Fig. 6From: Immunological and tumor-intrinsic mechanisms mediate the synergistic growth suppression of experimental glioblastoma by radiotherapy and MET inhibitionModulation of response to tepotinib and irradiation alone or in combination by loss of adaptive immunity. A. Rag1−/− mice were intracranially implanted with SMA-560 glioma cells, treated daily with 100 mg/kg tepotinib from day 6 on or solvent, or with a single dose of 10 Gy on day 7, or in combination. Kaplan–Meier survival curves are shown. B,C. GL-261 wildtype cells were intracranially implanted into C57/BL6 Rag1−/− mice (B), or GL-261 Met knockout cells were intracranially implanted into C57/BL6 wildtype mice (C). Mice were treated daily with 100 mg/kg tepotinib or solvent from day 6 on, or with a single dose of 10 Gy on day 7, or a combination thereof, and Kaplan–Meier survival curves are shown (++ p < 0.01, versus control). D. Illustration of median survival differences between treatment groups in the GL-261 model (n.d., not defined, > 50% of animals cured; *** p < 0.0001, versus control; ### p < 0.0001, versus tepotinib; +++ p < 0.0001, versus radiotherapy). Symptomatic animals implanted with GL-261 wildtype or Met knockout cells were euthanized, the brains removed, cut into thin slices and stained with H&E or for CD31 (T, tumor; B, brain). Representative images are shown (left), stainings were quantified using Image J (right) (** p < 0.01, relative to control; AU, arbitrary units)Back to article page