Skip to content

Advertisement

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Research
Open Access

Rubidium and potassium levels are altered in Alzheimer’s disease brain and blood but not in cerebrospinal fluid

  • Blaine R. Roberts1, 2Email author,
  • James D. Doecke2, 3, 4,
  • Alan Rembach^1,
  • L. Fernanda Yévenes1,
  • Christopher J. Fowler1,
  • Catriona A. McLean1, 5, 6,
  • Monica Lind1,
  • Irene Volitakis1,
  • Colin L. Masters1, 2,
  • Ashley I. Bush1, 2,
  • Dominic J. Hare1, 7 and
  • the AIBL research group8
^Deceased
Acta Neuropathologica CommunicationsNeuroscience of Disease20164:119

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0390-8

©  The Author(s). 2016

Received: 15 September 2016

Accepted: 29 October 2016

Published: 14 November 2016

Abstract

Loss of intracellular compartmentalization of potassium is a biochemical feature of Alzheimer’s disease indicating a loss of membrane integrity and mitochondrial dysfunction. We examined potassium and rubidium (a biological proxy for potassium) in brain tissue, blood fractions and cerebrospinal fluid from Alzheimer’s disease and healthy control subjects to investigate the diagnostic potential of these two metal ions. We found that both potassium and rubidium levels were significantly decreased across all intracellular compartments in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. Serum from over 1000 participants in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL), showed minor changes according to disease state. Potassium and rubidium levels in erythrocytes and cerebrospinal fluid were not significantly different according to disease state, and rubidium was slightly decreased in Alzheimer’s disease patients compared to healthy controls. Our data provides evidence that contrasts the hypothesized disruption of the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease, with the systemic decrease in cortical potassium and rubidium levels suggesting influx of ions from the blood is minimal and that the observed changes are more likely indicative of an internal energy crisis within the brain. These findings may be the basis for potential diagnostic imaging studies using radioactive potassium and rubidium tracers.

Keywords

Positron Emission TomographyRubidiumImpaired Energy MetabolismLumbar Puncture ProcedureFrontal Cortical Tissue

Introduction

Mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired energy metabolism are features that immediately precede neuronal loss in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [1]. Oxidative stress arising from neurotoxic β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation and oligomerization causes a loss in membrane integrity in the synapse [2], which is heavily dependent on sufficient ATP production to regulate ion transport in and out of the cell [3]. Oligomeric Aβ species adversely affect cellular function through a range of hypothesized mechanisms, a number of which directly compromise both energy production and membrane potential [4, 5].

Impaired energy production related to AD pathology has been of research interest. Positron emission tomography (PET) has identified a metabolic decrease in glucose consumption in the AD brain [6], which is indicative of reduced neural activity [7] and direct impairment of Na+/K+-ATPase-regulated intramembrane ion transport [8]. Thus, there is potential that markers of modified K+ handling may be indicative of AD, and could be a useful preclinical marker of increased AD risk.

As a group 1 alkali metal, rubidium (Rb+) has similar biochemical characteristics to K+ [9]. Though it has no known biological function, Rb+ is present in almost all biological systems due to its ability to readily exchange with K+ [10]. Assessment of Rb+ is a useful proxy for K+, so much so that turnover of radioactive 86Rb+ has been successfully used as a measure of basal metabolic rate [11]. Rubidium assays are also less prone to environmental contamination, and the ion is present in biological matrices at concentrations well suited to contemporary analytical techniques [12].

As is the case with many other biometals, there are numerous conflicting reports of either changes to [13, 14] or stability of [15–17] Rb and K levels in AD, most likely due to low statistical power. Here, we used post mortem brain tissue from the Victorian Brain Bank Network along with blood samples from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing [18], which is one of the world’s largest longitudinal studies of AD, to investigate changes in the regulation of K+ and Rb+ from a system-wide perspective. We aimed to categorically determine if levels of these metals are altered in AD.

Methods and materials

Human brain samples

All brain tissues were obtained from the Victorian Brain Bank Network, and all experiments were approved by the University of Melbourne health sciences, human ethics subcommittee (ID1136882). Tissue was collected at autopsy, frozen at −80 °C, then thawed to −20 °C and sectioned into 1 cm slices. From these, c.a. 5 g samples of frontal cortex were collected and 0.5 g aliquots of grey matter dissected and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Neurological control tissues were defined as free from AD lesions with the number of plaque and tangles were well below the cut-off values for the neuropathological diagnosis of AD (NIA Reagan criteria). No other neurological disease was present.

Preparation of tissue homogenate fractions

Sample preparation steps for tissue samples were adapted our previously reported methods [19, 20]. Aliquots (0.1–0.3 g) of dissected grey matter from the frontal cortex were thawed on ice and homogenized in single-use BioMasher (Omni International) vials. After centrifugation at 100,000 g a 1:4 tissue-to-buffer (w/v) ratio of Tris buffered saline (TBS; 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl) with EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Roche) was added to each homogenate. Samples were transferred to ultracentrifuge vials, spun at 100,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C, and then had the supernatant removed (the ‘soluble’ fraction). The remaining pellet was isolated and resuspended with 1:4 (w/v) 100 mM NaCO3 (pH 11.0), then centrifuged again at 100,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C to retrieve the ‘vesicular’ fraction. Remaining material was then subjected to extraction of membrane-bound proteins and metals (the ‘membrane’ fraction) by addition of 1:4 (w/v) 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4 % 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and 30 mM Bicine (pH 8.5) and further centrifugation at 100,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. Any remaining ‘insoluble’ material was then digested in 70 % formic acid for c.a. 18 h before centrifugation as performed for all other extractions. No material remained at the conclusion of fractionation experiments.

Preparation of blood samples

Protocols for the preparation of serum and erythrocytes was followed according to our previously reported method [21]. Whole blood was drawn from AIBL subjects after overnight fasting. For serum collection, blood was drawn into serum-gel 7.5 mL tubes (Sarstedt) and left standing at room temperature for 20 min before centrifugation at 1800 g for 15 min. Serum was split into 250 μL aliquots and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis. After thawing, serum samples were spun briefly at 1800 g and diluted 1:10 in 1 % HNO3 for analysis. Platelets were recovered by centrifuging a plasma fraction (collected from whole blood in a lithium-heparin tube) at 800 g for 15 min and removing the plasma supernatant.

Erythrocytes were collected from blood samples taken after an overnight fast into standard lithium-heparin 7.5 mL tubes (Sarstedt). Samples were spun at 3200 g to remove plasma and platelets, leaving erythrocytes that were washed three times in 0.9 % (w/v) NaCl. Erythrocytes were distributed by inverting the tube and then centrifuged at 650 g for 10 min, after which the supernatant was removed and samples were spun again at 1500 g for 10 min at room temperature. Erythrocytes were then resuspended in 6 mL of 0.1 M PBS and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis. A 50 μL of thawed erythrocytes were transferred to 1.5 mL polypropylene tubes and digested in equal volumes of 65 % HNO3 and ≥30 % H2O2 on a hotplate at 80 °C. After cooling, samples were diluted 1:20 with 1 % HNO3. Platelets were prepared for analysis using the same digestion procedure as described for erythrocytes.

Preparation of CSF samples

Cerebrospinal fluid was collected using the gravity drip method described by Rembach et al. [22]. Patients underwent a lumbar puncture procedure following an overnight fast, and up to 8 mL of CSF was collected directly into a 15 mL polypropylene tube. Samples were centrifuged at 2000 g at 4 °C and then divided into 300 μL aliquots and stored on liquid nitrogen. After thawing, 100 μL aliquots were diluted 1:10 with 1 % HNO3 for analysis.

Rubidium and potassium analysis

All metal analyses were performed on an Agilent 7700× Series inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) using a Teflon MiraMist nebulizer (Burgener Research Inc.) and Scott-type double-pass spray chamber (Glass Expansion). Helium was used as a collision gas to remove potential polyatomic interferences. The instrument was calibrated using multi-element standards (Accustandard, ICP-MS-2-1, ICP-MS-3-1, ICP-MS-4-1; total of 44 elements) containing K and Rb at 0, 5, 10, 50, 100 and 500 μg L−1 with 89Y introduced online through a T-piece as the internal standard. 39K and 85Rb were monitored. Seronorm™ L1 and L2 (Sero) were reconstituted in 1:20, 1 % HNO3 prior to analysis for use as quality control standards.

Statistical analysis

All statistical testing was performed in GraphPad Prism v6.0 h using unpaired t-tests, one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis as appropriate. Significance was defined as p < 0.05 after Bonferroni post-hoc testing.

Results

K and Rb levels are consistently decreased in fractionated brain homogenates

We analyzed post mortem AD and healthy control (HC) frontal cortical tissue (n = 30 per group, matched for age and sex; see Table 1 for demographics) by subjecting homogenates of frontal cortex to a stepwise fractionation process that extracted material into ‘soluble’, vesicular-peripheral membrane (‘vesicular’), membrane-bound (‘membrane’) and ‘insoluble’ classifications [19]. These solutions were then assayed for total K and Rb content using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; see Materials and Methods). In AD frontal cortex significant decreases in both K and Rb levels were apparent (Fig. 1a-b). The degree of change increased in magnitude from the ‘soluble’ to ‘insoluble’ fractions. As expected, a high degree of correlation between tissue K and Rb levels were observed regardless of diagnosis (r = 0.862 (HC); r = 0.738 (AD); both p < 0.001; Fig. 1c-d). However, the slope measured by linear regression was significantly decreased in the AD brains (63.7 % of HC; F = 5.41, p < 0.05). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of both K and Rb levels in the total homogenate (which showed the largest difference between clinical classifications) found that Rb performed better at predicting AD, with an area under the curve of 0.815 versus 0.754 for K (both p < 0.01; Fig. 1e-f).
Table 1

Subject demographics for post mortem brain samples

 

Healthy controls (n = 30)

Alzheimer’s disease (n = 30)

p value

Age (years)

76.8 (7.6)

78.3 (9.2)

0.56

Females (%)

33.3

26.7

0.59

% APOE ε4 carriers

13.3

75.8

<0.001

Post mortem interval (hours)

38.4 (14.3)

33.9 (21.9)

0.38

Mean (standard deviation); p-value calculated using a two-tailed Student’s t-test

Figure 1
Fig. 1

a, b K and Rb levels in fractionated brain homogenates were consistently decreased in AD brains (n = 30 per group; one-way ANOVA; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; percentage decrease in AD group compared to healthy controls shown). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. c Both metals showed significant correlation regardless of clinical classification (p < 0.001), though the slope of the line of best fit was significantly decreased in the AD group (p < 0.05). d, e Both metals performed well at predicting AD via ROC curve analysis, with Rb slightly superior performance

Serum levels of K and Rb are altered in Alzheimer’s disease

To investigate whether the observed changes in K and Rb levels within brain homogenates are reflected in the periphery, we examined serum K and Rb concentrations in the entire baseline AIBL cohort, including the mildly cognitively impaired group (n total  = 1077; n HC  = 778; n MCI  = 128; n AD  = 171; Table 2; see Ellis et al. [18] for cohort full demographics). Significant differences were observed for both analytes between HC and AD groups, but these shifts did not reflect the magnitude or direction of those observed in the brain. There was a 2.6 % increase in serum K levels in the AD subjects (Fig. 2a), with a small (5.4 %) decrease in serum Rb (Fig. 2b). There was a highly significant (p < 0.001) decrease in the ratio of Rb to K in the AD group (Fig. 2c), though ROC analysis revealed changes in all three measures were less robust (though still statistically significant) indicators of AD than total Rb and K in brain homogenates (AUC K  = 0.569; AUC Rb  = 0.575; AUC Rb:K  = 0.6115; Additional file 1: Figure S1). K and Rb levels correlated in both groups, although again to a much lesser extent than in brain homogenates, and the slopes of both lines did not differ (F = 0.21; p = 0.65; Fig. 2d).
Table 2

Subject demographics of the baseline AIBL cohort used for serum K and Rb analysis

 

Healthy controls (n = 778)

Mild cognitive impairment (n = 128)

Alzheimer’s disease (n = 171)

p-value

Age (years)

70.6 (7)

76.2 (7.6)

78.8 (8.6)

<0.001

Females (%)

57.6

56.3

62.0

0.34

% APOE ε4 carriers

27.2

49.2

62.4

<0.001

CDR SOB

0.0 (0.1)

1.2 (0.8)

5.8 (2.9)

<0.001

MMSE

28.9 (1.2)

26.2 (2.7)

18.9 (5.3)

<0.001

CDR SOB is the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes score used to stage dementia. MMSE is the mini-mental state examination questionnaire score. p-value calculated using a one-way ANOVA or chi-squared test for percentages

Figure 2
Fig. 2

K levels were significantly increased in AD serum (a; one-way ANOVA; * p < 0.05), whilst Rb levels were conversely decreased in AD (b; * p < 0.05); the latter mirroring our observation in brain homogenates. The ratio of Rb to K was significantly (*** p < 0.001) decreased in AD (c), though Rb and K levels were less well correlated in serum (d). In a subset (n = 30 per group) of erythrocytes from HC and AD groups, there was no significance difference in metal concentration (e, f). Boxes depict 25th and 75th percentiles and mean; error bars represent minimum to maximum values

Rb levels are decreased in platelets, but not erythrocytes or CSF

We analyzed a subset of AD and HC erythrocytes for Rb and K concentrations (n = 40 per classification) and found no significant difference between groups (p = 0.62; Fig. 2e, f). K levels in a subset of HC, AD and MCI platelets (n HC  = 50, n AD  = 41, n MCI   = 7; Table 3) were not different between groups (Fig. 3a). Rb levels in AD platelets were significantly decreased compared to the HC group (one-way ANOVA; p < 0.05; Fig. 3b; Table 4). This decrease in Rb levels in platelets showed limited diagnostic potential when examined using an ROC curve (Additional file 1: Figure S2). In cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; n HC  = 36, n AD  = 9, n MCI   = 7; Table 5) K and Rb levels were unaltered according to clinical classification (Fig. 3c, d).
Table 3

Subject demographics for erythrocytes

 

Healthy controls (n = 40)

Alzheimer’s disease (n = 40)

p-value

Age (years)

82.0 (8.0)

82.0 (8.0)

0.97

Females (%)

52.5

50.0

0.96

% APOE ε4 carriers

37.5

60.0

0.05

p-value calculated using a two-tailed Student’s t-test

Figure 3
Fig. 3

K and Rb levels in platelets and CSF. a, b In platelets no significant changes were observed for K, though Rb was significantly decreased (p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA) in AD subjects compared to controls. c, d K and Rb levels in CSF remained unchanged. Boxes depict 25th and 75th percentiles and mean; error bars represent minimum to maximum values

Table 4

Subject demographics for platelets

 

Healthy controls (n = 50)

Mild cognitive impairment (n = 7)

Alzheimer’s disease (n = 41)

p-value

Age (years)

73.8 (6.3)

71.6 (4.8)

80.8 (7.8)

<0.001

Females (%)

60

14.3

75.6

<0.01

% APOE ε4 carriers

20

28.6

75.6

<0.001

p-value calculated using a one-way ANOVA or chi-squared test for percentages

Table 5

Subject demographics for CSF

 

Healthy controls (n = 36)

Mild cognitive impairment (n = 7)

Alzheimer’s disease (n = 9)

p-value

Age (years)

71.8 (5.6)

68.3 (4.5)

71.3 (7.1)

0.40

Females (%)

58.0

57.1

33.3

0.41

% APOE ε4 carriers

19

0

44.4

0.20

p-value calculated using a one-way ANOVA or chi squared test for percentages

Discussion

Our results expand upon a previous smaller study that reported decreased Rb levels in the AD brain [23]; we found here that Rb levels are decreased in interstitial/cytosolic, vesicular, membrane-bound and otherwise insoluble fractions, and that these changes correlate with and reflect decreased K levels in the same isolates. Both K and Rb levels have been shown to be decreased in homogenates from a range of brain regions that show progressive neurodegeneration in AD [24]. We found no compelling evidence that K and Rb levels external to the brain (i.e., blood products and CSF) have diagnostic potential in AD research.

Our data suggests that the observed effects of impaired alkali metal metabolism in the AD brain, such as altered Na+/K+-ATPase activity manifest as a decrease in total brain Rb and K levels, as opposed to being restricted to a specific fraction. We found that the decrease was of a higher magnitude (c.a. 50 %) within cellular membranes (i.e., the ‘membrane’ and ‘insoluble’ fractions). It is unclear as to whether a reduction in K (and, by nature of its ability to exchange, Rb) is a cause or effect of the disease process, though a number of genes associated with K transport and flux have been identified as showing decreased transcription levels in the AD brain [25]. In vitro studies of mixed cortical cultures have shown that Aβ induces K+ efflux via enhancing the delayed rectifier K+ current I K [26], potentially through the formation of transient ion channels in bilayer membranes [27].

Importantly, this disruption of cellular metabolism in AD likely commences well before the appearance of histopathological features and the onset of clinical symptoms. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of AD brains identified as many as 70 % of genes encoding subunits of the mitochondrial electron transport chain were expressed at lower levels in regions of the brain most affected by AD when compared to controls [28]. Neural network analysis of ‘seed genes’ (the principal genes from which regulatory pathways are grown [29]) identified those encoding the master energy regulator AMP-activated protein kinase as being dysregulated in AD [30].

The effects of impaired energy metabolism appear to primarily result in a loss of membrane integrity through its negative impact on active transport mechanisms that regulate resting membrane potential. As the major consumer of energy in the cell—maintaining resting potential and action potentials accounts for 20–50 % of energy use in neurons in the cortex [31]—the action of Na+/K+-ATPase is easily compromised by energy deficits. In the AD brain, Na+/K+-ATPase activity is depressed [32], with a reduction in α3 subunit mRNA observed, a process that occurs prior to the formation of Aβ plaques and is rapidly accelerated in the disease [33], further supporting the hypothesis that an energy crisis is inexorably linked to the molecular basis of the disease.

These findings may have diagnostic potential in the clinical setting. Rubidium-82 has been extensively used in positron emission tomography (PET) as a diagnostic marker for brain tumors [34], with increased uptake of the Rb-82 tracer indicative of a loss of blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Permeability of the BBB is thought to be a feature of both normal aging and AD [35], though both increased serum K concentrations in AD and a failure to identify a change in CSF K or Rb levels tends to suggest that BBB permeability is not directly responsible for the decrease in akali metal levels in the AD brain. Further, a recent study using animal models of AD, including the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) model of induced inflammation, PS2-APP and human tau expressing transgenic mice lines, APOE knockout and APOE4 knock-in mice showed no evidence of BBB permeability compared to both wild type and a positive multiple sclerosis model control using multiple assays, including Rb-86 radiotracer experiments [36], questioning the long-held belief that BBB disruption is characteristic of AD.

Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis of brain Rb levels (Fig. 2f) shows that changes in levels of this metal is a strong predictor of AD, therefore Rubidium-82/86 PET imaging could be used to identify early-stage AD. Considering that alkali metal homeostasis is disrupted via decreased Na+/K+-ATPase activity prior to Aβ plaque formation, this approach may have greater preclinical value than the contemporary method employing Pittsburgh compound-B to assess brain amyloid burden by PET [37]. However, if the BBB integrity is maintained in AD, delivery of the imaging agent presents a challenge to use as a preclinical diagnostic tool. An intact BBB still demonstrates a small degree (2.1 %) of Rb uptake, though this is ten-fold less than typically observed in cases of brain tumors and associated BBB disruption [38]. Hyperosmolar BBB disruption via injection of 25 % mannitol to the carotid artery has been shown to induce a temporary window for 82Rb loading into the baboon brain [39], though the safety of this approach in humans remains untested beyond patients with pre-existing brain tumors. A non-invasive scanning ultrasound approach to temporarily open the BBB in the APP23 transgenic AD mouse model was shown to be effective in clearing accumulated Aβ [40], and a number of clinical trials testing the safety and efficacy of this approach, predominantly for drug delivery, are currently ongoing [41]. Development of a suitable BBB-permeable vehicle that releases Rb into the brain is an intriguing line of enquiry.

An alternative means to monitor brain Rb levels without the need to deliver an exogenous tracer uses the paramagnetic properties of the naturally occurring 87Rb radioisotope, which accounts for approximately 28 % of Rb in the natural environment. T 1 and T 2 relaxation times are well suited to magnetic resonance imaging using specialized coils, and this approach has been used to quantitatively assess K (using 87Rb as a proxy) in the brains of ischemic rats [42, 43]. This approach uses chronic Rb loading via drinking water in the weeks preceding MRI scanning, which could be employed in a diagnostic workflow for AD, though the use of high field strength (e.g., 7 T) MRI systems may have the capacity to assess endogenous 87Rb with sufficient sensitivity.

Conclusions

We have shown that Rb and K levels are consistently decreased across all cellular components in the AD frontal cortex, and altered to a lesser extent in the periphery. As Rb is readily exchangeable with K, we hypothesize that this decrease is indicative of dysfunctional Na+/K+-ATPase activity, a pathological feature of AD that is representative of an internal energy crisis and precedes the formation of proteinaceous inclusions and neuron loss in the disease. Rubidium levels in the brain performed well in predicating AD, and may represent a new avenue of early diagnosis using existing in vivo imaging techniques, including PET and MRI.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the support of the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Mental Health. The CRC programme is an Australian Government initiative. Tissues were received from the Victorian Brain Bank Network, supported by The University of Melbourne, Alfred Hospital, the Victorian Forensic Institute of Medicine, the National Health and Medical Research Council. We acknowledge funding from the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program and the Australian Research Council Linkage Projects Scheme (with Agilent Technologies). Partial support from the National Health and Medical Research Council and the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Research Foundation.

Authors’ contributions

BR conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. DH, BR, AB wrote the paper. IR, DH, LYF, BR carried out metal measurements. CLM, AB, CF, AR participated in the collection of AIBL samples. CAM participated in the collection and diagnosis of brain tissue. BR, DH, JD, LYF, CF participated in the study design and statistical analysis. ML, DH, BR, LYF, IR carried out sample preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
(2)
Cooperative Research Centre for Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
(3)
The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Herston, Australia
(4)
CSIRO Preventative Health Flagship, Molecular Science and Engineering, Parkville, Australia
(5)
Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
(6)
Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
(7)
Elemental Bio-imaging Facility, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
(8)

References

  1. Mattson MP. Pathways towards and away from Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2004;430(7000):631–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kamat PK, Kalani A, Rai S, Swarnkar S, Tota S, Nath C, Tyagi N. Mechanism of oxidative stress and synapse dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the Therapeutics strategies. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;53(1):648–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Butterfield D. Amyloid β-peptide (1-42)-induced oxidative stress and neurotoxicity: implications for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease brain. A review. Free Radic Res. 2002;36(12):1307–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crews L, Masliah E. Molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(R1):R12–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Angelova PR, Abramov AY. Alpha-synuclein and beta-amyloid – different targets, same players: calcium, free radicals and mitochondria in the mechanism of neurodegeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Fukuyama H, Ogawa M, Yamauchi H, Yamaguchi S, Kimura J, Yonekura Y, Konishi J. Altered cerebral energy metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease: a PET study. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(1):1–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Göbel B, Oltmanns KM, Chung M. Linking neuronal brain activity to the glucose metabolism. Theor Biol Med Model. 2013;10(1):50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Astrup J, Sørensen PM, Sørensen HR. Oxygen and glucose consumption related to Na + -K+ transport in canine brain. Stroke. 1981;12(6):726–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Relman AS. The physiological behavior of rubidium and cesium in relation to that of potassium. Yale J Biol Med. 1956;29(3):248–62.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fieve RR, Meltzer H, Dunner DL, Levitt M, Mendlewicz J, Thomas A. Rubidium: biochemical, behavioral, and metabolic studies in humans. Am J Psychiatry. 1973;130(1):55–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tomlinson S, Mathialagan PD, Maloney SK. Special K: testing the potassium link between radioactive rubidium (86Rb) turnover and metabolic rate. J Exp Biol. 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Vanhoe H, Vandecasteele C, Versieck J, Dams R. Determination of iron, cobalt, copper, zinc, rubidium, molybdenum, and cesium in human serum by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1989;61(17):1851–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerhardsson L, Lundh T, Minthon L, Londos E. Metal concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(6):508–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vance DE, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR. A search for longitudinal variations in trace element levels in nails of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1990;26–27(1):461–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Basun H, Forssell LG, Wetterberg L, Winblad B. Metals and trace elements in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect. 1991;3(4):231–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornett CR, Ehmann WD, Wekstein DR, Markesbery WR. Trace elements in Alzheimer’s disease pituitary glands. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1998;62(1–2):107–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornett CR, Markesbery WR, Ehmann WD. Imbalances of trace elements related to oxidative damage in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Neurotoxicology. 1998;19(3):339–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis KA, Bush AI, Darby D, De Fazio D, Foster J, Hudson P, Lautenschlager NT, Lenzo N, Martins RN, Maruff P, et al. The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(4):672–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rembach A, Hare DJ, Lind M, Fowler CJ, Cherny RA, McLean C, Bush AI, Masters CL, Roberts BR. Decreased copper in Alzheimer’s disease brain is predominantly in the soluble extractable fraction. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;2013(1–2):1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Roberts BR, Hare DJ, McLean CA, Conquest A, Lind M, Li Q-X, Bush AI, Masters CL, Morganti-Kossmann M-C, Frugier T. Traumatic brain injury induces elevation of Co in the human brain. Metallomics. 2015;7(1):124–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Rembach A, Hare DJ, Doecke JD, Burnham SC, Volitakis I, Fowler CJ, Cherny RA, McLean C, Grimm R, Martins R, et al. Decreased serum zinc is an effect of ageing and not Alzheimer’s disease. Metallomics. 2014;6(7):1216–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rembach A, Evered LA, Li Q-X, Nash T, Vidaurre L, Fowler CJ, Pertile KK, Rumble RL, Trounson BO, Maher S, et al. Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers are not influenced by gravity drip or aspiration extraction methodology. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wenstrup D, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR. Trace element imbalances in isolated subcellular fractions of Alzheimer’s disease brains. Brain Res. 1990;533(1):125–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bélavári C, Andrási E, Molnár Z, Bertalan É. Determination of alkali metals in control and AD brain samples by different techniques. Microchem J. 2005;79(1–2):367–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller JA, Woltjer RL, Goodenbour JM, Horvath S, Geschwind DH. Genes and pathways underlying regional and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 2013;5(5):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu SP, Farhangrazi ZS, Ying HS, Yeh C-H, Choi DW. Enhancement of outward potassium current May participate in β-amyloid peptide-induced cortical neuronal death. Neurobiol Dis. 1998;5(2):81–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Arispe N, Pollard HB, Rojas E. Giant multilevel cation channels formed by Alzheimer disease amyloid beta-protein [A beta P-(1-40)] in bilayer membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(22):10573–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang WS, Reiman EM, Valla J, Dunckley T, Beach TG, Grover A, Niedzielko TL, Schneider LE, Mastroeni D, Caselli R, et al. Alzheimer’s disease is associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in posterior cingulate neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(11):4441–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hashimoto RF, Kim S, Shmulevich I, Zhang W, Bittner ML, Dougherty ER. Growing genetic regulatory networks from seed genes. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(8):1241–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Caberlotto L, Lauria M, Nguyen T-P, Scotti M. The central role of AMP-kinase and energy homeostasis impairment in Alzheimer’s disease: a multifactor network analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11), e78919.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Howarth C, Gleeson P, Attwell D. Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(7):1222–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hattori N, Kitagawa K, Higashida T, Yagyu K, Shimohama S, Wataya T, Perry G, Smith MA, Inagaki C. Cl − -ATPase and Na+/K + -ATPase activities in Alzheimer’s disease brains. Neurosci Lett. 1998;254(3):141–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chauhan NB, Lee JM, Siegel GJ. Na, K-ATPase mRNA levels and plaque load in Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Neurosci. 1997;9(3):151–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Roelcke U, Radü EW, von Ammon K, Hausmann O, Maguire RP, Leenders KL. Alteration of blood-brain barrier in human brain tumors: comparison of [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose, [11C]methionine and rubidium-82 using PET. J Neurol Sci. 1995;132(1):20–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marques F, Sousa JC, Sousa N, Palha JA. Blood–brain-barriers in aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2013;8(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bien-Ly N, Boswell CA, Jeet S, Beach TG, Hoyte K, Luk W, Shihadeh V, Ulufatu S, Foreman O, Lu Y, et al. Lack of widespread BBB disruption in Alzheimer’s disease models: focus on therapeutic antibodies. Neuron. 2015;88(2):289–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist G, Holt DP, Bergström M, Savitcheva I, Huang G-F, Estrada S, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(3):306–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Brooks DJ, Beaney RP, Lammertsma AA, Leenders KL, Horlock PL, Kensett MJ, Marshall J, Thomas DG, Jones T. Quantitative measurement of blood—brain barrier permeability using rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1984;4(4):535–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zünkeler B, Carson RE, Olson J, Blasberg RG, Girton M, Bacher J, Herscovitch P, Oldfield EH. Hyperosmolar blood-brain barrier disruption in baboons: an in vivo study using positron emission tomography and rubidium-82. J Neurosurg. 1996;84(3):494–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Leinenga G, Götz J. Scanning ultrasound removes amyloid-β and restores memory in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(278):278ra233.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Leinenga G, Langton C, Nisbet R, Götz J. Ultrasound treatment of neurological diseases - current and emerging applications. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(3):161–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yushmanov VE, Kharlamov A, Ibrahim TS, Zhao T, Boada FE, Jones SC. K+ dynamics in ischemic rat brain in vivo by 87Rb MRI at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2011;24(7):778–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Yushmanov VE, Kharlamov A, Boada FE, Jones SC. Monitoring of brain potassium with rubidium flame photometry and MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(3):494–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

ISSN: 2051-5960

Contact us