Skip to main content

Severe ACTA1-related nemaline myopathy: intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, and enlarged perinuclear space as characteristic pathological features on muscle biopsies


Nemaline myopathy (NM) is a muscle disorder with broad clinical and genetic heterogeneity. The clinical presentation of affected individuals ranges from severe perinatal muscle weakness to milder childhood-onset forms, and the disease course and prognosis depends on the gene and mutation type. To date, 14 causative genes have been identified, and ACTA1 accounts for more than half of the severe NM cases. ACTA1 encodes α-actin, one of the principal components of the contractile units in skeletal muscle. We established a homogenous cohort of ten unreported families with severe NM, and we provide clinical, genetic, histological, and ultrastructural data. The patients manifested antenatal or neonatal muscle weakness requiring permanent respiratory assistance, and most deceased within the first months of life. DNA sequencing identified known or novel ACTA1 mutations in all. Morphological analyses of the muscle biopsy specimens showed characteristic features of NM histopathology including cytoplasmic and intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, and major myofibrillar disorganization. We also detected structural anomalies of the perinuclear space, emphasizing a physiological contribution of skeletal muscle α-actin to nuclear shape. In-depth investigations of the nuclei confirmed an abnormal localization of lamin A/C, Nesprin-1, and Nesprin-2, forming the main constituents of the nuclear lamina and the LINC complex and ensuring nuclear envelope integrity. To validate the relevance of our findings, we examined muscle samples from three previously reported ACTA1 cases, and we identified the same set of structural aberrations. Moreover, we measured an increased expression of cardiac α-actin in the muscle samples from the patients with longer lifespan, indicating a potential compensatory effect. Overall, this study expands the genetic and morphological spectrum of severe ACTA1-related nemaline myopathy, improves molecular diagnosis, highlights the enlargement of the perinuclear space as an ultrastructural hallmark, and indicates a potential genotype/phenotype correlation.


Nemaline myopathies (NM) form a genetically and clinically heterogeneous group of congenital myopathies characterised by early-onset hypotonia, muscle and facial weakness, respiratory distress, swallowing difficulties, delayed motor milestones, and skeletal deformities [20, 23]. To date, 14 causative NM genes have been identified (ACTA1, ADSSL1, CFL2, KBTBD13, KLHL40, KLHL41, LMOD3, MYO18B, MYPN, NEB, TNNT1, TNNT3, TPM2, TPM3) [20, 32, 34], and they primarily code for components of the contractile unit, the sarcomere, or for auxiliary proteins regulating sarcomeric function, stability, or turnover [13]. As a direct consequence of pathogenic mutations in the NM genes, muscle biopsy specimens from affected individuals typically show abnormal accumulations of sarcomeric structures known as nemaline rods.

Mutations in ACTA1 account for more than half of the genetically characterised cases with severe NM. Most are heterozygous missense mutations occurring de novo and affecting highly conserved amino acids, while 10% are reported with autosomal recessive inheritance [17, 23]. ACTA1 encodes skeletal muscle α-actin (αskm-actin), a multi-functional protein able to polymerize and form the helical strands of the thin filaments. The formation of dynamic cross-bridges with the thick myosin filaments causes a sliding movement between actin and myosin, resulting in the shortening of the contractile unit, and the generation of force to enable motion [7]. Besides classical nemaline rods, histological investigations of muscle sections from ACTA1 patients often reveal other structural anomalies including focal disorganization (core-like areas) with or without inclusion of rods, congenital fibre type disproportion (CFTD), and—more rarely—intranuclear rods or zebra bodies [20, 30]. The coexistence of several anomalies on the same muscle biopsy specimen is frequently observed, indicating that the ACTA1 mutations can variably impact-on αskm-actin structure, function, and positioning, and thereby interfere with normal muscle architecture and physiology at different levels.

Here, we provide the clinical description of a series of ten unreported patients with severe NM together with a thorough analysis of the muscle morphology and ultrastructure. Molecular investigations detected known and novel ACTA1 mutations in all affected individuals, including nine heterozygous missense mutations and a single heterozygous stop-loss mutation affecting the original termination codon and predicted to result in an extended protein. Histological and ultrastructural investigations of the muscle biopsy specimens uncovered common ACTA1-related anomalies such as clusters of rods, intranuclear rods and cytoplasmic bodies, and we detected additional structure abnormalities affecting the perinuclear space and the neuromuscular junction.

Patients and methods

Cohort description

We established a cohort of ten patients (cases 1–10) with a severe form of early-onset myopathy, and we examined muscle histology and ultrastructure, and performed genetic testing (Table 1). We subsequently included three previously reported cases (11–13) with concordant molecular diagnosis and similar clinical and histopathological presentation. The following points were investigated and compared in the eight females and five males: birth weight and gestational age, antenatal and neonatal signs, respiration, orthopaedic and dysmorphic abnormalities, disease course, additional clinical features, and muscle morphology. Sample collection was performed for diagnostic purposes and with written informed consent from the legal guardians of the patients according to the declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Table 1 Description of the clinical, morphological and genetics findings

Muscle biopsies—histology, ultrastructure, immunofluorescence

All 13 patients underwent open muscle biopsy of the deltoid or quadriceps muscles. Patients 5, 11, and 13 underwent multiple biopsies. For morphological analyses, transverse 10 µm snap frozen cryostat sections were stained with standardized histological and histoenzymological techniques [38] and digital photographs were obtained with the AxioCam HRc camera (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Cytoplasmic/sarcoplasmic rods, intranuclear rods, and cytoplasmic bodies were assessed on Gomori trichrome-stained sections.

Electron microscopy studies were performed on muscle biopsy specimens from all 13 patients by standardized techniques [19]. The grids were viewed on a CM120 (Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and a Met Jeol 1400 Flash electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). Immunofluorescence studies were carried out on 8 µm muscle sections from the four patients with sufficient biological material and two age-matched controls. Images were acquired on a Ti2 microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) driven by Metamorph (Molecular Devices, San José, USA), and equipped with a CSU-W1 spinning disk head (Yokogawa, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with a Prime 95 sCMOS camera (Photometrics, Tucson, USA) and a 100 × oil-immersion objective lens. Super-resolution images were obtained using the LiveSR module (Gataca Systems, Massy, France). The following primary and secondary antibodies were used:

Primary antibodies Epitope Origin Dilution Manufacturer
MAB 414 (ab24609) Nuclear pore complex Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Abcam
MANEM 5 (8A1) Emerin Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
MANEM 8 (7B9) Emerin Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
MANLAC 1 (4A7) Lamin A/C Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
MANNES 1A (7A12) Nesprin 1 Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
MANNES 1E (8C3) Nesprin 1 Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
MANNES 2C (12A5) Nesprin 2 Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
MANNES 2E (18F7) Nesprin 2 Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
MANNES 2F (11C5) Nesprin 2 Monoclonal (mouse) 1:100 Glenn Morris
A9357 Cardiac actin Monoclonal (mouse) 1:500 Sigma Aldrich
L9393 Laminin Polyclonal (rabbit) 1:50 Sigma Aldrich
Secondary antibodies Reference Specificity   Manufacturer
ALEXA Fluor 555 A-21422 Anti-mouse (red) 1:300 Life technologies
ALEXA Fluor 488 A-11034 Anti-rabbit (green) 1:300 Life technologies
DAPI D-1306 Nuclei (blue) 1:1000 Life technologies

The A9357 anti-cardiac actin antibody has been used according the manufacturer’s recommendations to ensure specificity.

Genetics—exome and Sanger sequencing

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood by routine methods. Exome sequencing was carried out for families 3, 4, 5, and 9, panel sequencing covering 210 neuromuscular genes (MYOdiagHTS) for families 1 and 7, and direct Sanger sequencing of all coding ACTA1 exons and adjacent splice-relevant regions for families 2, 6, 8, and 10. For exome sequencing, leukocyte DNA libraries were prepared with the SureSelect Human all Exon 50 Mb capture library v5 (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 (Illumina, San Diego, USA). Sequence data were aligned to the GRCh37/hg19 reference genome, and variants were filtered and ranked based on their frequency in the internal and gnomAD databases, their predicted impact and segregation, and their expression pattern and known implication in human disorders. The presence and segregation of the variants was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The ACTA1 mutations were numbered according to GenBank NM_001100.4 and NP_001091.1.


Clinical data

The ten novel patients constituting our cohort are sporadic cases from unrelated families without ancestral history of a neuromuscular disorder. All presented with antenatal or neonatal onset of a severe myopathy. The clinical, genetic, and histological features are summarized in Table 1, and compared to three previously reported patients with analogous phenotype [18, 24, 36].

Antenatal signs including hydramnios and reduced foetal movements were noted for patients 5 and 9, and patients 2 and 10 were born prematurely with a low birth weight. All neonates presented with pronounced hypotonia and hypomobility at birth requiring immediate mechanical ventilation followed by tracheostomy. Sucking and swallowing difficulties partially associated with hyper-salivation were seen in most infants and necessitated tube feeding and subsequent gastrostomy. Additional clinical features encompassed arthrogryposis (7\(\times \)), facial anomalies (3\(\times \)), high-arched palate (3\(\times \)), and skeletal deformities including clubfoot/clubfeet (4\(\times \)), pectus excavatum (2\(\times \)), scoliosis (1\(\times \)), and short ribs (1\(\times \)). Major hip retractions with legs bent over the abdomen at birth were observed in patients 8 and 10. None of the patients manifested an involvement of extraocular muscles.

The disease course was severe and most often fatal. Five neonates deceased during the first weeks of life (patients 1, 2, 4, 6, and 9), and two infants before the age of three years (patients 5, 7) (Table1). The surviving children are 4 and 13 years of age (patients 3 and 10), use orthopaedic corsets, are under permanent respiratory assistance, and never acquired walking. The oldest patient can move his hands, is able to write, and attends regular school courses.

