- Open Access
Expression site of P2RY12 in residential microglial cells in astrocytomas correlates with M1 and M2 marker expression and tumor grade
- Changbin Zhu1,
- Johan M. Kros1, 2,
- Marcel van der Weiden1,
- PingPin Zheng1,
- Caroline Cheng†3, 4 and
- Dana A. M. Mustafa†1, 2Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 October 2016
Accepted: 15 December 2016
Published: 10 January 2017
The role of resident microglial cells in the pathogenesis and progression of glial tumors is still obscure mainly due to a lack of specific markers. Recently P2RY12, a P2 purinergic receptor, was introduced as a specific marker for microglial cells under normal and pathologic conditions. Here we analyzed the expression of P2RY12 in astrocytomas of various malignancy grades in relation to markers for M1 and M2 macrophage activation profiles by using two web-based glioma datasets and confocal immunohistochemistry to 28 astrocytoma samples grades II-IV. In the gliomas, P2RY12 immunoreactivity delineated CD68 negative cells with otherwise microglial features from CD68 positive tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). The presence of P2RY12 positive cells correlated positively with overall survival. P2RY12 mRNA levels and membrane-bound localization of P2RY12 were inversely correlated with increasing malignancy grade, and the expression site of P2RY12 shifted from cytoplasmic in low-grade gliomas, to nuclear in high-grade tumors. The cytoplasmic expression of P2RY12 was associated with the expression of M1 markers, characteristic of the pro-inflammatory macrophage response. In contrast, the nuclear localization of P2RY12 was predominant in the higher graded tumors and associated with the expression of the M2 marker CD163.
We conclude that P2RY12 is a specific marker for resident microglia in glioma and its expression and localization correspond to tumor grade and predominant stage of M1/M2 immune response.
Microglial cells are brain-specific tissue resident macrophages that are directly derived from yolk-sac erythromyeloid precursor cells (EMP) during embryonic development . As major contributors to the immune status of the central nervous system (CNS) microglial cells scan the CNS for cellular debris by continuously protract and retract their cell processes . The microglial survey mediates the immune response, supports the homeostasis of the neurons and, in collaboration with astrocytes, maintains the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [23, 32, 37]. Microglial cells become activated by a large variety of pathogenic situations. Upon activation, the cells take on an amoeboid shape and initiate the paracrine recruitment of blood-derived macrophages into the altered brain parenchyma, initiating an inflammatory response [2, 11]. Microglia serves additional, only partly known, roles in repair processes following the acute stage of tissue damage [18, 27]. Recent studies addressing the phenotypic adaptations of peripheral macrophages in cancer have shown that tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), similar to the M1 and M2 activation states of macrophages, display particular marker profiles of pro- and anti-oncogenic action [25, 31]. TAMs with anti-tumor action share characteristics with M1 macrophages; are capable of antigen presentation and paracrine signaling to promote inflammation, thereby hampering tumor growth and prolonging patient survival [28, 39]. These cells are referred to as M1-like cells. In contrast, TAMs that promote tumor progression are associated with an immunosuppressive response; contribute to tumor angiogenesis and proliferation, and are associated with poor clinical outcomes [10, 17, 33] and these cells are referred to as M2-like cells. In general, TAMs are more similar to M2 - than M1 macrophages .
Recent reports have pointed to the heterogeneity of microglial cells . In glioblastoma, microglia displays a pro-oncogenic phenotype resembling that of M2-like macrophages, because the cells are in a microenvironment rich in glioma (stem) cell derived factors like TGF-β1, MCP-1, PGE-2, and soluble colony stimulating factors . There is data showing that resident microglia in glioblastomas plays a role in tumor progression and invasion by the release of cytokines and proteases [24, 35, 38]. However, the mechanism of microglial activation and the contribution of microglia to tumor progression are largely unknown. In order to obtain insight in the specific action of residential microglial cells in gliomas, proper discrimination of these cells from TAMs is necessary. So far, specific markers for residential microglial cells that delineate these cells from other recruited cells of monocyte lineage, are lacking. As a matter of fact, TAMs share many markers with microglial cells. The microglial marker Iba-1 is co-expressed with CD45 and is therefore, not discriminative between residential microglia and monocytic cells that migrated into the brain . In the brains of patients who suffered from Alzheimer disease (AD) the markers CD45 and Iba-1 were used in combination with P2RY12 to separate macrophages from microglia . Considering the growing interest in understanding the role of microglial cells in gliomas, specific markers for the identification of resident microglia in the context of primary brain tumors are urgently needed.
