Skip to main content

ApoER2-Dab1 disruption as the origin of pTau-associated neurodegeneration in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract

In sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (sAD) specific regions, layers and neurons accumulate hyperphosphorylated Tau (pTau) and degenerate early while others remain unaffected even in advanced disease. ApoER2-Dab1 signaling suppresses Tau phosphorylation as part of a four-arm pathway that regulates lipoprotein internalization and the integrity of actin, microtubules, and synapses; however, the role of this pathway in sAD pathogenesis is not fully understood. We previously showed that multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components including ApoE, Reelin, ApoER2, Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19 accumulate together within entorhinal-hippocampal terminal zones in sAD, and proposed a unifying hypothesis wherein disruption of this pathway underlies multiple aspects of sAD pathogenesis. However, it is not yet known whether ApoER2-Dab1 disruption can help explain the origin(s) and early progression of pTau pathology in sAD. In the present study, we applied in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to characterize ApoER2 expression and accumulation of ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components in five regions known to develop early pTau pathology in 64 rapidly autopsied cases spanning the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD. We found that (1) these selectively vulnerable neuron populations strongly express ApoER2; and (2) multiple ApoER2-Dab1 components representing all four arms of this pathway accumulate in abnormal neurons and neuritic plaques in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and sAD cases and correlate with histological progression and cognitive deficits. Multiplex-IHC revealed that Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19 accumulate together within many of the same ApoER2-expressing neurons and in the immediate vicinity of ApoE/ApoJ-enriched extracellular plaques. Collective findings reveal that pTau is only one of many ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components that accumulate in multiple neuroanatomical sites in the earliest stages of sAD and provide support for the concept that ApoER2-Dab1 disruption drives pTau-associated neurodegeneration in human sAD.

Introduction

Sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (sAD) is not a global brain disease. Specific regions, layers and neurons accumulate hyperphosphorylated Tau (pTau) and degenerate early while others remain unaffected even in advanced disease [24, 25, 83, 84]. Despite decades of research, three key puzzles regarding the molecular basis of pTau-associated neurodegeneration remain unsolved. First, although neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) have a remarkably consistent anatomical site of origin and sequence of progression throughout the brain (Fig. 1), specific molecular features that predispose vulnerable neurons to NFT formation remain elusive. Second, although pTau accumulates in four distinct lesions [NFTs, neuropil threads (NTs), neuritic plaques (NPs), and granulovacuolar degeneration bodies (GVDs)], the spatial and mechanistic connections between these lesions are not yet clear. Third, although Tau phosphorylation is well-established to destabilize microtubules, a causal role for pTau in other aspects of neurodegeneration (such as destabilization of the actin cytoskeleton and extracellular ApoE-Aβ plaque deposition) has not been established. While prion-like spread of Tau has been suggested to account for progression of pTau pathology throughout the brain, it does not explain how the first lesions develop [103] and it is not easily reconciled with the spatiotemporal distribution of NFTs in the early stages of sAD (Fig. 1). The identification of a single, shared mechanism that can (1) explain both the origin and stereotypical progression of NFT pathology; (2) provide a missing molecular link between the formation of NFTs, NTs, NPs, and GVDs; and (3) integrate these four pTau pathologies with other hallmark and emerging aspects of neurodegeneration, could have major implications for prevention and treatment of sAD.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Anatomical sites of origin and ordered progression of NFT pathology in early sAD. Depiction of the stereotypical site(s) of origin and ordered sequence of progression of pTau pathology throughout the brain, focusing on five neuron populations in the temporal lobe (A) and rostral pons (B) that accumulate pTau in the earliest stages of sAD (i.e., Braak stages I–II and pre-tangle stages). The features that predispose these vulnerable neurons to NFT formation remain elusive. It has been suggested that Tau pathology spreads through synaptically connected neurons; however, discrepancies between connectivity and the distribution of pTau pathology appear to preclude a simple model of connectome-based spread in humans. In this paper we highlight these discrepancies and investigate an alternative hypothesis wherein high expression of a receptor for ApoE (teal shading) predisposes vulnerable neurons to pTau-associated neurodegeneration. A Temporal lobe: purple arrows denote the unidirectional tri-synaptic circuitry underlying memory formation. Red arrows trace the stereotypical progression of pTau pathology in the medial temporal lobe. In Braak stage I, pTau pathology is confined to ErC L2 projection neurons. In Braak stage II, pTau pathology progresses to include the basal lamina of the ProS-CA1 border region. In Braak stages III and IV, pTau pathology progresses throughout the cornu ammonis. Paradoxically, despite being the major synaptic recipient of ErC L2 neurons, dentate granule neurons (light blue arc) are spared from NFT pathology until late-stage sAD (Braak stages V/VI). This contrasting directionality of purple and red arrows indicates that NFT pathology progresses in a direction that is opposite to the synaptic connections underlying memory. Although often overlooked, pTau also accumulates within multiple distal dendritic tips of solitary L3 and L5 pyramids in the temporal neocortex very early in sAD (Braak stage I), while sparing neighboring neurons. B Rostral pons: pTau pathology classically begins in the LC–PC complex (pre-tangle stage a/b) before progressing to raphe nucleus (pre-tangle stage c) and ErC L2 (Braak stage I, see A). LC axonal projections (blue arrow in B5) innervate virtually the entire brain including all layers of temporal neocortex (depicted by blue axon terminals in L1–L6 of temporal cortex). Raphe neurons (green arrow in B4) also project widely throughout the brain. Since LC and raphe axons arborize over large areas and individual projection neurons classically innervate hundreds of neighboring target neurons, selective spread of pTau to ErC L2 neurons and solitary L3/L5 pyramids is not easily reconciled with connectome-based Tau spread

ApoER2-Dab1 disruption as the cause of pTau-associated neurodegeneration in sAD

Studies in model systems have shown that ApoER2-Dab1 signaling regulates memory, cognition, and neuronal integrity via a four-arm pathway (Fig. 2) [9, 17, 22, 35, 50, 51, 53, 57, 72, 93, 96, 98, 121, 124, 125, 128, 131, 136, 156]; however, the role of this pathway in the pathogenesis of human sAD has not been fully explored. The best-characterized arm of this pathway suppresses Tau phosphorylation [9, 50, 72, 125, 136] and thus disruption leads to pTau accumulation and destabilization of the microtubule cytoskeleton. The other three arms of this pathway regulate integrity of the actin cytoskeleton (via LIMK1 phosphorylation), synapse strength (via PSD95 phosphorylation), and neuronal delivery of cholesterol and specialized phospholipids (via lipoprotein internalization) (Fig. 2) (reviewed in [131]). Thus, disruption of this pathway at the level of ApoER2 could potentially trigger four core molecular derangements implicated in sAD pathogenesis, while inducing co-accumulation of multiple pathway components.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The ApoER2-Dab1 pathway and its proposed role in pTau-associated neurodegeneration in sAD. The ApoER2-Dab1 pathway suppresses Tau phosphorylation as part of a four-arm pathway that stabilizes actin, microtubules, and synapses, and delivers essential lipid cargo via receptor-mediated lipoprotein internalization. Nine core components of the ApoER2-Dab1 pathway that are a focus of the current paper are illustrated in the figure and described below. Under physiological conditions, binding of ligands (ApoE [1]), Reelin [2]), ApoJ [3]) to ApoER2 [4] triggers recruitment of Dab1 [5] and P85α [6] to lipid rafts, formation of ApoER2-Dab1-P85α signaling complexes, and phosphorylation, activation, and degradation of Dab1. Ensuing activation of the Dab1-P85α/PI3K cascade evokes phosphorylation of LIMK1 [7] to stabilize the actin cytoskeleton, and inhibition of GSK3β, which in turn inhibits phosphorylation of Tau [8] and PSD95 [9] to stabilize microtubules and postsynaptic receptor complexes, respectively. Disruption of this pathway at the level of ApoER2 (gray oval near ApoER2) is proposed to destabilize actin, microtubules, and synapses, to disrupt lipoprotein internalization, and to induce the co-accumulation of multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components in sAD

We previously showed that multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components (including ApoE, Reelin, ApoER2, Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19) accumulate together in the terminal zones of the perforant path in sAD [131], and proposed a unifying hypothesis wherein disruption of this pathway drives multiple aspects of sAD pathogenesis. The importance of the ApoER2-Dab1 pathway in AD pathogenesis has since been bolstered by evidence that the DAB1 gene locus is associated with AD risk in APOE4 homozygotes [32], and that a gain-of-function variant in the RELN gene protects from familial AD in humans [109]. However, it is not yet known whether ApoER2-Dab1 disruption can help explain the origin(s) and stereotypical progression of pTau pathology in the early stages of sAD. Here, to gain insights into the potential role of ApoER2-Dab1 disruption in early pTau lesions we focus on five brain regions that are known to accumulate pTau in the very earliest stages of sAD (i.e., Braak stages I-II and pre-tangle stages) (Fig. 1). We hypothesized that (1) these vulnerable neuron populations strongly express ApoER2; and (2) multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components accumulate in the vicinity of NTs, NFTs, NPs, and GVDs in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and sAD cases in each affected region.

Using in situ hybridization (ISH), single-marker immunohistochemistry (IHC) and multiplex fluorescence IHC (MP-IHC) to examine human postmortem specimens spanning the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD we observed: (1) striking laminar and cellular distributions of ApoER2 with strong expression in neuron populations known to accumulate pTau early in sAD; and (2) accumulations of two ApoER2 ligands (ApoE, ApoJ) in extracellular plaques and five ApoER2 signaling partners (Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pPSD95Thr19, pTauSer202/Thr205) within abnormal neurons in these same regions and layers in MCI and sAD cases. MP-IHC suggested that these five ApoER2 signaling partners co-accumulated within many of the same ApoER2-expressing, NT/NFT- and/or GVD-bearing neurons and in the vicinity of ApoE- and ApoJ-enriched NPs. These observations demonstrate co-accumulation of markers representing of all four arms of the ApoER2-Dab1 pathway in each of the sampled regions, layers, and neuron populations that are vulnerable to early NFT pathology. Collective findings reveal that pTau is only one of many ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components that accumulate in multiple neuroanatomical sites in the early stages of sAD and provide support for the concept that ApoER2-Dab1 disruption drives pTau-associated neurodegeneration in human sAD.

Materials and methods

Case selection and postmortem specimens

Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program (BBDP)

Rapidly-autopsied, minimally-fixed specimens from 34 BBDP cases spanning the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD (Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2) acquired from the BBDP at the Banner Sun Health Research Institute (http://www.brainandbodydonationprogram.org) [131] were used for the main analyses of ventral entorhinal cortex (ErC), prosubiculum (ProS)-CA1 border region, and temporal neocortex. Briefly, 6 μm-thick formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections containing (1) ErC at the level of the amygdala; (2) medial temporal lobe at the level of the body of the hippocampus; and (3) middle temporal gyrus were obtained from BBDP. BBDP employed a rapid, on-call autopsy team to achieve short postmortem interval (PMI) (mean of 3 h) to mitigate limitations due to tissue degradation. Standardized fixation procedures were employed using 1 cm3 tissue blocks fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h. All BBDP subjects provided written consent for study procedures, autopsy, and sharing of de-identified data prior to enrollment. The study and its consenting procedures were approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Puyallup, Washington. The Banner BBDP population has been extensively described. Briefly, most BBDP donors were enrolled as cognitively normal volunteers residing in retirement communities near Phoenix, Arizona. Following provision of informed consent, donors received standardized medical, neurological, and neuropsychological assessments during life. Neuropathological and cognitive endpoints captured by BBDP are extensive as described in previous publications [8, 16, 122, 158] and in the Additional file 1: pages 25–26. AD cases selected for this study had clinical dementia during life with pathologic diagnosis determined according to the NIA-Reagan criteria [152] using a high likelihood of AD threshold. MCI cases selected for this study were classified as MCI by BBDP based on a clinical diagnosis of MCI plus the presence of mild to moderate AD-type pathology that did not meet NIA-Reagan criteria for AD. Controls did not meet criteria for AD or MCI, although some degree of AD-type pathology was evident at autopsy in most controls. Key individual and summary characteristics of the BBDP cohort including PMI, Braak stage (0–VI), Thal phase (0–5), total amyloid plaques (0–15), neuritic plaque density (0–3), and APOE status are provided in Additional file 1: Tables S1a and S2a. The antemortem Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE, 0–30) test had the least missing data and was the main cognitive endpoint for the present study.

University of Auckland, New Zealand Neurological Foundation Human Brain Bank (UA-HBB) [120]

Minimally-fixed specimens from 10 sAD cases and 8 neurologically normal control cases (Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2) that were acquired from the UA-HBB and the Human Anatomy Laboratory within the Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging at the University of Auckland [120, 157] were used for the main analyses of upper pons [locus coeruleus (LC) plus raphe nucleus] and as a validation cohort for pathologies observed in the ErC and ProS-CA1 regions in BBDP specimens. Briefly, 5 μm-thick FFPE tissue sections including (1) transverse sections of the upper pons at the level of the LC and (2) medial temporal lobe specimens at the level of the body of the hippocampus were obtained from the UA-HBB team. Tissue was donated with informed consent from the family before brain removal; all procedures were approved by the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (Ref: 011654). The right hemisphere of each brain was either perfusion or immersion fixed (depending on the location of the mortuary conducting the brain removal) in 15% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 48 h at room temperature. The upper pons block was paraffin-embedded in a transverse orientation as previously described [157]. The UA-HBB team carefully dissected the upper pons and each block was visually inspected to ensure presence of the LC and raphe nucleus. Presence of the LC and raphe nucleus was further confirmed by our team via hematoxylin–eosin and anti-tyrosine hydroxylase staining in serial sections. Neuropathological endpoints captured by UA-HBB have been extensively described [120, 157]. AD cases selected for this study had clinical dementia during life with pathologic diagnosis confirmed by independent pathological assessment. Neurologically normal control cases had no history of neurological abnormalities, and no substantive neuropathology was noted upon autopsy. Key individual and summary characteristics of the UA-HBB cohort including age, sex, PMI, Braak stage (0–VI), Thal phase (0–5), neuritic plaque density (0–3), and APOE status are provided in Additional file 1: Tables S1b and S2b.

University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (UK-ADRC) Biobank

FFPE blocks containing the superior and middle temporal gyrus (SMTG) from 12 rapidly-autopsied cases spanning the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD were acquired through the UK-ADRC Biobank (Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2). 6 μm-thick sections generated from these specimens were used solely for validation of pathologies observed in the BBDP and UA-HBB cohorts and were not used for quantitative analyses. The UK-ADRC team classified cases as AD, MCI, or control according to the NIA-Reagan criteria as previously described [140]. Standardized fixation procedures were employed with brain fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for approximately 1 month. UK-ADRC subjects provided written consent for study procedures, autopsy, and sharing of de-identified data prior to enrollment. The study and its consenting procedures were approved by the IRB (44009) of the University of Kentucky. Neuropathological and cognitive endpoints captured by UK-ADRC have been extensively described [140]. Individual and summary characteristics of the UK-ADRC cohort including age, sex, PMI, Braak stage (0–VI), Thal phase (0–5), neuritic plaque density (0–3), and APOE status are provided in Additional file 1: Tables S1c and S2c.

Single-marker immunohistochemistry (IHC) and antibody validation

Single-marker IHC was performed by Histoserv (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and in our NIA laboratory as previously described [131]. Briefly, combined blocks containing temporal cortex from sAD cases and non-AD controls were sectioned into 6 μm-thick coronal sections. Optimal immunostaining conditions were then empirically determined using an incremental heat induced epitope retrieval (HIER) method using 10 mM Na/Citrate pH6 and/or 10 mM TRIS/EDTA pH9 buffer that were heated at 70 °C for 10–40 min. Selected antibodies with suboptimal HIER treatment underwent additional retrieval rounds using formic acid (88%, 10 min) at room temperature. Secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) used for single IHC chromogenic staining were appropriately matched to the host class/subclass of the primary antibody. These combined sAD plus anatomically-matched control tissue blocks were used to generate negative controls (comparing staining results versus pre-immune serum and with the primary antibody omitted) and positive controls (comparing staining results in temporal or frontal cortex specimens from confirmed AD cases with known region-specific Aβ and tangle scores versus non-AD controls) as previously described. These empirically determined optimal conditions were then used to immunolabel sets of slides using IHC and MP-IHC (as described below). Briefly, for IHC, sections were first deparaffinized using standard Xylene/Ethanol/Rehydration protocol followed by antigen unmasking with 10–40 min HIER at 70 °C or formic acid for 10 min at room temperature, as described above.

Sources and technical specifications of reagents used in this study are provided in Additional file 1: Table S3. All antibodies used for IHC in this study have previously been used for IHC in human FFPE specimens and those targeting core ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components have been used specifically for IHC in human brain specimens in published manuscripts [131]. Data supporting the validation of these antibodies (i.e., Western blot, RNA–protein co-detection, multi-epitope immunolabeling) was included in the Additional file 1 of a published manuscript [131] and is summarized in Additional file 1: Table S3. For the present study, we performed additional automated Western immunoblotting experiments comparing antibody detection of lysates generated from HEK293T cells transfected to transiently overexpress human target proteins or empty vector transfected HEK293T cells (Additional file 1 pages 27–30).

Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization

MP-IHC and multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (MP-ISH) were performed on sections that were mounted on Leica Apex Superior adhesive slides (VWR, 10015-146) or UberFrost (InstrumeC) slides to prevent tissue loss. We completed one round of MP-ISH and up to 6 iterative rounds of sequential MP-IHC staining with select mRNA probes and antibody panels targeting the ApoER2-Dab1 pathway and/or classical sAD biomarkers, alongside classical cytoarchitectural biomarkers to map brain tissue parenchyma (see Additional file 1: Table S3). MP-ISH was carried out on a subset of sections using custom designed RNA probes and standard RNAScope Multiplex Fluorescent V2 hybridization kits (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc.) per manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorophore-labelled mRNA/protein targets from each round of staining were imaged by multispectral epifluorescence microscopy followed by mRNA probe/antibody stripping and tissue antibody re-staining steps to repeat the cycle, as previously described [112, 131], each time using a different antibody panel. Briefly, for screening tissues by MP-ISH/MP-IHC, the sections were first deparaffinized using standard Xylene/Ethanol/Rehydration protocol followed by proteinase and/or HIER target unmasking steps in 10 mM Tris/EDTA buffer for 10 min using an 800 W microwave set at 100% power. Select sections were then processed for MP-ISH, as referenced above, and all sections to be sequentially processed for iterative MP-IHC screening were first incubated with Human BD Fc Blocking solution (BD Biosciences) to saturate endogenous Fc receptors and then in True Black Reagent (Biotium) to quench intrinsic tissue autofluorescence. Sections were then immunoreacted for 1 h at room temperature using cocktail mixture of immunocompatible antibody panels, with each antibody used at optimal staining concentration, as listed in Additional file 1: Table S3. This step was followed by washing off unbound primary antibodies in PBS supplemented with 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA) and staining the sections using a 1 μg/mL cocktail mixture of the appropriately cross-adsorbed and host- and immunoglobulin class/subclass-specific secondary antibodies (purchased from either Thermo Fisher, Jackson ImmunoResearch, or Li-Cor Biosciences) conjugated to one of the following spectrally compatible fluorophores: Alexa Fluor 430, Alexa Fluor 488, Alexa Fluor 546, Alexa Fluor 594, Alexa Fluor 647, IRDye 600LT, or IRDye 800CW. After washing off excess secondary antibodies, sections were counterstained using 1 μg/mL DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for visualization of cell nuclei. Slides were then coverslipped using Immu-Mount medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and imaged using a multispectral epifluorescence microscope (see next section). After imaging, tissue-bound primary and secondary antibodies were both stripped off the slides after a 5-min incubation at room temperature in NewBlot Nitro 5X Stripping buffer (Li-Cor Biosciences) followed by a 1-min additional HIER step in Tris/EDTA buffer. The above processing cycle beginning with re-blocking of tissues in Human BD Fc Blocking solution was repeated and the same sections then incubated using an additional panel of antibodies of interest.

Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry image acquisition and computational reconstruction

Composite MP-IHC images were used to provide cytoarchitectural and pathological context for single-marker IHC images, which were used for quantitation. Images were acquired from MP-ISH and/or MP-IHC probed specimen sections using the Axio Imager.Z2 slide scanning epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a 20×/0.8 Plan-Apochromat (Phase-2) non-immersion objective (Zeiss), a high resolution ORCA-Flash4.0 sCMOS digital camera (Hamamatsu), a 200 W X-Cite 200DC broad band lamp source (Excelitas Technologies), and eight customized filter sets (Semrock) optimized to detect the following fluorophores: DAPI, Alexa Fluor 430, Alexa Fluor 488 (or Opal 520), Alexa Fluor 546 (or Opal 570), Alexa Fluor 594 (or Opal 620), Alexa Fluor 647, IRDye 680LT (or Opal 690), and IRDye 800CW. Image tiles (600 × 600 μm viewing area) were individually captured at 0.325 micron/pixel spatial resolution, and the tiles seamlessly stitched into whole specimen images using the ZEN 2 image acquisition and analysis software program (Zeiss), with an appropriate color table having been applied to each image channel to either match its emission spectrum or to set a distinguishing color balance. The RGB histogram of each image was adjusted using Zen software, resulting in optimized signal brightness and contrast, improved dynamic range, exposure correction, and gamma/luminosity-enhancement to reveal hidden/dim image details. The stitched images were exported as tif files, then computationally registered at the subpixel level using affine transformation and corrected for photobleaching, autofluorescence, non-uniform illumination shading, spectral bleed-through, and molecular colocalization artifacts. Images were exported as BigTIFF and imported into Adobe large document format upon which the images were linearly contrast-enhanced using the levels function, sharpened to reduce blurring using the sharpening filter, and pseudo-colored to enhance color contrast either to show colocalization or separated to display multiple markers in a single image, as previously described by Maric et al. [19, 120, 131].

Regional annotation and quantitation

Single-marker IHC images were uploaded into HALO 3.5 image analysis software (Indica Labs, Corrales, NM). Boundaries of each anatomical region of interest (ErC, ProS-CA1 border region, gray matter of middle temporal gyrus, pontine LC plus raphe nucleus) were identified and annotated using a combination of anatomical landmarks (rhinal sulcus, dentate gyrus, temporal horn of lateral ventricle, pyramidal blades of the dentate gyrus, 4th ventricle) and cytoarchitectonic mapping as previously described [131]. MP-IHC images from serial sections with numerous cytoarchitectural markers labeled were used to assist with identification of landmarks and boundaries (i.e., white matter tracts, gray matter-white matter interfaces). Following alignment and registration of serial sections, the regional annotations were applied to each image. The flood fill annotation tool was used to help define boundaries and to limit the inclusion of edge artefacts. For most pathological markers, the HALO Area Quantification (AQ) v2.4.2 module was used to quantify the stain positive area as a percentage of each annotated region, as previously described [131]. Although prominent accumulations of Dab1 were evident in dystrophic neurites in the immediate vicinity of neuritic plaques, it is also expressed by many healthy neurons. To distinguish between pathological plaque-associated Dab1 and the Dab1 typically present in neurons, we used the HALO Object Colocalization (OC) v2.1.5 module with the classifier function enabled to selectively detect and quantify plaque-associated Dab1 objects per mm2 within each annotated region, as previously described [131]. Representative examples depicting applications of these two modules are provided in Additional file 1: Methods page 31.

Statistical analysis

For each annotated region, between-group differences according to each marker were quantified using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Variable transformations (e.g., natural log) were used as necessary. A Spearman’s correlation coefficient between each immunohistochemical marker and each AD endpoint (Braak stage, Aβ plaque load, MMSE) was calculated. Graphs showing individual data points in each group and their relationships to sAD endpoints are provided in Figs. 4, 6, 9, and 10. In a sensitivity analyses accounting for the false discovery rate, we adjusted the p values using the two-stage linear step-up procedure described by Benjamini et al. [2, 14]. (Additional file 1: Table S4). Statistical analyses were conducted in Stata Release 17 [145].

Results

ApoER2 is strongly expressed in the same regions, layers and neuron populations that develop NFT pathology in the earliest stages of sAD

ApoER2 regulates hippocampal dendritic arborization and memory in rodent models [45, 93]. We recently demonstrated that human DG and hippocampal pyramidal neurons express ApoER2 [131], however, it is not yet known whether neurons that develop NFT pathology in the earliest stages of sAD express ApoER2. In the present study, IHC and MP-ISH/IHC revealed that regional, laminar, cellular and subcellular (dendritic) distributions of ApoER2 and LRP8 expression parallel well-established selective vulnerability to develop NFT pathology—with strong expression in ErC L2 neurons, the ProS-CA1 border region, a subset of L5 and L3 neocortical pyramids, and pontine LC and raphe nuclei neurons—and lower or absent expression in neuron populations that are spared from NFT pathology (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Ext Fig S3.1). In ErC L2, both Reelin-expressing stellate projection neurons and pyramidal neurons are particularly vulnerable to pTau accumulation and are affected in Braak stage I [24, 25, 27, 95], with pTau pathology originating in distal dendrites, followed by cell bodies and finally axons [25]. L4 pyramids are affected next in Braak stage II, while L3 neurons are not affected until later in the disease process [24, 25, 27]. ISH and IHC in the ErC region revealed striking laminar and cellular LRP8 and ApoER2 expression patterns, with strong signals observed in the soma of Reelin-expressing stellate-shaped ErC L2 neurons and in a subset of ErC L2 pyramids lacking Reelin expression, and their basal and apical dendritic projections emanating into L1-L2 border region (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S3.1). ApoER2 protein expression was higher in L2 than L3, resulting in a visible laminar termination threshold at the L2–L3 border. Strong ApoER2 expression was also observed in a subset of ErC L4 pyramids but was minimal or absent in a subset of neighboring L4 neurons (Fig. 3A, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S3.1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ApoER2 expression parallels regional, laminar, and cellular vulnerabilities to NFT pathology. Panels AD are coronal sections of the ErC (A), ProS-CA1 border region (B), middle temporal gyrus (C), and transverse sections of the upper pons (D) from one representative middle-aged Braak stage I non-AD control. Soma and neuritic projections are demarcated by arrows and open arrows, respectively. Composite MP-IHC images were used to provide cytoarchitectural and pathological context for single-marker IHC images. ErC (A1–10): LRP8 gene (LRP8M) (A1–5) and ApoER2 protein (A6–10) are strongly expressed by stellate-shaped Reelin-expressing (RELN) neurons in (A1–2,7–8), a subset of L2 pyramids (A3–4), and basal and apical dendritic tufts emanating from L2 neurons (A7–9). A visible laminar threshold (broken arrows in A6–8) for ApoER2 expression was observed near the L2–L3 border (A10); p value based on Wilcoxon rank-sum test. LRP8 and ApoER2 are strongly expressed by a subset of L4 pyramids and surrounding neurites (A5, A9); adjacent L4 neurons with low ApoER2 expression are demarcated by an * in A9. ProS-CA1 region (B1–10): Strong LRP8 (B1–5) and ApoER2 (B6–10) expression was observed in a subset of basal pyramids (B1–2) and neurons localized to the basal stripe (B4–5). Pyramids located in the middle and apical laminae tended to have lower LRP8 and ApoER2 expression (B3). Temporal neocortex (C1–5): Strong ApoER2 expression in a subset of neocortical L3 and L5 pyramids, apical and basal dendritic projections (C3–4), and highly-ramified apical dendritic tufts (C1) located in the vicinity of L2. ApoER2 expression was low or absent in neighboring L3 pyramids (demarcated by * in C2) and most L4 stellate-shaped neurons (C3). A visible laminar threshold (broken arrow in C1) was observed near the L2–L3 border (C5); p value based on Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Pontine LC and raphe nucleus (D1–10): Strong ApoER2 protein (D1–2,6–8) and LRP8 gene (LRP8M and LRP8L) (D3–5,9–10) expression was observed in fusiform-shaped and multipolar LC neurons (D2–5) and in their MAP2-labeled dendritic tufts emanating into the peri-coeruleus region (oval in D2, white arrows in D4–5). ApoER2 (D6–8) and LRP8 (D9–10) are also strongly expressed in neurons and neuritic projections in the raphe nucleus. Scale bars in MP-IHC images = 5µm.

The basal stripe of the ProS-CA1 border region begins to accumulate pTau in Braak stage II and is the first subregion of the hippocampal formation to develop NFT pathology [24, 27]. ISH and IHC in the ProS-CA1 border region revealed prominent laminar and cellular LRP8 and ApoER2 expression patterns with moderate-to-strong expression in basal pyramids and non-pyramidal neurons and neurites localized to the basal stripe (Fig. 3B). Pyramids located within the middle and apical layers tended to have lower LRP8 expression (Fig. 3B).

pTau accumulation is evident within multiple distal dendritic tips emanating from solitary temporal L5 and L3 pyramids very early in sAD (Braak stage I) [29]. The observation that pTau pathology spares neighboring neurons is an enduring puzzle that is not readily explained by prion-like Tau spread [27, 29, 30]. Spiny stellate cells in L4 do not develop pTau pathology even in severe sAD [28, 29]. In temporal and frontal neocortex (Fig. 3C, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S3.1), we observed striking layer- and cell-specific distributions of ApoER2 with the strongest expression in the perikarya of subset of L5 and L2/L3 pyramids and their basal dendrites, and in the distal portions of their highly branched apical dendritic tufts in the L1–L2 border region (Fig. 3C, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S3.1) ApoER2 protein expression was higher in L1–L2 than L3, resulting in a visible laminar termination threshold near the L2–L3 border. Despite this high expression in a subset of L5 neocortical pyramids and their basal and apical dendrites (Fig. 3C, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S3.1), ApoER2 expression was minimal or absent in a subset of neighboring L5 pyramids and in most L4 neurons.

LC and raphe neurons in the upper pons accumulate pTau very early in the sAD process (pre-tangle stages a/b and c, respectively) [31]. In LC and raphe nuclei and scattered clusters of multipolar neurons located between both structures, IHC and MP-ISH/IHC revealed strong LRP8 and ApoER2 expression in neuronal soma and high ApoER2 expression in neuritic projections (Fig. 3D). Strong ApoER2 protein expression was observed within highly-branched projections emanating from LC neurons to the peri-coeruleus. MP-IHC revealed that ApoER2 expression in the LC had substantial overlap with MAP2-labeled dendritic arbors but minimal overlap with the axonal and pre-synaptic terminal markers NFL and synaptophysin, respectively.

The expression of two other ApoE receptors (LRP1 and VLDLR) was less restricted than ApoER2 and neither closely matched the laminar and cellular distribution of NFT pathology. LRP1 was expressed by glia and neurons, with prominent signals in glia surrounding NPs (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S3.2). Unlike ApoER2, VLDLR was strongly and ubiquitously expressed by neurons in all neocortical layers including neocortical L4 stellate neurons (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S3.2) that are known to be resistant to NFT pathology [28, 29].

Pathological accumulation of ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components in ErC L2

We next sought to determine if ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components accumulate in the ErC and whether such accumulations increase across the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD. Single-target IHC using serial sections revealed that seven ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components—Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pTauSer202/Thr205, pPSD95Thr19, ApoJ and ApoE—accumulated in abnormal neurons, and in proximity to NPs, were higher in MCI and sAD cases than controls and positively correlated with histological progression or antemortem cognitive deficits (Fig. 4, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S4.1). ApoER2-Dab1 components exhibited different distributions and morphologies (Fig. 4A). pTau prominently accumulated as hallmark NTs and NFTs, and in the neuritic components of NPs. Dab1 accumulated within intraneuronal inclusions and large globular complexes. pP85αTyr607 and pLIMK1Thr508 accumulated in intraneuronal vacuolar structures reminiscent of GVDs and to a lesser extent in globular structures consistent with plaque-associated dystrophic neurites. pPSD95Thr19 accumulated in intraneuronal vacuolar structures, small punctae surrounding affected neurons, and globular structures consistent with plaque-associated dystrophic neurites. ApoE and ApoJ accumulated primarily within extracellular plaques. MP-IHC suggested that Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, and pPSD95Thr19 accumulated together with pTauSer202/Thr205 within MAP2 and ApoER2-labeled dystrophic dendrites and perikarya of nearby ApoER2-expressing abnormal neurons. Extracellular lipoprotein deposition was also evident with ApoE and ApoJ co-localized in the central core of many of the same NPs (Fig. 4C).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components accumulate together with pTau in ErC in MCI and sAD cases. A Serial coronal sections of the entorhinal region from non-AD control (Braak stage I), MCI (Braak stage III) and sAD (Braak stage VI) cases were probed with antibodies targeting ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components (see Additional file 1: Table S3). Zoomed-out images of the non-sAD control are provided (left column in A) to illustrate the lack of positive IHC staining throughout the whole ErC section, with only modest pTauSer202/Thr205 accumulation (open arrows in A2) and no overt accumulation of pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, or pPSD95Thr19. Dab1 expression was confined to the soma of a subset of neurons. By contrast, in MCI (middle column in A) and especially sAD (right column in A), prominent accumulations of pTauSer202/Thr205, Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, and pPSD95Thr19 were observed within abnormal neurons (solid arrows) and in the vicinity of NPs (black stars). Examples of neighboring neurons with little or no evidence of ApoER2-Dab1 component accumulation are designated with * (A4,15,22,27). Open arrows in A17 and A22–23 designate granulovacuolar accumulations of pP85αTyr607 and pLIMK1Thr508, respectively. B The expression of multiple neuronal ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components increased across the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD (B1–3,6–8) and correlated with Braak stage (B4,9) and cognitive deficits (B9,10). For dot plots, open and closed blue circles indicate young controls and age-matched controls; open and closed red diamonds indicate MCI cases and sAD cases, respectively. p values are from Kruskal–Wallis tests. Fitted line plots show Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and p values. C MP-IHC suggested that Dab1, pTauSer202/Thr205, and pPSD95Thr19 accumulate together within ApoER2-expressing neurons (white arrows in C1–4) and that Dab1 accumulated within MAP2-labeled dystrophic dendrites (yellow arrows in C1–4) in the vicinity of ApoE and ApoJ-enriched extracellular plaques (white star). Scale bars in MP-IHC images = 5 µm

We next searched for evidence for ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption in the earliest stage of pTau pathology before clinical manifestations are apparent. Using IHC and MP-IHC for deep phenotyping of ErC in a Braak stage I/Thal phase I non-AD case (Fig. 5), we observed that Dab1, pLIMK1Thr508, and pPSD95Thr19 tend to accumulate together with pTauSer202/Thr205 within the soma of the same L2 ApoER2-expressing stellate-shaped neurons and pyramidal neurons (Fig. 5). Despite this selective vulnerability of their neighbors, a subset of adjacent neurons appears to be spared from pathological accumulation of pTau and other ApoER2-Dab1 components (designated with * in Fig. 5). pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19 also accumulated within adjacent ApoER2-enriched neuritic projections. Dab1 accumulated within globular structures that co-localized with MAP2-labeled dystrophic dendrites, and to a lesser extent with NFL-labeled axons (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S5.1). Unlike MCI and sAD cases, these intra-neuronal and neuritic ApoER2-Dab1 pathway component accumulations were accompanied by only subtle extracellular ApoE and ApoJ deposits (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S4.1).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Multiple ApoER2-Dab1 components accumulate in the same ApoER2-expressing ErC L2 neurons in Braak stage I. Serial coronal sections of the ErC from one non-AD control case in an initial stage of NFT pathology (Braak stage I, Thal phase I, MMSE 27/30) were probed with antibodies targeting ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components. Single-target IHC revealed that both stellate-shaped (designated S) and pyramid-shaped (designated P) neurons in ErC L2 strongly express ApoER2 (A1–5), and that multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components including Dab1 (A6–10), pP85αTyr607 (A10–11), pLIMK1Thr508 (A12–15), and pPSD95Thr19 (A21–25) accumulated together with pTauSer202/Thr205 (A16–20). Dab1 accumulated within the soma of a subset of ErC L2 neurons (solid arrows) and adjacent globular grape-like structures (open arrows). pP85αTyr607 accumulated within the soma of a subset of stellate-shaped neurons (S in A11). pLIMK1Thr508 accumulated within a subset of stellate-shaped (S in A12–13) and pyramidal neurons (P in A12). Granulovacuolar pLIMK1Thr508 accumulations are designated with solid arrows in A14. pTauSer202/Thr205 accumulated within a subset of NFT-bearing stellate-shaped and pyramidal neurons, and as NTs in the adjacent neuropil. pPSD95Thr19 accumulated in the soma of affected stellate-shaped and pyramidal neurons and as discrete punctae in adjacent neuropil. Neighboring neurons with little or no evident accumulations of ApoER2-Dab1 components are designated with an * in A10–25. B MP-IHC suggested that pTauSer202/Thr205, Dab1, pLIMK1Thr508, and pPSD95Thr19 accumulate together within the same ApoER2-expressing stellate-shaped neurons (designated S in B1–5) and pyramidal neurons (designated P in A5–8), and adjacent dystrophic neurites (yellow arrows) that may emanate from these abnormal ApoER2 and Dab1-expressing ErC L2 neurons. Neighboring NEUN-labeled neurons with little or no ApoER2-Dab1 components evident in the soma are designated with an *. Scale bars in MP-IHC images = 5 µm

Pathological accumulation of ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components in the ProS-CA1 border region

We next sought to determine if ApoER2-Dab1 components accumulate in the ProS-CA1 border region and whether such accumulations increase across the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD. Single-target IHC revealed that eight ApoER2-Dab1 pathway markers (Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pTau, pPSD95Thr19, pDab1Tyr220, ApoE, ApoJ) accumulated within abnormal neurons or NPs, were higher in MCI and sAD cases than controls, and positively correlated with histological progression or cognitive deficits (Figs. 6, 7 and 8, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S6.1). Subtle peri-plaque Reelin aggregates were observed in ProS-CA1 in some sAD cases (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S6.2). However, Reelin aggregates were less common and much less prominent in ProS-CA1 than we previously observed in the CA2 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus [131] (see Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S6.2) and thus did not correlate with histological progression or antemortem cognitive deficits (Fig. 6). MP-IHC revealed that within the ProS-CA1 border region Dab1, pP85αTyr607, and pPSD95Thr19 generally accumulated together with pTauSer202/Thr205 in swollen dystrophic neurites surrounding ApoE-enriched NPs and within a subset of neighboring ApoER2-expressing neurons (Figs. 7 and 8). In a recent publication [131], we described large plaque-associated Dab1 complexes in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus and the CA2 region of the hippocampus in sAD cases wherein Dab1 was primarily localized to MAP2-labeled dystrophic dendrites. In the present study, we observed similar large Dab1 complexes in three layers [stratum oriens (SO), stratum pyramidale (SP), stratum radiatum (SR)] of the ProS-CA1 border region in sAD cases (Fig. 7). As expected, MP-IHC in the SP layer suggested that globular Dab1 accumulated primarily within MAP2-labeled swollen, dystrophic dendrites in the vicinity of ApoE-enriched NPs. Dab1-enriched dystrophic dendrites in the SP layer appear to emanate from one or more neighboring ApoER2-expressing neurons that co-accumulated multiple ApoER2-Dab1 components including pP85αTyr607, pPSD95Thr19 and pTauSer202/Thr205 (Fig. 7). Unexpectedly, in the SR layer, Dab1 accumulated primarily within NFL-positive (MAP2-negative) dystrophic axons surrounding ApoE-enriched NPs (Fig. 7). In the SO layer, Dab1 accumulated in both MAP2-labeled dendrites and NFL-labeled axons (Fig. 7), suggesting a dual dendritic and axonal origin for Dab1 in the vicinity of extracellular lipoprotein deposits.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Co-accumulation of ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components in ProS-CA1 border region in sAD. (A) Serial coronal sections of the ProS-CA1 region from representative non-AD control (Braak stage I) and sAD (Braak stage IV) cases were probed with antibodies targeting ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components (see Additional file 1: Table S3). In the non-sAD control (A), single-target IHC revealed little or no expression of pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19, with modest Dab1 expression confined to a subset of neurons. In sAD cases, pTauSer202/Thr205 accumulated within NTs, NFTs, and the neuritic components of NPs (B1–5). Dab1 accumulated within abnormal neurons (B7–8) and in plaque-associated clusters of globular neurites (B8–10). pPSD95Thr19 accumulated within abnormal neurons, neuritic components of NPs, and in discrete punctae within the neuropil. All three components accumulated within the apical stripe region (arrows in B1,6&11), which harbors the terminal apical dendritic projections emanating from basal ProS-CA1 pyramidal neurons. C Expression of Dab1, pTauSer202/Thr205, pPSD95Thr19, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pDab1Tyr220, ApoE, and ApoJ increased across the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD and correlated with Braak stage and cognitive deficits (C1–15). For dot plots, open and closed blue circles indicate young controls and age-matched controls; open and closed red diamonds indicate MCI cases and sAD cases, respectively. p values are from Kruskal–Wallis tests. Fitted line plots show Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and p values. IHC images for pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pDab1Tyr220, and ApoJ are provided in Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S6.1

Fig. 7
figure 7

DAB1 accumulates in dystrophic dendrites and axons in the CA1 region in sAD. Coronal sections of a representative (Braak stage IV, Thal phase 5) sAD case were probed with antibodies targeting ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components (see Additional file 1: Table S3). A Single-target IHC revealed that Dab1 accumulates as grape-like clusters in three layers of CA1 (stratum oriens [SO], stratum pyramidale [SP], and stratum radiatum [SR]). The globular Dab1 accumulations (open arrows in A2–4) are reminiscent of dystrophic neurites, however it is not yet clear if they are of dendritic or axonal origin. Dab1 clusters in the SP layer appear to emanate from a single neighboring neuron (black arrow in A3). A presumptive neighboring neuronal source of Dab1 complexes is not evident in the SO and SR. B MP-IHC suggested that in the SO layer Dab1 accumulates within both NFL-labeled axons (yellow arrows) and MAP2-labeled dendrites (white arrows) surrounding an ApoE enriched plaque (star). One neighboring ApoER2-expressing neuron at the SO-SP border had prominent intraneuronal accumulation of Dab1 and pTau (white arrows). Another nearby ApoER2 and Dab1-expressing neuron in the SP layer had prominent granulovacuolar co-accumulation of pP85αTyr607 and pPSD95Thr19 (open white arrows), with little or no pTauSer202/Thr205 evident. C MP-IHC in the SP layer suggested that Dab1 accumulates primarily within MAP2-labeled dendrites (white arrows in C1–4) and soma of neighboring neurons in the vicinity of extracellular ApoE (white stars). However, one Dab1-expressing globular structure co-localized with NFL (yellow arrow). Dab1 accumulated together with pTau and pPSD95Thr19 in several neighboring ApoER2-expressing neurons (white arrows in C1–4). Two nearby ApoER2 and Dab1-expressing neurons had prominent granulovacuolar co-accumulation of pP85αTyr607 and pPSD95Thr19 (open white arrows), with little or no pTauSer202/Thr205 evident. D MP-IHC in the SR layer suggested that Dab1 accumulated primarily within dystrophic NFL-labeled axons (yellow arrows in D1–4) surrounding ApoE, ApoJ and Aβ-enriched extracellular plaques (white star). Unlike the SP layer, Dab1 accumulation was not evident within MAP2-labeled dendrites. Scale bars in MP-IHC images = 10 µm