Identification of ACTA1 mutations in all patients

Exome, panel, or Sanger sequencing was carried out for the ten patients and the available clinically unaffected parents and uncovered ACTA1 mutations in all families. These encompassed heterozygous missense mutations affecting highly conserved amino acids in patient 1 (c.109G > C; p.Val37Leu), patient 2 (c.113G > A; p.Gly38Asp), patient 3 (c.203C > A; p.Thr68Asn), patient 4 (c.282C > A; p.Asn94Lys), patient 5 (c.283G > A; p.Glu95Lys), patient 6 (c.355G > C; p.Glu119Gln), patient 7 (c.493G > T; p.Val165Leu), patient 8 (c.592C > T; p.Arg198Cys), and patient 9 (c.686 T > C; p.Met229Thr), as well as a stop-loss mutation predicted to generate an elongated protein with 47 supernumerary amino acids in patient 10 (c.1132 T > C; p.Ter378GlnextTer47), (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The missense mutations were evenly distributed over exons 2, 3, 4, and 5, and had no predicted impact on splicing. None was listed in the gnomAD public human variant database (, but c.109G > C (p.Val37Leu; initially described as p.Val35Leu) [36], c.203C > A (p.Thr68Asn) [17], c.282C > A (p.Asn94Lys) [6], c.283G > A (p.Glu95Lys), c.493G > T (p.Val165Leu, initially described as p.Val163Leu) [14, 25, 36, 40], c.592C > T (p.Arg198Cys) [17], c.686 T > C (p.Met229Thr) [17, 36], and c.11132 T > C (p.Ter378GlnextTer47) [39] have previously been reported in unrelated NM cases. Furthermore, the LOVD mutation database lists the c.283G > A (p.Glu95Lys) mutation found in patient 5, and also registered different mutations affecting residues Val37, Gly38, Thr68, Asn94, Val165, Arg198, Met229, or the stop codon (

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of the ACTA1 mutations. A Schematic representation of the seven ACTA1 exons and position of the mutations in the ten novel patients (bold) and in the previously reported cases (light). B Resolved 3D protein structure of an αskm-actin monomer with position of the missense mutations highlighted in red

Segregation analyses revealed a de novo occurrence of the mutations in families 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10, while parental DNA samples were not available for family 8 (Table 1). The c.493G > T (p.Val165Leu) missense in patient 7 was also found in the leucocyte DNA from the clinically unaffected mother with a low signal intensity on the electropherogram, indicating a mosaic pattern of the mutation.

Taken together, all ACTA1 mutations described in the present study either arose de novo or were described in previously reported nemaline myopathy cases, pointing out their causality and pathogenicity.

Common histopathological and ultrastructural hallmarks

The ten novel patients enrolled in the study underwent open muscle biopsies between 2 days and 3 months of life, and patient 5 had an additional biopsy at a later stage (Table 1). The muscle sections were examined through a standard panel of histological and histochemical stains and revealed distinct structural anomalies and pathological protein accumulations. All muscle biopsy specimens displayed prominent fibre size variability (Fig. 2) associated with type I fibre atrophy, often accompanied by type I fibre predominance and occasionally by endomysial fibrosis. We also detected numerous fibres containing scattered central and clustered subsarcolemmal rods in patients 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9, intranuclear rods in patients 6, 7, 8, and 9, and cytoplasmic bodies in patients 4, 5, 8, and 9. Signs of necrosis and muscle fibre degeneration were not seen. In patients 4, 5, 7, and 10, no cytoplasmic rods were detectable by light microscopy.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Muscle histology. Gomori trichrome staining on transverse muscle sections evidenced fibre size variability throughout the samples. The images also show an increased interstitial connective tissue in patients 4, 5, 7, 10, and 13 (B, C, E, H, I), abundant cytoplasmic rods in patients 2, 6, 8, 9, and 13 (A, D, F, G, I), cytoplasmic bodies (arrows) in patients 4, 5, 8, and 9 (B, C, F, G), major accumulations of thin filaments in patient 13 (I), as well as intranuclear rods in patient 7 (arrow, highlighted in the inset). In patient 10 (H), no rods or cytoplasmic bodies were observed

Ultrastructural analyses of the muscle samples by electron microscopy confirmed the presence of cytoplasmic rods of variable size and shape, sometimes with thin filamentous protrusions as in patients 2, 6, and 7, or emanating from thickened Z-line segments as in patients 1 and 9 (Fig. 3). We also found mini-rods in patients 1, 4, 5, 7, and 10, and intranuclear rods in patients 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (Figs. 3 and 5). Cytoplasmic bodies characterized by the typical halo of radiating filamentous material were observed in patients 2, 4, 5, 8, and 9 (Fig. 4). Apart from these histopathological features classically characterizing nemaline myopathy, we also detected structural myofibre anomalies affecting the nuclear envelope, the nuclear lamina, and the neuromuscular junction (Figs. 5 and 6). Indeed, on muscle sections from patients 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9, the perinuclear space appeared significantly enlarged in 10 – 12% of the fibres. In contrast to the average distance of 40 nm between the inner and the outer nuclear membrane in control myofibres, the width of the perinuclear space scaled up to 1200 nm in our patients (Fig. 5). Patient 1 additionally displayed increased spots of dense heterochromatin. Myofibrillar disorganization was prominent throughout the muscle biopsy specimens, and many atrophic fibres showed an undulating and partially detached basal lamina projecting into the interstitial tissue (Figs. 4 and 6). We also noted that all neuromuscular junctions were abnormal in patient 5, manifesting a reduced number of postsynaptic membrane folds and impoverished sub-neural structures (Fig. 6).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cytoplasmic and intranuclear rods by electron microscopy. Ultrastructural investigations of the muscle biopsy specimens illustrate cytoplasmic rods with the typical lattice structure in patients 4, 6, and 9 (D, E, F), thin filaments emanating from thickened Z-lines in patients 6 and 9 (arrow) (E, F), numerous intranuclear rods in patients 7 (arrow) and 12 (A, B, C), accumulations of thin filaments in patients 7 (arrow) and 13 (H, I), and major myofibre disorganization in patients 4, 7, and 9 (D, G, H). Note the square shape of the intranuclear rods in patient 12 (B, C)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cytoplasmic bodies by electron microscopy. Cytoplasmic bodies showing the characteristic halo of radiating filaments as illustrated on muscle sections from patients 4, 5, 8, and 9 (arrows, AD). The patients also displayed fibre size variability, myofibre disorganization and endomysial fibrosis. The enlargement of the perinuclear space is indicated in patient 9 (arrow, D)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Ultrastructure of the nuclei. Electron microscopy detected nuclear anomalies in the muscle samples including intranuclear rods in patients 5 and 7 (B, C), and especially a significant enlargement of the perinuclear space scaling up to 165 nm in patient 5 (B), 195 nm in patient 1 (A), 217 nm in patient 4 (E), 230 nm in patient 11 (F), 390 nm in patient 7 (D), and 1230 nm in patient 6 (C) as indicated by the red bars. Patient 1 additionally displayed dense heterochromatic areas (A)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Ultrastructural endplates and membrane anomalies. Electron microscopy uncovered an abnormal organization of the skeletal muscle basal membrane in atrophic fibres showing ripples of excessive membrane projecting into the interstitium in patients 8 and 11 (arrows, B, D), and depleted postsynaptic membrane fold of the neuromuscular junctions in patients 5 and 11 (A, C, arrows)

