Skip to main content

Table 1 Statistical analysis methods and results for validation data

From: Brain matters: unveiling the distinct contributions of region, age, and sex to glia diversity and CNS function

Validation

Method

Model

Model output

Other statistical output

Number of samples (4 fields of view each quantified)

SPARC + RBFOX1- OLIG2 + (IF)

Linear Model

Cube root (percentage of SPARC + RBFOX1-OLIG2 +) ~ tissue region + age*sex

Predictor

Est

SE

t-value

p-value

NA

BA4: 6

CB: 4

CSC: 6

(Intercept)

1.2

0.3

4.06

 < 0.001

Tissue: CB

− 0.17

0.36

− 0.47

0.64

Tissue: CSC

0.74

0.32

2.34

0.023

Age Group: Young

− 0.43

0.46

− 0.931

0.356

Sex: Male

− 0.02

0.39

− 0.07

0.94

Young: Male

0.35

0.61

0.578

0.565

HCN2 + SPARC + OLIG2 + (IF)

Wilcoxon Rank Sum test

Proportion of HCN2 + SPARC + oligodendrocytes ~ tissue

NA

W = 18.5

p-value = 0.025

BA4: 3

CSC: 2

PAX3 + PDGFRA + (BaseScope duplex)

Poisson Model

Count of double positive cells ~ total count of PDGFRA positive + tissue

(Intercept)

− 1.31

0.34

− 3.82

 < 0.001

NA

5 BA4

5 CB

7 CSC

Total count PDGFRA

0.05

0.02

1.97

0.048

Tissue: CB

1.50

0.31

4.87

 < 0.001

Tissue: CSC

1.65

0.30

5.56

 < 0.001

NELL1 + PDGFRA + (BaseScope duplex)

Linear Model

NELL1 + PDGFRA +  ~ tissue region

(Intercept)

0.67

0.16

4.3

 < 0.001

NA

3 BA4

3 CSC

Tissue: CSC

− 0.67

0.22

− 2.97

0.007

EBF1 + PDGFRA + (RNAscope)

linear model

Proportion EBF1 + PDGFRA +  ~ age group + tissue + mean cellular autofluorescence

(Intercept)

0.43

0.2

4.09

 < 0.001

NA

CB old: 4

CB young: 4

CSC old: 5

CSC young: 5

Age Group

0.18

0.05

3.64

 < 0.001

Tissue (CSC)

− 0.32

0.05

− 7.05

 < 0.0001

Cellular auto-fluorescence

44.00

26.27

1.68

0.099

  1. IF Immuno-fluorescence, CB Cerebellum, CSC Cervical spinal cord, Est Estimate, SE Standard Error