Recently, the Purinergic Receptor P2Y12 (P2RY12) was proposed as a specific marker for healthy rodent CNS microglial cells, discriminating these cells from other types of tissue resident macrophages or blood-derived monocytes . P2RY12 was claimed as a specific marker for microglial cells in human brains [1, 6, 34]. P2RY12 belongs to the family of P2 purinergic receptors, consisting of seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that contribute to ATP-and ADP-mediated cell migration in vitro . P2RY12 is expressed in activated platelets and notoriously, in microglial cells . P2RY12 deficiency in P2RY12 knockdown mice significantly compromised microglial chemotaxis and extension of microglial foot processes in response to CNS injury [12, 29]. In this study, we scrutinized P2RY12 as a marker for microglial cells in glial tumors. We also investigated the relation between the expression of P2RY12 and that of pro- or anti-inflammatory markers; the expression sites in the microglial cells and the relation with tumor progression.
Material and methods
summary of the patients used for immunohistochemistry
Astrocytoma grade II (All)
Anaplastic astrocytoma (AA)
Control (autopsy brains)
Mean age ± st. dev.
42 ± 12.8
40 ± 12.8
45 ± 14.9
58 ± 13.3
Adjacent sections of 5 μm thickness from Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) samples were used for immunohistochemical analysis. The sections were incubated with antibodies against P2RY12 (1:100; Sigma, Sweden); CD68 (1:800; Dako, Denmark) GFAP (1:200; Dako, Denmark); CD45 (1:100; Dako, Denmark) and CD163 (1:400; Abd Serotec, USA). The staining procedure and scanning of the stained sections were performed according to the protocol described previously . For double labeling, Alexa Fluor 488 and 555-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, The Netherlands) were used for detection. For triple staining, Goat anti-Mouse F(ab)2 fragment (Jackson ImmunoResearch, WestGrove, PA, USA) was used to block background epitopes and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, The Netherlands) was used for detection. The fluorescent labeled samples were analyzed by using the confocal microscope LSM 700 (Zeiss, The Netherlands). Signal positive areas and staining intensity were quantified using the Image J program to five high power field (40x) areas of each immunostained slide.
The transcription level of P2RY12 was assessed in human gliomas of various WHO grades, using 2 different datasets derived from the public NCBI GEO database (GDS 4467 Gene ID 64805 and GDS1816 Gene ID 64805). In addition, transcriptional data of P2ry12 in a murine glioma model were obtained from the GEO database (GSE 86573) .
RNA-sequencing data of P2RY12 combined with clinical data were obtained from two TCGA glioblastoma databases (Provisional: 166 GBM patients . In addition, information on IDH1 mutation as well as MGMT methylation status were also obtained from the TCGA GBM database (Cell, 2013). The R program and CGDS-R package provided by the cBioPortal for cancer genomics from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was used to download and process data.
To study the relation between P2RY12 mRNA expression levels and markers for microglia identification, a mutual exclusivity analysis was performed as described previously [8, 9]. The GBM TCGA dataset (GBM, provisional) and a low-grade glioma TCGA dataset were selected for analysis using the cBioPortal websource (Additional file 1: Table S1). High P2RY12 expression was defined by a Z score ≥ 2. Z score = (individual P2RY12 value – mean P2RY12 value) / std. dev. of the whole sample set. A log Odd Ratio (OR) >0 indicates a trend of co-occurrence in expression of P2RY12 with the listed genes and log (OR) <0 indicates a trend of mutual exclusivity in expression pattern.
The results of immunostaining and the data from public database were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test (P < 0.05 was considered significant). Survival analysis was performed using the Log-rank test (P < 0.05 was considered significant). All data and graphs were analyzed and made by using Graph pad Prism 5.0.
Reduction of membrane P2RY12 signal correlates with glioma grade
P2RY12nuclei+ cells are not of myeloid origin, but represent resident microglia
In the GEO dataset GSE 86573 generated from a murine glioma model the expression of P2ry12 by microglia (MG) was significantly higher than that by bone marrow- derived macrophages (BMDM) (Additional file 2: Figure S1).
