Skip to main content

Table 4 Association of APOE-ε4 (rs429358) with different pathology contrasts

From: APOE-ε4 and BIN1 increase risk of Alzheimer’s disease pathology but not specifically of Lewy body pathology

 

Current sample

Initial sample × Tsuang et al. [51] criteria

Initial sample × Kaivola et al. [27] criteria

Reported by Tsuang et al. [51]

Reported by Kaivola et al. [27]

Reported by Chia et al. [13]

AD+LB+ vs. ADLB

4.24 [3.52 5.10] (1.49e-52)

3.86 [3.23 4.63] (5.10e-49)

5.02 [3.97 6.35] (2.21e-41)

12.6 [8.1 19.8] (2.1e-28)

2.31 [1.40 3.83] (1.1e-03)

4.25 [3.35 4.39] (1.29e-32)

N/A

AD+LB vs. ADLB

4.22 [3.60 4.96] (1.41e-69)

3.55 [3.07 4.12] (3.27e-64)

4.66 [3.87 5.60] (3.90e-60)

9.9 [6.4 15.3] (1.2e-24)

N/A

N/A

ADLB+ vs. ADLB

0.93 [0.60 1.43] (7.34e-01)

1.46 [1.12 1.90] (5.47e-03)

1.17 [0.74 1.84] (4.95e-01)

6.1 [3.5 10.5] (1.3e-10)

0.75 [0.43 1.30] (3.1e-01)

N/A

AD+LB+ vs. AD+LB

1.01 [0.90 1.13] (8.33e-01)

1.09 [0.97 1.22] (1.66e-01)

1.00 [0.88 1.14] (9.93e-01)

N/A

N/A

N/A

LB+ vs. ADLB

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.45 [2.22 2.74] (4.65e-63)

LB+ vs. LB

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

LB+ vs. ADLB+

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

AD+ vs. AD+LB

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

Reported by Beecham et al. [2]

Reported by Bras et al. [10] (at rs769449)b

Reported by Chung et al. [14]

Reported by Dickson et al. [18]

Reported by Guerreiro et al. [24]

Reported by Robinson et al. [45]

Reported by Sabir et al. [47]

AD+LB+ vs. ADLB

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.88 [0.37 9.49] (4.5e−01)

3.42 [1.48 7.92] (4e−03)

3.74 [2.34 5.97] (4e−08)

9.37 [2.90 30.24] (2e−04)

5.58 [3.38 9.20] (2e−11)

6.96 [4.70 10.29] (3e−22)

N/A

N/A

N/A

AD+LB vs. ADLB

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ADLB+ vs. ADLB

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.30 [0.10 0.87] (2.7e−02)

0.73 [0.40 1.34] (0.31)

3.46 [1.66 7.22] (1e−03)

N/A

N/A

N/A

AD+LB+ vs. AD+LB

N/A

N/A

(3e−02)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

LB+ vs. ADLB

N/A

2.711 [2.313 3.177]

(7.09e−35)

N/A

N/A

2.40 [2.14 2.70]

(1.05e−48)

N/A

2.94 [2.34 3.71] (6.6e-20)

LB+ vs

LB

1.63 [1.52 1.76]

(2.8e-11)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

LB+ vs. ADLB+

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.25 [0.25 19.90] (4.66e−01)

8.69 [0.70 107.39] (9.2e−01)

9.32 [2.12 40.95] (3e−03)

N/A

AD+ vs. AD+LB

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.71 [0.17 2.95] (6.4e−01)

0.93 [0.48 1.82] (8.3e−01)

N/A

  1. The first column corresponds to the current study, while the following two columns correspond to results obtained using the current sample using literature criteria to classify participants into pathology groups (Fig. 1a–b) [27, 51]. The other columns correspond to results reported in the literature [2, 10, 13, 14, 18, 24, 27, 45, 47, 51]. Effect sizes are reported as OR with 95% confidence interval [CI] and significance (P-value)
  2. aIn Kaivola et al., Dickson et al., and Robinson et al., analyses were performed on separate subgroups [18, 27, 45]. The order of the results is the same as the order in which the corresponding subgroups were listed in Additional file 1: Table S1
  3. bAPOE-ε4 and rs769449 reported in [13] and [10] are in linkage disequilibrium (R2 = 0.766)