Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Case report
  • Open Access

H3F3A-G34R mutant high grade neuroepithelial neoplasms with glial and dysplastic ganglion cell components

  • 1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 2,
  • 7,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Acta Neuropathologica Communications20197:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0731-5

  • Received: 8 March 2019
  • Accepted: 29 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

The recently described malignant neuro-epithelial tumors with histone H3F3A point mutations at G34 (NET-H3-G34) occur most often in cerebral hemispheres of teenagers and young adults, and have a generally adverse prognosis. These tumors have been histologically classified as glioblastoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) in the past, and have not been defined as a separate entity in the revised WHO classification of tumors of the CNS 2016. Here, we report two cases of NET-H3-G34 with glial and dysplastic ganglion cell components affecting teenagers. Patients were treated with surgery and radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. One patient underwent partial resection and deceased 21 months after diagnosis, while the other patient is alive without evidence of disease 15 months after total resection. So far, a dysplastic ganglion cell component has not been described in NET-H-G34, and its presence raises a possible relation to (anaplastic) gangliogliomas. Genome-wide copy number analysis did not provide unequivocal evidence that these tumors represent anaplastic variants of gangliogliomas, as opposed to NET-H3-G34. Our observations expand the morphologic spectrum of NET-H3-G34. Further cases of NET-H3-G34 with dysplastic ganglion cells should be clinically followed to find differences or similarities in their biological behavior, as compared to NET-H3-G34 and anaplastic gangliogliomas.

Keywords

  • Anaplastic ganglioglioma
  • Histone H3
  • Mutation
  • G34R
  • Neuroepithelial tumor
  • Glioblastoma

Introduction

The recently described malignant neuro-epithelial tumors with histone H3F3A point mutations at G34 (NET-H3-G34) occur most often in cerebral hemispheres of teenagers and young adults, and have a generally adverse prognosis, with reported median PFS and OS of 8–9 months and 12–22 months [3, 8]. They typically show an undifferentiated phenotype with a small blue-cell component, a glioblastoma-like astrocytic component or a mixture of the two, and therefore have been histologically classified as glioblastoma or primitive neuroepithelial tumor in the past [2, 8]. These tumors have not been defined as a separate entity in the recently revised WHO classification. We report two cases of H3F3A-G34R mutant, high grade neuroepithelial neoplasms with glial and dysplastic ganglion cell components. To our knowledge, the presence of dysplastic ganglion cells in tumors carrying H3F3A G34 mutations has not yet been reported.

Case presentation

Case 1 affected a 16-year-old male patient with significant weight loss in 1 year, headaches and visual impairment developing over 2 months. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a left-sided fronto-temporo-insular mass, hypointense on T1 (Fig. 1a) with inhomogeneous contrast enhancement (Fig. 1b) and significant mass effect. The tumor showed a solid component with a slightly hyperintense signal and signs of a small surrounding edema on FLAIR (Fig. 1c) and T2-weighted images (Fig. 1d). After partial resection the tumor progressed rapidly, despite radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. The patient deceased 21 months after surgery.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a-c, pre-operative MR of case 1 T1-weighted pre- (a) and post- (b) gadolinium images showed a fronto-insular mass with hypointensity and heterogeneous enhancement. On FLAIR- (c) and T2-weighted images (d), the tumor displayed a solid component with slight hyperintensity and signs of surrounding edema. The mutation was confirmed by pyrosequencing (e). The upper part shows the mutation in tumor tissue as compared to the control sample, shown below. f-i, histopathology of case 1. Hematoxylin phloxin safranine stain revealed a tumor with both neuronal and glial components. Large multinucleated neurons (f), positive for chromogranin A (insert), and a major glial diffuse component (g), positive for GFAP (insert) were found. H3-G34R was positive in neoplastic neuronal cells (h, thin arrow) and in neoplastic glial cells (i), but negative in non-neoplastic neurons (h, thick arrow). j-n, histopathology of case 2 The tumor displayed abundant binucleated ganglionic cells (j) as well as glial tumor cells (k), both positive for H3-G34R (l). The dysplastic ganglion cells strongly expressed chromogranin (m) and showed nuclear accumulation of p53 (n)

Case 2 involved a 14-year-old male patient presenting with headaches for 8 weeks. Computed tomography scans showed a partially hyperdense tumor with calcifications and slight contrast enhancement. MRI revealed a right occipital cortical/−subcortical tumor with a cystic component, measuring 5.3 × 4.6 × 6.8 cm3, extending to the falx, hyperintense on FLAIR-weighted images, slightly hypointense in T1 with small hyperintense spots, compatible with calcifications and blood. The tumor was sharply demarcated from the surrounding brain parenchyma, which presented no significant signs of edema. The patient underwent total resection and radiochemotherapy with temozolomide, and 15 months after surgery was asymptomatic, without radiological evidence of residual or progressive disease.

Histologically, both tumors showed mixed neuronal and glial components (Fig. 1f, g, j, k), with similar immunophenotypes. The neuronal component consisted of large bi- or multi-nucleated neurons, (Fig. 1f, j) positive for chromogranin A (Fig. 1f insert; j, m), also displaying cytoplasmic expression of synaptophysin. The predominant glial component was composed of diffusely infiltrating small cells (Fig. 1g, k) expressing glial fibrillary acidic protein (Fig. 1 g insert), but not Olig2. Perineuronal satellitosis, perivascular clustering and subpial infiltration were present in case 1 only. Eosinophilic granular bodies were absent. Mitotic activity was high. Vascular proliferation was only present in case 2; palisading necrosis was observed in both cases. The proliferation activity (Ki-67 staining) was high. IDH1-R132H, BRAF-V600E and H3-K27 M proteins were not detectable. ATRX was lost in both neuronal and glial tumor cells. Both cases displayed CD34-positive satellite cells. H3-G34R immunostaining [4] was positive in neoplastic neuronal cells (Fig. 1h, l) and neoplastic glial cells (Fig. 1i, l), but negative in entrapped neurons. p53 was strongly accumulated in the nuclei of both glial and neuronal tumor cells in case 2 (Fig. 1n), but was negative in case 1. Pyrosequencing confirmed the presence of a H3F3A G34R mutation in both cases (Fig. 1e). Classification by DNA methylation profiling was in agreement with H3G34 tumors (not shown). Molecular Inversion Probe analysis revealed among other alterations gains of chromosome 7 and 10q losses in both tumors (Fig. 2). Case 1 showed gain of chromosome 1q and loss of 9p including the CDKN2A locus, as well as indication of chromothripsis of chromosome 10. Case 2 displayed amplification of CDK6 and loss of chromosome 3q and 4q (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Molecular inversion probe assay plots from cases 1(top) and 2 (bottom) are shown. Chromosomes are illustrated by different colours

Discussion and conclusions

A ganglion cell differentiation in NET-H3-G34 is not surprising, as the specific pattern of H3K36me3 binding in these tumors upregulates genes particularly involved in neuronal morphogenesis and differentiation, such as MYCN and DLX6, among others [1]. However, dysplastic ganglion cells are a hallmark of (anaplastic) gangliogliomas. The question remains, whether the tumors described here represent a variant of “NET-H3-G34” or a biologically distinct variant of anaplastic ganglioglioma (AGG). AGGs (WHO grade III) are rare glioneuronal tumors with a generally unfavorable prognosis. Among adults, a median PFS of 8 months and median OS of 24.7 months were reported [12]. Children with AGG seem to have a better prognosis, with 63% 5-year-PFS and 88% 5-year-OS in a series of 8 cases [6].

The radiological findings described for gangliogliomas and “NET-H3-G34” do not enable a clear distinction between them [11, 13]. Cytogenetically, a distinction is also difficult, as very few cases of AGG have been described in the literature. Case 1 displayed chromosome 9p losses, including CDNK2A, which have been described in a case of AGG [5], and are frequently seen in glioblastomas [9], as well as in 14% of NET-H3-G34 [8]. Case 2 showed loss of chromosome 3q and 4q, reported in 67–70% of NET-H3-G34, and also a CDK6 amplification seen in 10% of NET-H3-G34 [8]. These alterations have not been described in AGGs so far. The presence of chromosome 7 gain seen in the two cases is a typical feature of glioblastomas [9], and also frequently observed in NET-H3-G34 [8]. However, this finding does not completely rule out an AGG, as chromosome 7 gains seem to be a frequent cytogenetic alteration observed in 21% of gangliogliomas [5].

Histone H3F3A-K27 M mutations have been detected in AGG [7, 13], but so far H3F3A-G34 mutations have not been reported in AGG. One should keep in mind that the histological spectrum of mutations associated with tumor entities is often wider than initially described – a good example is the growing list of tumors with BRAF-V600E mutations or histone H3-K27 mutations. Occurrence of a certain mutation, therefore, may not per se define a tumoral entity. On the other hand, ganglion cell differentiation is not sufficient for the diagnosis of a ganglioglioma, as this feature has been documented in different glial tumors, including oligodendroglioma IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted [10]. However, in the cases described here the ganglionic cell component is clearly dysplastic. The term “neuroepithelial tumors with histone H3-G34 mutations” proposed by Korshunov et al. [8] seems adequate, as the morphological spectrum of these tumors is wide. Therefore, our observations further expand the morphologic spectrum of NET-H3-G34 beyond glioblastomas with or without PNET-like components. More patients with such rare NET-H3-G34 with dysplastic ganglion cells should be clinically followed to find differences or similarities in their biological behavior, as compared to other NET-H3-G34 and AGG.

Abbreviations

AGG: 

Anaplastic ganglioglioma

FLAIR: 

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

NET-H3-G34: 

Neuro-epithelial tumors with histone H3F3A point mutations at G34

PNET: 

Primitive neuroectodermal tumor

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

Most data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Additional datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

FA, PV and TP designed the study. FA, TL, AK, BB, AG, AW, PV and TP performed the experiments/interpreted the results. JZ, CK and MZ collected and analyzed clinical data. All authors provided manuscript review and approval.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The use of clinical data and biologic material is in conformity with the ethics regulation standards of the Sainte-Anne Hospital and the University of Bonn Medical Center:

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest except Pascale Varlet (Hoffmann La Roche, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim) and Torsten Pietsch (Affymetrix/Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
(2)
Department of Neuropathology, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France
(3)
Department of Pediatrics, Clinic Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
(4)
Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
(5)
Department of Neuropathology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
(6)
Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
(7)
Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France

References

  1. Bjerke L, Mackay A, Nandhabalan M et al (2013) Histone H3.3 mutations drive paediatric glioblastoma through upregulation of MYCN. Cancer Discov 3(5):512–519View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gessi M, Gielen GH, Hammes J et al (2013) H3.3 G34R mutations in pediatric primitive neuroectodermal tumors of central nervous system (CNS-PNET) and pediatric glioblastomas: possible diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Neuro-Oncol 112(1):67–72View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Grill J, Massimino M, Bouffet E et al (2018) Phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial (HERBY) of bevacizumab in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 36(10):951–958View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Haque F, Varlet P, Puntonet J et al (2017) Evaluation of a novel antibody to define histone 3.3 G34R mutant brain tumours. Acta Neuropathol Commun 5(1):45View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoischen A, Ehrler M, Fassunke J et al (2008) Comprehensive characterization of genomic aberrations in gangliogliomas by CGH, array-based CGH and interphase FISH. Brain Pathol 18(3):326–337View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Karremann M, Pietsch T, Janssen G et al (2009) Anaplastic ganglioglioma in children. J Neuro-Oncol 92(2):157–163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Donson A, Foreman NK et al (2017) H3 K27M mutation in gangliogliomas can be associated with poor prognosis. Brain Pathol 27(6):846–850View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Korshunov A, Capper D, Reuss D et al (2016) Histologically distinct neuroepithelial tumors with histone 3 G34 mutation are molecularly similar and comprise a single nosologic entity. Acta Neuropathol 131(1):137–146View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. McLendon R, Friedman A, Bigner D et al (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455(7216):1061–1068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Perry A, Burton SS, Fuller GN et al (2010) Oligodendroglial neoplasms with ganglioglioma-like maturation: a diagnostic pitfall. Acta Neuropathol 120(2):237–252View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Puntonet J, Dangouloff-Ros V, Saffroy R et al (2018) Histo-radiological correlations in high-grade glioma with the histone 3.3 G34R mutation. J Neuroradiol 45(5):316–322View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Terrier LM, Bauchet L, Rigau V et al (2017) Natural course and prognosis of anaplastic gangliogliomas: a multicenter retrospective study of 43 cases from the French Brain Tumor Database. Neuro Oncol 19(5):678–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zanello M, Pages M, Tauziède-Espariat A et al (2016) Clinical, imaging, histopathological and molecular characterization of anaplastic ganglioglioma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 75(10):971–980View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement