Reference | Referred to as in our current study | Criterion | Region/s | Cut point | Data source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Accuracy-based cut point’ | Accuracy based on age-matched clinically normal versus amyloid-positive cognitively impaired individuals from the MCSA | Meta-ROI including entorhinal, amygdala, parahippocampal, fusiform, inferior temporal, and middle temporal ROIs | ≥ 1.33 | MCSA | |
Byun et al. [15] | ‘1SD cut point’ | Flortaucipir uptake + 1SD from amyloid-negative cognitively unimpaired individuals from ADNI | Hippocampus Entorhinal cortex | ≥ 2.79 ≥ 3.73 | ADNI |
Jack et al. [16] | ‘10% cut point’ | Sensitivity (10th percentile flortaucipir uptake) based on amyloid-positive cognitively impaired study participants from ADNI | Hippocampus Entorhinal cortex | ≥ 2.75 ≥ 3.83 | ADNI |
Schöll et al. [18] | ‘Schöll cut point’ | Conditional inference tree analysis to classify individuals into Braak stage I/II | Transentorhinal, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex | ≥ 1.40 | BACS and UCSF-MAC |
Maass et al. [19] | ‘Maass cut point’ | Conditional inference tree analysis to classify individuals into Braak stage I/II | Transentorhinal, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex | ≥ 1.13 | BACS and UCSF-MAC |