Taken together, the patients of our cohort presenting with severe ACTA1-related nemaline myopathy manifested major structural anomalies on the muscle biopsy specimens including a high frequency of cytoplasmic bodies and intranuclear rods, an unusual enlargement of the perinuclear space, and—in a single case—an aberrant architecture of the neuromuscular junction.

Comparison with other severe ACTA1 patients and immunohistopathological analysis of nuclei

Nuclear envelope deformities in combination with rods and cytoplasmic bodies constituted the principal anomalies on the muscle biopsy specimens from our patients. In order to conclude on the potential relevance of these structural aberrations as disease signature of severe ACTA1-related nemaline myopathy, we reviewed the clinical data from 3 previously reported cases with similar clinical presentation [18, 24, 36], and performed complementary investigations on the muscle biopsy specimens. Patient 11 harboured a homozygous nonsense mutation, and patients 12 and 13 carried heterozygous missense mutations (Fig. 1). Analogous to our ten unreported patients described here, the three additional cases presented with severe neonatal hypotonia and respiratory distress, and all deceased in infancy or childhood (Table 1). Thorough morphological analyses of the muscle sections revealed the same set of principal architectural aberrations including fibre size variability, atrophy associated with endomysial fibrosis, cytoplasmic and intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, and especially the enlargement of the perinuclear space (Figs. 35). Moreover, all neuromuscular junctions showed a reduced number of postsynaptic membrane folds and impoverished sub-neural structures in patient 11 (Fig. 6), and patient 12 displayed a large number of intranuclear-rods with unusual square shape (Fig. 3).

To shed light on the factors contributing to the pathologic widening of the perinuclear space in our patients, we investigated the localization of inner and outer nuclear membrane proteins forming the LINC (linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton) complex and connecting the nuclear lamina with the cytoskeleton. Immunofluorescence on muscle sections from patients 6 and 7 revealed abnormal lamin A/C, Nesprin-1, and Nesprin 2 signals compared with the control (Fig. 7 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Confocal microscopy across the nuclei and quantification of the signal intensities through line scans confirmed the narrow localization of the three proteins at the nuclear envelope in the control muscle samples, while the distribution pattern of lamin A/C, Nesprin-1 and Nesprin 2 was significantly wider in the ACTA1 patients (Fig. 7 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Indeed, lamin A/C signals were detectable within the nuclei, and Nesprin-1 and Nesprin-2 signals in the perinuclear region in patients 6 and 7, indicating an impairment of the NE integrity.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Immunofluorescence of nuclei. Representative images of muscle samples showing an abnormal nuclear shape in patients 6 and 7 compared with the age-matched control as illustrated by the lamin A/C, Nesprin-1, and Nesprin-2 signals. Laminin indicates the basal lamina. The images correspond to a single z-plane after super-resolution of confocal acquisition

Increased cardiac α-actin expression in the patients with longer lifespan

The cohort described here is composed of patients with severe nemaline myopathy. While most deceased within the first days or weeks of life, others lived into childhood or early adolescence. To investigate the potential molecular causes accounting for the intrafamilial variability, we determined the expression level of cardiac α-actin by western blot and immunofluorescence on muscle samples from our patients and age-matched healthy controls (Fig. 8). Cardiac α-actin differs from αskm-actin in only 4 amino acids, is the predominant α-actin form in skeletal muscle during embryonic development, and is replaced by αskm-actin around birth [35]. Patients with homozygous ACTA1 null mutations and a total absence of αskm-actin in skeletal muscle were found to persistently express cardiac α-actin after birth, which may have contributed to a less severe disease course in the reported cases [24]. In agreement with its physiological role in embryonic muscle development, cardiac α-actin was detectable on muscle samples from the younger control of 10 days, and was largely absent in the older control of 5 years (Fig. 8). Of note, the cardiac α-actin signals were significantly enhanced in muscle samples from the patients with longer lifespan (patients 7 and 8, lived until 2.5 and 5 years, respectively) compared with the patients perished in the neonatal period (patients 2 and 6, deceased at 1 and 3 months, respectively), suggesting a compensatory effect of cardiac α-actin in patients with ACTA1 missense mutations.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Cardiac α-actin immunofluorescence. (A) Cardiac α-actin signals (Magenta) on muscle sections from patients and age-matched controls. Laminin appears in Cyan. Scale bar:100 \(\upmu \)m (B) Normal distribution of each fibre intensity for cardiac actin demonstrates an increased cardiac α-actin level in patients 6 and 7 compared with the other patients and the controls. The number of analysed fibres is indicated for each patient. (C) Western blot on muscle extracts shows intense cardiac α-actin bands in patients 7 and 8, and a lower expression in patient 2 and in the controls. Ponceau red served as loading control


Here, we describe ten novel patients with severe nemaline myopathy associated with dominant ACTA1 mutations. Through in-depth histological, ultrastructural, and immunofluorescence investigations of the ten new and three published cases, we expand the spectrum of morphological muscle anomalies in severe ACTA1-related NM, and we also provide a potential disease signature encompassing intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, neuromuscular junction abnormalities, and the enlargement of the perinuclear space.