Cytoplasmic or nuclear distribution of P2RY12 in microglia relates to the functional marker profiles
High expression levels of P2RY12 are associated with favorable clinical outcomes
Summary of patients’ information from TCGA GBM database
TCGA GBM Database n = 151
High (n = 21)
Low (n = 130)
mRNA level ± S.D
(RNA Seq V2 RSEM)
3263 ± 722.6
499.5 ± 580.1
Age (year) ± S.D
55.1 ± 15.1
61.5 ± 12.4
TMZ Chemoradiation, TMZ Chemo
Standard Radiation, TMZ Chemo
Nonstandard Radiation, TMZ Chemo
Standard Radiation, Alkylating Chemo
Standard Radiation, Alkylating Chemo
P2RY12 expression correlates with microglia/macrophage function
P2RY12 had a significant likelihood for co-occurrence with the microglia markers Iba-1 and CX3CR1 in GBM, and CX3CR1, CD11b in low grade glioma. Likewise, IRF8, a transcription factor for the function and development of microglia cells [14, 15] is expressed simultaneous with P2RY12 in both GBM and low grade gliomas. Due to the limited number of samples in the high P2RY12 expression group, the p-values of associations with log(OR) < -3 remain non-significant, despite a high probability and tendency for mutual exclusion.
The associations between P2RY12 and other markers are listed in the Additional file 1: Table S1. Genes positively (Spearman r ≥0.5) or negatively (Spearman r ≤ -0.3) correlated with P2RY12 from the two TCGA GBM database were selected for pathway enrichment analysis (Fig. 5b, d). Pathway analysis from Gene Ontology based on 222 P2RY12 positively correlating genes included the regulation of immune response including defense response, leukocyte activation, T cell activation (Fig. 5c). Pathway analysis on 58 P2RY12 negatively correlating genes mainly included cell cycle regulation and cell proliferation (Fig. 5e). The findings indicate that P2RY12 expression is positively correlated with markers commonly used for microglia in the CNS and positive immune response, but is inversely associated with markers for peripheral recruited macrophages, M2-like microglia/macrophage activation and cell proliferation.
In the present study, we found that resident microglial cells in gliomas specifically express P2RY12 and that the expression distinguishes microglia from other monocytes and macrophages. This finding in human gliomas corroborates the data we generated from the murine gliomas represented in the GEO database. The analysis of the public glioma datasets and the multi-labeling experiments of the glioma biopsy specimens confirmed that P2RY12 mRNA and protein expression is confined to resident microglial cells. In addition, P2RY12 expression is associated with tumor grade: the expression is less in AA and GBM, as compared to A II. However, the expression of P2RY12 is not an independent prognosticator in gliomas; when strong prognostic factors as IDH mutational status or methylation status of MGMT are taken into consideration, no additional effects of the expression are found. The expression of P2RY12 appeared to be higher in the IDH mutated tumors, which is in line with the association of IDH mutation and better prognosis on the one hand, and the pro-inflammatory status on the other. Remarkably, with increasing malignancy grade there is a shift from cytoplasmic to nuclear expression, and in the high-grade tumors the nuclear expression of P2RY12 coincides with that of the M2 markers CD163 and CD204 (Fig. 1a and c, Fig. 4). We also observed that in the high-grade gliomas the P2RY12 positive microglial cells have taken an amoeboid phenotype (Fig. 1b).
Upon pathologic stimuli, resting microglia adopt a highly dynamic phenotype referred to as “ramified microglia”, with an extensive motile set of foot processes that continuously survey the local environment to recognize and eliminate pathogens . Loss of microglial expression of P2RY12 in knockout mice resulted in impaired polarization, migration and extension of microglial processes towards extracellular nucleotides released from damaged cells, indicating that P2RY12 is required to guide microglial chemotaxis . Further studies revealed that a raise of local extracellular ATP/ADP levels at the site of CNS injury activates Gi/o-coupled P2RY12, followed by PI3K and PLC signaling-mediated migration of microglial cells towards the chemotactic source . Exogenous stimuli like lipopolysaccharides (LPS) can cause a dramatic reduction of the P2RY12 expression in microglia cells in vitro accompanied by the retraction of microglial processes and metamorphosis into an amoeboid shape . These phenomena indicate a function of P2RY12 in the activation of immune regulation during inflammation.
The environmental changes taking place under various pathological conditions cause ATP/ADP leaks that are noticed by the P2RY12 receptors of microglia and lead to changes affecting the cell processes and motility of the cells . High concentrations of purinergic nucleotides and nucleosides such as adenosine and ATP were shown to work in synergy with LPS activation of microglial cells, promoting chemo repulsion away from the ATP source, a process that is associated with increased local adenosine A2A receptor signaling [16, 30]. The expression of the adenosine A2A receptor increases significantly in response to LPS, while P2RY12 expression decreased by LPS, indicating that the shift from a ramified towards an amoeboid phenotype depends on the balance between P2RY12 and A2A receptor signaling, respectively . More studies are required to elucidate the exact regulatory mechanism of microglia immune-activation by these two significant signaling pathways.
