Skip to main content
Download PDF

Modeling Alexander disease with patient iPSCs reveals cellular and molecular pathology of astrocytes

Acta Neuropathologica Communications volume 4, Article number: 69 (2016) Cite this article

An Erratum to this article was published on 16 September 2016

Abstract

Alexander disease is a fatal neurological illness characterized by white-matter degeneration and formation of Rosenthal fibers, which contain glial fibrillary acidic protein as astrocytic inclusion. Alexander disease is mainly caused by a gene mutation encoding glial fibrillary acidic protein, although the underlying pathomechanism remains unclear. We established induced pluripotent stem cells from Alexander disease patients, and differentiated induced pluripotent stem cells into astrocytes. Alexander disease patient astrocytes exhibited Rosenthal fiber-like structures, a key Alexander disease pathology, and increased inflammatory cytokine release compared to healthy control. These results suggested that Alexander disease astrocytes contribute to leukodystrophy and a variety of symptoms as an inflammatory source in the Alexander disease patient brain. Astrocytes, differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells of Alexander disease, could be a cellular model for future translational medicine.

Introduction

Alexander disease (AxD) was first described by W. S. Alexander [1]. The clinical phenotypes of AxD are macrocephaly, frontal leukodystrophy and a variety of developmental delays with epileptic seizures, dysphagia, or bulbar/pseudobulbar signs. However, the severity of these clinical features differs among patients, being mostly dependent on the age of onset [2].

The common neuropathological feature of AxD is the presence of Rosenthal fibers, a unique cytoplasmic inclusion within astrocytes. Rosenthal fibers contain glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), major astrocytic intermediate filament protein and molecular chaperones, including alpha-B-crystallin and other heat shock proteins [3, 4]. After extensive neuropathological investigations, missense mutations in GFAP have been identified as a genetic basis for AxD [5]. The discovery of the GFAP mutations opened the way to the development of model systems using tissue culture cells and transgenic mice for the study of AxD. Transgenic models recapitulated GFAP aggregations. However, it remained unclear how AxD mutations lead to protein aggregation in patient astrocytes as well as how mutant GFAP-expressing astrocytes contribute to neuronal degeneration [6].

In 2007, the discovery of a combination of transcription factors that could reprogram somatic cells into cells exhibiting pluripotency, called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), has provided researchers with a revolutionary tool to study human biology and diseases [7]. iPSCs can be derived from many somatic cell types, including easily accessible dermal fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells [8, 9]. Similar to human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), iPSCs can self-renew and expand indefinitely in culture [7]. More importantly, they share the capacity to generate any cell types in the body, a property that is particularly useful for the study of neurological diseases. The pluripotency of iPSCs enables the production of astrocytes for disease modeling [10–12]. This remarkable feature of iPSCs facilitates the study of brain cell types that are difficult to obtain from living individuals, including human astrocytes. To directly examine AxD patient astrocytes, we established iPSCs from three AxD patients, with different GFAP mutations, respectively, and three healthy individuals without GFAP mutation. In a recent review of more than 215 cases of AxD with GFAP mutation, AxD was divided into 2 groups: type I was characterized by early onset, seizures, megalencephaly, and typical leukodystrophy as MRI features, and type II with a later age at onset characterized by brainstem features and atypical MRI findings [13]. Two patients in this study showed type I clinical phenotype and one patient showed type II clinical phenotype. In this study, AxD iPSC-derived astrocytes showed GFAP-positive aggregates, like Rosenthal fibers, and also exhibited altered cytokine release. The strategy of this study was to provide an effective and versatile way of pathogenic investigation and drug screening for AxD and other astrocyte-relevant diseases.

Materials and methods

Human subjects

Skin or blood samples were obtained from healthy controls or patients with Alexander disease. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committees of the University of Kyoto and Kumamoto University and written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

Generation of human iPSCs

In this application study, we used dermal fibroblasts or blood cells as patient somatic cells to prepare iPSCs [8, 12, 14]. For the iPSC clones of HC1, HC2, HC3, Alex1, and Alex3, episomal vectors were used to introduce a reprogramming factor (SOX2, KLF4, OCT4, L-MYC, LIN28, siRNA for p53) to the somatic cells, which were seeded onto SNL feeder cells. The next day, the medium was changed from a dermal fibroblast medium to a human ES cell medium (ReproCell, Yokohama, Japan) comprising 4 ng/mL of bFGF (Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan); the medium was replaced every other day, and after 30 days, about 20 iPSC colonies were picked up. Later, the presence or absence of residual plasmid was confirmed by PCR, and clones without residual plasmid were selected. Selected clones were run through karyotype analysis, and normal karyotype clones were analyzed. For the iPSC clones of Alex2, human iPSCs were generated by using Sendai virus vector as described previously [14].