The genetics of severe ACTA1-related NM

To date, more than 200 ACTA1 mutations have been described, and they give rise to a spectrum of muscle disorders collectively classified as actinopathies and varying in disease severity and the presence of histopathological hallmarks on muscle biopsy specimens [17, 23] ( Missense mutations are most commonly found, but nonsense mutations, splice mutations, as well as insertions/deletions have also been described. The mutations are evenly distributed over the six coding exons of ACTA1, and the absence of an obvious hotspot is supported by the observation that the number of reported mutations correlates with the size of the individual exons [17]. Accordingly, nine of our novel patients carried ACTA1 missense mutations, and they were spread along the exons.

ACTA1 is a highly conserved gene barely tolerating genetic modifications. Any mutation is likely to have major pathogenic effects on αskm-actin function and muscle contraction, which presumably accounts for the elevated number of ACTA1 patients with severe clinical presentation. Consistently, all our patients manifested marked disease signs in the neonatal period with pronounced hypotonia, general muscle weakness, and respiratory distress. In agreement with the high degree of premature lethality of affected individuals, only ACTA1 mutations associated with a milder phenotype have been reported with autosomal dominant inheritance, while most arise de novo [17]. Indeed, nine of the ten mutations described here were undetectable in the parents. For one family, parental DNA was not available for segregation studies, but the index patient had no ancestral history of a muscle disorder, suggesting that the respective mutation occurred de novo. The c.493G > T (p.Val165Leu) missense mutation in patient 7 constitutes an exception. Exome sequencing detected the same nucleotide transversion with a low number of reads in the leucocyte DNA from the clinically unaffected mother, indicating mutation mosaicism. Another ACTA1 mosaic mutation associated with marked left–right asymmetry has recently been reported [18]. The c.1132 T > C mutation found in patient 10 affects the terminal stop codon of ACTA1 and is predicted to result in an elongated αskm-actin protein. It remains to be determined how and to what extent the 47 supernumerary amino acids interfere with αskm-actin structure, function, and the interaction with other proteins, but the fact that the very same mutation has been described in unrelated cases with severe disease presentation [39] is in favour of a strong pathogenic effect. However, our patient is now 13, while the published cases deceased in infancy, suggesting that additional genetic and non-genetic factors modulate disease development and survival.

Intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, and an enlarged perinuclear space as histopathological hallmarks of severe NM

The pathognomonic nemaline rods are the most common histopathological feature in NM patients [23, 30]. They are found in the cytoplasm throughout most muscle biopsy specimens from affected individuals, irrespectively of the implicated gene and the causative mutation [14]. The rods are essentially composed of thin filaments and Z-line material forming the lateral boundaries of the contractile units, and contain α-actinin, actin, tropomyosin, myotilin, γ-filamin, cofilin-2, telethonin, and nebulin [34]. Noteworthy, cytoplasmic rods were invisible by histology in five of our patients, and were ultimately detected through ultrastructural analyses by electron microscopy. This is possibly due to the restricted resolution of light microscopy and the little size of the rods, but may also reflect the absence of rods on specific muscle sections or is associated with the age of the patient at the time of muscle biopsy. Indeed, myofibres from neonates are often small, and it may be challenging to detect histological lesions within hypotrophic fibres. Patient 13 underwent muscle biopsies at 20 days, 2.5 years, and 6 years, and we observed a distinct evolution of the histopathological features with barely detectable mini-rods on the first muscle biopsy specimen, and prominent clusters of rods with aggregation of thin filaments on the last muscle biopsy specimen.

In contrast to cytoplasmic rods, intranuclear rods are seen less often, and it is currently not fully understood why and how the rods form within the myonuclei [5]. It is however well known that the intracellular localization of α-actin is not restricted to the cytoplasm or to a given tissue or organism. Indeed, nuclear α-actin has been observed across species and in many different cell types, indicating a role in transcriptional regulation [15]. It has also been demonstrated that specific chemical substances and an increased temperature can stimulate the formation of intranuclear rods in cultured cells [8, 41], suggesting that mechanical or another form of cellular stress may trigger the abnormal accumulation of αskm-actin bundles in ACTA1 patients. Of note, intranuclear rods are mainly found in severe ACTA1 cases, and especially in patients carrying missense mutations affecting amino acids 139 to 165, encompassing the hinge domain responsible for protein flexibility [17, 21]. In our cohort, intranuclear rods were noted in five patients. All carried missense mutations encoded by exons 3, 4, and 5, indicating that structural modification of the central part of αskm-actin may indeed promote the formation of intranuclear rods. However, mutations between amino acids 139 and 165 were only found in two patients, suggesting that the sensitive region may be larger than currently assumed.

In analogy to nemaline rods, cytoplasmic bodies are also believed to derive from Z-line material. Cytoplasmic bodies are not pathognomonic for a particular neuromuscular disease as they can be found in myofibrillar myopathies, reducing body myopathy, myotonic dystrophy, or periodic paralysis [6, 33]. They are however rarely seen in ACTA1-related NM, and the few described cases were invariably severe [6, 11, 16, 37]. Noteworthy, one of these patients carried the same c.282C > A (p.Asn94Lys) missense mutation as our patient 4, and the c.283G > A (p.Glu95Lys) mutation affecting the adjacent amino acid was detected in patient 5. Both patients displayed cytoplasmic bodies on the muscle biopsy specimens, indicating a common role of αskm-actin residues 94 and 95 in the formation of cytoplasmic bodies.

Another striking histopathological feature in the muscle fibres of our patients is the abnormal nuclear shape. The nuclear envelope (NE) separates the nucleus from the cytoplasm in all eukaryotic cells and is composed of an outer and inner nuclear membrane bordering a perinuclear space of 30 to 50 nm [10]. The spatial and structural integrity of the nucleus is maintained by the LINC complex, which also controls nuclear orientation, and possibly plays a regulatory role in replication, DNA repair, and cell division [3]. The mechanical link between the nuclear envelope and the cytoskeleton is mediated by F-actin, which is essentially composed of cytoskeletal actins encoded by ACTB and ACTG1 [27]. In our patients, inner and outer membranes were disassembled with an enlargement of the perinuclear space of up to 1200 nm and more, and consistently, we observed an abnormal localization of the LINC proteins Nesprin-1 and Nesprin-2. Together with the concurrent mislocalisation of lamin A/C, coating the inner nuclear membrane and implicated in transcriptional modulation [4], this suggests that the ACTA1 mutations directly or indirectly impact on the function of F-actin as a molecular linker, and that the aberrant nuclear envelope architecture may interfere with gene expression as in nuclear envelopathies [2] and contribute to the severe phenotype of our patients. Of note, a single study previously reported irregularities in nuclear distribution and shape associated with chromatin abnormalities in both ACTA1 and NEB patients [31], indicating that alterations of the nuclear envelope can also be seen in other nemaline myopathy forms and potentially involve a common pathomechanism. An enlargement of the perinuclear space has furthermore been reported in myogenic-type arthrogryposis multiplex congenita-3 (AMC3) patients harboring SYNE1 mutations [1].

A significant loss of postsynaptic membrane folds was seen in one novel (Patient 5) and in one previously reported patient (Patient 11). However, biopsies are muscle fragments and usually reflect only a narrow tissue section. In most of our patients, the samples did not contain areas with neuromuscular junctions, precluding a general conclusion on the correlation between ACTA1 mutations and aberrant NMJ architecture. However, this is clinically meaningful since motor, respiratory and bulbar fatigability is a relevant feature, often observed in nemaline myopathy. It is worth mentioning that NMJ anomalies are commonly seen in acquired and genetic myasthenic diseases (myasthenia gravis, congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS)) and can also occur in congenital myopathies [28]. Treatment with salbutamol or with the cholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine is efficient in myasthenia gravis and in different CMS, and has been shown to improve muscle function in patients with TPM3-related congenital fibre type disproportion (CFTD) [22] and in patients with centronuclear myopathy (CNM) caused by DNM2, MTM1, or RYR1 mutations [9, 12, 29], and may therefore suggest a therapeutic option for severe ACTA1-related NM.

Potential genotype/phenotype correlation

The interfamilial disparity of disease course, severity, and lifespan in our patients probably reflects a combination of numerous individual parameters including the position of the mutation and pathogenic impact, ethnic origin, the diverging activity of modifier genes, and the intensity of clinical care. A genotype/phenotype correlation may nevertheless be drawn from the histological and ultrastructural anomalies on the muscle biopsy specimens. Indeed, none of the patients featuring at the same time intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, and perinuclear space enlargement survived beyond the age of 18 months, and from the patients living more than 3 years, all except one manifested none or only one of these hallmarks. This indicates that distinct missense mutations affecting specific amino acids or protein domains have a more deleterious effect on skeletal muscle integrity, and directly correlate with disease severity. However, it remains to be determined why and how other ACTA1 missense mutations in the same region lead to a comparably milder phenotype. The relative expression of cardiac α-actin—although only assessed in four patients with sufficient biological material—appears to be another contributing factor. Indeed, patients 7 and 8 showed increased levels of cardiac α-actin in skeletal muscle, and both survived beyond the age of 2 years, while patient 2 and 6 expressed significantly less cardiac α-actin and lived for a few weeks only. In accordance, the overexpression of cardiac α-actin in Acta1 KO mice was shown to preserve muscle function [26]. Overall, the findings in humans and mice suggest that cardiac α-actin is able to partially attenuate disease progression and to increase lifespan in ACTA1-related NM, and highlight the therapeutic potential of the cardiac actin paralogue.

Concluding remarks

ACTA1 is a major NM gene, and pathogenic mutations are most often associated with a severe clinical presentation and poor prognosis. Histological investigations of muscle biopsy specimens from affected neonates can be inconclusive in the absence of classical nemaline rods and may systematically require complementary ultrastructural analyses. ACTA1 should be considered in patients with pronounced antenatal or neonatal muscle weakness, especially if electron microscopy on muscle sections detects intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, and an enlargement of the perinuclear space.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study and concerning clinical and histological characteristics and ACTA1 are included in this published article. Other DNA variants identified by panel or exome sequencing are not publicly accessible.