In this study we observed nuclear localization of P2RY12 in microglial cells in the high-grade tumors, while in the lower graded astrocytomas P2RY12 was expressed in the cytoplasm. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as P2RY12 and its family members are considered as cell surface bound mediators of intracellular signaling. From in vitro and in vivo studies, it is known that some receptors have a nuclear localization. These receptors include the receptors for apelin, angiotensin II AT1, parathyroid hormone, glutamate mGluR5, endothelin ETA and ETB, and the prostaglandins EP1, EP3, and EP4 . The mechanism and functional implications of nuclear translocation remains obscure. It has been suggested that nuclear import is programmed by the DNA sequence of the receptors. Nuclear GPCRs complex proteins such as heterotrimeric G proteins, phospholipase A2, and phospholipase C seem to remain active in intracellular signaling, similar to the activation of nuclear endothelin and prostaglandin receptors that were proven to increase nuclear Ca2+concentrations . However, the functional implications of nuclear localization of the P2RY12 receptor and its association with advanced tumor grade needs to be further unraveled.
The expression site of P2RY12 matches astrocytoma grade, and also reflects the activation status of microglia cells in the tumors. Because of its association with the stage of immune response, P2RY12 may become an interesting drug target for future immune-modulation based therapy for the patients suffering from these tumors.
CZ was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council, (201206230102). CC was supported by the Netherlands Foundation for Cardiovascular Excellence and by the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative: An initiative with support of the Dutch Heart Foundation, (CVON2014-11 RECONNECT), VIDI grant 91714302, the Erasmus MC fellowship grant, and the RM fellowship grant of the UMC Utrecht. DAM was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF) grant (KWF EMCR 2009-4553).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
CZ performed the analyses and most of the work. MW performed the immunohistochemistry staining. PPZ helped with the data analysis. JMK, CZ, DAM designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Bennett ML, Bennett FC, Liddelow SA, Ajami B, Zamanian JL, Fernhoff NB et al (2016) New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(12):E1738–E1746View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Block ML, Zecca L, Hong JS (2007) Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(1):57–69View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman RL, Klemm F, Akkari L, Pyonteck SM, Sevenich L, Quail DF et al (2016) Macrophage Ontogeny Underlies Differences in Tumor-Specific Education in Brain Malignancies. Cell Rep 17(9):2445–2459View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brennan CW, Verhaak RG, McKenna A, Campos B, Noushmehr H, Salama SR et al (2013) The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 155(2):462–477View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Butovsky O, Jedrychowski MP, Moore CS, Cialic R, Lanser AJ, Gabriely G et al (2014) Identification of a unique TGF-beta-dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia. Nat Neurosci 17(1):131–143View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Butowski N, Colman H, De Groot JF, Omuro AM, Nayak L, Wen PY, et al. Orally administered colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor PLX3397 in recurrent glioblastoma: an Ivy Foundation Early Phase Clinical Trials Consortium phase II study. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;18:557–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cattaneo M (2015) P2Y12 receptors: structure and function. J Thromb Haemost 13(Suppl 1):S10–S16View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciriello G, Cerami E, Sander C, Schultz N (2012) Mutual exclusivity analysis identifies oncogenic network modules. Genome Res 22(2):398–406View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gao JJ, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO et al (2013) Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal 6(269):pl1View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hambardzumyan D, Gutmann DH, Kettenmann H (2016) The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression. Nat Neurosci 19(1):20–27View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hanisch UK (2002) Microglia as a source and target of cytokines. Glia 40(2):140–155View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haynes SE, Hollopeter G, Yang G, Kurpius D, Dailey ME, Gan WB et al (2006) The P2Y12 receptor regulates microglial activation by extracellular nucleotides. Nat Neurosci 9(12):1512–1519View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jay TR, Miller CM, Cheng PJ, Graham LC, Bemiller S, Broihier ML et al (2015) TREM2 deficiency eliminates TREM2+ inflammatory macrophages and ameliorates pathology in Alzheimer's disease mouse models. J Exp Med 212(3):287–295View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kierdorf K, Erny D, Goldmann T, Sander V, Schulz C, Perdiguero EG et al (2013) Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways. Nat Neurosci 16(3):273–280View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kierdorf K, Prinz M (2013) Factors regulating microglia activation. Front Cell Neurosci 7:44View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Koizumi