Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and autopsy features by proteinopathy groups and subtypes in our autopsy cohort

From: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration proteinopathies have disparate microscopic patterns of white and grey matter pathology

 

FTLD-Tau

CBD

MAPT

PiD

PSP

FTLD-TDP

Type A

Type B

Type C

Type E

sig. groupa

sig. subtypeb

N

37

11

5

12

9

55

20

17

13

5

  

Female (%)

16/37 (43.2)

7/11 (63.6)

4/5 (80.0)

4/12 (33.3)

1/9 (11.1)

27/55 (49.1)

11/20 (55.0)

8/17 (47.1)

4/13 (30.8)

4/5 (80.0)

0.672

0.072

Phenotype (%)

 bvFTD

23/37 (62.2)

4/11 (36.4)

5/5 (100)

10/12 (83.3)

4/9 (44.4)

42/55 (76.4)

14/20 (70.0)

16/17 (94.1)

7/13 (53.8)

5/5 (100.0)

0.166

0.004

 PPA

14/37 (37.8)

7/11 (63.6)

0/5 (0)

2/12 (16.7)

5/9 (55.6)

13/55 (23.6)

6/20 (30.0)

1/17 (5.9)

6/13 (46.2)

0/5 (0)

  

 naPPA

10/14 (71.4)

5/7 (71.4)

–

0/2 (0)

5/5 (100.0)

3/13 (23.1)

2/6 (33.3)

1/1 (100.0)

0/6 (0)

–

0.007

 < 0.001

 svPPA

1/14 (7.1)

0/7 (0)

–

1/2 (50.0)

0/5 (0)

8/13 (61.5)

2/6 (33.3)

0/1 (0)

0/6 (0)

–

  

 mPPA

3/14 (21.4)

2/7 (28.6)

–

1/2 (50.0)

0/5 (0)

2/13 (15.4)

2/6 (33.3)

0/1 (0)

6/6 (100.0)

–

  

Genetic cases (%)

5/37 (13.5)

0/11 (0)

5/5 (100)

0/11 (0)

0/9 (0)

28/55 (50.9)

14/20 (70.0)c

12/17 (70.6)

2/13 (15.4)

0/5 (0.0)

 < 0.001

 

 MAPT

5/37 (13.5)d

0/11 (0)

5/5 (100)

0/11 (0)

0/9 (0)

       

 C9orf72

     

15/55 (27.3)

3/20 (15.0)

11/17 (64.7)

1/13 (7.7)

0/5 (0.0)

 

 < 0.001g

 GRN

     

11/55 (20.0)e

10/20 (50.0)

1/17 (5.9)

0/13 (0.0)

0/5 (0.0)

  

 TBK1

     

2/55 (3.6)f

1/20 (5.0)

0/17 (0.0)

1/13 (7.7)

0/5 (0.0)

  

Age at onset

60.0 ± 12.3

58.1 ± 9.4#

47.0 ± 14.9#

56.8 ± 6.8#

73.6 ± 7.7

59.0 ± 7.7

60.4 ± 6.4#

57.7 ± 8.8#

59.2 ± 8.5#

57.6 ± 8.4#

0.691

 < 0.001

Age at death

67.6 ± 12.5

64.4 ± 10.6#

53.8 ± 16.0#

67.3 ± 8.3

79.6 ± 7

66.0 ± 8.8

67.5 ± 7.1#

63.7 ± 9.2#

68.9 ± 9.9

60.0 ± 9.1#

0.496

 < 0.001

Disease duration

7.6 ± 3.7

6.3 ± 2.9

6.8 ± 2.3

10.5 ± 4.2^&

6.0 ± 2.5

6.9 ± 4.3

7.1 ± 3.6

6.0 ± 4.8

9.6 ± 3.7&

2.4 ± 0.9

0.394

 < 0.001

PMI

12.0 ± 6.4

13.9 ± 7.4

9.4 ± 3.1

12.6 ± 6.4

10.6 ± 6.5

12.6 ± 6.6

10.6 ± 5.9

14.4 ± 7.7

13.8 ± 6.0

11.6 ± 6.8

0.689

0.550

Brain weight

1091.9 ± 146.7

1096.0 ± 140.7

1082.0 ± 192.7

1021.5 ± 126.5

1179.0 ± 123.3

1097.7 ± 190.3

985.9 ± 165.1&

1145.0 ± 207.3

1126.0 ± 134.1

1289.0 ± 119.7

0.872

0.004

  1. bvFTD = behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia; CBD = corticobasal degeneration; FTLD-Tau = frontotemporal lobar degeneration with inclusions of the protein tau; FTLD-TDP = frontotemporal lobar degeneration with inclusions of the TDP-43 protein; MAPT = FTLD-tau with MAPT gene mutation; mPPA = mixed variant of primary progressive aphasia; naPPA = nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia; PiD = Pick’s disease; PMI = post-mortem interval; PPA = primary progressive aphasia; PSP = progressive supranuclear palsy; svPPA = semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia; Type A/Type B/Type C/Type E = subtypes of FTLD-TDP
  2. aStatistical significance (p value) when comparing the two main FTLD proteinopathies (i.e. FTLD-Tau and FTLD-TDP)
  3. bStatistical significance (p value) when comparing all proteinopathy subtypes (i.e. FTLD-Tau: CBD, MAPT, PiD, PSP; FTLD-TDP: type A, type B, type C, type E)
  4. cOne patient with FTLD-TDP type A had two VUS in the GRN gene (GRN c.956 T > A, p.Ile319Lys; c.1058G > A, p.Ser353Asn), which were not considered to be pathogenic; therefore, this patient was classified as a sporadic case. Another patient with FTLD-TDP type A had a mutation in the GBE gene (GBE1 c.1280delG, p.G427fs*9), whose association with FTLD-TDP is unclear; for this reason, this patient was also classified as a sporadic case
  5. dMAPT point mutations were: c.1165G > A, p.G389R (n = 1); c.796C > G, p.L266V (n = 1); c.902C > T, p.P301L (n = 1); c.915 + 16C > T, intronic variant (n = 2)
  6. eGRN point mutations were: c.1009C > T, p.Q337* (n = 1 type A); c.102delC, p.G35Efs*19 (n = 1 type A); c.1179 + 2 T > C, p.? (n = 1 type B); c.1252C > T, p.R418* (n = 1 type A); c.1414-2A > G, p.A472Vfs*10 (n = 1 type A); c.1477C > T, p.R493* (n = 1 type A); c.26C > A, p.A9D (n = 1 type A); c.295_308delTGCCCACGGGGCTT, p.C99Pfs*15 (n = 1 type A); c.348A > C, p.S116 = (n = 1 type A); c.675_676delCA, p.S226Wfs*28 (n = 1 type A); c.911G > A, p.W304* (n = 1 type A)
  7. fTBK1 point mutations were: c.1387_1388delGA, p.E463Sfs*13 (n = 1 type C); TBK1 c.922C > T, p.R308* (n = 1 type A)
  8. gThe frequency of FTLD-TDP-related genetic mutations (i.e. C9orf72, GRN, TBK1) was compared between proteinopathy subtypes of FTLD-TDP only (i.e. type A, type B, type C, type E). The frequency of FTLD-Tau-related genetic mutations (i.e. MAPT) could not be statistically tested between subtypes because all cases with mutation were grouped as a separate MAPT proteinopathy subtype
  9. #< 0.05 compared to PSP (post-hoc comparisons, Bonferroni-corrected); ^< 0.05 compared to TDP type B (post-hoc comparisons, Bonferroni-corrected); &< 0.01 compared to TDP type E (post-hoc comparisons, Bonferroni-corrected)