  1. Baumann M, Steichen-Gersdorf E, Krabichler B, Petersen BS, Weber U, Schmidt WM et al (2017) Homozygous SYNE1 mutation causes congenital onset of muscular weakness with distal arthrogryposis: a genotype-phenotype correlation. Eur J Hum Genet 25:262–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonne G, Quijano-Roy S (2013) Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, laminopathies, and other nuclear envelopathies. Handb Clin Neurol 113:1367–1376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouzid T, Kim E, Riehl BD, Esfahani AM, Rosenbohm J, Yang R et al (2019) The LINC complex, mechanotransduction, and mesenchymal stem cell function and fate. J Biol Eng 13:68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Carmosino M, Torretta S, Procino G, Gerbino A, Forleo C, Favale S et al (2014) Role of nuclear Lamin A/C in cardiomyocyte functions. Biol Cell 106:346–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Domazetovska A, Ilkovski B, Kumar V, Valova VA, Vandebrouck A, Hutchinson DO et al (2007) Intranuclear rod myopathy: molecular pathogenesis and mechanisms of weakness. Ann Neurol 62:597–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Donkervoort S, Chan SHS, Hayes LH, Bradley N, Nguyen D, Leach ME et al (2017) Cytoplasmic body pathology in severe ACTA1-related myopathy in the absence of typical nemaline rods. Neuromuscul Disord 27:531–536.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebashi S (1974) Regulatory mechanism of muscle contraction with special reference to the Ca-troponin-tropomyosin system. Essays Biochem 10:1–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukui Y (1978) Intranuclear actin bundles induced by dimethyl sulfoxide in interphase nucleus of Dictyostelium. J Cell Biol 76:146–157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbs EM, Clarke NF, Rose K, Oates EC, Webster R, Feldman EL et al (2013) Neuromuscular junction abnormalities in DNM2-related centronuclear myopathy. J Mol Med (Berl) 91:727–737.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hetzer MW (2010) The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ilkovski B, Nowak KJ, Domazetovska A, Maxwell AL, Clement S, Davies KE et al (2004) Evidence for a dominant-negative effect in ACTA1 nemaline myopathy caused by abnormal folding, aggregation and altered polymerization of mutant actin isoforms. Hum Mol Genet 13:1727–1743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Illingworth MA, Main M, Pitt M, Feng L, Sewry CA, Gunny R et al (2014) RYR1-related congenital myopathy with fatigable weakness, responding to pyridostigimine. Neuromuscul Disord 24:707–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jungbluth H, Treves S, Zorzato F, Sarkozy A, Ochala J, Sewry C et al (2018) Congenital myopathies: disorders of excitation-contraction coupling and muscle contraction. Nat Rev Neurol 14:151–167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaimaktchiev V, Goebel H, Laing N, Narus M, Weeks D, Nixon R (2006) Intranuclear nemaline rod myopathy. Muscle Nerve 34:369–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelpsch DJ, Tootle TL (2018) Nuclear Actin: From Discovery to Function. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 301:1999–2013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ladha S, Coons S, Johnsen S, Sambuughin N, Bien-Wilner R, Sivakumar K (2008) Histopathologic progression and a novel mutation in a child with nemaline myopathy. J Child Neurol 23:813–817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laing NG, Dye DE, Wallgren-Pettersson C, Richard G, Monnier N, Lillis S et al (2009) Mutations and polymorphisms of the skeletal muscle alpha-actin gene (ACTA1). Hum Mutat 30:1267–1277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lornage X, Quijano-Roy S, Amthor H, Carlier RY, Monnier N, Deleuze JF et al (2020) Asymmetric muscle weakness due to ACTA1 mosaic mutations. Neurology 95:e3406–e3411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Malfatti E, Lehtokari VL, Bohm J, De Winter JM, Schaffer U, Estournet B et al (2014) Muscle histopathology in nebulin-related nemaline myopathy: ultrastrastructural findings correlated to disease severity and genotype. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Malfatti E, Romero NB (2016) Nemaline myopathies: State of the art. Rev Neurol (Paris) 172:614–619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moreno CAM, Abath Neto O, Donkervoort S, Hu Y, Reed UC, Oliveira ASB et al (2017) Clinical and Histologic Findings in ACTA1-Related Nemaline Myopathy: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Pediatr Neurol 75:11–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Munot P, Lashley D, Jungbluth H, Feng L, Pitt M, Robb SA et al (2010) Congenital fibre type disproportion associated with mutations in the tropomyosin 3 (TPM3) gene mimicking congenital myasthenia. Neuromuscul Disord 20:796–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nowak KJ, Ravenscroft G, Laing NG (2013) Skeletal muscle alpha-actin diseases (actinopathies): pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 125:19–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nowak KJ, Sewry CA, Navarro C, Squier W, Reina C, Ricoy JR et al (2007) Nemaline myopathy caused by absence of alpha-skeletal muscle actin. Ann Neurol 61:175–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nowak KJ, Wattanasirichaigoon D, Goebel HH, Wilce M, Pelin K, Donner K et al (1999) Mutations in the skeletal muscle alpha-actin gene in patients with actin myopathy and nemaline myopathy. Nat Genet 23:208–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ochala J, Iwamoto H, Ravenscroft G, Laing NG, Nowak KJ (2013) Skeletal and cardiac alpha-actin isoforms differently modulate myosin cross-bridge formation and myofibre force production. Hum Mol Genet 22:4398–4404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pfisterer K, Jayo A, Parsons M (2017) Control of nuclear organization by F-actin binding proteins. Nucleus 8:126–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ravenscroft G, Laing NG, Bonnemann CG (2015) Pathophysiological concepts in the congenital myopathies: blurring the boundaries, sharpening the focus. Brain 138:246–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Robb SA, Sewry CA, Dowling JJ, Feng L, Cullup T, Lillis S et al (2011) Impaired neuromuscular transmission and response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in centronuclear myopathies. Neuromuscul Disord 21:379–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Romero NB, Sandaradura SA, Clarke NF (2013) Recent advances in nemaline myopathy. Curr Opin Neurol 26:519–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross JA, Levy Y, Ripolone M, Kolb JS, Turmaine M, Holt M et al (2019) Impairments in contractility and cytoskeletal organisation cause nuclear defects in nemaline myopathy. Acta Neuropathol 138:477–495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Saito Y, Nishikawa A, Iida A, Mori-Yoshimura M, Oya Y, Ishiyama A et al (2020) ADSSL1 myopathy is the most common nemaline myopathy in Japan with variable clinical features. Neurology 95:e1500–e1511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schessl J, Columbus A, Hu Y, Zou Y, Voit T, Goebel HH et al (2010) Familial reducing body myopathy with cytoplasmic bodies and rigid spine revisited: identification of a second LIM domain mutation in FHL1. Neuropediatrics 41:43–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sewry CA, Laitila JM, Wallgren-Pettersson C (2019) Nemaline myopathies: a current view. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 40:111–126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sheterline P, Clayton J, Sparrow J (1995) Actin. Protein Profile 2:1–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sparrow JC, Nowak KJ, Durling HJ, Beggs AH, Wallgren-Pettersson C, Romero N et al (2003) Muscle disease caused by mutations in the skeletal muscle alpha-actin gene (ACTA1). Neuromuscul Disord 13:519–531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suwa K, Mizuguchi M, Momoi MY, Nakamura M, Arima K, Komaki H et al (2002) Co-existence of nemaline and cytoplasmic bodies in muscle of an infant with nemaline myopathy. Neuropathology 22:294–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Udd B, Stenzel W, Oldfors A, Olive M, Romero N, Lammens M et al (2019) 1st ENMC European meeting: the EURO-NMD pathology working group Recommended Standards for Muscle Pathology Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 7 December 2018. Neuromuscul Disord 29:483–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wallefeld W, Krause S, Nowak KJ, Dye D, Horvath R, Molnar Z et al (2006) Severe nemaline myopathy caused by mutations of the stop codon of the skeletal muscle alpha actin gene (ACTA1). Neuromuscul Disord 16:541–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weeks DA, Nixon RR, Kaimaktchiev V, Mierau GW (2003) Intranuclear rod myopathy, a rare and morphologically striking variant of nemaline rod myopathy. Ultrastruct Pathol 27:151–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Welch WJ, Suhan JP (1985) Morphological study of the mammalian stress response: characterization of changes in cytoplasmic organelles, cytoskeleton, and nucleoli, and appearance of intranuclear actin filaments in rat fibroblasts after heat-shock treatment. J Cell Biol 101:1198–1211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Anne Boland and Jean-François Deleuze for their technical support in exome sequencing, Nicolas Dondaine in MYOdiagHTS sequencing, and Favienne Levy-Borsato for retrieving clinical data from ancient records. This work was supported by the Association Institute of Myology (AIM), Inserm, CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Labex INRT (ANR-10-LABX-0030, ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02), Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM-22734), France Génomique (ANR-10-INBS-09) and Fondation Maladies Rares within the frame of the “Myocapture” sequencing project, and AFM-16992 and CREGEMES for the MYOdiagHTS sequencing. NGL was supported by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship APP1117510.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



N.B.R. designed and coordinated the project and obtained funding; C.L., G.B., A.L.T., B.C., J.R., V.B., M.T.B., A.C., A.M., E.L., M.B., O.A.N., S.C., N.L., J.L., J.B., N.B.R. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; S.M., S.Q.R., H.A., L.S., Y.d.F., M.E., M.S., B.L., V.L., F.L., A.B.B., T.E. provided clinical data and biological samples, J.B. and N.B.R. drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norma B. Romero.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Molecular diagnosis was carried out with written informed consent from the patients or legal guardians. DNA storage and usage were IRB-approved (DC-2012–1693).

Consent for publication

All patients and legal guardians’ consent to the publication of the clinical, histological, and genetic data.

Competing interests

None of the authors reports a conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Myofibre nuclear envelope line scan profiles. Quantification of signal intensities at the middle of the nuclei shows an abnormal lamin A/C, Nesprin-1, and Nesprin-2 localization in patients 6 and 7 compared with the age-matched control. Red brackets show the extension of nuclear envelope proteins into the cytoplasm. Each graph corresponds to one nucleus. Bottom right: explanatory scheme of the analysis with the nucleoplasm depicted in grey.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labasse, C., Brochier, G., Taratuto, AL. et al. Severe ACTA1-related nemaline myopathy: intranuclear rods, cytoplasmic bodies, and enlarged perinuclear space as characteristic pathological features on muscle biopsies. acta neuropathol commun 10, 101 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • ACTA1
  • Congenital myopathy
  • Nemaline rods
  • Intranuclear rods
  • Cytoplasmic bodies
  • Nuclear envelope
  • Neuromuscular junction