R81C

CH1

F

FTD

bvFTD

F

56

-

GRN p.W304

DR1221.1

p.E309K

Ig 1

M

FTD

PNFA

S

45

-

 

DR1222.1

p.E323V

Ig 1

M

FTD

bvFTD

S

71

-

 

DR659.1

p.K524R

Ig 3

M

FTD

bvFTD

F

38

-

C9orf72 G4C2 exp.

DR454.1

p.D710N

Ig 5

F

FTD-ALS

FTD - ALS

F

69

rs370035829

C9orf72 G4C2 exp.

DR1223.1

p.A806T

Ig 6

F

FTD

PSP

F

63

-

 

ADR1

p.V831I

Ig 6

M

FTD

bvFTD

F

52

-

 

DR1224.1

p.V1047L

Ig 8

F

FTD

-

S

57

-

 

AD1485.1

p.P1163R

Ig 10

M

FTD

bvFTD

F

76

-

 

AD1430.1

p.V1335M

Ig 11

M

FTD

bvFTD

S

47

rs368220468

 

DR1225.1

p.L1364F

Ig 12

F

FTD

PSP

U

83

-

 

AD1788.1

p.R1370Q

Ig 12

M

FTD

-

S

68

-

 

DR867.1

p.A1551T

Ig 14

M

FTD

bvFTD

F

77

-

 

DR559.1

p.E1571K

Ig 14

F

FTD

bvFTD

F

60

-

TREM2 p.R47H

DR1226.1

p.E1571K

Ig 14

M

FTD

SD

S

75

-

 

DR355.1

p.R1758W

Linker Ig 15–16

F

FTD

bvFTD

S

75

rs369187211

 

DR825.1

p.V2014A

Ig 18

F

FTD

PNFA

S

66

-

 

AD1462.1

p.T2025I

Ig 18

F

FTD

PPA + EPS

S

62

-

GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)

DR1227.1

p.T2025I

Ig 18

F

CBS

CBS

U

70

-

 

DR868.1

p.R2318Q

Ig 21

M

FTD

PNFA

S

71

-

 

AD1321.1

p.S2461N

Ig 22

F

FTD

-

U

63

-

 

bvFTD behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, CBD corticobasal degeneration, CBS corticobasal syndrome, dbSNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database, EPS extrapyramidal syndromes, exp. expansion, F familial, GRN progranulin, PNFA progressive nonfluent aphasia, PPA primary progressive aphasia, PSP progressive supranuclear palsy, S sporadic, TREM2 Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2, U family history undocumented

In addition to patient-only variants, we identified another 15 missense FLNC variants that were present in both FTD patients and control individuals. Except for p.R1241C and p.R1567Q (MAF >1 % and >5 %), the other 13 were rare (MAF <1 %) (Additional file 1: Table S3a and b). We also identified 34 missense variants present only in control individuals (MAF <1 %) (Additional file 1: Table S4). Three different prediction software programs, i.e. SIFT, Polyphen-2 and SNAP2, were applied to estimate the predicted pathogenicity of variants identified in FTD patients and/or controls. However, the vast majority of FLNC variants found in patients and/or controls were predicted to have non-neutral effects (Additional file 1: Table S5a-c).

Two control individuals were carrying 2 and 3 different missense variants in FLNC. Interestingly, the p.A2430V variant found in one control individual was previously described in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) [21].

Rare variant gene burden analysis in the Belgian FTD cohort

We performed a gene burden analysis collapsing all rare variants with an MAF <1 % across the whole protein and comparing the overall frequency of rare variant alleles between patients and controls using χ 2 statistics. Considering all rare variants observed in patients, we obtained an overall cumulative frequency of 11.3 % (60/529) compared to 7.9 % in control individuals (73/920). The increased frequency in patients was significant with an odds ratio of 1.46 (chi-squared (χ 2) test, P = 0.0349; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.03–2.07).

Increase of FLNC in FTLD-TDP patients is strongly linked to GRN haploinsufficiency

In the initial report, published by Schmid et al. [12], the expression levels of both the short and long isoforms of human FLNC were found to be elevated in the frontal cortex of FTLD-TDP patients, compared to neurologically healthy control individuals and AD patients [12]. We analyzed FLNC expression levels in the frontal cortex (BA10) of FTLD-TDP patients carrying a pathological mutation in VCP, GRN or C9orf72 (Table 1), and of FTLD-TDP patients without a known genetic cause (nonmutation FTLD-TDP patients). Compared to transcript levels measured in the frontal cortex of control individuals and of AD or DLB patients, both the short and long isoform of FLNC were elevated up to 8.9 and 7.2 times in GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) carriers (Fig. 2a). The long isoform of FLNC was also increased in nonmutation FTLD-TDP patients (Fig. 2a). No altered expression patterns were observed in patients with the VCP p.R159H or C9orf72 repeat expansion mutation.
Fig. 2

Analysis of FLNC expression in FTD patients at transcript and protein level. a qRT-PCR analysis showed significantly increased levels of both the short and long isoform of FLNC in the frontal cortex of FTLD-TDP patients with GRN haploinsufficiency. The long isoform was also significantly increased in FTLD-TDP patients without a known mutation in causal FTD-ALS genes. b Increased expression levels of FLNC were confirmed on protein level using immunoblot analysis. In contrast to transcript levels, FLNC was also upregulated in VCP and FLNC variation carriers. Elevated phosphorylated FLNC levels at serines 2113 and 2213 (pSer2113 and pSer2213) were identified to a variable extent in GRN and VCP mutation carriers compared to controls. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001

Western blot analysis, using an antibody raised against the carboxyl terminus of human FLNC confirmed the elevated expression of FLNC in GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) patients compared to age-matched control individuals (Fig. 2b). No notable increase could be observed for the p.A89Vfs*41 frameshift mutation in FLNC expression. In contrast to the transcript data, FLNC protein levels were also elevated to a lower extent in FTD patients carrying the VCP p.R159H mutation. No increased FLNC levels were observed in a VCP carrier (DR7.4) that also carried the FLNC low frequency variant p.R1241C (Additional file 1: Table S3b). Interestingly, analysis of the FLNC p.V831I carrier showed an increase in FLNC levels compared to control individuals (Fig. 2b). Absence of elevated FLNC levels in brains of AD patients was in line with the transcript data and the previous data published by Schmid et al. [12] (Fig. 2a and Additional file 2: Figure S2a). As the strongest alterations in FLNC expression were observed in FTD patients with GRN haploinsufficiency, we verified whether reduced GRN levels in vitro could confirm the FLNC increase seen in patients. No significant changes, however, could be observed in FLNC expression levels upon GRN knockdown in both HeLa or KELLY cells (Additional file 2: Figure S3a-c).

Besides its anchoring and crosslinking functions, FLNC is known to scaffold a wide range of signaling pathways through interactions with signal transduction molecules, receptors and ion channels. FLNC is phosphorylated by protein kinase B-α at serine 2213 (pSer2213) and harbors also a potential cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation site at serine 2113 (pSer2113) [49]. Western blot analysis of the FLNC phosphorylation status at these reported residues demonstrated a considerable increase in pSer2113 levels in GRN loss-of-function mutation carriers. In contrast to total FLNC levels, VCP mutation carriers also showed a strong increased phosphorylation of FLNC at position pSer2113. Surprisingly, the FLNC p.V831I showed a lower degree of pSer2113levels compared to the low frequency variant (p.R1241C) carrier (Fig. 2b). Upregulation of phosphorylation of FLNC pSer2213 could only be detected in GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) carriers and was not present in controls or other FTD-related mutation carriers (Fig. 2b).

Elevated Flnc expression levels are confirmed in a progranulin knockout mouse model

We aimed at validating the altered transcript profile present in FTLD-TDP patients with GRN haploinsufficiency in progranulin (Grn) knockout mice [24]. We analyzed expression levels of both long and short isoforms of mouse Flnc in heterozygous Grn+/- and homozygous Grn-/- transgenic mice compared to wild-type (Wt) animals at 3 months, 9 months, 16–18 months and 24 months of age. Consistent with the data obtained for FTLD-TDP patients with GRN haploinsufficiency, transcript levels of both Flnc isoforms increased significantly in an age-dependent manner in Grn-/- brains starting from an age of 16–18 months and increasing to a fivefold at 24 months of age (P <0.0001) (Fig. 3a). No changes in Flnc isoform expression were observed between heterozygous Grn+/- and Wt mice up to an age of 24 months despite a small age-related tendency to increase in relative values. Utilizing a mouse Flnc-specific antibody, Flnc protein levels were found to progressively increase with age and the strongest increase was detected at an age of 21 months in Grn-/- mice which is comparable to the transcript data (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Analysis of Flnc expression in Grn knockout mice at transcript and protein level. qRT-PCR analysis of the long and short isoform of Flnc (a) measured in progranulin knockout mice of different ages. We analyzed the expression levels of both long and short isoforms of mouse Flnc in heterozygous Grn+/- and homozygous Grn-/- mice and wild-type (Wt) animals of 3 months (n = 4), 9 months (n = 4), 16-18 months (n = 6) and 24 months (n = 5) of age. b Increased FlnC expression levels were confirmed on protein level using quantitative immunoblot analysis. Two protein bands are detected around the height of mouse FLNC using the Kinasource AB152 anti FLNC antibody. The upper band is FLNC specific as determined by Western blotting using lysates from FlnC knockout mice (data not shown). The lower band is therefore considered as an aspecific protein band. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001, n.s. not significant

Further in line with the human data is that Flnc levels remained unchanged in two mouse models of AD, including Tg2576 mice overexpressing the Swedish APP variant p.KM670/671NL (Taconic Farms Inc.) or T8B7 mice expressing the PSEN1 p.G384A mutation (Additional file 2: Figure S2b) [50]. Due to the high sequence homology between Flnc and other members of the filamin family, we also investigated the expression levels of filamin A (Flna, ≈72 % homology) and filamin B (Flnb, ≈70 % homology) in our Grn-/- mouse model. No significant alterations were identified for both Flna and Flnb transcripts at end-stage Grn-/- mice compared to Wt mice (Additional file 2: Figure S2c-d), suggesting that the identified alterations are Flnc specific. Expression of other FTD-related genes, e.g. Tdp-43, Vcp and C9orf72 in Grn-/- mice remained unaltered as well (Additional file 2: Figure S2e-g).