S, Ohsawa K, Inoue K, Kohsaka S (2013) Purinergic receptors in microglia: Functional modal shifts of microglia mediated by P2 and P1 receptors. Glia 61(1):47–54View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Komohara Y, Ohnishi K, Kuratsu J, Takeya M (2008) Possible involvement of the M2 anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype in growth of human gliomas. J Pathol 216(1):15–24View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lalancette-Hebert M, Gowing G, Simard A, Weng YC, Kriz J (2007) Selective ablation of proliferating microglial cells exacerbates ischemic injury in the brain. J Neurosci 27(10):2596–2605View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lavin Y, Mortha A, Rahman A, Merad M (2015) Regulation of macrophage development and function in peripheral tissues. Nat Rev Immunol 15(12):731–744View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lecchi A, Razzari C, Paoletta S, Dupuis A, Nakamura L, Ohlmann P et al (2015) Identification of a new dysfunctional platelet P2Y12 receptor variant associated with bleeding diathesis. Blood 125(6):1006–1013View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee DK, Lanca AJ, Cheng R, Nguyen T, Ji XD, Gobeil F Jr et al (2004) Agonist-independent nuclear localization of the Apelin, angiotensin AT1, and bradykinin B2 receptors. J Biol Chem 279(9):7901–7908View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li W, Graeber MB (2012) The molecular profile of microglia under the influence of glioma. Neuro Oncol 14(8):958–978View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lou N, Takano T, Pei Y, Xavier AL, Goldman SA, Nedergaard M (2016) Purinergic receptor P2RY12-dependent microglial closure of the injured blood-brain barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(4):1074–1079View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Markovic DS, Glass R, Synowitz M, Rooijen N, Kettenmann H (2005) Microglia stimulate the invasiveness of glioma cells by increasing the activity of metalloprotease-2. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64(9):754–762View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez FO, Gordon S (2014) The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep 6:13View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nayak D, Roth TL, McGavern DB (2014) Microglia development and function. Annu Rev Immunol 32:367–402View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Neumann J, Gunzer M, Gutzeit HO, Ullrich O, Reymann KG, Dinkel K (2006) Microglia provide neuroprotection after ischemia. FASEB J 20(6):714–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noy R, Pollard JW (2014) Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy. Immunity 41(1):49–61View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ohsawa K, Irino Y, Sanagi T, Nakamura Y, Suzuki E, Inoue K et al (2010) P2Y12 receptor-mediated integrin-beta1 activation regulates microglial process extension induced by ATP. Glia 58(7):790–801PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orr AG, Orr AL, Li XJ, Gross RE, Traynelis SF (2009) Adenosine A(2A) receptor mediates microglial process retraction. Nat Neurosci 12(7):872–878View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ostuni R, Kratochvill F, Murray PJ, Natoli G (2015) Macrophages and cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Trends Immunol 36(4):229–239View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parkhurst CN, Gan WB (2010) Microglia dynamics and function in the CNS. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20(5):595–600View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Prosniak M, Harshyne LA, Andrews DW, Kenyon LC, Bedelbaeva K, Apanasovich TV et al (2013) Glioma grade is associated with the accumulation and activity of cells bearing M2 monocyte markers. Clin Cancer Res 19(14):3776–3786View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasaki Y, Hoshi M, Akazawa C, Nakamura Y, Tsuzuki H, Inoue K et al (2003) Selective expression of Gi/o-coupled ATP receptor P2Y12 in microglia in rat brain. Glia 44(3):242–250View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sliwa M, Markovic D, Gabrusiewicz K, Synowitz M, Glass R, Zawadzka M et al (2007) The invasion promoting effect of microglia on glioblastoma cells is inhibited by cyclosporin A. Brain 130:476–489View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szulzewsky F, Arora S, de Witte L, Ulas T, Markovic D, Schultze JL et al (2016) Human glioblastoma-associated microglia/monocytes express a distinct RNA profile compared to human control and murine samples. Glia 64(8):1416–1436View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay ME, Stevens B, Sierra A, Wake H, Bessis A, Nimmerjahn A (2011) The role of microglia in the healthy brain. J Neurosci 31(45):16064–16069View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watters JJ, Schartner JM, Badie B (2005) Microglia function in brain tumors. J Neurosci Res 81(3):447–455View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang M, He Y, Sun X, Li Q, Wang W, Zhao A et al (2014) A high M1/M2 ratio of tumor-associated macrophages is associated with extended survival in ovarian cancer patients. J Ovarian Res 7:19View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zheng PP, van der Weiden M, Kros JM (2014) Fast tracking of co-localization of multiple markers by using the nanozoomer slide scanner and NDPViewer. J Cell Physiol 229(8):967–973View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar