Skip to main content
Download PDF

A novel ELOVL4 variant, L168S, causes early childhood-onset Spinocerebellar ataxia-34 and retinal dysfunction: a case report

Acta Neuropathologica Communications volume 11, Article number: 131 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Spinocerebellar ataxia 34 (SCA34) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease characterized by age-related cerebellar degeneration and ataxia caused by mutations in the Elongation of Very Long Chain Fatty Acid-4 (ELOVL4) gene. The ELOVL4 enzyme catalyzes the biosynthesis of both very long chain saturated fatty acids (VLC-SFA) and very long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (VLC-PUFA) that are important for neuronal, reproductive, and skin function. Several variants in ELOVL4 have been shown to cause different tissue-specific disorders including SCA34 with or without Erythrokeratodermia Variabilis (EKV), a skin condition characterized by dry, scaly skin, Autosomal Dominant Stargardt-Like Macular Dystrophy (STGD3), and seizures associated with neuro-ichthyotic disorders. What is puzzling is how different mutations in the same gene seem to cause different tissue-specific disorders. To date, no SCA34 patients have presented with both SCA34 and STGD3 pathology that is caused by ELOVL4 variants that cause truncation of ELOVL4. Here, we report a novel case of an early childhood onset and rapidly progressive cerebellar degeneration and retinal dysfunction in a Belgian-Italian girl who developed severe dysarthria and gait problems starting at about 3.5 years of age and progressed to immobility by 4.5 years of age. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed progressive vermian, cerebellar, cortical atrophy, progressive corpus callosum slimming, and hot cross bun sign visible on the MRI. Ophthalmological examinations also revealed progressive macular dysfunction as measured by electroretinography. Using exome sequencing, we identified a novel heterozygous ELOVL4 variant, c.503 T > C (p. L168S) in the patient. To understand the enzymatic function of this novel ELOVL4 variant and how it alters the levels of VLC-PUFA and VLC-SFA biosynthesis to contribute to cerebellar and retinal dysfunction, we expressed wild-type ELOVL4 or the L168S ELOVL4 variant in cell culture and supplemented the cultures with VLC-PUFA or VLC-SFA precursors. We showed that the L168S ELOVL4 variant is deficient in the biosynthesis of VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA. Our work suggests that differential depletion of these fatty acids may be a contributing factor to the pathogenic mechanism of SCA34 with or without EKV. Further studies will help further define how the different ELOVL4 variants cause different tissue-specific disorders with variable ages of onset.

Introduction

Spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCAs) are a genetically diverse group of autosomal dominant inherited disorders marked by age-dependent loss of balance, loss of gait, and slurred speech [1]. Currently, there are more than 40 genes known to cause different types of SCAs that are usually characterized by damage to different brain regions, especially to Purkinje neurons in the cerebellum followed by cerebellar atrophy [2,3,4,5]. In addition, cognition and mobility of individuals with SCA are impaired, and many SCAs lead to premature death [6, 7]. In the last decade, several different heterozygous point mutations in the Elongation of Very Long Chain Fatty Acids-4 (ELOVL4) have been reported to cause Spinocerebellar Ataxia-34 (SCA34) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. An ELOVL4 variant [c.540G > C (p. L168F)] reported in a large French-Canadian family in 2014 was the first heterozygous ELOVL4 variant shown to cause SCA34 pathology with or without Erythrokeratodermia Variabilis (EKV) [13]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain of affected patients revealed severe atrophy of the cerebellum and the pons [13]. Following this initial report, other SCA34-causing ELOVL4 variants, c.736 T > G (p. W246G), c.539A > C (p. G180P), c.512 T > C (p. I171T), and c.698C > T (p. T233M), have been reported to cause the disease with or without EKV [9,10,11,12]. The EKV pathologies were reported in patients carrying the c.540G > C (p. L168F), c.539A > C, p. G180P, and c. 698C > T, p T233M. In 2020, further characterization of the C.504G > C p. L168F variant in another French-Canadian family revealed that none of the nine clinically affected family members had EKV [8]. This may indicate incomplete penetrance of EKV in contrast to the SCA34 pathology or environmental and nutritional factors contributing to EKV pathology. To date, no patients with ELOVL4 variants that developed SCA34 with or without EKV were reported to have macular degeneration as reported in STGD3 patients. However, it must be noted that an ELOVL4 variant, c.512 T > C, p. I171T, was recently shown to cause SCA34 with retinal abnormalities consistent with retinitis pigmentosa in four of eight individuals that carry the mutation [9]. Except for c.736 T > G (p. W246G) and c. 698C > T, p T233M variant, which occur in exon 6 like other ELOVL4 variants that cause STGD3, all the other heterozygous SCA34-causing mutations occur in exon 4 of ELOVL4 [14]. The critical role of ELOVL4 function in health and disease is further supported by the fact that inheritance of homozygous ELOVL4 variants causes severe pathologies that affect the brain and skin resulting in early childhood mortality [15, 16]. Inheritance of the homozygous ELOVL4 variant, c.78C > G; p. Tyr26 ∗ and c.646C > T, p. Arg216X (41) located in exon 5, and c.690del p. Ile230Metfs ∗ 22 in exon 6, causes intellectual disability, seizures, hypertonia, and premature death [15, 16], which underscores the critical role of functional ELOVL4 for normal growth and survival.

ELOVL4 is an essential enzyme that catalyzes the first and rate limiting step in the elongation of both saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids to produce VLC-SFAs and VLC-PUFAs containing 28 or more carbons that we collectively call very long chain fatty acids (VLC-FA) [17]. In the retina, depletion/loss of VLC-PUFAs enriched in retinal phosphatidylcholines (PCs) leads to a significant decline in visual function [18, 19]. On the other hand, VLC-SFAs incorporated into sphingolipids are the predominant ELOVL4 product in the brain and are necessary for proper brain health [20]. We showed that VLC-SFA are enriched in synaptic vesicles where they regulate presynaptic transmitter release kinetics in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons [20] and that the W246G variant that suppresses VLC-SFA biosynthesis both in vitro [21] and in the skin [22] also impairs synaptic plasticity in parallel and climbing fibers in the cerebellum to cause motor defects in a rat model of SCA34 [23].

For most SCA34 patients, the onset of ataxia occurs in the third or fourth decade of life, although reports of childhood-onset EKV and ataxia have been reported in some other SCAs [14, 24]. Here, we report a case of childhood-onset SCA34 with retinal dysfunction resulting from a novel ELOVL4 variant (NM_022726.3: c.503 T > C, p. L168S). The patient developed progressive cerebellar and cortical atrophy and gait starting at 3.5 years of age. A year later, the patient lost her ability to walk. In addition to brain pathology, she also developed progressive retinal dysfunction, especially at the macular level as measured by electroretinography (ERG), at 4.5 and 6.5 years of age. Using in vitro characterization assays, we showed that the L168S ELOVL4 variant is enzymatically deficient in the biosynthesis of both VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA, which are necessary for normal brain and retinal function [20, 25]. These findings suggest that the reduction in both VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA biosynthesis may be a contributing factor to the pathogenic mechanism of SCA34 and retinal dysfunction in this patient [21].

Case presentation

A four-year-old girl was brought to the clinic because of problems with gait imbalance and deterioration in her ability to walk. Her family history was unremarkable. She was the first child of unrelated Belgian-Italian parents, both of whom are not affected. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal period were uneventful. She said her first words at 12 months and made little progress thereafter. Because she was not able to form complete sentences, she was referred to a speech therapist for treatment where she was diagnosed with dysarthria. She started walking at 17 months of age, but her parents noticed gait problems and deterioration in her walking starting at about 3.5 years of age. She had problems running and climbing stairs. By the age of 4.5 years, she was unable to walk by herself. However, her weight, height, and head circumference were all within the normal range. There were no dysmorphic signs. The child had axial hypotonia, an ataxic gait, Achilles tendon retractions, positive Gowers' sign, brisk deep-tendon reflexes, and Babinski sign, which suggests upper motor neuron lesion mostly due to defects in the pyramidal system [26, 27].

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed mild vermian atrophy at the age of 4 years (Figs. 1 and 2). Subsequent brain MRI confirmed progressive cerebellar and cortical atrophy and progressive corpus callosum slimming with visible hot cross bun sign (Figs. 1 and 2). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology, protein, glucose, and lactate levels were normal. Additional metabolic investigations, including peroxisomal, lysosomal, and purine analyses, yielded normal results. Electroencephalography (EEG), nerve conduction velocities, brainstem auditory-evoked responses, and kidney and heart ultrasound were normal.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at A 4 years, B 4 years and 5 months, C 5 years and 2 months, and D 7 years and 6 months of age

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at A and E 4 years, B and F 4 years and 5 months, C and G 5 years and 2 months, and D and H 7 years and 6 months of age. T2 axial and T1 sagittal sequences reveal progressive cerebellar and cortical atrophy with slimming of corpus callosum

Full size image

Her initial ophthalmological examination was normal, except for a vertical and horizontal optokinetic nystagmus. However, electroretinography examinations performed at the age of 4.5 years showed attenuation of rod and cone conduction predominantly at the macular level. Her clinical evolution consisted of progressive motor decline with severe axial hypotonia with absence of sitting position, few spontaneous movements, dysmetria, and severe dysarthria. Further ERG analyses at the age of 6.5 years confirmed retinal dysfunction as specified by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard for full field clinical ERG [28, 29] (Additional file 1: Fig. 1A–F and Additional file 2: Fig. 2A–F). At 4.5 years of age, the patient had below-normal and delayed responses to the dark-adapted (DA) 0.01 and 3.0 ERGs (Additional file 1: Fig. 1A, B). The light-adapted (LA) 3.0 response was delayed and showed below normal amplitude whereas the flicker response had a normal amplitude that was delayed (Additional file 1: Fig. 1D, F). These results indicate a pan retinal defect in both the rod and cone systems with the rods having slightly greater dysfunction than the cones. Two years later at age 6.5, the DA at 0.01 was undetectable and the DA 3.0 ERG was delayed and severely reduced below normal (Additional file 2: Fig. 2A–D). There was no change in the LA responses (LA 3.0 was still reduced and delayed; while the flicker amplitude was normal but delayed) (Additional file 2: Fig. 2E, F). Altogether the ERG results showed that the rods were likely the primary photoreceptor type that were affected by disease with profound loss of the DA responses within the two years’ time. Unfortunately, the child died at the age of 10 after the placement of a gastrostomy. However, autopsy was not done on the patient after her death to enable us have further pathological insight into how the L168S ELOVL4 variant contributed to her neurological symptoms.

To determine what contributes to the observed phenotypic and pathological signs in the patient, exome sequencing was performed, which identified and confirmed a de novo ELOVL4 variant, c.503 T > C (p. Leu168Ser), in the coding region of ELOVL4 (MIM *133190) (Fig. 3). Since this novel ELOVL4 variant is similar to the L168F variant, except for replacement of phenylalanine with serine at the conserved lysine 168 position in ELOVL4, we carried out further in vitro biochemical analyses to determine how this novel ELOVL4 variant contributes to the early-onset progressive brain and retina disorders of the patient.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Confirmation of the NM_022726.3: c.503 T > C de novo variant with Sanger sequencing. (I) index case, (II) father, (III) mother with forward primers (upper electropherogram) and reverse primers (lower electropherogram). The variant is between black lines on the 503 position

Full size image

In vitro biochemical characterization: L168S SCA34 variant suppresses VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA biosynthesis

The L168S variant, similar to the L168F ELOVL4 variant, is six amino acid residues away from the histidine catalytic core (HXXHH) that is essential for the biosynthesis of both VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA by ELOVL4 [14, 30, 31]. Beaudin et al., reported mislocalization of ELOVL4 L168F variant beyond the perinuclear region with a punctate and aggregated appearance in fibroblast cells from L168F patients [8]. To explore the impact of the L168S variant on ELOVL4 subcellular localization as well as VLC-PUFA and VLC-SFA biosynthesis, we generated adenoviral particles of Myc-tagged wild-type (WT) mouse Elovl4 and Myc-tagged L168S mouse Elovl4. Immunofluorescence studies after transducing ARPE-19 cells with the mouse WT Elovl4 and the L168S Elovl4 showed that WT and L168S proteins co-localized with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker Calnexin, indicating their localization in the ER (Fig. 4A). This localization pattern is different from what was reported by Beaudin et al. [8] for the L168F variant but is consistent with our recent results for the L168F localization in vitro [21]. Our result is further consistent with the fact that the L168S ELOVL4 is a full-length protein with intact ER retention/retrieval signal, so we expected it to be localized to the ER membrane.

Fig. 4
figure 4

L168S ELOVL4 localizes properly to the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) but is deficient in Very Long Chain Saturated fatty acid synthesis. A ARPE-19 cells transduced with WT mouse ELOVL4 and L168S mouse ELOVL4 MYC constructs were immunostained for MYC (red) and CALNEXIN (green). WT and L168S colocalizes with ER transmembrane marker Calnexin (Scale bar, 10 µm) indicating their localization to the ER necessary for their biochemical activity. B Accumulation of 24:0 (lignoceric fatty acid) in HEK293 cells expressing L168S mutant protein. HEK293 cells overexpressing WT, L168S and control cells (GFP and UT) were supplemented with 24:0 SFA for 72 h. C L168S showed enzymatic activity by making higher amounts of 28:0, 30:0 and 32:0 compared to GFP controls. However, L168S synthesized lower levels of VLC-SFA levels compared to WT. Results are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed for B and C by ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; ns not significant in comparison with WT

Full size image

Since the L168S variant seems to impair neuronal health and VLC-SFAs enriched in neuronal tissues are necessary for normal neuronal function [20, 32], and the L168S ELOVL4 variant was targeted to the ER, the site of VLC-FA biosynthesis, we analyzed the effect of the L168S variant on VLC-SFA synthesis. We overexpressed WT and L168S as well as GFP in HEK293 cells and supplemented the cells with the VLC-SFA precursor, 24:0 for 72 h followed by lipid extraction and analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Our results showed a significant uptake of 24:0 FA in L168S overexpressing cells (Fig. 4b). Despite uptake of the 24:0, the L168S ELOVL4 variant consistently synthesized significantly lower amounts of VLC-SFA products 28:0, 30:0, 32:0, 34:0, and 36:0, compared to WT. Compared to the GFP control cells, L168S ELOVL4 seemed to retain some level of enzymatic activity since it synthesized significant amounts of 28:0 and 30:0, the major VLC-SFA enriched in synaptic vessels [20], as well as 32:0 (Fig. 4C).

VLC-PUFA are necessary for retinal function [25, 33]. Considering the progressive decline in retinal function in the patient, we determined the effect of the L168S ELOVL4 on VLC-PUFA synthesis by supplementing HEK293 cells expressing Myc-tagged WT and L168S ELOVL4 with the VLC-PUFA precursor 20:5n3 (EPA) [30, 31, 34]. Our results showed an equivalent uptake of 20:5n3 in both WT and L168S ELOVL4-expressing cells (Fig. 5A). However, compared to WT ELOVL4-expressing cells, L168S ELOVL4 was deficient in biosynthesis of 34:5n3, 34:6n3, and 36:5n3 (Fig. 5B). We did not detect any VLC-PUFA products in both GFP and untransduced (UT) controls (Fig. 5B), which again supports the fact that the L168S ELOVL4 that is targeted to the ER retains some enzymatic activity in contrast to the 5-bp STGD3 mutant ELOVL4 that lacks VLC-PUFA biosynthesis due to loss of its ER localization signal [31]. To further characterize the enzymatic function of the L168S ELOVL4 towards elongation of VLC-PUFAs, we supplemented HEK293 cells expressing either WT or L168S ELOVL4 with 34:5n3, a direct substrate of ELOVL4. Uptake of 34:5n3 VLC-PUFA was equivalent in L168S and WT overexpressing cells (Fig. 5C). However, the L168S ELOVL4 was deficient in making 34:6n3 and 36:5n3 compared to WT (Fig. 5D). Taken together, results from these biochemical analyses suggest that even though the L168S ELOVL4 is targeted to the ER, the substitution of serine for leucine in L168S ELOVL4 has a significant impact on biosynthesis of the full complement of both VLC-PUFA and VLC-SFA products that are necessary for retinal and brain function.

Fig. 5
figure 5

L168S ELOVL4 variant is deficient in VLC-PUFA synthesis. A Uptake of 20:5n3 after 72 h in HEK293T cells overexpressing WT, L168s and control cells (GFP and UT) supplemented with 20:5n3. B Relative mole% of VLC-PUFA levels normalized to WT ELOVL4 and L168S ELOVL4 protein levels after 20:5n3 supplementation. L168S mutation decreased the synthesis of the major VLC-PUFA 34:5n3 followed by 36:5n3 found in human retina. C Uptake of 34:5n3 after 72 h in HEK293T cells overexpressing WT, L168S and control cells (GFP and UT) supplemented with 34:5n3. D Elongated products of 34:5n3 normalized to WT ELOVL4 and L168S ELOVL4 expression levels. L168S ELOVL4 protein was deficient in catalyzing the addition of two carbons to produce 36:5n3 similar to cells treated with 20:5n3. Results are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed for A, B, C, D by ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; ns not significant in comparison with WT

Full size image

Discussion and conclusions

Here, we report the first case of a childhood-onset SCA34 with retinal dysfunction resulting from a novel ELOVL4 variant (NM_022726.3: c.503 T > C, p. L168S) that also leads to death within the first decade of life as previously reported [15]. We provide detailed biochemical analyses of the L168S ELOVL4 enzyme activity in the biosynthesis of VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA products and show that the L168S ELOVL4 is deficient in biosynthesis of both VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA. In SCA34 patients, the main pathological finding is age-related cerebellar atrophy as determined by MRI [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Indeed, MRI scans of the brain of the patient showed not only progressive cerebellar atrophy but also progressive cortical and vermian atrophy with corpus callosum thinning with hot cross bun signs at a very early age of 4 years. Consistent with other ELOVL4 variants such as T233M and W246G carrying patients that do develop cerebellar atrophy but do not have EKV [12, 35], this patient did not develop any skin conditions or ichthyosis. However, disease progression was very rapid with the patient losing her ability to walk within a year of first developing gait problems at 3.5 years. Childhood onset SCAs have been reported in SCA2, SCA7, and SCA13 [36, 37], but this is the first report of early child-onset SCA34 caused by  an ELOVL4 variant that also affects macular function and caused early-childhood death. Our biochemical analyses showed that L168S ELOVL4 variant localizes to the ER, which is necessary for its function [30]. Using both ELOVL4 and MYC antibodies, we did not detect any mislocalization of the L168S ELOVL4 as reported in fibroblast cells from L168F patients [8]. Despite localization to the ER, the L168S variant showed consistent deficiency in VLC-SFA synthesis as we recently reported for W246G and L168F variants of ELOVL4 proteins [21]. In addition, the L168S variant was also deficient in biosynthesis of 34:5n3 and 36:5n3, which are the predominant VLC-PUFAs found in the human retina [18]. These results further suggest that defects in neuronal VLC-FA biosynthesis may contribute to the mechanism by which the different ELOVL4 variants contribute to SCA34 pathology and that mutations that severely affect both VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA biosynthesis have detrimental effects on health and childhood quality of life and survival.

The L168F ELOVL4 variant was the first ELOVL4 variant known to cause SCA34 [13]. Interestingly, the L168S occurs at the same amino acid residue, which is six amino acids from the critical catalytic site of ELOVL4. Although the present case involves a single patient, none of the 19 affected French-Canadian families carrying the L168F variant had early childhood onset of ataxia and cerebellar degeneration [13]. The earliest onset of ataxia reported for the L168F variant was at 35 years of age with the individual developing mild symptoms associated with SCA [13]. The early childhood onset of brain and retinal pathologies in the L168S variant and the rapid progression of disease pathologies and death of this patient within the first decade of life even though not related to her symptoms suggest critical structural changes due to the amino acid substitution that may influence disease progression. Even though pathological examinations were not done on the patient after her death, based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria (with the help of Intervar), the variant is predicted to be pathogenic. Using bioinformatic tools, Polyphen2, the L168S variant, which is at a highly conserved amino acid residue, was predicted to be functionally deleterious and could be more damaging with a score of 1.00 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00) compared to the previously published L168F that was predicted to be possibly damaging with a score of 0.867 (sensitivity: 0.83; specificity: 0.93) [13] (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/). In addition, mutation taster predicted both L168F and L168S variant as disease-causing with PROVEAN predictions of L168F (-2.767) and L168S (-4.083) as deleterious (https://www.mutationtaster.org/). As such, it was not surprising that the L168S variant patient had much more severe disease onset and rapid progression compared to other SCA34-causing ELOVL4 variants. For example, a patient carrying the T233M ELOVL4 variant was reported to develop ataxia starting at 15 years of age [10]. However, at the time of examination of this patient at 60 years of age, an MRI of the brain showed only subtle flattening of the ventral pons and mild cerebellar atrophy [10]. Another patient carrying the Q180P ELOVL4 variant developed ataxia in his mid-20 s and showed cerebellar and pontine atrophy [11]. Japanese patients also carrying the W256G variant developed gait ataxia between 13–56 years of age [12]. However, disease progression was reported to be very slow, and patients did not require assistance with walking with a walker or cane until the age of 60 years or older [12]. Taken together, it looks like the nature of the mutation and its effect on normal ELOVL4 function most likely through defects in VLC-FA biosynthesis or conformational changes in protein structure are critical to disease onset and severity of the pathologies.

Similar to some individuals with the L168F variant [13], the L168S patient had dysarthria. What is more revealing about the L168S patient is that she also showed progressive retinal dysfunction predominantly in the macula as measured by ERG. To rule out other potential inherited retinal degeneration gene(s) that could contribute to the patient’s retinal dysfunction, we reviewed the patient’s gene panel for potential retinal degeneration mutations that could cause the retinal pathology. However, we did not find any mutations that could account for the retinal pathology except for the L168S ELOVL4 variant. Studies have extensively shown the role of ELOVL4 and VLC-PUFA in retinal function and photoreceptor survival, although the mechanism has not been fully elucidated [14, 25, 31]. Thus, defects in VLC-PUFA biosynthesis and depletion in the retina in the patient presented here may be the reason for the retinal dysfunction since the L168S variant lacks VLC-PUFA biosynthesis. Despite the importance of ELOVL4 and VLC-PUFA in the retina, lack of information on ophthalmologic tests have made it difficult to know whether other ELOVL4 variants that cause SCA34 also cause retinal dysfunction. For instance, no comprehensive retinal tests have been conducted or reported for patients with the L168F ELOVL4 variant [13]. Except for the c.512.T > C, pIle171Thr variant that causes SCA34 and retinitis pigmentosa [9], all the other SCA34 patients reported so far in the literature did not undergo any retinal electrophysiological tests [8, 10,11,12]. Therefore, SCA34 patients carrying the various ELOVL4 variants may have impaired retinal function even in the absence of retinal degeneration at the time of their clinical examination. The possibility of late-onset clinical retinal changes could occur later in life in some SCA34 patients similar to some patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) where ERG deficits precede retinal degeneration [38,39,40]. The diagnosis of BBS in patients is often delayed until an ERG is performed [39, 41]. Therefore, here, we will lie to call attention the need for use of detailed electroretinography to detect possibility of retinal disturbance in SCA34 patients in the future.

There is currently no cure for SCAs, and current therapies such as physical and speech therapy are directed at managing the symptoms [7]. Due to the heterogeneity of the causative mutations of SCA, targeted therapeutic approaches may be required for each genotype. Therefore, the deficiency in VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA synthesis related to the L168S ELOVL4 variant suggests that repletion of these fatty acids may be a therapeutic approach specifically for SCA34 disease. As previously reported for other SCAs, targeting proteotoxicity, RNA toxicity, and ion channel dysfunction are also possible potential therapeutic targets [2, 25,26,27,28,29]. In SCA13, Purkinje cell hyperexcitability is thought to trigger cerebellar degeneration in patients with infant-onset SCA13 [42]. Similar to differences in the onset of SCA34 between L168S and L168F variants, infant- and adult-onset forms of SCA13 are caused by distinct mutations in the Kv3.3 gene that encodes the Kv3.3 voltage-gated K+ channel [42]. Kv3.3, like ELOVL4, is expressed in cerebellar neurons such as Purkinje cells [42]. Interestingly, suppressing hyperexcitability of Purkinje neurons in SCA13 by using NS13001, an agonist of Ca2+-activated K+ channels known to reduce neuronal excitability, promoted early survival of neurons in zebrafish [42]. Similarly, oral treatment with NS13001 rescued Purkinje cell loss and gait function in SCA2 model mice [43]. It is, therefore, possible that SCA34-causing ELOLV4 variants and impaired VLC-SFA synthesis may utilize similar mechanisms as in SCA13 to cause cerebellar atrophy.

Conclusion

Here we report the first case of childhood-onset SCA34 with retinal dysfunction caused by a novel ELOVL4 variant, L168S. The L168S variant caused a severe and rapid progression of cortical and cerebral atrophy with the patient losing her ability to walk at 4.5 years of age as well as retinal dysfunction and death within the first decade of life. Our biochemical analyses indicate that the L168S variant is deficient in making both VLC-SFA and VLC-PUFA products necessary for brain and retinal health [20, 25]. Therefore, depletion of VLC-FA may underlie the pathogenic mechanism of SCA34. Future studies to investigate the effect of the child-onset SCA34 caused by the L168S variant on cerebellar neurons compared to other adult-onset mutations, especially the L168F variant, would help us further understand how different ELOVL4 variants affect VLC-FA biosynthesis to cause different tissue-specific disorders in humans. This understanding will enable the scientific community to explore potential therapeutic avenues to attenuating disease progression.

Availability of data and materials

There are no associated datasets for these manuscripts. Related queries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

SCA34:

Spinocerebellar ataxia-34

EKV:

Erythrokeratodermia Variabilis

STGD3:

Autosomal Stargardt-like macular dystrophy

VLC-PUFA:

Very long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid

VLC-SFA:

Very long chain saturated fatty acid

ELOVL:

Elongation of very long chain fatty acid

ISCEV:

International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision

ERG:

Electroretinography

References

  1. Harding AE (1983) Classification of the hereditary ataxias and paraplegias. Lancet 1(8334):1151–1155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Houlden H, Johnson J, Gardner-Thorpe C, Lashley T, Hernandez D, Worth P, Singleton AB, Hilton DA, Holton J, Revesz T et al (2007) Mutations in TTBK2, encoding a kinase implicated in tau phosphorylation, segregate with spinocerebellar ataxia type 11. Nat Genet 39(12):1434–1436

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klockgether T, Mariotti C, Paulson HL (2019) Spinocerebellar ataxia. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5(1):24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seidel K, Siswanto S, Brunt ER, den Dunnen W, Korf HW, Rub U (2012) Brain pathology of spinocerebellar ataxias. Acta Neuropathol 124(1):1–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adachi T, Kitayama M, Nakano T, Adachi Y, Kato S, Nakashima K (2015) Autopsy case of spinocerebellar ataxia type 31 with severe dementia at the terminal stage. Neuropathology 35(3):273–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diallo A, Jacobi H, Cook A, Labrum R, Durr A, Brice A, Charles P, Marelli C, Mariotti C, Nanetti L et al (2018) Survival in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 (EUROSCA): a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol 17(4):327–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schols L, Bauer P, Schmidt T, Schulte T, Riess O (2004) Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: clinical features, genetics, and pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol 3(5):291–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beaudin M, Sellami L, Martel C, Touzel-Deschenes L, Houle G, Martineau L, Lacroix K, Lavallee A, Chrestian N, Rouleau GA et al (2020) Characterization of the phenotype with cognitive impairment and protein mislocalization in SCA34. Neurol Genet 6(2):e403

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao C, Binkley EM, Rexach J, Knight-Johnson A, Khemani P, Fogel BL, Das S, Stone EM, Gomez CM (2019) A family with spinocerebellar ataxia and retinitis pigmentosa attributed to an ELOVL4 mutation. Neurol Genet 5(5):e357

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bourque PR, Warman-Chardon J, Lelli DA, LaBerge L, Kirshen C, Bradshaw SH, Hartley T, Boycott KM (2018) Novel ELOVL4 mutation associated with erythrokeratodermia and spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA 34). Neurol Genet 4(4):e263

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourassa CV, Raskin S, Serafini S, Teive HA, Dion PA, Rouleau GA (2015) A New ELOVL4 Mutation in a Case of Spinocerebellar Ataxia With Erythrokeratodermia. JAMA Neurol 72(8):942–943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozaki K, Doi H, Mitsui J, Sato N, Iikuni Y, Majima T, Yamane K, Irioka T, Ishiura H, Doi K et al (2015) A novel mutation in ELOVL4 leading to Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) with the hot cross bun sign but lacking erythrokeratodermia: a broadened spectrum of SCA34. JAMA Neurol 72(7):797–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cadieux-Dion M, Turcotte-Gauthier M, Noreau A, Martin C, Meloche C, Gravel M, Drouin CA, Rouleau GA, Nguyen DK, Cossette P (2014) Expanding the clinical phenotype associated with ELOVL4 mutation: study of a large French-Canadian family with autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia and erythrokeratodermia. JAMA Neurol 71(4):470–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeboah GK, Lobanova ES, Brush RS, Agbaga MP (2021) Very long chain fatty acid-containing lipids: a decade of novel insights from the study of ELOVL4. J Lipid Res 62:100030

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aldahmesh MA, Mohamed JY, Alkuraya HS, Verma IC, Puri RD, Alaiya AA, Rizzo WB, Alkuraya FS (2011) Recessive mutations in ELOVL4 cause ichthyosis, intellectual disability, and spastic quadriplegia. Am J Hum Genet 89(6):745–750

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mir H, Raza SI, Touseef M, Memon MM, Khan MN, Jaffar S, Ahmad W (2014) A novel recessive mutation in the gene ELOVL4 causes a neuro-ichthyotic disorder with variable expressivity. BMC Med Genet 15:25

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Agbaga MP, Brush RS, Mandal MN, Henry K, Elliott MH, Anderson RE (2008) Role of Stargardt-3 macular dystrophy protein (ELOVL4) in the biosynthesis of very long chain fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(35):12843–12848

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu A, Chang J, Lin Y, Shen Z, Bernstein PS (2010) Long-chain and very long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in ocular aging and age-related macular degeneration. J Lipid Res 51(11):3217–3229

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grayson C, Molday RS (2005) Dominant negative mechanism underlies autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy linked to mutations in ELOVL4. J Biol Chem 280(37):32521–32530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopiavuori BR, Deak F, Wilkerson JL, Brush RS, Rocha-Hopiavuori NA, Hopiavuori AR, Ozan KG, Sullivan MT, Wren JD, Georgescu C et al (2018) Homozygous expression of mutant ELOVL4 leads to seizures and death in a novel animal model of very long-chain fatty acid deficiency. Mol Neurobiol 55(2):1795–1813

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gyening YK, Chauhan NK, Tytanic M, Ea V, Brush RS, Agbaga MP (2022) ELOVL4 mutations that cause spinocerebellar ataxia-34 differentially alter very long chain fatty acid biosynthesis. J Lipid Res 2022:100317

    Google Scholar 

  22. Agbaga MP, Stiles MA, Brush RS, Sullivan MT, Machalinski A, Jones KL, Anderson RE, Sherry DM (2020) The Elovl4 Spinocerebellar Ataxia-34 Mutation 736T>G (p.W246G) Impairs Retinal Function in the Absence of Photoreceptor Degeneration. Mol Neurobiol 57(11):4735–4753

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagaraja RY, Sherry DM, Fessler JL, Stiles MA, Li F, Multani K, Orock A, Ahmad M, Brush RS, Anderson RE et al (2021) W246G mutant ELOVL4 impairs synaptic plasticity in parallel and climbing fibers and causes motor defects in a rat model of SCA34. Mol Neurobiol 58:4921

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Durr A (2010) Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: polyglutamine expansions and beyond. Lancet Neurol 9(9):885–894

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bennett LD, Brush RS, Chan M, Lydic TA, Reese K, Reid GE, Busik JV, Elliott MH, Anderson RE (2014) Effect of reduced retinal VLC-PUFA on rod and cone photoreceptors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(5):3150–3157

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lance JW (1980) The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology 30(12):1303–1313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Gijn J (1978) The Babinski sign and the pyramidal syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41(10):865–873

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Robson AG, Frishman LJ, Grigg J, Hamilton R, Jeffrey BG, Kondo M, Li S, McCulloch DL (2022) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update). Doc Ophthalmol 144(3):165–177

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M (2015) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol 130(1):1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Logan S, Agbaga MP, Chan MD, Brush RS, Anderson RE (2014) Endoplasmic reticulum microenvironment and conserved histidines govern ELOVL4 fatty acid elongase activity. J Lipid Res 55(4):698–708

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Logan S, Agbaga MP, Chan MD, Kabir N, Mandal NA, Brush RS, Anderson RE (2013) Deciphering mutant ELOVL4 activity in autosomal-dominant Stargardt macular dystrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(14):5446–5451

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nagaraja RY, Sherry DM, Fessler JL, Stiles MA, Li F, Multani K, Orock A, Ahmad M, Brush RS, Anderson RE et al (2021) W246G Mutant ELOVL4 Impairs Synaptic Plasticity in Parallel and Climbing Fibers and Causes Motor Defects in a Rat Model of SCA34. Mol Neurobiol 58(10):4921–4943

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorusupudi A, Rallabandi R, Li B, Arunkumar R, Blount JD, Rognon GT, Chang FY, Wade A, Lucas S, Conboy JC et al (2021) Retinal bioavailability and functional effects of a synthetic very-long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118(6):1

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yu M, Benham A, Logan S, Brush RS, Mandal MNA, Anderson RE, Agbaga MP (2012) ELOVL4 protein preferentially elongates 20:5n3 to very long chain PUFAs over 20:4n6 and 22:6n3. J Lipid Res 53(3):494–504

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nishide M, Le Marquand K, Davis MR, Halmagyi GM, Fellner A, Narayanan RK, Kennerson ML, Reddel SW, Worgan L, Panegyres PK et al (2023) Two new families and a literature review of ELOVL4-associated Spinocerebellar ataxia type 34. Cerebellum

  36. Chojnacki T, Jankowski W, Mankowski T, Sasak W (1975) Preparative separation of naturally occurring mixtures of polyprenols on hydroxyalkoxypropyl-Sephadex. Anal Biochem 69(1):114–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Herman-Bert A, Stevanin G, Netter JC, Rascol O, Brassat D, Calvas P, Camuzat A, Yuan Q, Schalling M, Durr A et al (2000) Mapping of spinocerebellar ataxia 13 to chromosome 19q13.3–q13.4 in a family with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia and mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 67(1):229–235

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Meng X, Long Y, Ren J, Wang G, Yin X, Li S (2021) Ocular Characteristics of Patients With Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Caused by Pathogenic BBS Gene Variation in a Chinese Cohort. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:635216

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Azari AA, Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Schwartz SB, Windsor EA, Sumaroka A, Cheung AY, Steinberg JD, Roman AJ, Stone EM et al (2006) Retinal disease expression in Bardet-Biedl syndrome-1 (BBS1) is a spectrum from maculopathy to retina-wide degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(11):5004–5010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Berezovsky A, Rocha DM, Sacai PY, Watanabe SS, Cavascan NN, Salomao SR (2012) Visual acuity and retinal function in patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 67(2):145–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Krill AE, Folk E, Rosenthal IM (1961) Electroretinography in the Laurence-Moon-Biedl syndrome. An aid in diagnosis of the atypical case. Am J Dis Child 102:205–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hsieh JY, Ulrich BN, Issa FA, Lin MA, Brown B, Papazian DM (2020) Infant and adult SCA13 mutations differentially affect Purkinje cell excitability, maturation, and viability in vivo. Elife 9:1

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kasumu AW, Hougaard C, Rode F, Jacobsen TA, Sabatier JM, Eriksen BL, Strobaek D, Liang X, Egorova P, Vorontsova D et al (2012) Selective positive modulator of calcium-activated potassium channels exerts beneficial effects in a mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Chem Biol 19(10):1340–1353

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the support received from the family of the patient in this study. We also thank Professor Emeritus Robert E. Anderson, MD, PhD, and David Sherry, PhD for their helpful insights, discussions and review of the manuscript and to Janet Asiedua Faakye for reading and helping with editing. In addition, we grateful to Lea Bennett, PhD, for her input and interpretation of the ERG results.

Funding

The work was supported by NIH (R01EY030513); NIH(R21AR076035); Presbyterian Health Foundation (PHF) Team Science grants; and Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology (OCAST)(HR14-125) (MPA); BrightFocus Foundation Inc (MPA), American Macular Degeneration Foundation (AMDF), Unrestricted grant support from Research to Prevent Blindness and OUHSC Department of Ophthalmology Core Grant, P30 EY021725.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, DMEI 423 Parke Pavilion, 608 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA

    Yeboah Kofi Gyening, Richard S. Brush & Martin-Paul Agbaga

  2. Department of Ophthalmology and Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA

    Yeboah Kofi Gyening, Richard S. Brush & Martin-Paul Agbaga

  3. UF de Génomique du Développement, Centre de Génétique Moléculaire et Chromosomique, AP-HP.Sorbonne Université - Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France

    Keren Boris

  4. Unité Déficiences Intellectuelles/Troubles du, Développement, Service de Génétique Clinique et Médicale, AP-HP. Sorbonne Université -Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France

    Yeboah Kofi Gyening, Keren Boris, Mignot Cyril, Richard S. Brush & Martin-Paul Agbaga

  5. Centre de Référence des Maladies Héréditaires du Métabolisme - Service de NeurologiePédiatrique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc –UCLouvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium

    Mignot Cyril & Marie-Cécile Nassogne

Authors
  1. Yeboah Kofi Gyening
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keren Boris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mignot Cyril
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard S. Brush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marie-Cécile Nassogne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Martin-Paul Agbaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YKG: Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing- original draft, Writing-Review & Editing, Visualization; KB: performed DNA sequencing and analyses, discussed data and was involved in writing, Writing-Review & Editing; RSB: performed lipidomic analyses, analyzed data and reviewed manuscript; MC and MCN: collection of clinical data, discussed data and were involved in writing, Writing-Review and Editing of the manuscript as well as received consents for patient’s parents. MPA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-Review & Editing, Funding Acquisition. Drafted the manuscript, collected and interpreted clinical data, performed literature review, revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marie-Cécile Nassogne or Martin-Paul Agbaga.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Appropriate intuitional approval and written consent was obtained from the patient’s family for this study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for the submission and publication of this manuscript was obtained from the parents of the case study patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Fig. 1A-F. ERG performed at 4.5 years of age showed below normal and delayed responses to dark and light adapted ERGs that is indicative of a pan retinal defect in both the rod and cone systems with the rods having slightly greater dysfunction than cones.

Additional file 2

: Fig. 2A-F. ERG performed at 6.5 years of age showed undetectable ERG responses for dark adapted ERG at 0.01 and 3.0 amplitudes. In addition, the light adapted 3.0 ERG was still reduced and delayed. Consistent with the 4.5 years ERG, the flicker amplitude was still normal but delayed.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gyening, Y.K., Boris, K., Cyril, M. et al. A novel ELOVL4 variant, L168S, causes early childhood-onset Spinocerebellar ataxia-34 and retinal dysfunction: a case report. acta neuropathol commun 11, 131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01628-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01628-4

Keywords

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

ISSN: 2051-5960

Contact us