Proteomic investigation of frontal cortex of FTD patients with increased FLNC levels using iTRAQ

To investigate the post-genomic sequelae of the human FLNC phenotype we performed an exploratory quantitative proteomic study of the frontal cortex (BA10) from patients carrying the FLNC p.V831I variant, the GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) mutation and VCP p.R159H mutation compared to control individuals. C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers were not included due to the absence of a detectable FLNC increase. We found that 294, 326 and 337 proteins were significantly and differentially regulated for FLNC (Additional file 1: Table S6), GRN (Additional file 1: Table S7) and VCP (Additional file 1: Table S8) patients, respectively. Venn diagram separation of these significant protein datasets demonstrated the presence of a core set of 71 common and coherently regulated (with respect to elevated or reduced expression) proteins across all genomic FTD etiologies (Fig. 4a, Additional file 1: Table S9). We validated phosphoglycerate mutase 2 (PGAM2) and syntaxin binding protein 2 (STXBP2) via Western blot analysis (Fig. 4b), which closely paralleled the quantitative mass spectrometry data (exemplary iTRAQ reporter ion analysis for both proteins is represented in Additional file 2: Figure S4a,b). We also explored the nature of the proteins unique to each FTD paradigm, i.e. specific to the FLNC (p.V831I), GRN (p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C)) or VCP (p.R159H) patients (Additional file 1: Table S10-12).
Fig. 4

Visualization and validation of FLNC proteomics datasets on FTD patients. (a) Three-set Venn diagram separation of the significant protein datasets obtained from proteomic analysis of FTD patients with increased FLNC levels, i.e. FLNC p.V831I, GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) and VCP p.R159H carriers. Proteins depicted in the Venn diagrams are either up- (italic), down-(underlined) or contra-regulated (red) when compared to expression levels of control individuals (n = 3). (b) Among the core of most up- or downregulated proteins, phosphoglycerate mutase 2 (PGAM2) and syntaxin binding protein 2 (STXBP2) were validated using Western blot analysis

Differential bioinformatic interpretation of quantitative proteomic analyses

To create a gestalt biomedical appreciation of the differential expression datasets, we employed Textrous! natural language processing (NLP) based analysis to generate a focussed semantic interpretation of the common FTD dataset and the FLNC-, GRN- and VCP-unique datasets. Using the Textrous! individual processing module we found for the FTD-common protein dataset the strongest correlations between the words ‘dendrites’, ‘growth-associated’, ‘cytoskeleton’, ‘polymerization’, and ‘synapses’ and following proteins: growth associated protein 43/neuromodulin (GAP43), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), brain acid soluble protein 1 (BASP1), neuroplastin (NPTN) and neuronal pentraxin-1 (NPTX1) (Fig. 5a). To effectively condense the terms involved in the individual processing matrix we extracted all the semantically-associated nouns and noun-phrases from this output to generate a higher-order word cloud (Fig. 5b, Additional file 1: Table S13a), reinforcing the strong cytoskeletal/dendritic/synaptic focus of the FTD-common dataset.
Fig. 5

Representation of FTD-common protein dataset using Textrous! and word clouds. (a) Analysis of the FTD-common protein dataset using Textrous! natural language processing (NLP). Strongest correlations between words (vertical) and proteins (horizontal) are presented in a Textrous! heat map. Teal-colored blocks indicate strongly-associated geneword interactions in an intensity-sensitive manner; grey blocks indicate no significant interaction. (b) Word clouds obtained from Wordle (http://www.wordle.net/) analyzing the Textrous! output data common to all FTD patients

We next focussed on a similar NLP-based interpretation of the FLNC-specific protein dataset. Repeating the Textrous! NLP analysis for the FLNC p.V831I variant (Fig. 6a), as with the FTD-common dataset, we found strong correlations between the words ‘neuronal-Wiskott–Aldrich Syndrome protein (N-wasp)’, ‘cytoskeleton’, ‘neurites’, ‘microtubules’ and ‘filopodia’ and following proteins: CAP-GLY domain containing linker protein 1 (CLIP1), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 3 (WASF3), Myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 (BIN1) and microtubule-associated protein 4 (MAP4). Interestingly, and in contrast to the FTD-common dataset interpretation, a strong neurodegenerative focus was also present in the FLNC dataset interpretation, i.e. semantic association with multiple disease-related words including ‘aggregations’, ‘oxidation’, ‘tangles’, ‘tauopathies’, ‘neurodegenerative’, ‘inclusion’ and ‘frontotemporal’. This dual functionality of the FLNC-unique dataset, i.e. cytoskeleton/neurodegeneration was also strongly evident from the extracted higher-order word cloud (Fig. 6b, Additional file 1: Table S13b). Hence the FLNC proteomic phenotype appears closely focused on neuroskeletal mechanisms tightly linked with neurodegenerative activity.
Fig. 6

Representation of the FLNC p.V831I unique protein dataset using Textrous! and word clouds. (a) Analysis of the FLNC p.V831I unique protein dataset using Textrous! natural language processing (NLP). Strongest correlations between words (vertical) and proteins (horizontal) are presented in a Textrous! heat map. Teal-colored blocks indicate stronglyassociated gene-word interactions in an intensity-sensitive manner; grey blocks indicate no significant interaction (b) Word clouds obtained from Wordle (http://www.wordle.net/) analyzing the Textrous! output data unique for the FLNC p.V831I variant

Using an identical NLP-based informatic approach for the GRN- (Additional file 2: Figure S5a, b) and VCP-unique (Additional file 2: Figure S6a, b) datasets we found that the GRN dataset was focussed upon ‘transporter’, ‘mitochondrial’, ‘oxidation’ and ‘cellular motility’ activity while in contrast the VCP-unique dataset was more focussed upon neuronal ‘synaptic’, ‘vesicle’, ‘transmission’ and ‘plasticity’ functions (Additional file 1: Table S13c-d). A general overview of the top 10 highest frequency words for each ‘higher-order’ word cloud, both FTD-common and the individual unique datasets, are outlined together in Additional file 1: Table S13a-d.

Overall, it is evident that for the FLNC-, GRN- and VCP-specific paradigms a specific and idiosyncratic post-genomic FTD-related functionality is present. As we found that the FLNC-unique protein dataset was strongly associated with a neurodegenerative/oxidative damage signature we attempted to independently quantify this using an orthogonal informatic approach to Textrous!. Hence we sought to evaluate the semantic correlation between user-defined words associated with neurodegeneration, dementia and aging and proteins from the FLNC-, GRN- or VCP-specific datasets. This was performed using the LSI-based GeneIndexer application. Through summation of the total cosine similarity scores for the input interrogator word terms and taking into account the relative sizes of input datasets, we found that multiple factors in the FLNC-specific protein dataset (Fig. 7) demonstrated the strongest semantic correlations to multiple terms associated with FTD (Additional file 1: Table S14-16). Therefore it appears that, for the FLNC-FTD patients, both protein and bioinformatic associations demonstrate a relatively unique and profound connection to FTLD pathology.
Fig. 7

Total cosine similarity scores of the FLNC proteomics datasets on FTD patients. Summation of the total cosine similarity scores for the input interrogator terms showed that the FLNC-unique protein dataset demonstrated the strongest semantic correlation to multiple factors associated with FTD compared to the GRN or VCP-datasets. Factors included in the analysis comprise frontotemporal, dementia, neurodegeneration and aging. Calculations take into account the relative sizes of input datasets

Discussion

Investigating the pathogenicity of TDP-43 deletion in zebrafish by Schmid et al. [12] demonstrated a potential role for muscle-specific proteins in the disease mechanism underlying FTD-ALS disorders, with FLNC being the most up-regulated protein. A potential link between the loss of TDP-43 in zebrafish, and the concomitant altered expression of FLNC, and the human disease was provided by the observation of elevated FLNC levels in the frontal cortex of FTLD-TDP patients. To further explore the potential involvement of FLNC in FTLD pathogenesis, we consequently screened the Belgian FTD patient and control cohorts for the presence of FLNC variants associated with FTD and determined the genetic etiology underlying the elevated FLNC expression levels in FTLD-TDP patients as observed by Schmid et al. [12]. Molecular genetic screening of the coding sequence of FLNC resulted in the identification of 68 missense variants, of which 19 were missense variants identified in 21 FTD patients only. All variants reported in this study are rare (MAF <1 %), except the p.R1241C and p.R1567Q missense variants which were low frequency (1 % < MAF <5 %) and frequent (MAF >5 %) variants, respectively. When considering all rare variants, indifferent if they were present or not in control individuals, FTD patients demonstrated a significant enrichment of rare variants (cumulative variant frequency of 11.3 %) when compared to control individuals (cumulative variant frequency of 7.9 %) (P = 0.0349; OR = 1.46, 95 % CI = 1.03–2.07).

Formerly, mutations in FLNC were described as an underlying cause of two distinct types of myopathy, known as myofibrillar and distal myopathy (MFM and DM) [17]. These myopathies are characterized by a progressive weakening of either proximal (MFM) or distal (DM) skeletal muscles combined with severe muscle defects [22, 23]. The disease spectrum has recently been broadened by the identification of novel genetic alterations in FLNC in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) [21]. Patients with HCM have marked sarcomeric abnormalities in cardiac muscles which cause an increased incidence of sudden cardiac death [51].

Based on the currently available data, we can suggest that the missense variants detected in FLNC are specific to the FTD phenotype based on a number of reasons. First, none of the FLNC variants identified in the Belgian FTD cohort were previously reported as a causal factor underlying any form of (cardio)myopathy. One exception is p.A2430V which was identified in one Belgian control individual, and had previously been reported in a patient with HCM [21]. In this latter study, however, the p.A2430V variation was classified as neutral by the SIFT prediciton software tool and considered a potential rare polymorphism in FLNC, which is supported by our observation of the p.A2430V variant in a Belgian control individual. Second, the FLNC carriers with FTD in our study did not show overt clinical signs of any form of myopathy. Considering that the average onset age of most FTD patients is older than of myopathy patients further strengthens our interpretation that the FLNC variants we observed are specific for FTD. Third, the missense variations in FTD are affecting evolutionary conserved regions across the actin binding domain (ABD) and the 24 Immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains (Fig. 1b, Additional file 2: Figure S1). Although the pathogenicity of the FLNC variations remains speculative, p.V831I and p.R1241C showed alterations in the expression of the FLNC protein itself or its phosphorylation state. A number of FLNC variations - p.R81C, p.K524R, p.D710N, p.R1241C, and p.T2025I - were identified in FTD patients who carried a causal mutation in another FTD gene i.e. FLNC p.R1241C in a VCP p.R159H carrier, FLNC p.R81C and p.T2025I in GRN loss-of-function mutation carriers [10], and FLNC p.K524R and p.D710N in C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers [11] (Table 2, Additional file 1: Table S3b). Co-occurrence of FLNC variants with causal GRN or C9orf72 mutations is not surprising since they are the most frequent mutations found in FTD patients in Belgium. Also, FLNC p.E1571K was identified in a FTD patient carrying the TREM2 p.R47H risk allele [52, 53]. Whether the presence of these FLNC missense variations may influence the pathological effect of causal mutations in C9orf72 or GRN, or exert an additional pathological effect remains to be investigated. Overall, our genetic data obtained suggested that the role of FLNC variations might not be restricted to skeletal or cardiac muscle disorders, but might also be modifying the neurodegenerative processes in FTD patients. This implies that variations found in the same or in different functional domains of FLNC can be associated with distinct disease phenotypes involving miscellaneous tissues. This can be potentially explained by scaffolding functions of FLNC where different variants in certain protein domains could have differential effects on downstream signaling pathways or modulate distinct forms of FLNC protein-protein interactions.

Besides the moderate increase of FLNC levels in the frontal cortex of the FLNC p.V831I carrier, the GRN p.0(IVS1 + 5G > C) loss-of-function and to a lower extent the VCP p.R159H mutation showed a marked up-regulation of total FLNC levels. The potential link between GRN and FLNC was further supported by the strong increase in mouse Flnc levels observed in the frontal cortex of Grn-/- mice between 16-18 months and 24 months of age. Hence it seems that in this FTD paradigm a strong aging-dependent triggering process may be in evidence.

Interestingly, the VCP p.R159H seemed to have a more pronounced effect on the phosphorylation state of pSer2113 while this was more the case for pSer2213 in GRN loss-of-function patients, suggesting that alternative pathways are affected in these patients. Increased phosphorylation at pSer2113 and pSer2213 of FLNC, might hamper the interaction of FLNC with other signaling proteins or its ability to modulate downstream signal transduction [49]. Further research, however, is required to determine the downstream functional discrepancies between elevated levels of total FLNC and both phosphorylation states of FLNC.

How elevated FLNC levels in the brain can influence the development of TDP-43 proteinopathies remains unknown. Studies performed in cellular and animal models, however, have demonstrated that a precise stoichiometry of FLNC together with its associated signaling/binding proteins is of critical importance for muscle function and maintenance [54]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that a certain threshold level of filamins may be essential for cell viability [14, 55]. In non-muscle cells, filamins are reported to colocalize along stress fibers implicating that they might play a role in maintaining focal adhesion complexes and stabilization of cytoskeletal features [56]. As no changes in both Flna and Flnb could be observed, the elevated levels of FLNC identified both in human and in mouse could hamper neuronal cellular integrity or axonal/dendritic plasticity in the brain to cope with additional stressors or alterations during degenerative and aging processes. This posit is in line with the Flnc expression patterns that we measured in the brains of Grn-/-mice. As mentioned previously, our expression data obtained from aged Grn-/- mice demonstrated a strong increase of Flnc in brain between 16-18 months and 24 months. At an age of 23.5 months, the highest Flnc levels in mice also correlate with an 17.5-fold higher relative risk of dying for Grn-/- mice compared to Grn+/- mice [24]. This suggests that elevated Flnc levels might play an important role in mediating or accelerating the pathological aging process.

A potential role for accelerated aging and neurodegeneration, due to increased FLNC levels, is further supported by the identification of several protein factors in all differential datasets obtained from our exploratory quantitative proteomic analyses on the frontal cortex of a selected number of FTD patients with different genetic etiologies. For example, low levels of neurogranin show a clear correlation with cognitive deficits and aging [57]. The key role played by neuroplastins in synapse formation and its association with impaired intellectual ability might be indicative for the role of FLNC [58]. Furthermore, we identified also increased PGAM2 expression levels in the FLNC- and GRN-unique datasets as an additional muscle-specific protein that shows altered expression levels in the brain. Interestingly, PGAM2 overexpression has previously been associated with an altered energy metabolism and reduced stress resistance due to a decreased respiration capacity in mitochondria and increased production of reactive oxygen species in the heart of Pgam2 overexpression mice [59]. Abnormal energy metabolism has recently been linked to inflammation [60]. Furthermore, additional proteins which were consistently altered in both the FLNC-, GRN- and VCP-unique datasets, e.g. GFAP [61], NPTN [62], DBI [63], PRDX6 [64], MARCKS [65] and BSN [66], are closely associated with cognitive function, dementia and pathological aging, (Additional file 1: Table S6-8). Altered expression levels in these proteins could explain the observed accelerated aging of Grn-/- mice and concomitant increase in Flnc, but clearly further research into this aging-neurodegenerative nexus in FTD is necessary.

Compared to the GRN- and VCP-unique datasets, the FLNC-unique protein dataset showed the strongest correlation to frontotemporal dementia, neurodegeneration and aging (Figs. 6 and 7). The bioinformatic analyses of all differential datasets provided evidence that the FLNC-unique protein dataset showed the greatest similarity to the core functions of the FTD-common protein dataset with respect to the modulation of neuronal structure or cytoskeletal dynamics (Figs. 5 and 6). Further support for the strong and specific connection between the core FTD functionality and the FLNC-specific dataset was provided by the application of standard bioinformatic investigations with GO Term and KEGG pathway analyses (Additional file 1: Table S17-20). The results of our exploratory proteomic analyses of frontal cortex of FTD patients are encouraging the involvement of FLNC in FTD disease pathways, however, further experiments are required to confirm these observations and should be extended on potential brain material of additional FTD patients with concomitant elevated FLNC levels.

Hence we found four common significantly populated GO terms between the FTD-common and FLNC-specific dataset, i.e. oxidative phosphorylation, generation of precursor metabolites and energy, cellular protein complex assembly and protein polymerization. Only one common GO term could be found between the GRN-unique (transmembrane transport) or VCP-unique (ribonucleotide metabolic process) datasets and the FTD-common dataset. At the KEGG pathway level, four common pathways were identified between the FTD-common and the FLNC-unique dataset: oxidative phosphorylation, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, pathogenic Escherichia coli infection. No common pathways were found between the GRN- or VCP-unique datasets and the FTD-common dataset. In both cases the bioinformatic interpretation of the FLNC-unique dataset reveals a strong neurometabolic, neuronal architectural and neuordegenerative functional bias.

Conclusions

The data presented here provide further support that FLNC, a muscle-specific protein, could be a potential novel player in FTD pathogenesis. More specifically, we report a significant association between rare variants in FLNC and FTD. We have demonstrated that elevated FLNC levels in the frontal cortex of FTD patients are mainly associated with GRN haploinsufficiency and to a lower extent to the FLNC p.V831I and VCP p.R159H mutation. The GRN associated increase of FLNC was confirmed in the frontal cortex of aged Grn knockout mice. Moreover, proteomic analysis of FTD patients with increased FLNC levels points towards downstream alterations in pathways involved in aging, neurodegeneration and synaptogenesis, suggesting that FLNC levels might have a potential role in mediating or accelerating the aging process. However, the exact mode of action of increased FLNC levels in the brain of FTD patients is currently unknown and requires further investigation.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the participants for their kind cooperation and research nurses for the biosampling of the patients and the control individuals. We also thank the personnel of the Genomic Service Facility and of the Bioinformatics Unit of the VIB Department of Molecular Genetics (www.vibgeneticservicefacility.be), the Antwerp Biobank of the Institute Born-Bunge. We acknowledge the following neurologists: Dr. G. Laureys (General Hospital Sint-Maria Halle), Dr. P. Wostyn (Psychiatric Center Sint-Amandua Beernem), Dr. P. Vanderdonckt (General Hospital Groeninge Kortrijk) and Dr. K. Geens (General Hospital Klina Brasschaat) for their contribution to the clinical diagnosis of FLNC variation carriers. We also thank S. Pereson and M. Declercq for their support with the experimental work. We are grateful to the laboratory of Professor Kunkel for sharing the FLNC antibodies.

The BELNEU consortium: Tim Van Langenhove (Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium); Jan De Bleecker, Bart Dermaut (University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium); Olivier Deryck, Bruno Bergmans (AZ Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium); Alex Michotte, Jan Versijpt (University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium); Christiana Willems (Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium); Eric Salmon (University of Liège, Liège, Belgium)

Funding

This research was in part funded by the MetLife Foundation Award for Medical Research USA; the consortium of Centers of Excellence in Neurodegeneration (CoEN); the Belgian Science Policy Office Interuniversity Attraction Poles program, the Flemish Government initiated Flanders Impulse Program on Networks for Dementia Research (VIND) and the Methusalem Excellence Program, the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), the Agency for Innovation by Science and technology (IWT) and the University of Antwerp Research Fund, Belgium. S.M. is a recipient of an international mobility grant of the FWO Odysseus excellence program. The FWO provided a PhD fellowship to S.P. and a clinical investigator fellowship to A.S., and the IWT a PhD fellowship to J.J.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neurodegenerative Brain Diseases group, VIB Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Antwerp – CDE
(2)
Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp
(3)
Translational Neurobiology Group, Department of Molecular Genetics, VIB
(4)
Department of Neurology and Memory Clinic, Hospital Network Antwerp, Middelheim and Hoge Beuken
(5)
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ghent and University of Ghent
(6)
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)
(7)
Biomedical Center (BMC), Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich
(8)
Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)
(9)
Department of Neurology, Saint-Luc University Hospital and Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain
(10)
Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven
(11)
Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Memory Clinic, University of Leuven
(12)
Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven
(13)
Department of Neurology, Antwerp University Hospital
(14)
Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Research Center, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen

References

  1. Neary D, Snowden J, Mann D. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(11):771–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Van Langenhove T, van der Zee J, Van Broeckhoven C. The molecular basis of the frontotemporal lobar degeneration-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum. Ann Med. 2012;44(8):817–28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arai T, Hasegawa M, Akiyama H, Ikeda K, Nonaka T, Mori H, et al. TDP-43 is a component of ubiquitin-positive tau-negative inclusions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;351(3):602–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, Truax AC, Micsenyi MC, Chou TT, et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2006;314(5796):130–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Geser F, Martinez-Lage M, Kwong LK, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia and beyond: the TDP-43 diseases. J Neurol. 2009;256(8):1205–14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Polymenidou M, Lagier-Tourenne C, Hutt KR, Huelga SC, Moran J, Liang TY, et al. Long pre-mRNA depletion and RNA missplicing contribute to neuronal vulnerability from loss of TDP-43. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(4):459–68.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buratti E, Baralle FE. TDP-43: gumming up neurons through protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37(6):237–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ng AS, Rademakers R, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia: a bridge between dementia and neuromuscular disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1338:71–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Janssens J, Van Broeckhoven C. Pathological mechanisms underlying TDP-43 driven neurodegeneration in FTLD-ALS spectrum disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2013.Google Scholar
  10. Cruts M, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, Engelborghs S, Wils H, Pirici D, et al. Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature. 2006;442(7105):920–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gijselinck I, Van Langenhove T, van der Zee J, Sleegers K, Philtjens S, Kleinberger G, et al. A C9orf72 promoter repeat expansion in a Flanders-Belgian cohort with disorders of the frontotemporal lobar degeneration-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum: a gene identification study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(1):54–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmid B, Hruscha A, Hogl S, Banzhaf-Strathmann J, Strecker K, van der Zee J, et al. Loss of ALS-associated TDP-43 in zebrafish causes muscle degeneration, vascular dysfunction, and reduced motor neuron axon outgrowth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(13):4986–91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou AX, Hartwig JH, Akyurek LM. Filamins in cell signaling, transcription and organ development. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20(2):113–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Razinia Z, Makela T, Ylanne J, Calderwood DA. Filamins in mechanosensing and signaling. Annu Rev Biophys. 2012;41:227–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van der Flier A, Sonnenberg A. Structural and functional aspects of filamins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1538(2-3):99–117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Popowicz GM, Schleicher M, Noegel AA, Holak TA. Filamins: promiscuous organizers of the cytoskeleton. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006;31(7):411–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Furst DO, Goldfarb LG, Kley RA, Vorgerd M, Olive M, van der Ven PF. Filamin C-related myopathies: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(1):33–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maestrini E, Patrosso C, Mancini M, Rivella S, Rocchi M, Repetto M, et al. Mapping of two genes encoding isoforms of the actin binding protein ABP-280, a dystrophin like protein, to Xq28 and to chromosome 7. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2(6):761–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Thompson TG, Chan YM, Hack AA, Brosius M, Rajala M, Lidov HG, et al. Filamin 2 (FLN2): A muscle-specific sarcoglycan interacting protein. J Cell Biol. 2000;148(1):115–26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Xie Z, Xu W, Davie EW, Chung DW. Molecular cloning of human ABPL, an actin-binding protein homologue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;251(3):914–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Valdes-Mas R, Gutierrez-Fernandez A, Gomez J, Coto E, Astudillo A, Puente DA, et al. Mutations in filamin C cause a new form of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vorgerd M, van der Ven PF, Bruchertseifer V, Lowe T, Kley RA, Schroder R, et al. A mutation in the dimerization domain of filamin c causes a novel type of autosomal dominant myofibrillar myopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77(2):297–304.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Duff RM, Tay V, Hackman P, Ravenscroft G, McLean C, Kennedy P, et al. Mutations in the N-terminal actin-binding domain of filamin C cause a distal myopathy. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(6):729–40.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wils H, Kleinberger G, Pereson S, Janssens J, Capell A, Van Dam D, et al. Cellular ageing, increased mortality and FTLD-TDP-associated neuropathology in progranulin knockout mice. J Pathol. 2012;228(1):67–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Langenhove T, van der Zee J, Engelborghs S, Vandenberghe R, Santens P, Van den Broeck M, et al. Ataxin-2 polyQ expansions in FTLD-ALS spectrum disorders in Flanders-Belgian cohorts. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(5):1004–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Engelborghs S, Dermaut B, Goeman J, Saerens J, Marien P, Pickut BA, et al. Prospective Belgian study of neurodegenerative and vascular dementia: APOE genotype effects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(8):1148–51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 9):2456–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr179.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Odgerel Z, van der Ven PF, Furst DO, Goldfarb LG. DNA sequencing errors in molecular diagnostics of filamin myopathy. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(10):1409–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Goossens D, Moens LN, Nelis E, Lenaerts AS, Glassee W, Kalbe A, et al. Simultaneous mutation and copy number variation (CNV) detection by multiplex PCR-based GS-FLX sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(3):472–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20873.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–303.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Reumers J, De RP, Zhao H, Liekens A, Smeets D, Cleary J, et al. Optimized filtering reduces the error rate in detecting genomic variants by short-read sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(1):61–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res. 2001;11(5):863–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.176601.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0410-248.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bromberg Y, Rost B. SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(11):3823–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm238.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Zee J, Pirici D, Van Langenhove T, Engelborghs S, Vandenberghe R, Hoffmann M, et al. Clinical heterogeneity in 3 unrelated families linked to VCP p.Arg159His. Neurology. 2009;73(8):626–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Janssens J, Wils H, Kleinberger G, Joris G, Cuijt I, Ceuterick-de Groote C, et al. Overexpression of ALS-Associated p.M337V Human TDP-43 in Mice Worsens Disease Features Compared to Wild-type Human TDP-43 Mice. Mol Neurobiol. 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3 (7):RESEARCH0034.Google Scholar
  41. Kleinberger G, Wils H, Ponsaerts P, Joris G, Timmermans JP, Van Broeckhoven C, et al. Increased caspase activation and decreased TDP-43 solubility in progranulin knockout cortical cultures. J Neurochem. 2010;115(3):735–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Martin B, Brenneman R, Becker KG, Gucek M, Cole RN, Maudsley S. iTRAQ analysis of complex proteome alterations in 3xTgAD Alzheimer’s mice: understanding the interface between physiology and disease. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(7):e2750.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Cai H, Chen H, Yi T, Daimon CM, Boyle JP, Peers C, et al. VennPlex--a novel Venn diagram program for comparing and visualizing datasets with differentially regulated datapoints. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1), e53388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053388.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Maudsley S, Martin B, Janssens J, Etienne H, Jushaj A, van Gastel J, et al. Informatic deconvolution of biased GPCR signaling mechanisms from in vivo pharmacological experimentation. Methods. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.05.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Chen H, Martin B, Daimon CM, Siddiqui S, Luttrell LM, Maudsley S. Textrous!: extracting semantic textual meaning from gene sets. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e62665.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Chadwick W, Zhou Y, Park SS, Wang L, Mitchell N, Stone MD, et al. Minimal peroxide exposure of neuronal cells induces multifaceted adaptive responses. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(12):e14352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014352.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin B, Chadwick W, Cong WN, Pantaleo N, Daimon CM, Golden EJ, et al. Euglycemic agent-mediated hypothalamic transcriptomic manipulation in the N171-82Q model of Huntington disease is related to their physiological efficacy. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(38):31766–82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Murray JT, Campbell DG, Peggie M, Mora A, Cohen P. Identification of filamin C as a new physiological substrate of PKBalpha using KESTREL. Biochem J. 2004;384(Pt 3):489–94.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hsiao K, Chapman P, Nilsen S, Eckman C, Harigaya Y, Younkin S, et al. Correlative memory deficits, Abeta elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice. Science. 1996;274(5284):99–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults. Circulation. 1995;92(4):785–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, Carrasquillo M, Rogaeva E, Majounie E, et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):117–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211851.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Jonsson T, Stefansson H, Steinberg S, Jonsdottir I, Jonsson PV, Snaedal J, et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):107–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Arndt V, Dick N, Tawo R, Dreiseidler M, Wenzel D, Hesse M, et al. Chaperone-assisted selective autophagy is essential for muscle maintenance. Curr Biol. 2010;20(2):143–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Baldassarre M, Razinia Z, Burande CF, Lamsoul I, Lutz PG, Calderwood DA. Filamins regulate cell spreading and initiation of cell migration. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(11), e7830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007830.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Nakamura F, Stossel TP, Hartwig JH. The filamins: organizers of cell structure and function. Cell Adh Migr. 2011;5(2):160–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Diez-Guerra FJ. Neurogranin, a link between calcium/calmodulin and protein kinase C signaling in synaptic plasticity. IUBMB Life. 2010;62(8):597–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.357.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Beesley P, Kraus M, Parolaro N. The neuroplastins: multifunctional neuronal adhesion molecules--involvement in behaviour and disease. Advances in Neurobiology. 2014;8:61–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mons N, Enderlin V, Jaffard R, Higueret P. Selective age-related changes in the PKC-sensitive, calmodulin-binding protein, neurogranin, in the mouse brain. J Neurochem. 2001;79(4):859–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Neill LA, Hardie DG. Metabolism of inflammation limited by AMPK and pseudo-starvation. Nature. 2013;493(7432):346–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Finch CE. Neurons, glia, and plasticity in normal brain aging. Adv Gerontol. 2002;10:35–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Desrivieres S, Lourdusamy A, Tao C, Toro R, Jia T, Loth E, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism in the neuroplastin locus associates with cortical thickness and intellectual ability in adolescents. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20(2):263–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.197.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Luchetti S, Bossers K, Van de Bilt S, Agrapart V, Morales RR, Frajese GV, et al. Neurosteroid biosynthetic pathways changes in prefrontal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(11):1964–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.12.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Chhunchha B, Fatma N, Kubo E, Singh DP. Aberrant sumoylation signaling evoked by reactive oxygen species impairs protective function of Prdx6 by destabilization and repression of its transcription. FEBS J. 2014;281(15):3357–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12866.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Muthusamy N, Sommerville LJ, Moeser AJ, Stumpo DJ, Sannes P, Adler K, et al. MARCKS-dependent mucin clearance and lipid metabolism in ependymal cells are required for maintenance of forebrain homeostasis during aging. Aging Cell. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12354.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Gallart-Palau X, Serra A, Qian J, Chen CP, Kalaria RN, Sze SK. Temporal lobe proteins implicated in synaptic failure exhibit differential expression and deamidation in vascular dementia. Neurochem Int. 2015;80:87–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Janssens et al. 2015

Advertisement