Fig. 8
figure 8

Multiple ApoER2-Dab1 components accumulate in ApoER2-expressing neurons and NPs in the ProS-CA1 border region in early MCI. Serial coronal sections of the ProS-CA1 border region in a representative early MCI case (Braak stage III, MMSE 28/30) were probed with antibodies targeting ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components. Single-target IHC revealed regional co-accumulation of multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway markers including pTauSer202/Thr205 (A1–5), Dab1 (A6–7), pDab1Y220 (A8–10), pP85αTyr607 (A11–15), pLIMK1Thr508 (A16–20), and pPSD95Thr19 (A20–55). Affected neurons, GVD-like structures, and the apparent locations of extracellular plaques are designated with solid arrows, open arrows, and stars, respectively. Neighboring neurons with no evident accumulations of ApoER2-Dab1 components are designated with an * in A10–25. MP-IHC suggested that pTauSer202/Thr205, Dab1, pP85αTyr607, and pPSD95Thr19 accumulate together within a subset of ApoER2-expressing basal pyramidal neurons (open arrows in B1–5), and within MAP2- and ApoER2-immunoreactive globular (yellow arrows in B1–10) or thread-like (white arrows in B1–5) dystrophic dendrites in the vicinity of affected neurons and ApoE-enriched NPs (white star in B6–10). NFL is not included in merged images (B5, B10) to enhance visualization. Scale bars in MP-IHC images = 10 µm

We next sought to determine if accumulation of ApoER2-Dab1 components in the ProS-CA1 border region is evident in the early stages of sAD. Single-target IHC in a Braak stage III (MMSE 28/30) MCI case (Fig. 8) revealed that even in this early stage when NFTs are sparse in the hippocampus [3], pTau pathology was accompanied by prominent accumulations of Dab1, pDab1Tyr220, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, and pPSD95Thr19. Dab1 was most prominent within globular structures in the immediate vicinity of NPs. By contrast, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508 and pDab1Tyr220 were most prominent in GVD-like vacuolar structures that were localized to the soma and neuritic projections, and as solitary vacuolar structures in the neuropil (open arrows in Fig. 8A4,9&19). pLIMK1Thr508 also labeled discrete punctae in neuropil (solid arrows in Fig. 8A6–10). pPSD95Thr19 was prominent in GVD-like structures, small punctae surrounding affected neurons, and dystrophic neurites in the vicinity of NPs. MP-IHC suggested that Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19 accumulated together within many of the same ApoER2-expressing abnormal neurons (Fig. 8C1–5) and MAP2/ApoER2-labeled dystrophic dendrites in the vicinity of affected neurons and ApoE-enriched NPs (Fig. 8C6–10).

Dab1 accumulates together with ApoER2-Dab1 partners in temporal neocortex in MCI and sAD

Having shown that a subset of temporal L5 and L3 neocortical pyramids and their basal and apical dendritic projections strongly express ApoER2 (Fig. 3), we sought to determine if ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components accumulate in the temporal neocortex and whether such accumulations increase across the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD. In a recent report using IHC in middle temporal gyrus sections [131], we observed that pPSD95Thr19 accumulates within abnormal neurons and NPs in MCI and sAD cases and correlates with Braak stage, Aβ plaque load, and cognitive deficits. In the present study, single-marker IHC using serial sections from the same cohort revealed that Dab1 accumulates in MCI and sAD cases (Fig. 9) with strong signals localized to abnormal neurons, their basal dendritic arbors, and within the neuritic components of NPs. These Dab1-positive complexes increased across the spectrum of sAD and correlated with pPSD95Thr19, Braak stage, Aβ plaque load, and cognitive deficits (Fig. 9D). MP-IHC revealed that Dab1 generally accumulated together with pTau and pPSD95Thr19 in many of the same ApoER2-expressing, NFT-bearing pyramids (Fig. 9E1–5) and within swollen MAP2-positive dystrophic dendrites in the immediate vicinity of ApoE-enriched NPs (Fig. 9E6–8). However, as previously shown in the ErC and ProS-CA1 border region, a subset of these peri-plaque Dab1 accumulations in the temporal neocortex co-localized with NFL-labeled dystrophic axons (Fig. 9E10, Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S9.1).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Dab1 accumulates together with ApoER2 signaling partners in temporal cortex in MCI and sAD. A Serial coronal sections of the temporal neocortex from representative non-AD control (Braak stage I), MCI (Braak stage III) and sAD (Braak stage VI) cases were probed with antibodies targeting ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components (see Additional file 1: Table S3). In the non-sAD control (A), single-target IHC revealed that Dab1 expression is confined to a subset of pyramidal neurons (solid arrows). In MCI (B) and sAD (C) cases, prominent accumulations of Dab1 were observed within abnormal neurons and within clusters of globular structures (open arrows in B and C) in the vicinity of NPs (black stars) that in some cases appeared to emanate from neighboring neurons (black arrows in A3–4, A9–10, C1–2). Intraneuronal Dab1 inclusions are evident in a subset of L3 and L5 pyramids (solid arrow C4); neighboring neurons with little or no Dab1 expression are designated with an * in C4. D Dab1 accumulation increased across the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD and correlated with pPSD95Thr19, Braak stage, Aβ plaque load, and cognitive deficits. In the dot plot, open and closed blue circles indicate young controls and age-matched controls; open and closed red diamonds indicate MCI cases and sAD cases, respectively. p value is from a Kruskal–Wallis test. Fitted line plots show Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and p values. E MP-IHC suggested that Dab1, pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19 accumulate within the same ApoER2-expressing, NFT-bearing L5 and L3 pyramids (yellow arrows in E1–5) and MAP2-labeled dystrophic dendrites (yellow arrows in E6–10) in the immediate vicinity of Aβ plaques with ApoE enriched in the central core (white stars in E6–10). A small portion of Dab1 deposits appeared to accumulate within NFL-labeled axons or synaptophysin-labeled presynaptic terminals (white arrows in E9–10). Scale bars in MP-IHC images = 10 µm

Since Aβ plaques can precede widespread pTau pathology in neocortex, we next searched for evidence of peri-plaque Dab1 accumulation in cases that have substantial neocortical Aβ plaques but minimal pTau pathology. Single-target IHC in a non-AD control with Aβ plaques (Thal phase 3) but no overt pTau pathology (Braak stage 0) revealed multiple, globular plaque-associated Dab1 accumulations that were most prominent in L5 and L3 (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S9.2), with little or no pTauSer202/Thr205 or pPSD95Thr19 evident in serial sections. MP-IHC revealed that some of these globular Dab1 accumulations were clustered around an ApoE-enriched plaque core (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S9.2). When considered together with evidence from model systems that ApoER2-Dab1 signaling regulates both conversion of AβPP to Aβ [59, 76, 78] and GSK3β-mediated Tau phosphorylation [9, 50, 72, 125, 136], our findings suggest that Dab1 could potentially serve as a convergence point linking ApoE to both Aβ and pTau pathologies in early sAD. Future studies are needed to determine if these early plaque-associated Dab1 lesions in temporal neocortex are localized to axons or dendrites.

Co-accumulation of ApoER2-Dab1 components in pontine LC-PC complex and raphe nucleus in sAD

We next sought to determine if Dab1 and other ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components accumulate in the vicinity of the LC and raphe nucleus in sAD cases and neurologically normal controls using sections generated from carefully dissected pons specimens. In sAD cases, we observed that Dab1, pPSD95Thr19, and pTauSer202/Thr205 accumulate in both the LC–PC complex and raphe nuclei, and in the vicinity of scattered clusters of multipolar neurons located between these two nuclei (Fig. 10 and Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S10.1). Accumulations of all three markers were less pronounced or absent in non-AD controls, with accumulations positively correlating with Braak stage (Fig. 10C). Dab1 accumulated both as large globular neuritic complexes (Fig. 10B2–10) and as intraneuronal inclusions (Fig. 10B9 and Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S10.1). Prominent pTauSer202/Thr205 accumulations were observed in neuronal perikarya and in neighboring neuritic projections. pPSD95Thr19 accumulations had a similar distribution as pTau; however, unlike pTau, pPSD95Thr19 was most prominent within neuronal perikarya and discrete punctae surrounding affected neurons, with comparatively little staining of neuritic projections. MP-IHC suggested that Dab1 accumulated together with pPSD95Thr19 and pTauSer202/Thr205 within many of the same ApoER2-expressing neurons and within MAP2-labeled dendritic arbors that appear to emanate from neighboring ApoER2-expressing neurons (Fig. 10D). Extracellular accumulation of the ApoER2 ligand ApoE was observed in many sAD cases (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S10.2). Reelin-positive extracellular accumulations were observed in a few sAD cases (Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S10.2) but were not evident in most cases.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Dab1 accumulates together with ApoER2 signaling partners in LC and raphe nucleus in sAD. A Serial transverse sections of the upper pons from representative non-AD control (Braak stage I) and sAD (Braak stage V) cases were probed with antibodies targeting ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components (see Additional file 1: Table S3). In the non-sAD controls (A), single-target IHC revealed that Dab1 is expressed by a subset of LC and raphe nucleus neurons (solid arrows in A3, A5) and their neuritic projections (open arrows in A3, A5). pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19 accumulated within small subsets of LC and raphe nucleus neurons (solid arrows in A8–10). pTauSer202/Thr205 also accumulated in neuritic projections (open arrows in A8) while pPSD95 accumulated as discrete punctae in adjacent neuropil (open arrows in A8). In sAD cases (B), prominent accumulations of Dab1 were observed within clusters of globular structures (open arrows in B2–10) and as inclusions within abnormal neurons (solid arrows in B9). Additional examples of intraneuronal Dab1 inclusions are provided in Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S10.1 C Dab1 accumulated across the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD and correlated with Braak stage. For dot plots, p values are from Kruskal–Wallis tests. The fitted line plot shows Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and p values. D MP-IHC suggested that Dab1, pTauSer202/Thr205, and pPSD95Thr19 accumulate within the same ApoER2-expressing neurons (D1–4) and appeared to accumulate within MAP2-positive dendritic arbors (white circles in E1–4). Scale bars in MP-IHC images = 10 µm

Discussion

Fundamental questions about the origin and progression of pTau pathology in sAD have remained unanswered for decades. Our data support a model in which ApoER2-Dab1 disruption is the underlying cause of pTau-related neurodegeneration in humans. In contrast to the prevailing hypothesis for NFT progression—that Tau spreads in a prion-like manner—our findings suggest that pTau is locally produced by ApoER2-expressing neurons at multiple anatomical locations in response to ApoER2-Dab1 disruption. Since the ApoER2-Dab1 pathway regulates memory through delivery of essential lipids and stabilization of actin, microtubules, and synapses (Fig. 2), our finding that multiple pathway components co-accumulate in each affected region reframes Tau pathology as only one of many consequences of pathway disruption. As an alternative to prion-like spread, ApoER2-Dab1 disruption provides a single, shared mechanism that could: (1) account for the actin and microtubule destabilization, synaptic dysfunction, extracellular lipoprotein deposition, and cognitive deficits that characterize sAD; (2) help explain both the origin(s) and stereotypical progression of NFT pathology; (3) mechanistically link the etiology of NFTs to NPs, NTs, and GVDs; and (4) integrate these four pTau lesions with other hallmark (ApoE, Aβ, ApoJ) and emerging (Reelin, Dab1) neuropathological features to generate a unifying model for sAD in humans.

Can ApoER2 expression and demand for activation explain the origin(s) and progression of NFT pathology?

ApoER2-Dab1 disruption promotes Tau hyperphosphorylation through compromised Reelin and ApoE signaling [9, 50, 72, 125, 136]. Since ApoER2 is not ubiquitously expressed, our finding that ApoER2 is strongly expressed in the same regions, layers, neurons and subcellular compartment (distal dendrites) [27, 29, 164] that accumulate pTau earliest in sAD is consistent with our proposed model in which multisite ApoER2 disruption drives development of NFTs. Whereas the presence of ApoER2 may be required for NFT formation, a high demand for activation of the ApoER2-Dab1 pathway (with incessant turnover of core pathway components) could also contribute to the selective vulnerability of ApoER2-expressing neurons. It is therefore notable that ErC and LC neurons are active nearly continuously from birth until death due to their pivotal roles in memory formation during waking hours and memory consolidation during sleep [47, 67, 68, 115], among other vital functions [11].

Dab1 accumulation reveals evidence for ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption

Activation of the Reelin-ApoER2-Dab1 pathway shapes and strengthens synaptic connections underlying learning and memory (Fig. 2) [51, 53, 72, 98, 128, 153, 156]. Since Reelin signaling through ApoER2 induces rapid proteasomal degradation of Dab1 [18, 159], the accumulation of Dab1 protein in dystrophic neurites implies a localized, functional deficit in Reelin signaling through ApoER2 [131]. Our previous finding that Dab1 accumulates in the terminal zones of the perforant path in sAD [131] provided evidence for ApoER2-Dab1 disruption in circuitry underlying memory in humans. Here, the finding that Dab1 accumulates in each of five regions that develop NFT pathology prior to the hippocampus and dentate gyrus provides evidence that ApoER2-Dab1 disruption is widespread even in the early stages of sAD. Remarkably, Dab1 accumulation was extensive in MCI, and even preceded overt pTau accumulation in some controls, indicating that ApoER2-Dab1 disruption is likely a very early degenerative phenomenon. MP-IHC suggested that Dab1 and pTau generally accumulated within the same layers, neurons, and subcellular compartment (MAP2-labeled dystrophic dendrites) in each region. Since Dab1 is an upstream regulator of GSK3β-mediated Tau phosphorylation (Fig. 2) [9, 50, 72, 125, 136], together these observations provide a basis for our model wherein the accumulations of Dab1 and pTau (in NTs, NFTs, NPs) in each region result from ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption in ApoER2-expressing neurons. Intriguingly, Bracher-Smith et al. [32] recently reported a genetic association between the DAB1 locus and AD risk that was evident only in APOE4 homozygotes, a high-risk population that accounts ≈ 10% of sAD cases [160]. Our findings of extensive Dab1 accumulation in APOE3 homozygote and APOE2/APOE3 heterozygote MCI and sAD cases provide evidence that ApoER2-Dab1 disruption is a shared mechanism underlying sAD that may be exacerbated by, but is not dependent on, the APOE4 gene variant. Moreover, our findings that Dab1 accumulates together with phosphorylated forms of its binding partner P85α [17] and three downstream ApoER2-Dab1-P85α signaling partners (LIMK1, Tau, PSD95) that are known to stabilize actin, microtubules, and synapses, respectively, (Fig. 2) [35, 57, 124, 131] provide insights into molecular pathways and mechanisms linking Dab1 accumulation to cytoskeletal instability and synapse loss in sAD.

Dendritic co-accumulation of pP85α, pLIMK1, pTau and pPSD95 as evidence for ApoER2-Dab1 disruption

Dendritic spines are actin-rich protrusions that harbor excitatory synapses in postsynaptic densities, whose plasticity plays a central role in learning and memory [49, 155]. Binding of Reelin to ApoER2 stabilizes actin and microtubule cytoskeletons and postsynaptic densities by regulating phosphorylation and activation of Dab1, PI3K, LIMK1, GSK3β, Tau and PSD95 (Fig. 2) [9, 22, 35, 50, 51, 53, 57, 72, 96, 98, 121, 124, 125, 128] (reviewed in [131]). In rodent and cellular models, compromised Reelin-ApoER2-Dab1-PI3K signaling promotes GSK3β-mediated Tau hyperphosphorylation [9, 50, 72, 125, 136]. The Dab1 phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain—which recruits ApoER2-Dab1 complexes to lipid rafts by simultaneously binding the polar head group of PIP2 and cytoplasmic tail of ApoER2 [147] (Fig. 2)—is required for Reelin-Dab1 signaling [80, 146]. P85α serves as a critical node in this pathway by recruiting Dab1 and PI3K to lipid rafts [17, 74], enabling formation of postsynaptic ApoER2-Dab1-PI3K-signaling complexes. Reelin triggers interactions between P85α and Dab1 to suppress GSK3β-mediated Tau phosphorylation via activation of the PI3K pathway [17], while Tyr607-phosphorylation of P85α conversely inhibits PI3K [38]. Since activated GSK3β phosphorylates PSD95 to induce synapse disassembly [121], ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption provides a straightforward mechanism that could account for somatodendritic accumulations of both pTau and pPSD95Thr19 [131]. LIMK1 phosphorylation regulates remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton of dendritic spines [13, 107]. Heredia et al. [71] observed increased numbers of pLIMK1Thr508 positive neurons in AD-affected regions. Similarly, in sAD hippocampus, we previously reported that pP85αTyr607 and pLIMK1Thr508 accumulate together within GVD-like structures in neurons that accumulate pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19, and in neighboring abnormal neurons lacking overt pTau pathology [131]. In the present study, we observed that five core intra-neuronal pathway components (Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pTauSer202/Thr205, PSD95Thr19) accumulate together within many of the same ApoER2-expressing, NFT and/or GVD-bearing neurons and MAP2-labeled dystrophic dendrites in each region. These collective observations provide multifaceted evidence for a pathogenic nexus centered around dendritic ApoER2-Dab1 disruption in the neuron populations that are most vulnerable to early NFT pathology in humans.

ApoER2-Dab1 disruption could explain pTau pathology without invoking prion-like spread

The prevailing model cited to account for the ordered sequence of NFT progression posits that prion-like properties enable pathogenic forms of Tau to spread from donor neurons to recipient neurons and to convert normal Tau to pathogenic Tau [26, 29, 52, 56, 103]. While rodent and cellular models have shown that trans-synaptic Tau transmission is possible [69], three pivotal observations in humans appear to contradict a simple model of connectome-based spread. First, NFT progression proceeds in a direction opposite to unidirectional connectivity in the medial temporal lobe memory system (Fig. 1A) [15, 87]. Second, pTau pathology classically originates in the LC before progressing specifically to ErC L2 [26, 31]. However, LC neurons project widely throughout the brain and do not selectively innervate ErC L2 (Fig. 1B) [1, 4, 64, 90, 117]. Third, individual projection neurons classically innervate hundreds or even thousands of neighboring target neurons [70, 88, 105, 106]. Yet in the earliest stages of sAD pTau accumulates within multiple distal dendritic tips of rare, solitary L5 and L3 neocortical pyramids (Fig. 1A) while sparing neighboring neurons [29, 92]. Accommodation of the prion-like spread hypothesis therefore requires speculation about connections that are not yet known to exist [27] or a revised model of brain connectivity [29, 30]. In this connectome-inspired revision [29, 30], all pre-synaptic terminals emanating from a single donor axon synapse on dendrites emanating from a single target neuron and refrain from contacting neighboring neurons.

Our finding that multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components, including several that are upstream of Tau phosphorylation (Fig. 2), accumulate in each affected region strongly suggests that pTau is locally produced by ApoER2-expressing neurons at each site. Since prion-like properties are thought to be a unique feature of Tau [5, 118], connectome-based spread of numerous ApoER2-Dab1 components (including Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, pTauSer202/Thr205, PSD95Thr19) is an exceedingly unlikely explanation for this multisite co-accumulation. Tau inclusions are known to originate in distal dendrites [27, 29, 164]. Thus, our finding that pTau accumulates together with multiple upstream and downstream ApoER2-Dab1 components in MAP2-labeled dystrophic dendrites of many ApoER2-expressing neurons is consistent with ApoER2-Dab1 disruption but not easily reconciled with prion-like spread. The prion-like spread hypothesis, as usually presented, also does not explain the point(s) of origin of the disease process, or which intrinsic molecular features account for the vulnerability of this origin [103]. By contrast, dendritic ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption could explain the local production and accumulation of pTau in all affected neurons including the populations where pTau pathology is classically reported to begin (LC, ErC L2).

ApoER2-Dab1 disruption could mechanistically and spatially link four pTau-containing lesions

We previously reported that two ApoER2 ligands (ApoE and Reelin) accumulate together with extracellular Aβ and dendritic pTau in hippocampal NPs [131]. Our present finding that yet another ApoER2 ligand (ApoJ) [101] accumulates together with ApoE in the central core of many NPs, provides further evidence for ApoE receptor-ligand disruption with impaired lipoprotein internalization. ApoER2, Dab1, P85α, LIMK and PSD95 are enriched in the distal dendritic tips [10, 48, 51, 100, 107, 134] of pyramidal neurons, where pTau inclusions originate as NTs before progressing to proximal dendrites and soma of NFT-bearing neurons [27, 29]. Taken together, these findings support a model wherein dendritic ApoER2-Dab1 disruption initiates a disease-cascade resulting in both ‘extracellular trapping’ of ApoER2 ligands with lipoprotein deposition in the synaptic cleft, and accumulation of ApoER2-Dab1 signaling partners in adjacent distal dendrites (Fig. 11). GVDs are enigmatic pTau-containing lesions that are first evident in hippocampal and subicular pyramids that are considered to be pre-NFTs by some investigators [63, 79, 97, 151]. Nishikawa et al. [123] showed strong expression of PIP2 and lipid raft proteins in GVDs and NFTs, suggesting that both lesions originate in PI-enriched lipid rafts. Our finding that phosphorylated forms of ApoER2-Dab1 components known to play central roles in organizing these rafts—including P85α, Dab1, PSD95, and LIMK [48, 51, 100, 134]—accumulate alongside pTau in GVDs suggests a potential mechanistic link between ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption, granulovacuolar degeneration and NFT formation. Thus, dendritic ApoER2 disruption is a plausible mechanism that could help explain why NPs, NTs, NFTs and GVDs develop within spatially separated substructures (synaptic cleft, dendritic tips, soma) in the same affected neurons (Fig. 11). Consistent with this interpretation, in the ProS-CA1 border region we observed that multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components accumulate in anatomically distinct areas (basal stripe, pyramidal layer, apical stripe) corresponding to spatially-separated substructures in the same neuron populations.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Dendritic ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption links four pTau-containing lesions. The ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption hypothesis can mechanistically and spatially link four pTau-containing lesions (NTs [1], NFTs [2], NPs [3], GVDs [4]). ApoER2-Dab1 disruption is proposed to trigger Tau hyperphosphorylation and thus the presence of ApoER2 in neuronal membranes confers vulnerability to pTau-associated neurodegeneration. In this model, a triggering molecular lesion or competitive inhibition among ligands disrupts ApoER2 binding, leading to extracellular trapping and accumulation of the ApoER2 ligands ApoE, Reelin, and ApoJ in NPs. Impaired ApoER2 signaling disrupts Dab1 degradation leading to localized neuritic Dab1 accumulation. Ensuing disruption of the Dab1-P85α/PI3K-LIMK1 arm destabilizes the actin cytoskeleton and induces pP85αTyr607 and pLIMK1Thr508 accumulation. Impaired Reelin-ApoER2-Dab1-P85α/PI3K signaling activates GSK3β; ensuing hyperphosphorylation of Tau and PSD95 destabilizes microtubules and postsynaptic receptor complexes, and promotes accumulation of pTauSer202/Thr205 and pPSD95Thr19 in NTs, NFTs, NPs and GVDs. Thus, the ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption model attributes deficits in memory and cognition in sAD to impaired neuronal lipoprotein internalization and destabilization of actin, microtubules, and synapses. Our observation that multiple ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components accumulate in the immediate vicinity of NFTs, NTs, NPs, and GVDs is consistent with this model

Is ApoER2-Dab1 disruption also the origin of Aβ pathology in sporadic AD?

Dab1 serves as a cytoplasmic adaptor protein for both ApoER2 and AβPP [75, 166]. ApoER2-Dab1 signaling has been shown to regulate AβPP cleavage and Aβ synthesis in model systems [59, 76, 78]. AβPP is enriched in axons [110, 141], and Aβ appears to be synthesized primarily in dystrophic axon terminals [91, 137]. Although they are most abundant in dendritic spines, emerging evidence indicates that ApoER2 and Dab1 are also enriched in axonal growth cones [9], where they regulate arborization in a Reelin- and ApoE-dependent manner [21, 81, 102]. Thus, our finding that Dab1 accumulates in a subset of NFL-labeled dystrophic axons surrounding Aβ plaques suggests that axonal ApoER2-Dab1 disruption may regulate Aβ formation in humans. This finding, together with evidence that ApoER2-Dab1 signaling suppresses Tau phosphorylation in preclinical models [9, 50, 72, 125, 136] and our observation that Dab1 accumulates together with pTauSer202/Thr205 in dystrophic dendrites in humans, suggests that ApoER2-Dab1 disruption could serve as a convergence point and biologically plausible shared origin linking ApoE, Reelin and Dab1 to both the Aβ plaques and pTau tangles that define sAD in humans [20].

ApoER2-Dab1 disruption integrates formerly disjointed observations into a unifying model for sAD

Our present and previous [131] findings provide the foundation for a plausible unifying model wherein ApoE receptor-ligand disruption triggers a disease-cascade that ultimately manifests as sAD by: (1) disrupting ApoE receptor-ApoE/ApoJ dependent delivery of lipid cargo required to shape and remodel neuronal membranes; (2) disrupting ApoER2-Dab1 signaling cascades that stabilize actin and microtubule cytoskeletons and postsynaptic receptor complexes; (3) promoting Tau hyperphosphorylation and NT/NFT formation; (4) trapping lipid-laden ApoE/ApoJ particles outside neurons where they provide seeds for Aβ oligomerization [34, 111, 149]; and (5) promoting axonal Aβ synthesis and Aβ plaque formation. This model is attractive because it could help explain the origins of pTau pathology in the LC, ErC L2 and dendritic tips of solitary L5 and L3 neocortical pyramids and the sequential involvement of other neuron populations in successive Braak stages (Fig. 1) [29]. This proposed model also provides a straightforward, plausible explanation for the convergence of Aβ with pTau, ApoE, ApoJ and other ApoER2-Dab1 pathway components in NP niche, and mechanistically links the etiology of NPs to NTs, NFTs and GVDs. The ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption model is also consistent with established and emerging genetic risk factors for sAD [12, 99]—including variants in genes coding for ApoE [40, 99, 132, 133, 148], ApoJ [12, 55], Dab1 [32], P85α [44, 104], and components of glial pathways that govern extra-neuronal clearance of ApoE, ApoJ, Aβ, and lipids [65, 99, 165] and neuronal endolysosomal and proteasomal clearance pathways [12, 150].

Potential implications for sAD therapeutics

The prion-like spread model provides the rationale for immunotherapeutics designed to block the spread of Tau throughout the brain [39, 89]. However, despite clear beneficial effects in mice that are genetically modified to overexpress Tau [36, 138], anti-Tau monoclonals tested thus far in MCI and early sAD patients failed to demonstrate efficacy or even worsened cognitive decline [54, 86, 119]. Since our findings suggest that pTau accumulation in humans results from multisite ApoER2-Dab1 disruption rather than pTau spread, treatments that prevent or mitigate the underlying causes of this disruption may be better positioned to delay sAD progression.

Underlying causes of ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption

Plausible triggers for ApoER2-Dab1 disruption include neuritic injury-induced ApoE hypersecretion, lipoprotein peroxidation, Reelin depletion, and Aβ-induced Reelin sequestration. Astrocytes stimulate repair of injured axons by dramatically increasing local secretion of lipid-loaded ApoE particles [23, 85]. Since ApoE competes with Reelin for ApoER2 binding in model systems [46], an excess of ApoE following injury could potentially disrupt Reelin-ApoER2-Dab1 signaling. ApoE particles deliver lipids that are highly vulnerable to peroxidation to neurons via ApoE receptors including ApoER2 (reviewed in [131]). Our recent finding that ApoE and ApoER2 are vulnerable to lipid aldehyde-induced adduction and crosslinking [131] provides a mechanistic link between lipid peroxidation and ApoER2-Dab1 disruption. Since peroxidation is a common feature of many sAD risk factors [131] this mechanism could help explain why lipid peroxidation is markedly increased in the early stages of sAD [33, 60, 108, 113, 114, 116, 139, 143, 144, 167]. Since Reelin-ApoER2-Dab1 signaling suppresses Tau phosphorylation [9, 50, 72, 125, 136], and Reelin-secreting neurons are reported to degenerate in sAD [6, 37, 42, 135], Reelin depletion could potentially contribute to the intra-neuronal accumulations of pTau, Dab1, pP85αTyr607, pLIMK1Thr508, and pPSD95Thr19 observed in the present study. However, unlike ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption, Reelin depletion alone cannot readily account for our findings that ApoER2 ligands such as ApoE and ApoJ [and in some cases Reelin itself [131] (see Additional file 1: Ext Fig. S6.2)] accumulate in the immediate vicinity of many NPs. Finally, emerging evidence that Aβ can sequester Reelin [41, 43, 94] suggests that Aβ overproduction could potentially contribute to ApoER2-Dab1 disruption. Aβ-induced Reelin sequestration may be particularly important in familial AD cases with a genetic source of Aβ overproduction [154] (and transgenic mouse models harboring these same familial AD mutations) [161]. Future studies are needed to better understand the roles of ApoE secretion, lipoprotein peroxidation, Reelin depletion and Aβ-induced Reelin sequestration in familial AD and sAD.

Limitations and future directions

Delayed autopsy and prolonged fixation are reported to have limited impact on highly-aggregated proteins such as Aβ and pTau [129] but can obscure signals for less aggregated proteins [7, 66, 163]. Thus, use of rapidly-autopsied specimens that underwent uniform, time-limited (48 h) fixation, is an important strength of the present study. Postmortem specimens spanning the clinicopathological spectrum of sAD were used to approximate the spatiotemporal sequence of NFT progression. This cross-sectional study design cannot establish a sequence of disease progression [142]. Experimental data are therefore needed to establish a role for ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption in sAD. The moderate sample sizes are another important limitation. Although ApoER2-Dab1 pathologies were observed in all major APOE variants and both sexes, larger studies are needed to determine if results are influenced by genetics, sex, and other variables. The comparable IHC results obtained using specimens from three brain banks that employed different procedures for autopsies, sample processing and pathological assessment add confidence to study findings. However, since all three cohorts were primarily of Caucasian descent, future studies including more races and ethnicities are needed to determine generalizability. MP-IHC was performed on a subset of representative cases using thin sections with 20 × magnification. Future studies with more cases, thicker sections, and higher-resolution imaging are needed to assign ApoER2-Dab1 components to specific neurons and their dendritic arbors and to localize components to specific organelles such as LAMP1-labeled lysosomes. The human brain contains multiple LRP8 splice isoforms [62, 126] which encode variants in domains that regulate extracellular ligand binding, formation of ApoER2-PSD95 receptor complexes in excitatory synapses, and synaptic plasticity in preclinical models [10, 73, 77, 126, 130, 162]. Since the present study used two mRNA probes designed to detect sequences present in the most abundant LRP8 isoforms (Additional file 1: Table S3), future studies are needed to determine which specific isoforms are most closely associated with pTau accumulation and degeneration. Since Tau pathology is present predominantly but not exclusively in excitatory neurons [58, 127], future studies characterizing expression of LRP8 isoforms in these and other neuron subpopulations may provide additional insights into ApoER2-related Tau pathology in humans. Although they lack the restricted distribution of ApoER2, other brain ApoE receptors with common ligands and adaptor proteins may contribute to observed disease manifestations via partially overlapping mechanisms. While our finding that pTau accumulated together with upstream markers of pTau production (i.e., Dab1, pP85αTyr607) strongly suggests that pTau is locally produced by neurons within each affected region, it does not rule out the possibility that prion-like propagation of Tau, including pTau or Tau that is not detected by traditional methods [61, 82], could contribute to pTau-related neurodegeneration in sAD or other tauopathies.

Summary and conclusion

We found that five neuron populations that accumulate pTau in the earliest stages of sAD strongly express ApoER2 and that pTau is only one of many ApoER2-Dab1 components that accumulate within NPs and NT-, NFT-, and GVD-bearing ApoER2-expressing neurons. Collective findings support ApoER2-Dab1 pathway disruption as a plausible, alternative explanation for why specific neurons degenerate, and integrate pTau pathology into a unifying model with other hallmark (ApoE, Aβ, ApoJ) and emerging (Reelin, Dab1) pathological features of sAD in humans.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets and code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ApoE:

Apolipoprotein E

ApoER2:

ApoE receptor 2

ApoJ:

Apolipoprotein J

CA:

Cornu ammonis

CR:

Cajal–Retzius

Dab1:

Disabled homolog-1

ErC:

Entorhinal cortex

GVD:

Granulovacuolar degeneration body

HIER:

Heat induced epitope retrieval

L2:

Layer II

LC:

Locus coeruleus

LIMK1:

LIM domain kinase-1

LRP8 :

Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8 (gene encoding ApoER2)

LRP8M :

The midchain, beta propeller region of LRP8

LRP8L :

The ligand binding region of LRP8

NEUN:

Neuronal nuclear/soma antigen

NFL:

Neurofilament light chain

NFT:

Neurofibrillary tangle

NP:

Neuritic plaque

NT:

Neuropil thread

P85α:

PI3K regulatory subunit P85alpha

PC:

Peri-coeruleus

PI:

Phosphatidylinositol

PIP2:

Phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate

PI3K:

Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase

PMI:

Postmortem interval

ProS:

Prosubiculum

PSD95:

Postsynaptic density protein 95

pTau:

PTauSer202/Thr205

PTB:

Phosphotyrosine binding domain

RELN :

Gene encoding Reelin protein

sAD:

Sporadic AD

SO:

Stratum oriens

SP:

Stratum pyramidale

SR:

Stratum radiatum

SYNP:

Synaptophysin

References

  1. Agster KL, Mejias-Aponte CA, Clark BD, Waterhouse BD (2013) Evidence for a regional specificity in the density and distribution of noradrenergic varicosities in rat cortex. J Comp Neurol 521:2195–2207. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson ML (2008) Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: a reevaluation of the abecedarian, Perry preschool, and early training projects. J Am Stat Assoc 103:1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arriagada PV, Growdon JH, Hedley-Whyte ET, Hyman BT (1992) Neurofibrillary tangles but not senile plaques parallel duration and severity of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 42:631–639. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.42.3.631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aston-Jones G, Waterhouse B (2016) Locus coeruleus: from global projection system to adaptive regulation of behavior. Brain Res 1645:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.03.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayers JI, Giasson BI, Borchelt DR (2018) Prion-like spreading in tauopathies. Biol Psychiatry 83:337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.04.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baloyannis SJ (2005) Morphological and morphometric alterations of Cajal–Retzius cells in early cases of Alzheimer’s disease: a Golgi and electron microscope study. Int J Neurosci 115:965–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450590901396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bass BP, Engel KB, Greytak SR, Moore HM (2014) A review of preanalytical factors affecting molecular, protein, and morphological analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue: How well do you know your FFPE specimen? Arch Pathol Lab Med 138:1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0691-RA

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beach TG, Adler CH, Sue LI, Serrano G, Shill HA, Walker DG, Lue L, Roher AE, Dugger BN, Maarouf C et al (2015) Arizona study of aging and neurodegenerative disorders and brain and body donation program. Neuropathology 35:354–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12189

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Beffert U, Morfini G, Bock HH, Reyna H, Brady ST, Herz J (2002) Reelin-mediated signaling locally regulates protein kinase B/Akt and glycogen synthase kinase 3beta. J Biol Chem 277:49958–49964. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209205200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beffert U, Weeber EJ, Durudas A, Qiu S, Masiulis I, Sweatt JD, Li WP, Adelmann G, Frotscher M, Hammer RE et al (2005) Modulation of synaptic plasticity and memory by Reelin involves differential splicing of the lipoprotein receptor Apoer2. Neuron 47:567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bekar LK, Wei HS, Nedergaard M (2012) The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine network optimizes coupling of cerebral blood volume with oxygen demand. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32:2135–2145. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellenguez C, Kucukali F, Jansen IE, Kleineidam L, Moreno-Grau S, Amin N, Naj AC, Campos-Martin R, Grenier-Boley B, Andrade V et al (2022) New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat Genet 54:412–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben Zablah Y, Zhang H, Gugustea R, Jia Z (2021) LIM-kinases in synaptic plasticity, memory, and brain diseases. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10082079

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D (2006) Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93:491–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berron D, van Westen D, Ossenkoppele R, Strandberg O, Hansson O (2020) Medial temporal lobe connectivity and its associations with cognition in early Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 143:1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa068

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Birdsill AC, Walker DG, Lue L, Sue LI, Beach TG (2011) Postmortem interval effect on RNA and gene expression in human brain tissue. Cell Tissue Bank 12:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-010-9210-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bock HH, Jossin Y, Liu P, Forster E, May P, Goffinet AM, Herz J (2003) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase interacts with the adaptor protein Dab1 in response to Reelin signaling and is required for normal cortical lamination. J Biol Chem 278:38772–38779. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306416200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bock HH, Jossin Y, May P, Bergner O, Herz J (2004) Apolipoprotein E receptors are required for Reelin-induced proteasomal degradation of the neuronal adaptor protein disabled-1. J Biol Chem 279:33471–33479. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M401770200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bogoslovsky T, Bernstock JD, Bull G, Gouty S, Cox BM, Hallenbeck JM, Maric D (2018) Development of a systems-based in situ multiplex biomarker screening approach for the assessment of immunopathology and neural tissue plasticity in male rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res 96:487–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boluda S, Toledo JB, Irwin DJ, Raible KM, Byrne MD, Lee EB, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ (2014) A comparison of Abeta amyloid pathology staging systems and correlation with clinical diagnosis. Acta Neuropathol 128:543–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-014-1308-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Borrell V, Pujadas L, Simo S, Dura D, Sole M, Cooper JA, Del Rio JA, Soriano E (2007) Reelin and mDab1 regulate the development of hippocampal connections. Mol Cell Neurosci 36:158–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2007.06.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosch C, Muhaisen A, Pujadas L, Soriano E, Martinez A (2016) Reelin exerts structural, biochemical and transcriptional regulation over presynaptic and postsynaptic elements in the adult hippocampus. Front Cell Neurosci 10:138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Boyles JK, Zoellner CD, Anderson LJ, Kosik LM, Pitas RE, Weisgraber KH, Hui DY, Mahley RW, Gebicke-Haerter PJ, Ignatius MJ et al (1989) A role for apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein A-I, and low density lipoprotein receptors in cholesterol transport during regeneration and remyelination of the rat sciatic nerve. J Clin Investig 83:1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI113943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82:239–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Braak H, Braak E (1985) On areas of transition between entorhinal allocortex and temporal isocortex in the human brain. Normal morphology and lamina-specific pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 68:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Braak H, Del Tredici K (2011) Alzheimer’s pathogenesis: Is there neuron-to-neuron propagation? Acta Neuropathol 121:589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0825-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Braak H, Del Tredici K (2020) From the entorhinal region via the prosubiculum to the dentate fascia: Alzheimer disease-related neurofibrillary changes in the temporal allocortex. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 79:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlz123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Braak H, Del Tredici K (2015) Neuroanatomy and pathology of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 215:1–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Braak H, Del Tredici K (2018) Spreading of tau pathology in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease along cortico-cortical top-down connections. Cereb Cortex 28:3372–3384. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Braak H, Del Tredici K (2019) Top-down projections direct the gradual progression of Alzheimer-related tau pathology throughout the neocortex. Adv Exp Med Biol 1184:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Braak H, Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Del Tredici K (2011) Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 70:960–969. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e318232a379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bracher-Smith M, Leonenko G, Baker E, Crawford K, Graham AC, Salih DA, Howell BW, Hardy J, Escott-Price V (2022) Whole genome analysis in APOE4 homozygotes identifies the DAB1-RELN pathway in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Neurobiol Aging 119:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.07.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Calingasan NY, Uchida K, Gibson GE (1999) Protein-bound acrolein: a novel marker of oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 72:751–756. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0720751.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carter DB (2005) The interaction of amyloid-beta with ApoE. Subcell Biochem 38:255–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23226-5_13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chai X, Forster E, Zhao S, Bock HH, Frotscher M (2009) Reelin stabilizes the actin cytoskeleton of neuronal processes by inducing n-cofilin phosphorylation at serine3. J Neurosci 29:288–299. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2934-08.2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chai X, Wu S, Murray TK, Kinley R, Cella CV, Sims H, Buckner N, Hanmer J, Davies P, O’Neill MJ et al (2011) Passive immunization with anti-Tau antibodies in two transgenic models: reduction of Tau pathology and delay of disease progression. J Biol Chem 286:34457–34467. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.229633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chin J, Massaro CM, Palop JJ, Thwin MT, Yu GQ, Bien-Ly N, Bender A, Mucke L (2007) Reelin depletion in the entorhinal cortex of human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice and humans with Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 27:2727–2733. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3758-06.2007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Clayton NS, Fox M, Vicente-Garcia JJ, Schroeder CM, Littlewood TD, Wilde JI, Krishnan K, Brown MJB, Crafter C, Mott HR et al (2022) Assembly of nuclear dimers of PI3K regulatory subunits is regulated by the Cdc42-activated tyrosine kinase ACK. J Biol Chem 298:101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Colin M, Dujardin S, Schraen-Maschke S, Meno-Tetang G, Duyckaerts C, Courade JP, Buee L (2020) From the prion-like propagation hypothesis to therapeutic strategies of anti-tau immunotherapy. Acta Neuropathol 139:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-019-02087-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA (1993) Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 261:921–923. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8346443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cuchillo-Ibanez I, Balmaceda V, Botella-Lopez A, Rabano A, Avila J, Saez-Valero J (2013) Beta-amyloid impairs Reelin signaling. PLoS ONE 8:e72297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Cuchillo-Ibanez I, Balmaceda V, Mata-Balaguer T, Lopez-Font I, Saez-Valero J (2016) Reelin in Alzheimer’s disease, increased levels but impaired signaling: when more is less. J Alzheimers Dis 52:403–416. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-151193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cuchillo-Ibanez I, Mata-Balaguer T, Balmaceda V, Arranz JJ, Nimpf J, Saez-Valero J (2016) The beta-amyloid peptide compromises Reelin signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 6:31646. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Curtis D, Bakaya K, Sharma L, Bandyopadhyay S (2020) Weighted burden analysis of exome-sequenced late-onset Alzheimer’s cases and controls provides further evidence for a role for PSEN1 and suggests involvement of the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta and WNT signalling pathways. Ann Hum Genet 84:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. D’Arcangelo G (2005) Apoer2: a Reelin receptor to remember. Neuron 47:471–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. D’Arcangelo G, Homayouni R, Keshvara L, Rice DS, Sheldon M, Curran T (1999) Reelin is a ligand for lipoprotein receptors. Neuron 24:471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80860-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. de Lafuente V (2021) Memory consolidation during sleep might be regulated by the locus coeruleus. Neuroscience 453:266–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.11.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Delint-Ramirez I, Salcedo-Tello P, Bermudez-Rattoni F (2008) Spatial memory formation induces recruitment of NMDA receptor and PSD-95 to synaptic lipid rafts. J Neurochem 106:1658–1668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05523.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dent EW, Merriam EB, Hu X (2011) The dynamic cytoskeleton: backbone of dendritic spine plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Deutsch SI, Rosse RB, Deutsch LH (2006) Faulty regulation of tau phosphorylation by the Reelin signal transduction pathway is a potential mechanism of pathogenesis and therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 16:547–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.01.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Duit S, Mayer H, Blake SM, Schneider WJ, Nimpf J (2010) Differential functions of ApoER2 and very low density lipoprotein receptor in Reelin signaling depend on differential sorting of the receptors. J Biol Chem 285:4896–4908. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.025973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dujardin S, Hyman BT (2019) Tau prion-like propagation: state of the art and current challenges. Adv Exp Med Biol 1184:305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dumanis SB, Cha HJ, Song JM, Trotter JH, Spitzer M, Lee JY, Weeber EJ, Turner RS, Pak DT, Rebeck GW et al (2011) ApoE receptor 2 regulates synapse and dendritic spine formation. PLoS ONE 6:e17203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Florian H, Wang D, Arnold SE, Boada M, Guo Q, Jin Z, Zheng H, Fisseha N, Kalluri HV, Rendenbach-Mueller B et al (2023) Tilavonemab in early Alzheimer’s disease: results from a phase 2, randomized, double-blind study. Brain 146:2275–2284. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awad024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Foster EM, Dangla-Valls A, Lovestone S, Ribe EM, Buckley NJ (2019) Clusterin in Alzheimer’s disease: mechanisms, genetics, and lessons from other pathologies. Front Neurosci 13:164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Frost B, Jacks RL, Diamond MI (2009) Propagation of tau misfolding from the outside to the inside of a cell. J Biol Chem 284:12845–12852. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M808759200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Frotscher M, Zhao S, Wang S, Chai X (2017) Reelin signaling inactivates cofilin to stabilize the cytoskeleton of migrating cortical neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 11:148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Fu H, Possenti A, Freer R, Nakano Y, Hernandez Villegas NC, Tang M, Cauhy PVM, Lassus BA, Chen S, Fowler SL et al (2019) A tau homeostasis signature is linked with the cellular and regional vulnerability of excitatory neurons to tau pathology. Nat Neurosci 22:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0298-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fuentealba RA, Barria MI, Lee J, Cam J, Araya C, Escudero CA, Inestrosa NC, Bronfman FC, Bu G, Marzolo MP (2007) ApoER2 expression increases Abeta production while decreasing amyloid precursor protein (APP) endocytosis: Possible role in the partitioning of APP into lipid rafts and in the regulation of gamma-secretase activity. Mol Neurodegener 2:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-2-14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Fukuda M, Kanou F, Shimada N, Sawabe M, Saito Y, Murayama S, Hashimoto M, Maruyama N, Ishigami A (2009) Elevated levels of 4-hydroxynonenal-histidine Michael adduct in the hippocampi of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Res 30:227–233. https://doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.30.227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Furman JL, Vaquer-Alicea J, White CL 3rd, Cairns NJ, Nelson PT, Diamond MI (2017) Widespread tau seeding activity at early Braak stages. Acta Neuropathol 133:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1644-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gallo CM, Labadorf AT, Ho A, Beffert U (2022) Single molecule, long-read Apoer2 sequencing identifies conserved and species-specific splicing patterns. Genomics 114:110318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Greig NH, Sweeney DJ, Rapoport SI (1988) Comparative brain and plasma pharmacokinetics and anticancer activities of chlorambucil and melphalan in the rat. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 21:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Grzanna R, Molliver ME (1980) The locus coeruleus in the rat: an immunohistochemical delineation. Neuroscience 5:21–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(80)90068-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, Carrasquillo M, Rogaeva E, Majounie E, Cruchaga C, Sassi C, Kauwe JS, Younkin S et al (2013) TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 368:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gundisch S, Grundner-Culemann K, Wolff C, Schott C, Reischauer B, Machatti M, Groelz D, Schaab C, Tebbe A, Becker KF (2013) Delayed times to tissue fixation result in unpredictable global phosphoproteome changes. J Proteome Res 12:4424–4434. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr400451z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hahn TT, McFarland JM, Berberich S, Sakmann B, Mehta MR (2012) Spontaneous persistent activity in entorhinal cortex modulates cortico-hippocampal interaction in vivo. Nat Neurosci 15:1531–1538. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Hansen N (2017) The longevity of hippocampus-dependent memory is orchestrated by the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system. Neural Plast 2017:2727602. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2727602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Hasegawa M (2020) Experimental models of prion-like protein propagation. Neuropathology 40:460–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Helmstaedter M (2013) Cellular-resolution connectomics: challenges of dense neural circuit reconstruction. Nat Methods 10:501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Heredia L, Helguera P, de Olmos S, Kedikian G, Sola Vigo F, LaFerla F, Staufenbiel M, de Olmos J, Busciglio J, Caceres A et al (2006) Phosphorylation of actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin by LIM-kinase mediates amyloid beta-induced degeneration: a potential mechanism of neuronal dystrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 26:6533–6542. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5567-05.2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Hiesberger T, Trommsdorff M, Howell BW, Goffinet A, Mumby MC, Cooper JA, Herz J (1999) Direct binding of Reelin to VLDL receptor and ApoE receptor 2 induces tyrosine phosphorylation of disabled-1 and modulates tau phosphorylation. Neuron 24:481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80861-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hinrich AJ, Jodelka FM, Chang JL, Brutman D, Bruno AM, Briggs CA, James BD, Stutzmann GE, Bennett DA, Miller SA et al (2016) Therapeutic correction of ApoER2 splicing in Alzheimer’s disease mice using antisense oligonucleotides. EMBO Mol Med 8:328–345. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201505846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Hisatsune C, Umemori H, Mishina M, Yamamoto T (1999) Phosphorylation-dependent interaction of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor epsilon 2 subunit with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Genes Cells 4:657–666. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1999.00287.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hoareau C, Borrell V, Soriano E, Krebs MO, Prochiantz A, Allinquant B (2008) Amyloid precursor protein cytoplasmic domain antagonizes reelin neurite outgrowth inhibition of hippocampal neurons. Neurobiol Aging 29:542–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.11.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Hoe HS, Minami SS, Makarova A, Lee J, Hyman BT, Matsuoka Y, Rebeck GW (2008) Fyn modulation of Dab1 effects on amyloid precursor protein and ApoE receptor 2 processing. J Biol Chem 283:6288–6299. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M704140200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Hoe HS, Pocivavsek A, Chakraborty G, Fu Z, Vicini S, Ehlers MD, Rebeck GW (2006) Apolipoprotein E receptor 2 interactions with the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor. J Biol Chem 281:3425–3431. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509380200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hoe HS, Tran TS, Matsuoka Y, Howell BW, Rebeck GW (2006) DAB1 and Reelin effects on amyloid precursor protein and ApoE receptor 2 trafficking and processing. J Biol Chem 281:35176–35185. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M602162200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hoozemans JJ, van Haastert ES, Nijholt DA, Rozemuller AJ, Eikelenboom P, Scheper W (2009) The unfolded protein response is activated in pretangle neurons in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus. Am J Pathol 174:1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2009.080814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Huang Y, Shah V, Liu T, Keshvara L (2005) Signaling through Disabled 1 requires phosphoinositide binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 331:1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Huang ZJ, Cao F, Wu Y, Peng JH, Zhong JJ, Jiang Y, Yin C, Guo ZD, Sun XC, Jiang L et al (2020) Apolipoprotein E promotes white matter remodeling via the Dab1-dependent pathway after traumatic brain injury. CNS Neurosci Ther 26:698–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.13298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Hyman B (2022) All the tau we cannot see. Annu Rev Med. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-042921-023749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hyman BT, Gomez-Isla T (1994) Alzheimer’s disease is a laminar, regional, and neural system specific disease, not a global brain disease. Neurobiol Aging 15:353–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-4580(94)90031-0. (discussion 379–380)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hyman BT, Van Hoesen GW, Damasio AR, Barnes CL (1984) Alzheimer’s disease: cell-specific pathology isolates the hippocampal formation. Science 225:1168–1170. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6474172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ignatius MJ, Gebicke-Harter PJ, Skene JH, Schilling JW, Weisgraber KH, Mahley RW, Shooter EM (1986) Expression of apolipoprotein E during nerve degeneration and regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1125–1129. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.4.1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Imbimbo BP, Balducci C, Ippati S, Watling M (2023) Initial failures of anti-tau antibodies in Alzheimer’s disease are reminiscent of the amyloid-beta story. Neural Regen Res 18:117–118. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.340409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Insausti R, Amaral DG (2004) CHAPTER 23—hippocampal formation. In: Paxinos G, Mai JK (eds) The human nervous system, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 871–914

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  88. Ishizuka N, Weber J, Amaral DG (1990) Organization of intrahippocampal projections originating from CA3 pyramidal cells in the rat. J Comp Neurol 295:580–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902950407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Jadhav S, Avila J, Scholl M, Kovacs GG, Kovari E, Skrabana R, Evans LD, Kontsekova E, Malawska B, de Silva R et al (2019) A walk through tau therapeutic strategies. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0664-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Jones BE, Yang TZ (1985) The efferent projections from the reticular formation and the locus coeruleus studied by anterograde and retrograde axonal transport in the rat. J Comp Neurol 242:56–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902420105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kandalepas PC, Sadleir KR, Eimer WA, Zhao J, Nicholson DA, Vassar R (2013) The Alzheimer’s beta-secretase BACE1 localizes to normal presynaptic terminals and to dystrophic presynaptic terminals surrounding amyloid plaques. Acta Neuropathol 126:329–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1152-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Kaufman SK, Del Tredici K, Thomas TL, Braak H, Diamond MI (2018) Tau seeding activity begins in the transentorhinal/entorhinal regions and anticipates phospho-tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and PART. Acta Neuropathol 136:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1855-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Kim DH, Iijima H, Goto K, Sakai J, Ishii H, Kim HJ, Suzuki H, Kondo H, Saeki S, Yamamoto T (1996) Human apolipoprotein E receptor 2. A novel lipoprotein receptor of the low density lipoprotein receptor family predominantly expressed in brain. J Biol Chem 271:8373–8380. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.14.8373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Kobro-Flatmoen A, Battistin C, Nair RR, Bjorkli C, Skender B, Kentros C, Gouras G, Witter MP (2023) Lowering levels of reelin in entorhinal cortex layer II-neurons results in lowered levels of intracellular amyloid-beta. Brain Commun 5:fcad115. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Kobro-Flatmoen A, Nagelhus A, Witter MP (2016) Reelin-immunoreactive neurons in entorhinal cortex layer II selectively express intracellular amyloid in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 93:172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2016.05.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Kocherhans S, Madhusudan A, Doehner J, Breu KS, Nitsch RM, Fritschy JM, Knuesel I (2010) Reduced Reelin expression accelerates amyloid-beta plaque formation and tau pathology in transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Neurosci 30:9228–9240. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0418-10.2010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Kohler C (2016) Granulovacuolar degeneration: a neurodegenerative change that accompanies tau pathology. Acta Neuropathol 132:339–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1562-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Kruger MT, Zhao S, Chai X, Brunne B, Bouche E, Bock HH, Frotscher M (2010) Role for Reelin-induced cofilin phosphorylation in the assembly of sympathetic preganglionic neurons in the murine intermediolateral column. Eur J Neurosci 32:1611–1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07433.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kunkle BW, Grenier-Boley B, Sims R, Bis JC, Damotte V, Naj AC, Boland A, Vronskaya M, van der Lee SJ, Amlie-Wolf A et al (2019) Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Abeta, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat Genet 51:414–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Kupferman JV, Basu J, Russo MJ, Guevarra J, Cheung SK, Siegelbaum SA (2014) Reelin signaling specifies the molecular identity of the pyramidal neuron distal dendritic compartment. Cell 158:1335–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Leeb C, Eresheim C, Nimpf J (2014) Clusterin is a ligand for apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) and very low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR) and signals via the Reelin-signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 289:4161–4172. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.529271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Leemhuis J, Bouche E, Frotscher M, Henle F, Hein L, Herz J, Meyer DK, Pichler M, Roth G, Schwan C et al (2010) Reelin signals through apolipoprotein E receptor 2 and Cdc42 to increase growth cone motility and filopodia formation. J Neurosci 30:14759–14772. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4036-10.2010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Lewis J, Dickson DW (2016) Propagation of tau pathology: hypotheses, discoveries, and yet unresolved questions from experimental and human brain studies. Acta Neuropathol 131:27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1507-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Li H, Liu H, Lutz MW, Luo S, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I (2023) Novel genetic variants in TP37, PIK3R1, CALM1, and PLCG2 of the neurotrophin signaling pathway are associated with the progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 91:977–987. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Li XG, Somogyi P, Ylinen A, Buzsaki G (1994) The hippocampal CA3 network: an in vivo intracellular labeling study. J Comp Neurol 339:181–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903390204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Lichtman JW, Pfister H, Shavit N (2014) The big data challenges of connectomics. Nat Neurosci 17:1448–1454. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Lim JS, Kim HJ, Park I, Woo S, Kim JH, Park JW (2022) Force mapping reveals the spatial distribution of individual proteins in a neuron. Nano Lett 22:3865–3871. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Liu Q, Raina AK, Smith MA, Sayre LM, Perry G (2003) Hydroxynonenal, toxic carbonyls, and Alzheimer disease. Mol Aspects Med 24:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-2997(03)00025-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Lopera F, Marino C, Chandrahas AS, O’Hare M, Villalba-Moreno ND, Aguillon D, Baena A, Sanchez JS, Vila-Castelar C, Ramirez Gomez L et al (2023) Resilience to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease in a Reelin-COLBOS heterozygous man. Nat Med 29:1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02318-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Ma F, Akolkar H, Xu J, Liu Y, Popova D, Xie J, Youssef MM, Benosman R, Hart RP, Herrup K (2023) The amyloid precursor protein modulates the position and length of the axon initial segment. J Neurosci 43:1830–1844. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0172-22.2023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Manelli AM, Stine WB, Van Eldik LJ, LaDu MJ (2004) ApoE and Abeta1-42 interactions: effects of isoform and conformation on structure and function. J Mol Neurosci 23:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1385/JMN:23:3:235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Maric D, Jahanipour J, Li XR, Singh A, Mobiny A, Van Nguyen H, Sedlock A, Grama K, Roysam B (2021) Whole-brain tissue mapping toolkit using large-scale highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging and deep neural networks. Nat Commun 12:1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21735-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Markesbery WR (1997) Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic Biol Med 23:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00629-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Markesbery WR, Kryscio RJ, Lovell MA, Morrow JD (2005) Lipid peroxidation is an early event in the brain in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 58:730–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Monti JM (2010) The structure of the dorsal raphe nucleus and its relevance to the regulation of sleep and wakefulness. Sleep Med Rev 14:307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2009.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Montine KS, Olson SJ, Amarnath V, Whetsell WO Jr, Graham DG, Montine TJ (1997) Immunohistochemical detection of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal adducts in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with inheritance of APOE4. Am J Pathol 150:437–443

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Morrison JH, Foote SL, O’Connor D, Bloom FE (1982) Laminar, tangential and regional organization of the noradrenergic innervation of monkey cortex: dopamine-beta-hydroxylase immunohistochemistry. Brain Res Bull 9:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(82)90144-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Mudher A, Colin M, Dujardin S, Medina M, Dewachter I, Alavi Naini SM, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E, Buee L, Goedert M et al (2017) What is the evidence that tau pathology spreads through prion-like propagation? Acta Neuropathol Commun 5:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-017-0488-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Mullard A (2021) Failure of first anti-tau antibody in Alzheimer disease highlights risks of history repeating. Nat Rev Drug Discov 20:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00217-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Murray HC, Johnson K, Sedlock A, Highet B, Dieriks BV, Anekal PV, Faull RLM, Curtis MA, Koretsky A, Maric D (2022) Lamina-specific immunohistochemical signatures in the olfactory bulb of healthy, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease patients. Commun Biol 5:88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03032-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Nelson CD, Kim MJ, Hsin H, Chen Y, Sheng M (2013) Phosphorylation of threonine-19 of PSD-95 by GSK-3beta is required for PSD-95 mobilization and long-term depression. J Neurosci 33:12122–12135. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0131-13.2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Nichols JB, Malek-Ahmadi M, Tariot PN, Serrano GE, Sue LI, Beach TG (2021) Vascular lesions, APOE epsilon4, and Tau pathology in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 80:240–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlaa160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Nishikawa T, Takahashi T, Nakamori M, Hosomi N, Maruyama H, Miyazaki Y, Izumi Y, Matsumoto M (2016) The identification of raft-derived tau-associated vesicles that are incorporated into immature tangles and paired helical filaments. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 42:639–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Niu S, Renfro A, Quattrocchi CC, Sheldon M, D’Arcangelo G (2004) Reelin promotes hippocampal dendrite development through the VLDLR/ApoER2-Dab1 pathway. Neuron 41:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00819-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Ohkubo N, Lee YD, Morishima A, Terashima T, Kikkawa S, Tohyama M, Sakanaka M, Tanaka J, Maeda N, Vitek MP et al (2003) Apolipoprotein E and Reelin ligands modulate tau phosphorylation through an apolipoprotein E receptor/disabled-1/glycogen synthase kinase-3beta cascade. FASEB J 17:295–297. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.02-0434fje

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Omuro KC, Gallo CM, Scrandis L, Ho A, Beffert U (2022) Human APOER2 isoforms have differential cleavage events and synaptic properties. J Neurosci 42:4054–4068. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1800-21.2022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Otero-Garcia M, Mahajani SU, Wakhloo D, Tang W, Xue YQ, Morabito S, Pan J, Oberhauser J, Madira AE, Shakouri T et al (2022) Molecular signatures underlying neurofibrillary tangle susceptibility in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 110:2929–2948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.06.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Petit-Turcotte C, Aumont N, Beffert U, Dea D, Herz J, Poirier J (2005) The apoE receptor apoER2 is involved in the maintenance of efficient synaptic plasticity. Neurobiol Aging 26:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.04.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Pikkarainen M, Martikainen P, Alafuzoff I (2010) The effect of prolonged fixation time on immunohistochemical staining of common neurodegenerative disease markers. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 69:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181c6c13d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Qiu S, Weeber EJ (2007) Reelin signaling facilitates maturation of CA1 glutamatergic synapses. J Neurophysiol 97:2312–2321. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00869.2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Ramsden CE, Keyes GS, Calzada E, Horowitz MS, Zamora D, Jahanipour J, Sedlock A, Indig FE, Moaddel R, Kapogiannis D et al (2022) Lipid peroxidation induced ApoE receptor-ligand disruption as a unifying hypothesis underlying sporadic Alzheimer’s disease in humans. J Alzheimers Dis 87:1251–1290. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Rebeck GW, Reiter JS, Strickland DK, Hyman BT (1993) Apolipoprotein E in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: allelic variation and receptor interactions. Neuron 11:575–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(93)90070-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Reiman EM, Arboleda-Velasquez JF, Quiroz YT, Huentelman MJ, Beach TG, Caselli RJ, Chen Y, Su Y, Myers AJ, Hardy J et al (2020) Exceptionally low likelihood of Alzheimer’s dementia in APOE2 homozygotes from a 5,000-person neuropathological study. Nat Commun 11:667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14279-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Riddell DR, Sun XM, Stannard AK, Soutar AK, Owen JS (2001) Localization of apolipoprotein E receptor 2 to caveolae in the plasma membrane. J Lipid Res 42:998–1002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Riedel A, Miettinen R, Stieler J, Mikkonen M, Alafuzoff I, Soininen H, Arendt T (2003) Reelin-immunoreactive Cajal–Retzius cells: the entorhinal cortex in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 106:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-003-0729-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Rossi D, Gruart A, Contreras-Murillo G, Muhaisen A, Avila J, Delgado-Garcia JM, Pujadas L, Soriano E (2020) Reelin reverts biochemical, physiological and cognitive alterations in mouse models of Tauopathy. Prog Neurobiol 186:101743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Sadleir KR, Kandalepas PC, Buggia-Prevot V, Nicholson DA, Thinakaran G, Vassar R (2016) Presynaptic dystrophic neurites surrounding amyloid plaques are sites of microtubule disruption, BACE1 elevation, and increased Abeta generation in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 132:235–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1558-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Sankaranarayanan S, Barten DM, Vana L, Devidze N, Yang L, Cadelina G, Hoque N, DeCarr L, Keenan S, Lin A et al (2015) Passive immunization with phospho-tau antibodies reduces tau pathology and functional deficits in two distinct mouse tauopathy models. PLoS ONE 10:e0125614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Sayre LM, Zelasko DA, Harris PL, Perry G, Salomon RG, Smith MA (1997) 4-Hydroxynonenal-derived advanced lipid peroxidation end products are increased in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 68:2092–2097. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.68052092.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Schmitt FA, Nelson PT, Abner E, Scheff S, Jicha GA, Smith C, Cooper G, Mendiondo M, Danner DD, Van Eldik LJ et al (2012) University of Kentucky Sanders–Brown healthy brain aging volunteers: donor characteristics, procedures and neuropathology. Curr Alzheimer Res 9:724–733. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720512801322591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Seki E, Komori T, Arai N (2022) Distribution of amyloid-beta precursor protein-immunoreactive axons differs according to the severity of cerebral ischemia in autopsy brains. Neuropathology 42:269–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Serrano-Pozo A, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Hyman BT (2011) Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 1:a006189. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Smith MA, Perry G, Richey PL, Sayre LM, Anderson VE, Beal MF, Kowall N (1996) Oxidative damage in Alzheimer’s. Nature 382:120–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/382120b0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Smith MA, Rudnicka-Nawrot M, Richey PL, Praprotnik D, Mulvihill P, Miller CA, Sayre LM, Perry G (1995) Carbonyl-related posttranslational modification of neurofilament protein in the neurofibrillary pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 64:2660–2666. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64062660.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. StataCorp (2021) Stata statistical software: release 17. StataCorp LLC, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  146. Stolt PC, Chen Y, Liu P, Bock HH, Blacklow SC, Herz J (2005) Phosphoinositide binding by the disabled-1 PTB domain is necessary for membrane localization and Reelin signal transduction. J Biol Chem 280:9671–9677. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M413356200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Stolt PC, Jeon H, Song HK, Herz J, Eck MJ, Blacklow SC (2003) Origins of peptide selectivity and phosphoinositide binding revealed by structures of disabled-1 PTB domain complexes. Structure 11:569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-2126(03)00068-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, Roses AD (1993) Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1977–1981. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Strittmatter WJ, Weisgraber KH, Huang DY, Dong LM, Salvesen GS, Pericak-Vance M, Schmechel D, Saunders AM, Goldgaber D, Roses AD (1993) Binding of human apolipoprotein E to synthetic amyloid beta peptide: isoform-specific effects and implications for late-onset Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8098–8102. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.17.8098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Szabo MP, Mishra S, Knupp A, Young JE (2022) The role of Alzheimer’s disease risk genes in endolysosomal pathways. Neurobiol Dis 162:105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Thal DR, Del Tredici K, Ludolph AC, Hoozemans JJ, Rozemuller AJ, Braak H, Knippschild U (2011) Stages of granulovacuolar degeneration: their relation to Alzheimer’s disease and chronic stress response. Acta Neuropathol 122:577–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0871-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. The National Institute on Aging, and Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease (1997) Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 18:S1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Trotter J, Lee GH, Kazdoba TM, Crowell B, Domogauer J, Mahoney HM, Franco SJ, Muller U, Weeber EJ, D’Arcangelo G (2013) Dab1 is required for synaptic plasticity and associative learning. J Neurosci 33:15652–15668. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2010-13.2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Uddin MS, Hasana S, Hossain MF, Islam MS, Behl T, Perveen A, Hafeez A, Ashraf GM (2021) Molecular genetics of early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Gene Ther 21:43–52. https://doi.org/10.2174/1566523220666201123112822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Urbanska M, Swiech L, Jaworski J (2012) Developmental plasticity of the dendritic compartment: focus on the cytoskeleton. Adv Exp Med Biol 970:265–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0932-8_12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Ventruti A, Kazdoba TM, Niu S, D’Arcangelo G (2011) Reelin deficiency causes specific defects in the molecular composition of the synapses in the adult brain. Neuroscience 189:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Waldvogel HJ, Curtis MA, Baer K, Rees MI, Faull RL (2006) Immunohistochemical staining of post-mortem adult human brain sections. Nat Protoc 1:2719–2732. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Walker DG, Whetzel AM, Serrano G, Sue LI, Lue LF, Beach TG (2016) Characterization of RNA isolated from eighteen different human tissues: results from a rapid human autopsy program. Cell Tissue Bank 17:361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9555-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Wang G, Lei J, Wang Y, Yu J, He Y, Zhao W, Hu Z, Xu Z, Jin Y, Gu Y et al (2022) The ZSWIM8 ubiquitin ligase regulates neurodevelopment by guarding the protein quality of intrinsically disordered Dab1. Cereb Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac313

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Ward A, Crean S, Mercaldi CJ, Collins JM, Boyd D, Cook MN, Arrighi HM (2012) Prevalence of apolipoprotein E4 genotype and homozygotes (APOE e4/4) among patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology 38:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Watamura N, Sato K, Saido TC (2022) Mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease for preclinical research. Neurochem Int 158:105361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2022.105361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Weeber EJ, Beffert U, Jones C, Christian JM, Forster E, Sweatt JD, Herz J (2002) Reelin and ApoE receptors cooperate to enhance hippocampal synaptic plasticity and learning. J Biol Chem 277:39944–39952. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205147200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Wu X, Deng C, Su Y, Zhang C, Chen M, Tian K, Wu H, Xu S (2022) The effect of prolonged formalin fixation on the expression of proteins in human brain tissues. Acta Histochem 124:151879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2022.151879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Yamaguchi H, Nakazato Y, Shoji M, Ihara Y, Hirai S (1990) Ultrastructure of the neuropil threads in the Alzheimer brain: their dendritic origin and accumulation in the senile plaques. Acta Neuropathol 80:368–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00307689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Yeh FL, Wang Y, Tom I, Gonzalez LC, Sheng M (2016) TREM2 binds to apolipoproteins, including APOE and CLU/APOJ, and thereby facilitates uptake of amyloid-beta by microglia. Neuron 91:328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Yun M, Keshvara L, Park CG, Zhang YM, Dickerson JB, Zheng J, Rock CO, Curran T, Park HW (2003) Crystal structures of the Dab homology domains of mouse disabled 1 and 2. J Biol Chem 278:36572–36581. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304384200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Zhu X, Castellani RJ, Moreira PI, Aliev G, Shenk JC, Siedlak SL, Harris PLR, Fujioka H, Sayre LM, Szweda PA et al (2012) Hydroxynonenal-generated crosslinking fluorophore accumulation in Alzheimer disease reveals a dichotomy of protein turnover. Free Radic Biol Med 52:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.11.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the donors and brain banks that provided postmortem specimens, to Pragun Vohra and Histoserv staff for immunohistochemical expertise and immunostaining, and to Marc Raley (Visual Media Services, NIA/NIDA) for graphic art in Figs. 1, 2 and 11.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This project was supported by the intramural programs of NIA (1ZIAAG000453), NIAAA and NINDS, NIH. Additional support was provided as a research gift from John M. Davis to the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, NIA/NIH. The MP-IHC work utilized the computational resources of the NIH HPC Biowulf cluster (http://hpc.nih.gov). We are grateful to the research volunteers and the UA-HBB, BBDP, and UK-ADRC research teams including Henry Waldvogel, Clinton Turner, and Marika Ezses (UA-HBB) and Geidy Serrano (BBDP). The UA-HBB is supported by the Neurological Foundation of New Zealand. The BBDP is supported by the NINDS (U24 NS072026 National Brain and Tissue Resource for Parkinson’s Disease and Related Disorders), the NIA (P30 AG19610 Arizona Alzheimer’s Disease Core Center), the Arizona Department of Health Services (contract 211002, Arizona Alzheimer’s Research Center), the Arizona Biomedical Research Commission (contracts 4001, 0011, 05–901 and 1001 to the Arizona Parkinson's Disease Consortium) and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. The UK-ADRC is supported by the NIA/NIH (P30 AG072946).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CR directed the project, originated the hypothesis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DZ led the statistical analysis and contributed to manuscript preparation and revision. MH managed the data and images, performed annotations and image analysis, and contributed to manuscript preparation. AS performed the MP-IHC experiments, and JJ performed MP-IHC post-acquisition image processing and analysis. EC, GK, and XL contributed to antibody and target optimization and revised the manuscript. HM, MC, and RF led the collection of locus coeruleus specimens and related pathological assessment and contributed to manuscript revision. DM led the MP-IHC experiments and contributed to hypothesis refinement and manuscript preparation and revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher E. Ramsden.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent and agreement for autopsy were obtained from all participants in the study. The study and its consenting procedures were approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Puyallup, Washington, the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee, and the IRB of the University of Kentucky.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The National Institutes of Health filed a patent application related to mechanism-based biomarkers that are broadly related to this manuscript, with one coauthor (CR) named as an inventor.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Contains supplementary tables, extended figures, and supplementary text on materials and methods.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramsden, C.E., Zamora, D., Horowitz, M.S. et al. ApoER2-Dab1 disruption as the origin of pTau-associated neurodegeneration in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. acta neuropathol commun 11, 197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01693-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01693-9

Keywords