Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

A novel PARD3B-NUTM1 fusion in an aggressive primary CNS embryonal tumor in a young adult

Main text

We report a novel PARD3B-NUTM1 gene fusion in a primary embryonal tumor of the brain which had a very aggressive course. A 29-year-old female presented with worsening headache of three-weeks duration. CT and MRI showed a hemorrhagic mass involving the right inferior frontal lobe and temporal lobe (Fig. 1 a, b). The tumor was well-demarcated. It was surgically removed with no gross residual tumor. MRI on post-operative day 27 showed recurrence and additional tumor in the prepontine region and between cerebellar tonsils. Chemotherapy with vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide was initiated and staged re-excisions were performed, but the patient expired due to intraventricular hemorrhage on post-operative day 34. A comprehensive postmortem examination revealed no residual viable tumor in the brain or any other extracranial tumor.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CT and MRI showed a frontotemporal mass with hemorrhage and surrounding vasogenic edema (a, b). Representative histopathology. Low power view shows variegated appearance (c). Small, primitive-appearing tumor cells with some cytoplasmic clearing and hyperchromatic round-to-oval nuclei (d). Spindle cells with ovoid nuclei and myxoid background condensed around a vessel (e). Diffuse uniform nuclear NUT immunostaining (f). A focus of GFAP expression (g). CD99 stains all tumor cells in a membranous or cytoplasmic dot-like pattern (h). Ki-67 proliferative index is high (i). There is nuclear p53 (j) and c-Myc (k) expression in most tumor cells. PARD3B-NUTM1 gene fusion, discovered by NGS of tumor DNA, predicts a fusion protein (l)

Microscopic sections showed a relatively well-circumscribed, moderately cellular neoplasm. The tumor had a variegated histology with foci showing primitive, spindle cells in a myxoid to fibrillar background, foci showing small epithelioid cells with clear cytoplasm around thin-walled vessels, and foci of microvascular proliferation and necrosis (Fig. 1 c-e). There was microscopic infiltration of adjacent brain parenchyma by single tumor cells and reactive gliosis. Mitoses were frequent. No well-differentiated islands of squamous epithelium characteristic of NUT midline carcinoma were observed. By immunohistochemistry (Figs. 1 f-k), there was diffuse CD56 expression, patchy dot-like and strong membranous expression of CD99, focal neurofilament expression and GFAP was positive in a small subset of epithelioid tumor cells. Synaptophysin was positive in single scattered cells (less than 1%). Chromogranin A, OLIG2, IDH1 R132H mutant protein, EMA, pan-keratin, p40, p63, CD34, progesterone receptor, HMB-45, Melan-A, SOX10, desmin, smooth muscle actin, muscle specific actin, CD10, L1CAM, and WT-1 were negative by immunohistochemistry. INI-1 and ATRX expression were retained. The tumor cells showed strong nuclear p53 and c-Myc expression in most tumor cells and had a high Ki-67 (MIB-1) proliferative index (approximated at 60%). We classified the tumor as “central nervous system embryonal tumor, not otherwise specified”. The tumor was negative for EWSR1 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Histology of post-chemotherapy re-excision specimens were similar to the original with focal minimal necrosis (in approximately 10% of the tumor).

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the UCSF500 panel was performed (as described in reference [1]), which revealed a novel PARD3B-NUTM1 gene fusion between PARD3B intron 3–4 and NUTM1 intron 1–2 resulting in an in-frame fusion of exons 1–3 of PARD3B and exons 2–8 of NUTM1. The sequence predicts a fusion protein comprising the N-terminal 132 amino acids of the partitioning defective 3 homolog B protein (PAR3-β) and almost the entire NUT protein (amino acids 3–1160 C -terminus) (Fig. 1 l). There was also a BRCA2 nonsense mutation (p.K944*, c.1830A > T), which was present at a heterozygous allele frequency. NGS also showed chromosomal copy number changes that included gains of 6p and interstitial 15q, and loss of 6q. However, NGS did not detect TP53 or MYC alterations including mutation, amplification or rearrangements despite p53 and c-myc protein overexpression. Subsequent immunohistochemistry showed diffuse strong nuclear expression of NUT protein.


NUT carcinoma is an aggressive midline carcinoma predominantly seen in the head and neck region with undifferentiated or poorly differentiated morphology characterized by NUT expression [2]. The prognosis of NUT carcinomas is poor, with a median survival of 9.8 months [3]. It is now apparent that NUTM1 gene fusions also characterize a subset of undifferentiated soft tissue and visceral tumors not restricted to carcinomas or to the midline [4] and also has been described in B-ALL [5] . NUTM1-rearranged tumors often exhibit rapid growth and spread. Histologically they are heterogeneous and sometimes variegated and have a poorly differentiated cytology. In the brain, several NUTM1 rearrangements have been reported (Table 1). Five of the six cases reported as examples of a newly defined entity called “CNS Ewing sarcoma family tumor with CIC alteration” were shown to express NUT protein by immunohistochemistry and two of these were shown to have CIC-NUTM1 fusion [6]. An exceptional case of a NUTM1-rearranged brain tumor resulted in a disease-free survival at 16 months [7]. Our case showed a very aggressive course in the setting of a novel PARD3B-NUTM1 fusion accompanied by chromosomal copy number changes. PAR3-beta, the product of PARD3B, regulates cell-cell contact and indirectly activates the Hippo pathway, but few studies implicate PARD3B in tumorigenesis [8, 9].

Table 1 Comparison of reported NUTM1-rearranged primary brain tumors

The clinical and histopathologic features of the NUTM1-rearranged brain tumors reported to date are not specific and pose a diagnostic challenge. For the three cases with available histologic description, the tumors showed young age at presentation and hyperchromatic nuclei [4, 7]. Cytologic features were dissimilar. A myxoid background component was a common feature. GFAP expression varied from focal to diffuse. The reported cases were consistently negative for cytokeratin and chromogranin A, and at most focally positive for synaptophysin. There was strong nuclear expression of NUT protein expressed in all five cases. In contrast, some soft tissue and visceral NUTM1-rearranged tumors were negative for NUT expression by immunohistochemistry. The reported NUTM1-rearranged brain tumors were not designated as a specific entity. Based on the morphologic features, intra-axial location, lack of other primary site, diffuse CD99 and CD56 and focal GFAP and neurofilament positivity, lack of carcinoma and sarcoma markers, and lack of histologic and molecular alterations that define other specific CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumors, our case was classified as “CNS embryonal tumor, not otherwise classified” category in the current WHO classification system, which is equivalent to CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumor in previous WHO classification systems.

The reported cases of NUTM1-rearrangements in primary brain tumors were discovered by NGS (Table 1). RNA sequencing was performed either retrospectively or for research purposes for cases 1, 2, and 3. RNA sequencing was performed for diagnostic workup in case 4 (ATXN1-NUTM1). In the current case, DNA sequencing was performed for diagnostic workup, revealing additional chromosomal copy number changes.

To our best knowledge, PARD3B-NUTM1 fusion has not been reported in any tumor. As our case illustrates, utilization of NGS for routine diagnostic workup of primitive appearing CNS tumors may uncover more NUTM1-rearranged tumors with different fusion partners. Molecular analysis of these aggressive tumors may explain the differences seen in histopathologies and provide clues to prognosis and identification of novel therapies.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Fluorescence in-situ hybridization


Next generation sequencing


  1. Kline CN, Joseph NM, Grenert JP, van Ziffle J, Talevich E, Onodera C et al (2016) Targeted next-generation sequencing of pediatric neuro-oncology patients improves diagnosis, identifies pathogenic germline mutations, and directs targeted therapy. Neuro-Oncology 19:699–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Naggar AK, Chan JK, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ (2017) WHO classification of head and neck Tumours, 4th edn. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chau NG, Mitchell CM, Aserlind A, Grunfeld N, Kaplan L, Bauer DE et al (2014) Aggressive treatment and survival outcomes in NUT midline carcinoma (NMC) of the head and neck (HN). JCO. 32:6057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dickson BC, Sung Y, Rosenblum MK, Reuter VE, Harb M, Wunder JS et al (2018) NUTM1 gene fusions characterize a subset of undifferentiated soft tissue and visceral tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 42:636–645.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li J, Dai Y, Lilljebjörn H, Shen S, Cui B, Bai L et al (2018) Transcriptional landscape of B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on an international study of 1,223 cases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E11711–E11720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sturm D, Orr B, Toprak U, Hovestadt V, Jones DW, Capper D et al (2016) New brain tumor entities emerge from molecular classification of CNS-PNETs. Cell. 164:1060–1072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Siegfried A, Masliah-Planchon J, Roux F, Larrieu-Ciron D, Pierron G, Nicaise Y et al (2019) Brain tumor with an ATXN1-NUTM1 fusion gene expands the histologic spectrum of NUTM1-rearranged neoplasia. Acta neuropathologica communications 7:220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonastre E, Verdura S, Zondervan I, Facchinetti F, Lantuejoul S, Chiara MD, et al. PARD3 Inactivation in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinomas Impairs STAT3 and Promotes Malignant Invasion. Cancer Res. 2015;75: 1287–1297. doi: [doi]

  9. Milano DF, Ngai NA, Muthuswamy SK, Asthagiri AR (2016) Regulators of metastasis modulate the migratory response to cell contact under spatial confinement. Biophys J 110:1886–1895 doi: S0006-3495(16)30113-8 [pii]

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors contributed to clinical care of the patient and preparing and reviewing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Metin Ozdemirli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Georgetown University IRB has reviewed the case and determined that the above case study is exempt from IRB approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ko, K., Kitani, T., Harris, B.T. et al. A novel PARD3B-NUTM1 fusion in an aggressive primary CNS embryonal tumor in a young adult. acta neuropathol commun 8, 112 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: