Skip to main content
Download PDF

White matter damage due to vascular, tau, and TDP-43 pathologies and its relevance to cognition

Acta Neuropathologica Communications volume 10, Article number: 16 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Multi-compartment modelling of white matter microstructure using Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) can provide information on white matter health through neurite density index and free water measures. We hypothesized that cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and TDP-43 proteinopathy would be associated with distinct NODDI readouts of white matter damage which would be informative for identifying the substrate for cognitive impairment. We identified two independent cohorts with multi-shell diffusion MRI, amyloid and tau PET, and cognitive assessments: specifically, a population-based cohort of 347 elderly randomly sampled from the Olmsted county, Minnesota, population and a clinical research-based cohort of 61 amyloid positive Alzheimer’s dementia participants. We observed an increase in free water and decrease in neurite density using NODDI measures in the genu of the corpus callosum associated with vascular risk factors, which we refer to as the vascular white matter component. Tau PET signal reflective of 3R/4R tau deposition was associated with worsening neurite density index in the temporal white matter where we measured parahippocampal cingulum and inferior temporal white matter bundles. Worsening temporal white matter neurite density was associated with (antemortem confirmed) FDG TDP-43 signature. Post-mortem neuropathologic data on a small subset of this sample lend support to our findings. In the community-dwelling cohort where vascular disease was more prevalent, the NODDI vascular white matter component explained variability in global cognition (partial R2 of free water and neurite density = 8.3%) and MMSE performance (8.2%) which was comparable to amyloid PET (7.4% for global cognition and 6.6% for memory). In the AD dementia cohort, tau deposition was the greatest contributor to cognitive performance (9.6%), but there was also a non-trivial contribution of the temporal white matter component (8.5%) to cognitive performance. The differences observed between the two cohorts were reflective of their distinct clinical composition. White matter microstructural damage assessed using advanced diffusion models may add significant value for distinguishing the underlying substrate (whether cerebrovascular disease versus neurodegenerative disease caused by tau deposition or TDP-43 pathology) for cognitive impairment in older adults.

Graphical abstract

Introduction

The prevalence of neurodegenerative pathologies and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) increases with age [1]. Although Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and CVD are the major contributors of cognitive decline in the elderly and are widely studied, evidence suggests the co-occurrence of medial temporal lobe (MTL) changes are caused by the TAR DNA binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) [2,3,4], also recently referred to as limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) [5]. Typically, gray matter changes due to these age-related pathologies are the focus of most aging and dementia imaging studies. However, white matter (WM) damage associated with these pathological changes and their relevance to cognitive performance are not widely considered except for visible WM damage such as white matter hyperintensities.

Systemic vascular health and CVD have widespread impact on WM health [6, 7]. Greater damage has been observed in the frontal lobes related to anterior–posterior gradient in aging [8] and in CVD [9]. Our studies have also shown that frontal fibers are more vulnerable to age-related and CVD related changes [6, 10] and that the measurement of diffusion properties in the genu of the corpus callosum (we herein refer to this tract as “Genu”) captures WM damage primarily characterized by aging and CVD. On the other hand, pathological hallmark features of AD accumulation of two proteins, extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau [11] have a differential impact on WM health. Aβ accumulation has minimal effects on WM health [12, 13]. In contrast, temporal WM tracts may not only aid in the spreading of tau [14] but are progressively damaged because of increasing local tau toxicity [15]. Two tracts that are of particular interest in the context of tau are the parahippocampal cingulum bundle (commonly referred to as CGH – cingulum adjoining the hippocampus) [14] and inferior temporal WM (ITWM) [16]. The CGH WM tract is the primary connection with the hippocampus which is one of the earliest regions of tau deposition. The inferior temporal lobe tau which is affected in Braak stages III-IV; has high tau burden along the AD continuum [17].

The increasing accumulation of TDP-43 in the temporal lobes may also be hypothesized to cause damage to both CGH and ITWM tracts. While the gold standard for TDP-43 is an autopsy, recent evidence suggested [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) derived inferior/medial temporal (IMT) hypometabolism as a diagnostic marker of TDP-43 proteinopathy associated hippocampal sclerosis aging [18]. A more recent study reported higher sensitivity and specificity of IMT to frontal supra orbital ratio (IMT/FSO) for predicting earlier stages of AD-related TDP-43(+) status [19]. One could hypothesize that the TDP-43 proteinopathy damages white matter in the temporal lobes in addition to neuronal dysfunction observed on FDG-PET.

Traditionally, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been used extensively to study WM changes due to AD and CVD and their association with cognition [20, 21]. However, the DTI findings are generally limited by their inability to accurately capture the nature of underlying tissue properties and their overestimation of voxels within crossing fibers [22, 23]. The recently developed Neurite and Orientation Dispersion Density Imaging (NODDI) model is a biophysically inspired method that provides a much more appropriate model for the estimation of biological measures using diffusion images [24] and enhances DTI findings by separating out free water contribution from the microstructural tissue compartment. NODDI model can estimate the Neurite Density Index (NDI, nominally the proxy for axonal density), Orientation Dispersion Index (ODI, an indicator of the lack of axonal alignment) and Isotropic Volume Fraction (ISOVF, the fraction of water diffusing freely without encountering membranes). To date, there is evidence that NODDI can be used to identify WM changes in aging [25, 26], neurodegenerative diseases [27,28,29], and associated cognitive deficits [29, 30]. These NODDI measures also can provide information about neurite morphology and have shown sensitivity to tau [16]. Evidence from rodent’s tau model showed reduced NDI in WM and hippocampus [28]. Additionally, reduced cortical NDI in temporal and frontal lobes have been shown [31, 32], and reduced NDI in the cortex was associated with worse cognitive performance in AD [29, 31, 32]. We reported recently that NODDI derived indices (NDI and ISOVF) are sensitive to age and disease related WM damage and cognition [33].

Building on our previous work, in this paper we leveraged NODDI (NDI and ISOVF) measurements for evaluating aging and pathology related WM changes in the brain. Our central hypothesis was that NODDI measures from three WM tracts (Genu, ITWM, and CGH) would aid in differentially capturing WM damage due to CVD, tau, and TDP-43 pathologies and explaining variance in cognition in both the population-based cohort of Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and among clinically diagnosed AD dementia cases enrolled in the Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC). To test our hypothesis, we conducted two sets of analyses. First, we evaluated the association of vascular health, AD and TDP-43 biomarkers, and NODDI measurements in these three tracts. Second, we measured and compared the contribution of these NODDI measures for cognitive decline and compared this to amyloid and tau PET in the MCSA and ADRC cohorts.

Materials and methods

Selection of participants

Study participants were selected from the MCSA and ADRC. The selection criteria were the availability of multi-shell diffusion MRI (NODDI), amyloid and tau PET scans, vascular health indicators, and complete clinical assessments. FDG-PET was available in a subset of participants.

MCSA participants

The MCSA is an epidemiological cohort designed to investigate the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia among the residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota [34]. The Olmsted county population was enumerated using Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records linkage system infrastructure [35, 36] and participants were randomly invited to participate in the MCSA using an age- and sex-stratified sampling frame. The clinical diagnosis of the participants was ascertained at the time of MRI using previously published criteria [37]. Based on the selection criteria, we included 347 participants from the MCSA (> 60 years) with the following clinical characteristics: 281 cognitively unimpaired, 61 MCI, and 5 dementia participants. Because all MCSA participants were recruited from the REP, we were able to include nurse abstracted vascular health indicators from the medical records—hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cardiac arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and stroke to compute the composite score (CMC) as published previously [38].

ADRC participants

We included 61 amyloid positive clinically diagnosed AD dementia participants confirmed through consensus criteria from the Mayo Clinic-Rochester ADRC who were aged ≥ 65 years to capture typical AD.

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Medical Center institutional review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their qualified caregivers.

Imaging

MRI acquisition and processing

All MRIs were acquired on 3 T Siemens Prisma scanners using 64-channel receiver head coils. The acquisition protocols and analysis have been published previously for the MCSA [33]. All structural scans were acquired using magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence with following parameters: TR = 2300 ms, TE = 3.14 ms, TI = 945 ms, flip angle = 9°, and isotropic resolution = 0.8 mm. The diffusion scans were obtained with multi-band sequence with following parameters: TR = 3400 ms, TE = 71 ms, field of view = 232 mm, and voxel size = 2.0 mm isotropic. The diffusion data consisted of 127 volumes with 13 non-diffusion-weighted images (b = 0 s/mm2), and 114 diffusion-encoding gradient directions (6 b = 500, 48 b = 1000, and 60 b = 2000s/mm2). The data were evenly spread over the entire spherical shells using an electrostatic repulsion model [39]. Then, the diffusion images were processed as previously described (Raghavan et al. 2021). Briefly, the diffusion-weighted images were denoised [40], corrected for head motion, eddy current distortion [41], and Gibbs ringing [42], then debiased [43]. The diffusion tensors were then fit using a nonlinear least squares fitting algorithm implemented in dipy [44]. NDI, and ISOVF maps were estimated using the Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization (AMICO) implementation [45] of NODDI in Python. Our recent work showed a more consistent relationship of aging pathologies and cognition with NDI and ISOVF but not ODI [33] therefore we limited the analyses to NDI and ISOVF in this work. Median values of NODDI measures in the Genu, CGH, and ITWM were obtained by non-linearly registering the JHU “Eve” WM atlas [46] to each participant. The registration was calculated by aligning the “Eve” FA image to the participant FA using ANTS [47].

Amyloid, tau, and FDG PET markers

The acquisition, processing, and calculations of amyloid, tau, and FDG PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was described previously [18, 48]. Global amyloid SUVR for each participant was computed by calculating the median uptake over voxels in the prefrontal, orbitofrontal, parietal, temporal, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate/precuneus regions normalized by the median amyloid PET uptake in the cerebellar crus grey matter. Global tau SUVR for each participant was computed by calculating median tau PET uptake in the entorhinal, amygdala, parahippocampal, fusiform, inferior temporal, and middle temporal regions normalized by the median tau PET uptake in the cerebellar crus grey matter. We used continuous amyloid PET and tau PET as our primary AD biomarkers. We also utilized amyloid positivity (amyloid cutoff for positivity was SUVR ≥ 1.48) and tau positivity (tau cutoff for positivity was SUVR ≥ 1.25) established previously [48] for additional analyses.

For FDG-PET, we selected 3 regions of interest (ROI) from the ADIR122 atlas (available as part of the Mayo Clinic Adult Lifespan Template, nitrc.org/projects/mcalt/) which have been associated with TDP-43 positivity: inferior temporal (IT), medial temporal (MT) (amygdala and hippocampus), and frontal supraorbital (FSO). Regional FDG SUVR for each participant was computed by calculating the median uptake from gray matter voxels in each ROI normalized by the median FDG uptake in the pons. Then, we assessed the ratio of IT to MT (IMT) and then IMT to FSO (IMT/FSO) and used as our FDG TDP-43 signature as this was proposed previously as a biomarker of TDP-43(+) status [19].

Neuropathologic analysis

Autopsy analysis was conducted in 9 deceased participants using a standardized dissection and sampling procedure recommended by Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) [49]. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded left hemisphere brain sections were evaluated and were used for immunohistochemical analysis of TDP-43 (pS409/410, 1:10,000, Cosmo Bio). Cases were considered TDP-43(+) if TDP-43 immunoreactive neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, perivascular bi-lobed inclusions, or neuronal intranuclear inclusions were observed in the amygdala [50, 51].

Cognitive performance

The MCSA neuropsychological battery consists of nine tests covering 4 cognitive domains, as previously published [34, 37]. The primary outcome for the analysis was a global cognitive z score that was estimated from the z-transformation of the average of the 4 cognitive domain z scores (memory, language, attention/executive, and visuo-spatial function) [52]. Across MCSA and ADRC studies, the common test was Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [53], estimated from Short test of Mental Status [54], which we evaluated as an outcome for comparison.

Statistical analyses

The participant characteristics were summarized using mean (standard deviation, SD) for the continuous variables and count (%) for the categorical variables. Amyloid and tau distribution were skewed and hence analyzed with a log transformation.

Pearson partial correlations were used to identify the associations between vascular risk (CMC), AD biomarkers, FDG-TDP-43 signature with our tracts of interests after adjusting for age and sex.

Then, we fit separate multiple linear regression models with cognitive scores as an outcome variable (global cognition and MMSE in MCSA and MMSE in ADRC), with amyloid, tau, and regional diffusion measures as predictors, and adjusting for age, sex, education, and number of clinical visits (number of times a participant had previously completed cognitive testing in the study to account for practice effects). In addition, we fit multiple linear regression models using a combination of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with alpha = 1 and step-wise approaches to assess the added benefit of WM vascular component (Genu NDI and Genu ISOVF) and temporal WM diffusion metrics (CGH NDI and ITWM NDI) to AD biomarkers (amyloid and tau) for predicting cognitive performance. These models were also adjusted for age, sex, education, and number of clinical visits. We did not perform multiple comparison testing (which would rely on universal null hypothesis) because we did not want to inflate the probability of Type II error [55, 56].

Results

The characteristics of MCSA and ADRC data sets are shown in Table 1. There were more males and APOE ε4 carriers in the ADRC than the MCSA. All participants in the ADRC were amyloid positive with 92% of them were tau positive. Whereas, in the MCSA, 47% were amyloid positive with 36% of them were tau positive.

Table 1 Characteristics table of subjects with the mean (SD) listed for the continuous variables and count (%) for the categorical variables
Full size table

NODDI measurements were associated with vascular risk factors, amyloid, tau, and TDP-43

As explained in the introduction, the present study confirmed the relevance of Genu WM changes to cerebrovascular health. Both Genu ISOVF (r = 0.15, P = 0.005) and Genu NDI (r = − 0.15, P = 0.005) were correlated with vascular risk measure i.e. CMC. A plot of the Genu NODDI measures with CMC in MCSA are shown in the first panel of Fig. 1. Therefore, we used both Genu ISOVF and Genu NDI as the components of CVD (WM vascular component). Amyloidosis was associated with an increase in Genu ISOVF (r = 0.13, P = 0.02) in the MCSA, but none of the partial correlations were significant in the ADRC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Conceptual diagram illustrating the white matter tracts studied and their biological associations. Top panel: Genu as the white matter tract studied for systemic vascular health; parahippocampal cingulum (CGH) and inferior temporal white matter (ITWM) studied for temporal lobe pathologies. A Association of Genu white matter NODDI measures with systemic vascular health in MCSA. B Association of CGH and ITWM NDI measures with tau deposition in ADRC. Tau values were log transformed. C Association of CGH and ITWM NDI measures with FDG TDP-43 signature in MCSA. Inferior temporal to medial temporal (IMT) and frontal supra orbital ratio (IMT/FSO) was used as FDG TDP-43 signature

Full size image

As stated in the introduction, both ITWM and CGH are likely damaged by tau and TDP-43 such that loss of synapses and axons would be reflected in worsening neurite density on NODDI. Therefore, we considered these two tracts as our temporal WM component. In ADRC, where there is a greater range of tau, we found evidence that neurite density (correlate of loss of synapses and neurons) in the ITWM was marginally associated with tau (r = − 0.24, P = 0.07 for ITWM). This is illustrated in the middle panel of Fig. 1. Using the FDG-PET TDP-43 signature, we found that reduced NDI in the CGH of MCSA (n = 259) was associated with increased FDG-PET TDP-43 signature (r = − 0.23, P < 0.001 for CGH NDI). This is shown in the third panel of Fig. 1. We also performed a sensitivity analysis in a subset of amyloid negative 80 + MCSA participants (n = 22 of which 17 were cognitively unimpaired and 5 were impaired), who are also likely to have low WM damage in association with tau and are at a high risk of TDP-43. We found a significant association of NDI in CGH with TDP-43 signature (r = − 0.59, P = 0.007). We did not find any associations of ISOVF in temporal tracts with disease biomarkers, so we did not consider ISOVF in the temporal WM component for further analyses.

Relevance of NODDI in the context of AD biomarkers

The models for both MCSA and ADRC samples showing an association between the individual neuroimaging measures and cognitive performance after adjusting for age, sex, education, and number of clinical visits (single biomarker models) are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1 and also in Fig. 2. To identify the contribution of WM NODDI measures to overall cognitive performance, we considered global cognition as a primary outcome in the MCSA. In MCSA, amyloid, tau, and all diffusion metrics showed a significant contribution to global cognition and MMSE when each factor was considered independently. Among the diffusion metrics, higher Genu ISOVF was most strongly associated with lower cognitive performance. We also observed a greater predictive power for Genu ISOVF (partial R2 = 6.9% for global cognition and 3.4% for MMSE) than Genu NDI (partial R2 = 3% for global cognition and 2.7% for MMSE) in Fig. 2. Tau was a relatively lesser predictor of cognitive performance in this community dwelling cohort owing to its broad age ranges and relatively lower frequency of tau positivity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relative univariate contribution of imaging biomarkers to cognitive performance. ISOVF, isotropic volume fraction; NDI, neurite density index; CGH, parahippocampal cingulum; ITWM, inferior temporal white matter; MMSE, mini mental state examination

Full size image

In the ADRC cohort of amyloid positive individuals, higher ITWM NDI had a better prediction for lower cognitive performance than tau (14.8% and 11% respectively) univariately.

NODDI and AD biomarkers for detection of possible etiology and prediction of cognitive performance

The final models that included all imaging biomarkers (except FDG-PET TDP-43 signature), age, sex, education, and number of clinical visits for predicting cognitive performance are shown in Table 2. Older age and male sex were associated with worse global cognitive performance in the MCSA. In both MCSA the global cognition and MMSE models, higher education was associated with better cognition. There was contribution of amyloid, Genu ISOVF, and Genu NDI to worse global cognition and MMSE. However, amyloid contribution to global cognition (7.4%) was comparable to MMSE (6.6%). After accounting for amyloidosis, there was no significant contribution of the WM temporal component with both global cognition and MMSE. In the ADRC sample, only two predictors emerged as important. Lower tau (partial R2 = 0.10) and higher NDI in ITWM predicted better MMSE performance (partial R2 = 0.09).

Table 2 Final parsimonious models evaluating the utility of neuroimaging measures in predicting cognitive performance
Full size table

Figure 3 shows the predicted cognition by age group in MCSA and ADRC samples. Here, normal and abnormal were defined in quartiles with 25th and 75th percentiles of the measures within each age group respectively. For MCSA global cognition, the rapid lowering of predicted cognition as a function of age was expected given that age explains 12% of variance in cognition (Table 2) and the frequency of pathologies increases with age. For MCSA MMSE performance (middle panel), the average predicted MMSE was above 29 until age 70 after which there was a visible decline in the baseline MMSE which is typically observed in the population due to increasing burden of age-related pathologies. For the ADRC MMSE results in Fig. 3, there was worse MMSE in younger AD patients because more aggressive disease trajectories have been observed in younger AD patients [57].

Fig. 3
figure 3

The predicted cognition by age group for a given value of NODDI measure and AD biomarker. The reference (green) lines are predictions for healthy white matter tracts and low AD biomarkers (low amyloid, low tau, high temporal NDI, high Genu NDI, low Genu ISOVF). The blue lines are predictions for poor Genu health (high Genu ISOVF and low Genu NDI) in MCSA. The black lines are predictions for abnormal AD biomarker (high amyloid in MCSA and high tau in ADRC). The abnormal temporal WM (red) lines in ADRC show predictions for low ITWM. In the plot, reference (low) and abnormal (high) are defined by 25th and 75th percentiles

Full size image

Neuropathology findings as indicators of TDP-43 status:

Interestingly, a small subset (n = 9) had autopsy findings. Though the samples are small, NODDI data compared against gold-standard pathology provides insights into variability of NODDI as a function of pathological burden specifically TDP-43. Three out of four MCSA cases (75%) and two out of 5 (40%) ADRC cases were TDP-43(+). The imaging and neuropathological characteristics of the autopsy cohort are shown in Table 3 and discussed further below. The first TDP-43 positive case in MCSA (case 1) was hypertensive with a greater number of cardiovascular and metabolic conditions, higher Genu ISOVF, elevated IMT/FSO hypometabolism ratio, lower ITWM and CGH NDI reflecting the contribution of CVD and temporal WM contribution to impairment. Similarly, case 2 was tau-PET negative with hypertension, higher Genu ISOVF, high IMT/FSO hypometabolism ratio, very low ITWM and CGH NDI highlighting the usefulness of NODDI in helping assess vascular health. ADRC participants generally had low vascular disease burden but a greater extent of MTL damage (low Genu ISOVF, low ITWM, and low CGH NDI) which was reflected in the ADRC final model. Except one control, all other TDP-43(+) cases had abnormal hippocampal volume.

Table 3 Characteristics of autopsy cases in our dataset with TDP-43 information available
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we assessed WM damage using NODDI measures in the frontal and temporal lobes and evaluated their contribution to cognitive decline in two independent data sets. The main conclusions were: (i) Both Genu ISOVF and Genu NDI were sensitive to capturing age and systemic vascular health related WM damage and contributed to the prediction of cognitive performance. The utility of Genu ISOVF was greater in the population-based cohort in comparison to the clinically diagnosed AD dementia cohort with elevated Aβ where there was lower vascular contribution to cognitive impairment. (ii) Neurite density measures in the temporal lobe tracts captured WM changes due to temporal lobe focused pathologies which was associated with tau PET and FDG-PET based TDP-43 signature. (iv) NODDI imaging acquired in the single setting of MRI would add value in assessing the possible etiology (CVD vs. tau related changes vs. possibly TDP-43 in the absence of amyloid and tau) and their corresponding contribution to cognitive performance.

WM damage and CVD pathologies and its relevance for predicting cognition

We and others have shown that vascular risk factors are associated with poor WM health [6, 21, 58], particularly reduced Genu FA with hypertension [58,59,60], diabetes [61, 62], and dyslipidemia [63]. However, the FA metric cannot accurately disentangle the contribution from tissue degeneration (axonal damage and myelin breakdown) and free water increase, and NODDI helped us separate these factors using NDI and ISOVF. Our recent study showed that white matter hyperintensities were the strongest predictors of diffusion changes (ISOVF) in addition to age [33]. In this study, we further report that Genu ISOVF and Genu NDI was associated with systemic vascular health in the population-based cohort. Additionally, previous studies observed increased free water changes in the normal-appearing WM using free water elimination method [64,65,66], suggesting that mechanisms of microvascular degeneration and neuroinflammation due to blood–brain barrier dysfunction contribute to mild vascular damage in small vessel disease and AD.

In the present study, we found a significant contribution of Genu ISOVF and Genu NDI on global cognitive performance and MMSE in the general population along with amyloid (Figs. 2, 3). Previous studies including ours [6, 10] have shown the association of reduced WM integrity in the Genu and worse cognitive performance [67,68,69]. Our previous study showed that NODDI derived free water or ISOVF in the corpus callosum was a significant predictor of cognitive performance highlighting its usefulness in capturing vascular contribution to cognitive impairment [33]. Notably, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3, Genu was not a significant predictor of MMSE in the AD cohort where the vascular pathology was comparatively less. Our findings support the utility of NODDI for capturing vascular contributions to cognition in populations where there is a greater prevalence of vascular disease contributing to cognitive impairment.

The relevance of NODDI measures for the diagnosis of vascular etiology can also be deduced from Table 3. Case 1 was an 85-year-old male with a clinical presentation of multi-domain MCI (MMSE = 27) with amyloid and tau PET negative. Both the higher number of cardiovascular and metabolic conditions (4 out of 7 possible) and very high (or worse) Genu ISOVF of 0.22 (mean and standard deviation in MCSA were 0.11 and 0.03) and low Genu NDI of 0.49 (mean and standard deviation in MCSA were 0.54 and 0.04) indicates that the vascular contribution to impairment was significant and not sufficiently considered for diagnosis. Similarly, case 2, an 79-year-old male with amnestic MCI, was amyloid positive and tau PET negative. The high Genu ISOVF and low Genu NDI clearly supports the vascular contribution to cognitive impairment. Contrasting cases 5–8 from the ADRC, the lower values of Genu ISOVF and higher Genu NDI explain that the lower extent of vascular disease in the AD cases. While the self-report of CMC was available, the continuous scale of Genu ISOVF reflects the true extent of biological damage.

Temporal white matter damage and tau and its relevance for predicting cognition

Tau pathology is the underlying cause of axonal and neuronal neurodegeneration in some cognitively normal and in AD dementia individuals [12, 14, 70]. Tau related WM changes often depicts distinct spatial profiles with initial accumulation in temporal lobe regions susceptible to AD pathology and then propagates through axonal projections. Evidence from tau-mouse models showed reduced NDI in WM and hippocampus [28]. In the present study, we showed that in a typical AD population with a greater extent of tau related changes, the temporal NDI (ITWM) measures were useful in detecting tau related diffusion changes. Here, we extend previous observations that reported an association between DTI and NFT pathology in the MTL limbic connections and medial parietal WM [12]. Evidence also suggests the association between tau PET and anterior temporal cortex and associated pathways [70], suggesting greater WM vulnerability in tracts associated with early tau accumulation [29, 71].

CGH is an important tract connecting the hippocampus to the posterior cingulate cortex, and it has been reported that CGH diffusivity significantly predicts downstream tau accumulation and associated memory decline in amyloid positive individuals [14]. More recently, Wen et al. [16] studied the spatial pattern of tau propagation using a DTI and NODDI derived data-driven method and suggested reduced axonal packing density and higher diffusion freedom in white matter in regions of tau deposition (which included inferior temporal to inferior parietal regions in amyloid positive participants). Additionally, studies have shown reduced cortical NDI in temporal and frontal lobes [31, 32] which is suggested to be associated with worse cognitive performance in AD [29, 31, 32]. In our data, white matter temporal component NDI predicted MMSE and global cognitive performance, suggesting that these regional metrics could be sensitive to tau mediated WM damage and hence would be a relevant biomarker for studying disease progression. When we focused on multivariable analyses using a combination of Lasso and stepwise regression, tau and ITWM NDI emerged as the significant predictors of cognitive performance for typical AD. This was supported by recent in vivo PET studies that demonstrated a more extensive reduction in synaptic density in the medial temporal and neocortical early AD brains [72, 73]. Furthermore, reduced cortical NDI and ODI in the mesial and lateral temporal lobes of AD brains were associated with increased 18F-THK5351 signal and worse cognitive performance, implicating the role of tau and neuroinflammatory pathology in the formation of abnormal neuritis [74]. Notably, our observed non-trivial contribution of the NDI in ITWM (early neocortical pathway associated to tau deposition in AD) to cognitive performance along with tau suggests the integral role of NODDI as an early marker of cognitive changes in the preclinical stages (clearly shown in the third panel of Fig. 3)

Amyloid was useful in predicting cognition in the community cohort because there is a greater range of amyloidosis across the population and lower frequency of high levels of tau burden. However, the multivariable analysis in the MCSA not retained the effect of NDI in temporal tracts suggesting that temporal WM health is more strongly associated with tau than vascular etiology (Fig. 2). On the other hand, tau PET information and tau-mediated white matter injury (reflected with worsening ITWM NDI) predicted memory performance in the ADRC. Figure 3 illustrates how specific NODDI measures can be used to predict cognition along with AD biomarkers in two independent populations and the extent of damage on NODDI can also reflect the extent of damage attributed to CVD vs. tau-specific damage.

Temporal white matter damage and TDP-43 and its relevance for predicting cognition

The co-existence of multiple pathologies along with AD neuropathological changes especially in individuals after 80 years of age adds to the prediction of worsening cognitive performance. Clinical and neuropathological evidence identified accumulation of TDP-43 inclusions in association with AD [2, 3] and hippocampal sclerosis [75], suggesting it is a major contributor to cognitive dysfunction. Also, TDP-43 exacerbates the memory impairment and cognitive decline in individuals with AD pathologies [3, 76]. While there is no definite biomarker for TDP-43 other than autopsy, predominant involvement of MTL structures [4, 5] and recent evidence supports the usefulness of a FDG-PET hypometabolic signature as being correlated with the presence of TDP-43 [18, 19]. This proposed FDG TDP-43 marker, the derived IMT or IMT/FSO ratio, reliably identified the tau-negative amnestic status in older individuals [18, 19]. The association we observed between CGH NDI and FDG IMT/FSO ratio in all MCSA and amyloid negative 80 plus individuals suggests that neurite density also changes with other prominent non-AD temporal lobe pathology such as TDP-43.

Pathology information sheds additional light on the relevance of NODDI temporal WM values for identifying the likely etiology in Table 3. Cases 1–3 were classified as TDP-43(+) at autopsy. In all three cases, the tau PET scans were also negative, but the temporal WM measure was abnormal because the values were lower than 0.49 (average for CGH and ITWM in MCSA). The worse NDI in these tracts that are spread across the temporal lobes illustrates the likelihood that a different etiology such as TDP-43 or PART [77] (primary age-related tauopathy refers tau in the absence of amyloidosis) may have contributed to the cognitive impairment. As reported previously [18, 78], the current TDP-43(+) participants had abnormal hippocampal volumes, suggesting that both TDP-43 and hippocampal sclerosis accounted the tau-negative amnestic syndrome. While the NODDI measures also have the same non-specificity of a medial temporal atrophy [79] measure, future studies in larger datasets with autopsy confirmed data will be able to shed light on the usefulness of NODDI for identifying the underlying etiology of cognitive impairment. It cannot be ruled out that the WM changes observed may be due to PART, which will need confirmation in a larger autopsy cohort.

Usefulness of NODDI in Aging and Dementia Studies

Overall, our findings support the utility of non-invasive, increasingly available, and affordable biophysical diffusion models as proxy measures for WM damage due to vascular, AD, and TDP-43. As multi-band acceleration has become commonplace, these measures can inform the likely substrate of cognitive impairment and can facilitate early detection and tracking of disease progression in aging and dementia studies. Future studies will build on this work to optimize the usage of NODDI for differential diagnosis and expand on the idea of tracking longitudinal WM damage with disease progression.

An important finding from this study is that the usefulness of regional NODDI measures will vary based on the cohort under investigation. For example, in the community-dwelling cohort where multiple pathologies increase with age and contribute to cognitive decline, frontal WM would contribute to the prediction of cognitive performance. On the other hand, in clinically diagnosed AD dementia patients recruited from a dementia clinic where the primary substrate of dementia is likely tau deposition, temporal WM damage related to tau would be a significant predictor of cognitive performance.

Strength and limitations

A key strength of this study was the rich multimodal imaging information from two independent samples with varying degrees of CVD and AD pathologies along with pathology information in a subset. This allowed us to assess the vascular and AD contributions to diffusion alterations and associated cognitive performance. The use of an advanced diffusion model with conventional DTI enabled us to disentangle the source of WM alterations more accurately with precise control of CSF partial volume effects. Another strength is the focus on multiple cognitive measures in the MCSA sample to evaluate CVD-related cognitive impairment. A major limitation is the relatively modest sample size of typical AD participants in ADRC with comparatively less vascular disease that may limit the tract specific association findings. Another limitation is that we utilized FDG-PET TDP-43 signature as a surrogate for TDP-43 due to the lack of sufficient pathology data and TDP-43 also may likely be present in AD patients. However the association between NODDI and the FDG-PET TDP-43 signature in amyloid negative 80 + participants lends support for our hypothesis that NDI in temporal WM tracts are impacted by TDP-43. Future work based on a larger cohort with multiple biophysical diffusion models, pathology information, and longitudinal imaging measurements will further allow us to expand on these important findings.

Conclusions

In the present study, we found that cerebrovascular disease, tau, and TDP-43 proteinopathy cause white matter microstructural damage measurable using advanced diffusion NODDI models. In two independent cohorts with different clinical composition, we showed the clinical utility of NODDI models in predicting cognitive performance and its usefulness in identifying the substrate of cognitive impairment. Therefore, NODDI, acquired in a single setting of MRI, can add significant clinical value for differential diagnosis in cognitive impairment and dementia.

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this study will be made available upon reasonable request following MCSA and ADRC study procedures.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ADRC:

Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center

CGH:

Parahippocampal cingulum

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CU:

Cognitively unimpaired

CVD:

Cerebrovascular disease

DTI:

Diffusion tensor imaging

FA:

Fractional anisotropy

FDG-PET:

Fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET)

FLAIR:

Fluid attenuated inversion recovery

GCC:

Genu of corpus callosum

GM:

Gray matter

ISOVF:

Isotropic volume fraction

ITWM:

Inferior temporal white matter

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

MCSA:

Mayo clinic study of aging

MD:

Mean diffusivity

MMSE:

Mini mental state examination

NDI:

Neurite density index

NODDI:

Neurite orientation dispersion and density Imaging

ODI:

Orientation dispersion index

PET:

Positron emission tomography

TDP-43:

TAR DNA binding protein of 43 kDa

WM:

White matter

References

  1. Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA (2009) The neuropathology of probable Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 66(2):200–208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Knopman DS, Hu WT, Stroh DA, Baker M et al (2008) Abnormal TDP-43 immunoreactivity in AD modifies clinicopathologic and radiologic phenotype. Neurology 70(19 Pt 2):1850–1857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Weigand SD, Murray ME, Tosakulwong N, Liesinger AM et al (2014) TDP-43 is a key player in the clinical features associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 127(6):811–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Josephs KA, Martin PR, Weigand SD, Tosakulwong N, Buciuc M, Murray ME et al (2020) Protein contributions to brain atrophy acceleration in Alzheimer’s disease and primary age-related tauopathy. Brain 143(11):3463–3476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson PT, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, Jack CR, Boyle PA, Arfanakis K et al (2019) Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report. Brain 142(6):1503–1527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vemuri P, Lesnick TG, Przybelski SA, Graff-Radford J, Reid RI, Lowe VJ et al (2018) Development of a cerebrovascular magnetic resonance imaging biomarker for cognitive aging. Ann Neurol 84(5):705–716

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wassenaar TM, Yaffe K, van der Werf YD, Sexton CE (2019) Associations between modifiable risk factors and white matter of the aging brain: insights from diffusion tensor imaging studies. Neurobiol Aging 80:56–70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett IJ, Madden DJ (2014) Disconnected aging: cerebral white matter integrity and age-related differences in cognition. Neuroscience 276:187–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tullberg M, Fletcher E, DeCarli C, Mungas D, Reed BR, Harvey DJ et al (2004) White matter lesions impair frontal lobe function regardless of their location. Neurology 63(2):246–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raghavan S, Przybelski SA, Reid RI, Graff-Radford J, Lesnick TG, Zuk SM et al (2020) Reduced fractional anisotropy of the genu of the corpus callosum as a cerebrovascular disease marker and predictor of longitudinal cognition in MCI. Neurobiol Aging 96:176–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Alzheimer A, Förstl H, Levy R (1991) On certain peculiar diseases of old age. Hist Psychiatry 2(5 Pt 1):71–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kantarci K, Murray ME, Schwarz CG, Reid RI, Przybelski SA, Lesnick T et al (2017) White-matter integrity on DTI and the pathologic staging of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 56:172–179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rabin JS, Yang HS, Schultz AP, Hanseeuw BJ, Hedden T, Viswanathan A et al (2019) Vascular risk and β-amyloid are synergistically associated with cortical tau. Ann Neurol 85(2):272–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobs HIL, Hedden T, Schultz AP, Sepulcre J, Perea RD, Amariglio RE et al (2018) Structural tract alterations predict downstream tau accumulation in amyloid-positive older individuals. Nat Neurosci 21(3):424–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tracy TE, Gan L (2018) Tau-mediated synaptic and neuronal dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 51:134–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wen Q, Risacher SL, Xie L, Li J, Harezlak J, Farlow MR et al (2021) Tau-related white-matter alterations along spatially selective pathways. Neuroimage 226:117560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, Becker JA, Sepulcre J, Rentz D et al (2016) Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol 79(1):110–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Botha H, Mantyh WG, Murray ME, Knopman DS, Przybelski SA, Wiste HJ et al (2018) FDG-PET in tau-negative amnestic dementia resembles that of autopsy-proven hippocampal sclerosis. Brain 141(4):1201–1217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Buciuc M, Botha H, Murray ME, Schwarz CG, Senjem ML, Jones DT et al (2020) Utility of FDG-PET in diagnosis of Alzheimer-related TDP-43 proteinopathy. Neurology 95(1):e23–e34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Caballero MÁA, Song Z, Rubinski A, Duering M, Dichgans M, Park DC et al (2020) Age-dependent amyloid deposition is associated with white matter alterations in cognitively normal adults during the adult life span. Alzheimer’s Dementia 16(4):651–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cox SR, Lyall DM, Ritchie SJ, Bastin ME, Harris MA, Buchanan CR et al (2019) Associations between vascular risk factors and brain MRI indices in UK Biobank. Eur Heart J 40(28):2290–2300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pines AR, Cieslak M, Larsen B, Baum GL, Cook PA, Adebimpe A et al (2020) Leveraging multi-shell diffusion for studies of brain development in youth and young adulthood. Dev Cognit Neurosci 43:100788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schilling KG, Janve V, Gao Y, Stepniewska I, Landman BA, Anderson AW (2018) Histological validation of diffusion MRI fiber orientation distributions and dispersion. Neuroimage 165:200–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Alexander DC (2012) NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 61(4):1000–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kodiweera C, Alexander AL, Harezlak J, McAllister TW, Wu YC (2016) Age effects and sex differences in human brain white matter of young to middle-aged adults: A DTI, NODDI, and q-space study. Neuroimage 128:180–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cox SR, Ritchie SJ, Tucker-Drob EM, Liewald DC, Hagenaars SP, Davies G et al (2016) Ageing and brain white matter structure in 3,513 UK Biobank participants. Nat Commun 7:13629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamagata K, Zalesky A, Hatano T, Ueda R, Di Biase MA, Okuzumi A et al (2017) Gray matter abnormalities in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: evaluation by diffusional kurtosis imaging and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 38(7):3704–3722

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Colgan N, Siow B, O’Callaghan JM, Harrison IF, Wells JA, Holmes HE et al (2016) Application of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to a tau pathology model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 125:739–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu X, Shrestha S, Sun M, Wu Q, Luo Y, Zhang X et al (2019) Microstructural white matter alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: study based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI). Clin Neuroradiol 30(3):569–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wen Q, Mustafi SM, Li J, Risacher SL, Tallman E, Brown SA et al (2019) White matter alterations in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: a tract-specific study. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 11:576–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Parker TD, Slattery CF, Zhang J, Nicholas JM, Paterson RW, Foulkes AJM et al (2018) Cortical microstructure in young onset Alzheimer’s disease using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 39(7):3005–3017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Vogt NM, Hunt JF, Adluru N, Dean DC, Johnson SC, Asthana S et al (2020) Cortical microstructural alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Cereb Cortex 30(5):2948–2960

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Raghavan S, Reid RI, Przybelski SA, Lesnick TG, Graff-Radford J, Schwarz CG et al (2021) Diffusion models reveal white matter microstructural changes with ageing, pathology and cognition. Brain Commun 3(2):fcab106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts RO, Geda YE, Knopman DS, Cha RH, Pankratz VS, Boeve BF et al (2008) The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics. Neuroepidemiology 30(1):58–69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rocca WA, Yawn BP, St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Melton LJ 3rd (2012) History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population. Mayo Clin Proc 87(12):1202–1213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Yawn BP, Melton LJ 3rd, Pankratz JJ, Brue SM et al (2012) Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system. Int J Epidemiol 41(6):1614–1624

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Geda YE, Cha RH, Pankratz VS et al (2010) Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment is higher in men. The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Neurology 75(10):889–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Vemuri P, Lesnick TG, Przybelski SA, Knopman DS, Lowe VJ, Graff-Radford J et al (2017) Age, vascular health, and Alzheimer disease biomarkers in an elderly sample. Ann Neurol 82(5):706–718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Caruyer E, Lenglet C, Sapiro G, Deriche R (2013) Design of multishell sampling schemes with uniform coverage in diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 69(6):1534–1540

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades-Aron B, Sijbers J, Fieremans E (2016) Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 142:394–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Andersson JLR, Sotiropoulos SN (2016) An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 125:1063–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kellner E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, Reisert M (2016) Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn Reson Med 76(5):1574–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koay CG, Ozarslan E, Basser PJ (2009) A signal transformational framework for breaking the noise floor and its applications in MRI. J Magn Resonance (San Diego, Calif: 1997) 197(2):108–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Garyfallidis E, Brett M, Amirbekian B, Rokem A, van der Walt S, Descoteaux M et al (2014) Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data. Front Neuroinform 8:8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Daducci A, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, Zhang H, Dyrby TB, Alexander DC, Thiran JP (2015) Accelerated microstructure imaging via convex optimization (AMICO) from diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 105:32–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Oishi K, Faria A, Jiang H, Li X, Akhter K, Zhang J et al (2009) Atlas-based whole brain white matter analysis using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping: application to normal elderly and Alzheimer’s disease participants. Neuroimage 46(2):486–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC (2011) A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 54(3):2033–2044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jack CR Jr, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Therneau TM, Lowe VJ, Knopman DS et al (2017) Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia 13(3):205–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM et al (1991) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 41(4):479–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lin WL, Castanedes-Casey M, Dickson DW (2009) Transactivation response DNA-binding protein 43 microvasculopathy in frontotemporal degeneration and familial Lewy body disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 68(11):1167–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Josephs KA, Murray ME, Whitwell JL, Tosakulwong N, Weigand SD, Petrucelli L et al (2016) Updated TDP-43 in Alzheimer’s disease staging scheme. Acta Neuropathol 131(4):571–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Vemuri P, Lesnick TG, Przybelski SA, Machulda M, Knopman DS, Mielke MM et al (2014) Association of lifetime intellectual enrichment with cognitive decline in the older population. JAMA Neurol 71(8):1017–1024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kokmen E, Smith GE, Petersen RC, Tangalos E, Ivnik RC (1991) The short test of mental status. Correlations with standardized psychometric testing. Arch Neurol 48(7):725–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rothman KJ (1990) No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1(1):43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Perneger TV (1998) What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 316(7139):1236–1238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. La Joie R, Visani AV, Baker SL, Brown JA, Bourakova V, Cha J et al (2020) Prospective longitudinal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease correlates with the intensity and topography of baseline tau-PET. Sci Transl Med 12:524

    Google Scholar 

  58. Duering M, Gesierich B, Seiler S, Pirpamer L, Gonik M, Hofer E et al (2014) Strategic white matter tracts for processing speed deficits in age-related small vessel disease. Neurology 82(22):1946–1950

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Maillard P, Seshadri S, Beiser A, Himali JJ, Au R, Fletcher E et al (2012) Effects of systolic blood pressure on white-matter integrity in young adults in the Framingham Heart Study: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol 11(12):1039–1047

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Salat DH, Williams VJ, Leritz EC, Schnyer DM, Rudolph JL, Lipsitz LA et al (2012) Inter-individual variation in blood pressure is associated with regional white matter integrity in generally healthy older adults. Neuroimage 59(1):181–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Falvey CM, Rosano C, Simonsick EM, Harris T, Strotmeyer ES, Satterfield S et al (2013) Macro- and microstructural magnetic resonance imaging indices associated with diabetes among community-dwelling older adults. Diabetes Care 36(3):677–682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Hsu JL, Chen YL, Leu JG, Jaw FS, Lee CH, Tsai YF et al (2012) Microstructural white matter abnormalities in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroimage 59(2):1098–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cohen JI, Cazettes F, Convit A (2011) Abnormal cholesterol is associated with prefrontal white matter abnormalities among obese adults, a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroradiol J 1(21):989–997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Maillard P, Mitchell GF, Himali JJ, Beiser A, Fletcher E, Tsao CW et al (2017) Aortic stiffness, increased white matter free water, and altered microstructural integrity: a continuum of injury. Stroke 48(6):1567–1573

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Duering M, Finsterwalder S, Baykara E, Tuladhar AM, Gesierich B, Konieczny MJ et al (2018) Free water determines diffusion alterations and clinical status in cerebral small vessel disease. Alzheimers Dement 14(6):764–774

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Ji F, Pasternak O, Liu S, Loke YM, Choo BL, Hilal S et al (2017) Distinct white matter microstructural abnormalities and extracellular water increases relate to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease with and without cerebrovascular disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 9(1):63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Tuladhar AM, van Norden AG, de Laat KF, Zwiers MP, van Dijk EJ, Norris DG et al (2015) White matter integrity in small vessel disease is related to cognition. NeuroImage Clinical 7:518–524

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Jokinen H, Ryberg C, Kalska H, Ylikoski R, Rostrup E, Stegmann MB et al (2007) Corpus callosum atrophy is associated with mental slowing and executive deficits in subjects with age-related white matter hyperintensities: the LADIS Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(5):491–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Román GC, Erkinjuntti T, Wallin A, Pantoni L, Chui HC (2002) Subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia. Lancet Neurol 1(7):426–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Strain JF, Smith RX, Beaumont H, Roe CM, Gordon BA, Mishra S et al (2018) Loss of white matter integrity reflects tau accumulation in Alzheimer disease defined regions. Neurology 91(4):e313–e318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Mito R, Raffelt D, Dhollander T, Vaughan DN, Tournier JD, Salvado O et al (2018) Fibre-specific white matter reductions in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Brain 141(3):888–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mecca AP, Chen MK, O’Dell RS, Naganawa M, Toyonaga T, Godek TA et al (2020) In vivo measurement of widespread synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease with SV2A PET. Alzheimers Dement 16(7):974–982

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Bastin C, Bahri MA, Meyer F, Manard M, Delhaye E, Plenevaux A et al (2020) In vivo imaging of synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease with [18F]UCB-H positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47(2):390–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sone D, Shigemoto Y, Ogawa M, Maikusa N, Okita K, Takano H et al (2020) Association between neurite metrics and tau/inflammatory pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 12(1):e12125

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nelson PT, Head E, Schmitt FA, Davis PR, Neltner JH, Jicha GA et al (2011) Alzheimer’s disease is not “brain aging”: neuropathological, genetic, and epidemiological human studies. Acta Neuropathol 121(5):571–587

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Tosakulwong N, Weigand SD, Murray ME, Liesinger AM et al (2015) TAR DNA-binding protein 43 and pathological subtype of Alzheimer’s disease impact clinical features. Ann Neurol 78(5):697–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, Abisambra JF, Abner EL, Alafuzoff I et al (2014) Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol 128(6):755–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Botha H, Mantyh WG, Graff-Radford J, Machulda MM, Przybelski SA, Wiste HJ et al (2018) Tau-negative amnestic dementia masquerading as Alzheimer disease dementia. Neurology 90(11):e940–e946

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. de Flores R, Wisse LEM, Das SR, Xie L, McMillan CT, Trojanowski JQ et al (2020) Contribution of mixed pathology to medial temporal lobe atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 16(6):843–852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the study participants and staff in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, and Aging Dementia Imaging Research laboratory at the Mayo Clinic for making this study possible. We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation for the donation of the Quadro P5000 GPU used in this research.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grants R01 NS097495 (PI: Vemuri), U01 AG06786 (PI: Petersen/Mielke/Jack), R01 AG56366 (PI: Vemuri), P50 AG16574 (PI: Petersen), R37 AG11378 (PI: Jack), R01 AG41851 (PIs: Jack and Knopman), R01 AG054449 (PI: Murray); R01 AG37491 (PI Josephs); the Gerald and Henrietta Rauenhorst Foundation grant, Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), the Alexander Family Alzheimer’s Disease Research Professorship of the Mayo Foundation, Liston Award, Elsie and Marvin Dekelboum Family Foundation, Schuler Foundation, Opus building NIH grant C06 RR018898, and was made possible by Rochester Epidemiology Project (R01 AG34676).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Sheelakumari Raghavan, Val J. Lowe, Kejal Kantarci, Jennifer L. Whitwell, Clifford R. Jack Jr & Prashanthi Vemuri

  2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Scott A. Przybelski, Timothy G. Lesnick & Michelle M. Mielke

  3. Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Robert I. Reid

  4. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Vijay K. Ramanan, Hugo Botha, David S. Knopman, Jonathan Graff-Radford, David T. Jones, Michelle M. Mielke, Ronald C. Petersen & Keith A. Josephs

  5. Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA

    Billie J. Matchett & Melissa E. Murray

  6. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    R. Ross Reichard

  7. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Mary M. Machulda

Authors
  1. Sheelakumari Raghavan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Scott A. Przybelski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert I. Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Timothy G. Lesnick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vijay K. Ramanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hugo Botha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Billie J. Matchett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Melissa E. Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. R. Ross Reichard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. David S. Knopman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jonathan Graff-Radford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. David T. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Val J. Lowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Michelle M. Mielke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Mary M. Machulda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Ronald C. Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Kejal Kantarci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Jennifer L. Whitwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Keith A. Josephs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Clifford R. Jack Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Prashanthi Vemuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SKR and PV conceived and designed the study. All authors participated in data collection and analysis. SKR, PV, SAP, TGL and RIR drafted the manuscript and figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashanthi Vemuri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Medical Center institutional review boards and written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their qualified caregivers.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests related to the submitted manuscript. Dr. Raghavan reports no relevant financial disclosures. Mr. Przybelski reports no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Reid reports no relevant financial disclosures. Mr. Lesnick reports no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Ramanan reports no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Hugo reports no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Melissa reports no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Knopman serves on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for the DIAN study. He serves on a Data Safety monitoring Board for Biogen, but receives no personal compensation. He is an investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Biogen, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, and the University of Southern California. He serves as a consultant for Roche, Samus Therapeutics, Third Rock and Alzeca Biosciences but receives no personal compensation. Dr. Graff-Radford serves as an assistant editor for Neurology and receives research support from the NIH. Dr. Jones receives research support from NIH. Mrs. Matchett reports no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Lowe consults for Bayer Schering Pharma, Piramal Life Sciences, Life Molecular Imaging, Eisai Inc., AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, and Merck Research and receives research support from GE Healthcare, Siemens Molecular Imaging, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, and the NIH (NIA, NCI). Dr. Mielke serves as a consultant for Biogen and Brain Protection Company and receives research funds from NIH and DOD. Dr. Machulda receives research support from NIH. Dr. Petersen serves as a consultant for Roche Inc., Merck Inc., and Biogen, Inc. He serves on the Data Safety monitoring Board for Genentech, Inc and receives royalty from Oxford University Press and UpToDate. Dr. Kantarci served on the data safety monitoring board for Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.; receives research support from Avid Radioparmaceuticals and Eli Lilly, and receives funding from NIH and Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation. Dr. Whitwell receives research support from NIH. Dr. Josephs receives research support from NINDS, NIA and NIDCD. Dr. Jack serves on an independent data monitoring board for Roche, has served as a speaker for Eisai, and consulted for Biogen, but he receives no personal compensation from any commercial entity. He receives research support from NIH and the Alexander Family Alzheimer’s Disease Research Professorship of the Mayo Clinic. Dr. Vemuri received speaker fees from Miller Medical Communications, Inc. and receives research support from the NIH.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1. Single biomarker models evaluating the utility of neuroimaging measures for predicting cognitive performance after accounting for age, sex, education, and number of clinical visits.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raghavan, S., Przybelski, S.A., Reid, R.I. et al. White matter damage due to vascular, tau, and TDP-43 pathologies and its relevance to cognition. acta neuropathol commun 10, 16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-022-01319-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-022-01319-6

Keywords

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

ISSN: 2051-5960

Contact us