In vitro differentiation into three germ layers

CTK was used to harvest the iPSCs, and an embryoid body (EB) was formed [12]. Cell masses were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) comprising 20 % knockout serum replacement (KSR, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2 mM L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.1 M nonessential amino acids (NEAA, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.5 % penicillin/streptomycin. The medium was replaced every other day, and the EB after 8 days was cultured for another 8 days in DMEM comprising 10 % FBS on a gelatin-coated coverslip.

Differentiation and enrichment of astrocytes

Human iPSCs were dissociated to single cells and quickly reaggregated in U-bottom 96-well plates for suspension culture (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany), pre-coated with 2 % Pluronic F-127 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 100 % ethanol. Cell aggregates, called embryoid bodies (EBs), were cultured in ‘DFK5% medium’ (DFK5%; DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 5 % v/v KSR, 1x NEAA, 1x Glutamax (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific)) with 2 μM dorsomorphin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 μM SB431542 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) in a neural inductive stage (day 0 to 8). After neural induction, EBs were transferred onto Matrigel (Corning, Tewksbury, MA)-coated 6-well culture plates and cultured in DFK5% supplemented with 1x N2 supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 2 μM dorsomorphin in the patterning stage (day 8 to 24). A large number of neural stem cells (NESTIN-positive) were observed to migrate from the EB core. After the patterning stage, migrated neural stem cells were separated from the plate bottom using Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA) and cultured in Neurobasal medium FULL, Neurobasal Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 1x N2 supplement, 1x Glutamax, 10 ng/ml BDNF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ), 10 ng/ml GDNF (Peprotech) and 10 ng/ml NT-3 (Peprotech) on Matrigel-coated 6-well culture plates or cover-slips (day 24 to 60). At day 60, iPS-derived neural cells were plated at 400,000-2,000,000 cells per 90-mm dish without any coating in DMEM/F12 Glutamax (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 1x N2 supplement, 10 ng/ml EGF (Peprotech), 12 ng/ml basic FGF (Peprotech) and 2 μg/ml heparin (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). After passage, neurons could not attach to a non-coated polystyrene dish surface or they died by anoikis. On the other hand, astrocytes and a limited number of oligodendrocyte precusors could attach and proliferate. By repeated passage in the same manner at days 90, 120, 150 and 180, astrocytes increased their own abundance ratio and showed positive GFAP immunostaining.

Immunofluorescent study

The iPSCs or differentiated astrocytes were immobilized at room temperature for 30 min in 4 % paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4), and washed with PBS. The cells were then permeabilized for 10 min with PBS comprising 0.2 % Triton X-100. A non-specific reaction was also run for 60 min at room temperature in PBS comprising 10 % donkey serum; primary antibodies were reacted overnight, and fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies were reacted and observed. DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for nuclear staining. The following primary antibodies were used: NANOG (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, 1:50), TRA1-60 (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, 1:1,000), SOX-17 (R&D Systems, 1:50), αSMA (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark, 1:3,000), Tuj1 (Covance, 1:3,000), S100β (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:400), GFAP (DAKO, 1:2,000 or Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, 1:400), alpha-B crystallin (Millipore, 1:400), and N-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:50). Rhodamine phalloidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:1,000) were used for F-actin staining. Immunostained cells were analyzed using In Cell Analyzer 6000 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) or the super-resolution structured illumination microscopy with 100 x objective lens (N-SIM system, Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan).

Transmission electron microscopy

Briefly, iPSC-derived astrocytes were cultured on plastic coverslip (CellDesk, Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde/2 % glutaraldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer at 4 °C, washed in isotonic phosphate-buffered sucrose, and then post-fixed in 1 % osmic acid. Specimens were dehydrated with ethanol and propylene oxide and subsequently embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were cut with an ultramicrotome, mounted on grids, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined by using a Hitachi H-7650 electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Microarray and pathway analysis for differentiated astrocytes

Total RNA from differentiated neural cells was extracted by RNeasy micro kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and altered into ragmented/biotinylated cDNA by GeneChip® WT PLUS Reagent Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Fragmented cDNA samples were hybridized with GeneChip Human Gene 2.0 ST Array (Affymetrix). Each sample was hybridized once with the one-color protocol. Arrays were scanned with a GeneChip® Scanner 3000 7Gt (Affymetrix). Data were analyzed by GeneSpring GX7.3.1 software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) to create the list of gene sets. The normalized data have been deposited at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with accession number GSE83374. For pathway analysis, we adopted gene sets for Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA software, QIAGEN), and seek altered canonical pathways. To understand the upstream of pathway changes, the activation status of the functions/pathways was predicted using the IPA Upstream Regulator Analysis Tool, by calculating a regulation Z-score and an overlap p-value, which were based on the number of known target genes of interest pathways/functions, expression changes of these target genes and their agreement with literature findings. It was considered significantly activated (or inhibited) with an overlap p-value ≤ 0.05 and an IPA activation Z-score ≥ 1.2 (or ≤ −1.2). The detailed descriptions of IPA analysis are available under “Upstream Regulator Analysis”, “Biological Functions Analysis”, and “Ingenuity Canonical Pathways Analysis” on the IPA website (http://www.ingenuity.com).

Immunoblots

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % NP-40, 0.5 % deoxycholate, 0.1 % SDS, protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics)). Each 10 μg sample of protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE (5-20 % gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels, BIOCRAFT, Tokyo, Japan), and separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (HybondTM-P, GE Healthcare). The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, followed by appropriate secondary antibodies, and then visualized using ECL prime (GE Healthcare). For dot-blot analysis, cell lysate samples (each 2 or 4 μg/spot) were loaded on a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, followed by appropriate secondary antibodies, and then visualized using ECL prime (GE Healthcare). The images were acquired on LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare). The intensity of the protein band was analyzed using Fiji (http://fiji.sc/). The following primary antibodies were used: N-cadherin (1:1,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GAPDH (1:3,000, Abcam), 4E-BP1 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology (CST), Danvers, MA), Phospho-4E-BP1 (Ser65) (1:1,000, CST), eIF4B (1:1,000, CST), Phospho-eIF4B (Ser406) (1:1,000, CST), eIF4E (1:1,000, Abcam), and Phospho-eIF4E (Ser209) (1:1,000, Abcam).

Electrochemiluminescence assays for cytokines

Differentiated astroglial cells were replated at 4 x104 cells per well in 96-well plates coated with 0.1 % gelatin. Three days after replating, all culture medium was replaced with 100 μL of fresh astrocyte medium. To assess extracellular cytokine release, conditioned media were harvested for further analysis. As positive control of massive cytokines release, 1 μg/mL LPS was added to NC1 astrocytes. Cytokines in culture media were measured by human Cytokine Demonstration 10-Plex tissue Culture Kits (Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, MD). This assay uses each antibody to capture each cytokine and SULFO-TAG-labeled different specific antibodies for detection by electrochemiluminescence with Sector® Imager 2400 (Meso Scale Discovery). Ten kinds of cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, GM-CSF and TNFα, were assayed. The concentrations of IL-1β, IL4, IL-5, IL-6, GM-CSF and TNFα were quantified by using standard recombinant proteins, but the signals of IL-2, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-12p70 were not able to be detected in the dynamic range of the standard curve (0.05-10,000 pg/ml).

Statistics

Comparisons of the mean among three groups or more were performed by one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc test using Tukey–Kramer method (JMP software version 9.0, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Generation and characterization of AxD-specific iPSCs

In the present study, we generated iPSCs from three AxD patients with heterozygous GFAP mutation (Alex1, Alex2 and Alex3) and three healthy controls (HC1, HC2, and HC3) (Table 1). The disease onset of Alex1 and Alex2 was infantile and that of Alex3 was adult (Table 1). Primary cultures of somatic cells from all six individuals were independently reprogrammed to iPSCs, as judged by colony morphology, similar to human embryonic stem cells (ESCs), growth dynamics, and sustained long-term passaging (>20 passages) (Fig. 1a). The established iPSCs expressed NANOG and TRA1-60, markers of pluripotency (Fig. 1a). The pluripotency of the iPSCs was also evaluated in vitro through the formation of EBs. All iPSC lines spontaneously differentiated into cell types of the three embryonic germ layers as indicated by expression of the specific markers, including TUJ1 (ectoderm marker), αSMA (mesoderm marker), and SOX17 (endoderm marker) (Fig. 1b).

Table 1 Summary of iPSCs in this study
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Generation of iPSCs from Alexander disease patients and healthy controls. a Morphology and expression of human embryonic stem cell markers. iPSCs from both controls and patients with Alexander disease showed ESC-like morphology (phase image) and expressed pluripotent stem cell markers, NANOG and TRA1-60. Scale bars = 200 μm. b In vitro differentiation of established iPSCs to representative three-germ layer: TUJ1 (ectoderm), αSMA (mesoderm), and SOX17 (endoderm). Scale bars = 50 μm

Full size image

Differentiation of iPSCs into astrocytes

The astrocytic differentiation protocol for human iPSCs was modified from our previous method [12] (Fig. 2a). In the neural patterning stage, differentiated cells expressed NESTIN (marker of neural stem cells) or GFAP (marker of radial glia in cortical development) (Fig. 2b). After 2 months, differentiated cells abundantly expressed TUJ1 (neuronal marker) (Fig. 2b). By repeating low-density passage, differentiated neurons, without proliferation, failed to attach to the dish and were selectively removed. After five passages and more than 6 months of cultivation, iPSC-derived astrocytes were enriched (Fig. 2b). Differentiated astrocytes abundantly expressed S100β (Fig. 2c) and GFAP (Fig. 3a and b), which are commonly used as astrocytes markers. We did not observe any obvious difference in astrocytic differentiation efficacy among all individuals (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

iPSCs from AxD patients and healthy controls could differentiate into astrocytes with high purity. a Schematic procedures for astroglial differentiation. b Differentiated iPSCs at day 24 expressed neural stem cell markers NESTIN and GFAP. Neural cells at day 60 expressed neuronal or astrocytic marker TUJ1 or GFAP. Most enriched astrocytes expressed GFAP. Scale bars = 20 μm. c Estimation of astroglial differentiation from control and AxD iPSCs. After 180 days of differentiation, astrocytes were immunostained with an antibody against S100β (red color). Scale bars = 20 μm. d Calculated purity of astrocytic differentiation Data represent mean ± SD (biological replicates, n = 3 from randomly picked fields per clone). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not show significant variation. F (5, 12) =0.2432; p = 0.935

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Astrocytes of Alexander disease showed GFAP-positive aggregates. a Most iPSC-derived astrocytes showed GFAP-positive staining (green color). In healthy control, GFAP showed filamentous structure. In Alexander disease, GFAP mainly showed filamentous structure, but also fibrous/amorphous (arrows) or dot-like (arrowheads) aggregates. Scale bars = 5 μm. b Calculated purity of astrocytic differentiation data represent mean ± SD (biological replicates, n = 3 from randomly picked fields per clone). c Calculated positivity of GFAP aggregates. Data represent mean ± SD (biological replicates, n = 3 from randomly picked fields per clone)

Full size image

GFAP aggregates in iPSCs-derived astrocytes from AxD

To evaluate the in vitro recapitulation of Rosenthal fibers, we visualized GFAP of iPSC-derived astrocytes by immunofluorescent staining. Nearly all iPSC-derived astrocytes showed positive staining of GFAP (Fig. 3a and b). GFAP of healthy control astrocytes formed fine filaments distributed throughout the cytoplasm in a cytoskeletal array (Fig. 3a, panels of HC1, 2, and 3). In contrast, a proportion of GFAP in AxD astrocytes formed fibrous aggregates, similar to Rosenthal fibers of AxD brain, and also small dot-like patterns (Fig. 3a, panels of Alex 1, 2, and 3). These fibrous aggregates were formed in 5-10 % of AxD, and were rarely observed in healthy controls. Small dot-like aggregates were formed in 15-20 % of AxD and in a few of the healthy controls (Fig. 3c). To characterize small dot-like inclusions in detail, we visualized GFAP-positive dots using super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (N-SIM system). GFAP-positive dots, with a diameter of 50-200 nm, showed a cloud-like amorphous structure, adjacent to normal GFAP filament, and were co-immunostained with alpha-B crystallin particles (Fig. 4a). In addition to super-resolution microscopy, we observed cytosolic aggregates in AxD astrocytes by using electron microscopy. In AxD astrocytes, electron-attenuated, granular, or amorphous-appearing structures, surrounded by filamentous structure, were observed and determined as Rosenthal fiber-like structures (Fig. 4b). Overexpression of GFAP might contribute to astrocyte dysfunction in AxD as was shown in initial studies of overexpressing wild type GFAP in transgenic mice, which resulted in the formation of Rosenthal fibers indistinguishable from those found in Alexander disease patients. To investigate the GFAP dose effects on aggregates formation, we quantified the GFAP expression and found increased GFAP in AxD astrocytes (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 4
figure 4

High resolution imaging of aggregates in AxD astrocytes with 3D-SIM or electron microscopy. a Super resolution imaging of GFAP aggregates with dot-like pattern showed accumulated particles of both GFAP and alpha-B crystalline (CRYAB). Scale bar = 200 nm. b Electron microscopy of AxD astrocytes. Electron-dense amorphous-appearing structures (open arrow head) or granular (closed arrow head) structures, surrounded by filamentous structure (*). Scale bars = 100 nm

Full size image

Pathway analysis of alteration in global gene expression patterns

To uncover molecules involved in the AxD astrocyte pathogenesis, we analyzed global gene expression profiles of iPSC-derived astrocytes (Fig. 5a and b). Among 40,716 probe sets, we created a gene set with altered expression in AxD astrocytes versus control astrocytes (fold-change ≥ 2 fold). By adapting this gene set to the pathway analysis software, we investigated the background pathway of the AxD pathomechanism. Pathway analysis revealed altered function of cellular adherence (Additional file 2: Figure S2) and transcription change via mTORC1/mTORC2 (Additional file 3: Figure S3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Gene expression comparison between healthy control and Alexander’s disease astrocytes. a Scatter plot showing the 2-fold upregulated and downregulated genes (red and blue dots, respectively) in the astrocytes of Alexander disease. b List of increased and decreased top-20 genes (red and blue columns, respectively)

Full size image

From the results of cellular adherence pathway analysis, the expression of cell adhesion molecules (CAM), including the cadherin family, was altered in AxD astrocytes. In iPSC-derived astrocytes of AxD, gene expression and protein level of N-cadherin were increased, and those of E-cadherin were decreased (Additional file 2: Figure S2 and Fig. 6b). Cadherin is known to play an important role in the interactions between cells or their surrounding matrix, and also to affect the cell morphology [15]. The majority of iPSC-derived astrocytes showed polygonal shape, and less than 20 % showed stellate or star-like shape. However, we could not find any distinct difference in cell shape between control and AxD astrocytes. To investigate the detailed structural changes in AxD astrocytes, we performed an immunfluorescence study of N-cadherin and F-actin. The signal intensity of N-cadherin was increased in AxD astrocytes, but the distribution of N-cadherin or F-actin was similar between control and AxD (Fig. 6c).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Pathway analysis revealed altered status of cell-adhesion, mTOR, and cytokine release in Alexander disease astrocytes. a Schema of pathway analysis and upstream prediction analysis. b Whole-cell lysates of iPSC-derived astrocytes were prepared and equivalent amounts of total protein were loaded per lane on a polyacrylamide gel for Western blot (WB) analysis using N-cadherin or GAPDH antibodies shown on the left. c Astrocytes were immunostained with an antibody against N-cadherin (green color) and F-actin (red color) was also visualized by using Rhodamine phalloidin. Scale bar = 10 μm. d Whole-cell lysates were prepared and equivalent amounts of total protein were loaded per lane on a polyacrylamide gel for WB analysis using the panel of antibodies shown on the left. The values shown below each blot represent the ratio of phosphorylated/total band densities, calculated and normalized to the ratio in “HC1” astrocytes. e Quantification of cytokine release from iPSC-derived astrocytes. Gray/pink-colored columns indicate astrocytes of healthy controls/Alexander disease. Black-colored column indicates healthy astrocytes with addition of LPS as positive control of cytokine release. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. (*, p < 0.05, N.S.: not significant) Data represent mean ± SD (biological replicates, n = 3)

Full size image

Additionally, the altered pattern of global gene expression in AxD astrocytes suggested activation of the mTOR pathway. Active mTOR promotes protein synthesis by phosphorylating 4E-BPs on several sites that relieve their binding to eIF4E, eIF4G or eIF4B. eIF4E mediates binding of eIF4 large protein complex to the 5’ cap structure of mRNAs. On the other hand, 4E-BPs in their hypophosphorylated state bind to eIF4E competitively, inhibiting the association of eIF4E and eIF4G and leading to a block in translation [16]. Thus, we evaluated mTOR activation by western blotting with antibodies, specific to phosphorylated 4E-BP, eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4B (Fig. 6d). As well as the prediction of pathway analysis, the phosphorylation statuses of 4E-BP, eIF4E, eIF4G, and eiF4B were upregulated in AxD astrocytes (Fig. 6d), indicating activated mTOR pathway.

To understand the upstream of these two pathway changes, the activation status of the functions/pathways was predicted. We can predict that altered gene expression and pathways in AxD is regulated by inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 5c). To test the status of cytokines from iPSC-derived astrocytes, cytokines secreted in culture medium were quantified (Fig. 5d). The secretion of GM-CSF, IL6, IL5 and TNFα was significantly increased in AxD astrocytes (Fig. 5d). In contrast, the secretion of IL1β and IL4 was not altered. Additionally, immunostaining study showed intracellular dots of each cytokine in iPSC-derived astrocytes (Additional file 4: Figure S4). These results indicated that AxD astrocytes secrete more inflammatory cytokines and affect the neural circumstances of AxD patient brain.

Discussion

We generated iPSCs from AxD patients and differentiated them into astrocytes exhibiting GFAP-positive aggregates in cytosol. A part of the cytosolic aggregates was fibrous and had high immunoreactivity to GFAP antibody, resembling Rosenthal fibers of AxD brain. On the other hand, the filamentous structure of GFAP, which is the major intermediate filament of astrocytes, was almost absent in astrocytes with fibrous aggregates. In spite of this, however, we could not find any distinct morphological alteration in the shape of astrocytes with fibrous aggregates. We speculate that other species of intermediate filament proteins, including vimentin, may have compensated for the diminished GFAP-filament to maintain the cellular shape [17]. In addition to the fibrous aggregates, AxD astrocytes displayed small, round shape of GFAP-positive aggregates, described as a “small dot-like pattern” in the results. These small dots were similar to those of previous reports using cancer cell line models with overexpression of GFAP (overexpression models: OE models) [5, 18, 19]. These small dots in OE models were observed as irregular dots with or without sand-like diffuse staining patterns. The OE models with mutant GFAP-aggregates did not show any normal filamentous pattern of GFAP. However, anti-GFAP staining of iPSC-derived astrocytes of AxD showed both normal filamentous structure and small-dot aggregates in the same cells. Furthermore, the frequency of the appearance of small-dot aggregates was greater than that of fibrous aggregates. We speculate that small-dot aggregates, co-existing with wild filamentous GFAP, are a premature form of fibrous aggregates and transformed into fibrous aggregates after a period of time and/or accumulation of cellular stress. We also could observe electron-dense amorphous-appearing structures or granular structures, surrounded by filamentous cytoskeleton. These structures are similar to Rosenthal fiber in AxD patients brain, but electron-density of structures in iPSC-derived astrocytes were not as high as that of AxD brain. Relatively low electron-density might reflect the early stage of Rosenthal fiber, which can be an advantage in drug development to modify early pathomechanisms of AxD.

Secondly, we investigated how GFAP aggregates elicit the neurodegenerative process. By comparing global-gene expression between control and AxD astrocytes, we focused on cell-adhesion pathway and mTOR pathway. GFAP is an important cytoskeleton protein, but cell shape and cell proliferation are similar between control and AxD astrocytes. In our study, the iPSC-derived astrocytes were cultivated in the absence of neurons or other extracellular matrix and might require years of observation after transplantation into in vivo brain, to recapitulate morphological phenotypes, such as the increased ratio of reactive astrocytes. However, N-cadherin protein was increased in AxD astrocytes. Among the cadherin family, N-cadherin has been classified as “nerve-derived”, and is known as a key CAM in the brain. N-cadherin has also been reported to be upregulated via cellular-stress signaling after brain injury by using the N-cadherin knockout model [20]. We speculated that GFAP aggregates in AxD astrocytes can evoke cellular stress and upregulated N-cadherin as a stress response. In the case of in vivo, altered cell-adhesion via N-cadherin also might affect the cell-to-cell interaction among neurons, oligodendrocytes, microglia and astrocytes, and consequently could lead to clinical phenotypes of AxD.

Furthermore, we also focused on activation of the mTOR pathway. Activation of the mTOR cascade is known as a characteristic feature of the initial stress response, and is related to reactive astrocytes in brain pathologies [21]. According to a previous study by using GFAP Tg; Gfap+/R236H model mice, the activation through the mTOR pathway appears to be an early change, while the later, more severe pathology is accompanied by mTOR inactivation [22]. Considering these pieces of evidence, our iPSC-derived astrocytes reflect the early phase of the AxD pathomechanism, and should be applicable to the development of drugs for an initial insult of GFAP aggregates.

Previous neuropathological investigations have described that lymphocytic infiltration or microglial activation was not massive in AxD brain [2, 23]. Olanbarria et al. investigated detailed alteration of the cytokine network in AxD model mice with both OE of human wild-type GFAP and heterozygous knock-in of mice Gfap R236H, and detected inflammatory response [24]. Consistent with this report, in our study, AxD astrocytes from patient iPSCs exhibited increased amounts of secreted GM-CSF, IL5, IL6, and TNFα. GM-CSF, IL6, and TNFα are well known as proinflammatory cytokines and are upregulated in various kinds of white matter diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) [25–28]. IL-5 is a Th2 cell-type cytokine that is secreted by astrocytes and microglia [29], turning on the switch of inflammatory response by activating microglia to upregulate inflammatory response in the brain, cooperating with GM-CSF [30, 31]. IL-5 is also upregulated not only in inflammatory conditions with parasitic infections but also in neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson’s disease [32]. In addition, clinically, AxD, especially type 2, shows step-wise or stroke-like progression, which is similar to the typical progression of other white matter diseases involving oligodendrocytes, MS and NMO. These findings suggest that the neuroinflammatory process promoted by proinflammatory astrocytes may be involved in the pathogenesis of AxD, and that immunomodulation approaches [33] targeting astrocytopathy would be a candidate therapy for AxD. Recent studies showed that astrocytes themselves can secrete cytokines and have responsibility for extrinsic factors, including LPS [34–36]. The cell population of iPSC-derived astrocytes did not show microglial markers. So, astrocyte-derived cytokines and chemokines might play both neuroprotective and neurotoxic roles in AxD, and could be a phenotypic target of future drug development by the use of an iPSC-derived astrocyte platform.

Conclusions

iPSCs from AxD patients were used to clarify disease phenotypes of astrocytes, which are the target cells of AxD. iPSC-derived astrocytes from AxD patients showed GFAP-aggregates resembling Rothental fibers and altered release of cytokines such as in white matter disease. Patient-specific iPSCs of AxD would provide a feasible platform for the study of inherited astrocytopathies, and further studies focusing on pathological crosstalk between astrocytes and other types of cells in the brain might lead to novel therapies for AxD.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committees at the University of Kyoto and Kumamoto University, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

References

  1. Alexander WS. Progressive fibrinoid degeneration of fibrillary astrocytes associated with mental retardation in a hydrocephalic infant. Brain. 1949;72:373–81. 3 pl.

  2. Russo LSJ, Aron A, Anderson PJ. Alexander’s disease: a report and reappraisal. Neurology. 1976;26:607–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tomokane N, Iwaki T, Tateishi J, Iwaki A, Goldman JE. Rosenthal fibers share epitopes with alpha B-crystallin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and ubiquitin, but not with vimentin. Immunoelectron microscopy with colloidal gold. Am J Pathol. 1991;138:875–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Head MW, Corbin E, Goldman JE. Overexpression and abnormal modification of the stress proteins alpha B-crystallin and HSP27 in Alexander disease. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:1743–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenner M, Johnson AB, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Rodriguez D, Goldman JE, Messing A. Mutations in GFAP, encoding glial fibrillary acidic protein, are associated with Alexander disease. Nat Genet. 2001;27:117–20.

  6. Messing A, Daniels CML, Hagemann TL. Strategies for treatment in Alexander Disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:507–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–72.

  8. Okita K, Yamakawa T, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Amano N, Watanabe A, et al. An Efficient Non-viral Method to Generate Integration-Free Human iPS Cells from Cord Blood and Peripheral Blood Cells. Stem Cells. 2012.

  9. Nakagawa M, Taniguchi Y, Senda S, Takizawa N, Ichisaka T, Asano K, et al. A novel efficient feeder-free culture system for the derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:3594.

  10. Juopperi TA, Kim WR, Chiang C-H, Yu H, Margolis RL, Ross CA, et al. Astrocytes generated from patient induced pluripotent stem cells recapitulate features of Huntington’s disease patient cells. Mol. Brain. 2012;5:17.

  11. Serio A, Bilican B, Barmada SJ, Ando DM, Zhao C, Siller R, et al. Astrocyte pathology and the absence of non-cell autonomy in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of TDP-43 proteinopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:4697–702.

  12. Kondo T, Asai M, Tsukita K, Kutoku Y, Ohsawa Y, Sunada Y, et al. Modeling Alzheimer’s disease with iPSCs reveals stress phenotypes associated with intracellular Aβ and differential drug responsiveness. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:487–96.

  13. Prust M, Wang J, Morizono H, Messing A, Brenner M, Gordon E, et al. GFAP mutations, age at onset, and clinical subtypes in Alexander disease. Neurology. 2011;77:1287–94.

  14. Fujie Y, Fusaki N, Katayama T, Hamasaki M, Soejima Y, Soga M, et al. New type of Sendai virus vector provides transgene-free iPS cells derived from chimpanzee blood. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113052.

  15. Lecuit T, Lenne P-F. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:633–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Showkat M, Beigh MA, Andrabi KI. mTOR Signaling in Protein Translation Regulation: Implications in Cancer Genesis and Therapeutic Interventions. Mol. Biol. Int. 2014;2014:686984.

  17. Cho W, Messing A. Properties of astrocytes cultured from GFAP over-expressing and GFAP mutant mice. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:1260–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Quinlan RA, Brenner M, Goldman JE, Messing A. GFAP and its role in Alexander disease. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313(10):2077–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsiao VC, Tian R, Long H, Der Perng M, Brenner M, Quinlan R a, et al. Alexander-disease mutation of GFAP causes filament disorganization and decreased solubility of GFAP. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2057–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanemaru K, Kubota J, Sekiya H, Hirose K, Okubo Y, Iino M. Calcium-dependent N-cadherin up-regulation mediates reactive astrogliosis and neuroprotection after brain injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013;110:11612–7.

  21. Codeluppi S, Svensson CI, Hefferan MP, Valencia F, Silldorff MD, Oshiro M, et al. The Rheb-mTOR pathway is upregulated in reactive astrocytes of the injured spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:1093–104.

  22. Sosunov AA, Guilfoyle E, Wu X, McKhann GM, Goldman JE. Phenotypic conversions of “protoplasmic” to “reactive” astrocytes in Alexander disease. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:7439–50.

  23. Towfighi J, Young R, Sassani J, Ramer J, Horoupian DS. Alexander’s disease: Further light-, and electron-microscopic observations. Acta Neuropathol. 1983;61:36–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Olabarria M, Putilina M, Riemer EC, Goldman JE. Astrocyte pathology in Alexander disease causes a marked inflammatory environment. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;130:469–86.

  25. Amedei A, Prisco D, D’Elios MM. Multiple sclerosis: The role of cytokines in pathogenesis and in therapies. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(10):13438–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Paemen L, Olsson T, Söderström M, van Damme J, Opdenakker G. Evaluation of gelatinases and IL-6 in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory neurological diseases. Eur. J. Neurol. 1994;1:55–63.

  27. Rasouli J, Ciric B, Imitola J, Gonnella P, Hwang D, Mahajan K, et al. Expression of GM-CSF in T Cells Is Increased in Multiple Sclerosis and Suppressed by IFN-β Therapy. J. Immunol. 2015;194:5085–93.

  28. Uzawa A, Mori M, Arai K, Sato Y, Hayakawa S, Masuda S, et al. Cytokine and chemokine profiles in neuromyelitis optica: significance of interleukin-6. Mult. Scler. 2010;16:1443–52.

  29. Sawada M, Suzumura A, Itoh Y, Marunouchi T. Production of interleukin-5 by mouse astrocytes and microglia in culture. Neurosci. Lett. 1993;155:175–8.

  30. Ringheim GE. Mitogenic effects of interleukin-5 on microglia. Neurosci. Lett. 1995;201:131–4.

  31. Liva SM, de Vellis J. IL-5 induces proliferation and activation of microglia via an unknown receptor. Neurochem. Res. 2001;26:629–37.

  32. Walker DG, Lue L-F, Serrano G, Adler CH, Caviness JN, Sue LI, et al. Altered Expression Patterns of Inflammation-Associated and Trophic Molecules in Substantia Nigra and Striatum Brain Samples from Parkinson’s Disease, Incidental Lewy Body Disease and Normal Control Cases. Front. Neurosci. 2015;9:507.

  33. Dubey D, Kieseier BC, Hartung HP, Hemmer B, Miller-Little W a, Stuve O. Clinical management of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: approved therapies and emerging candidates. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2015;11:93–108.

  34. van Neerven S, Nemes A, Imholz P, Regen T, Denecke B, Johann S, et al. Inflammatory cytokine release of astrocytes in vitro is reduced by all-trans retinoic acid. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;229:169–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Qin H, Benveniste EN. ELISA Methodology to Quantify Astrocyte Production of Cytokines/Chemokines In Vitro. 2012. p. 235–49.

  36. Choi SS, Lee HJ, Lim I, Satoh JI, Kim SU. Human astrocytes: Secretome profiles of cytokines and chemokines. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e92325.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all our coworkers and collaborators, to Takako Enami and Ran Shibukawa for their technical support, and to Noriko Endo, Rumi Ueno, and Rie Okuyama for their administrative support. We wish to thank Keiko Furuta and Haruyasu Kohda (Division of Electron Microscopic Study, Center for Anatomical Studies, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University) for technical assistance with electron microscopy. We wish to thank Hiroshi Gomi (Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University) for critical comments on electron microscopy findings. This work was supported by the Program for Intractable Diseases Research utilizing disease-specific iPS cells from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) to H.I., Research Project for Practical Applications of Regenerative Medicine from AMED to H.I., the grant for Core Center for iPS Cell Research of Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine from AMED to H.I., the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research to H.I., the Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science to H.I., and Intramural Research Grant (24-9) for Neurological and Psychiatry Disorders of NCNP to H.I..

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Takayuki Kondo, Misato Funayama, Michiyo Miyake, Kayoko Tsukita & Haruhisa Inoue

  2. Department of Cell Modulation, Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics (iMEG), Kumamoto University, 2-2-1 Honjo, Tyuou-ku, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan

    Takumi Era

  3. Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical School, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan

    Hitoshi Osaka

  4. Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Takashi Ayaki & Ryosuke Takahashi

Authors
  1. Takayuki Kondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Misato Funayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michiyo Miyake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kayoko Tsukita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takumi Era
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hitoshi Osaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takashi Ayaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ryosuke Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Haruhisa Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haruhisa Inoue.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

H.I. conceived the project. T.K. and H.I. designed the experiment. T.K., M.F., M.M., K.T., and H.I. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. T.E. provided the materials. H.O., T.A., and R.T. provided patient samples and information. T.K. and H.I. wrote the manuscript.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0366-8.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

GFAP expression of iPSC-derived astrocytes. Gene expression of GFAP was quantitatively analyzed with RT-qPCR. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant variation. F (5, 12) =9.2490; p = 0.0008. Post hoc analysis revealed significant increases in GFAP expression in Alex1 and Alex3 (*, p < 0.05). Data represent mean ± SD (biological replicates, n = 3). (PDF 343 kb)

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Alteration in cellular adherence pathway. Gene expression changes were described within epithelial adherens junction signaling. Red to orange color = increased in Alexander disease. Blue to green color = decreased in Alexander disease, Grey color = not altered. (PDF 3.50 MB)

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Alteration in mTORC1/mTORC2 pathway. Gene expression changes were described within mTOR signaling. Red to orange color = increased in Alexander disease. Blue to green color = decreased in Alexander disease, Grey color = not altered. (PDF 3.63 MB)

Additional file 4: Figure S4.

Immunofluorescent study of cytokines in iPSC-derived astrocytes. iPSC-derived astrocytes showed positive staining of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-5 (green color) and , GM-CSF, TNFα, IL-4 (red color). Scale bar = 5 μm. (PDF 3.32 MB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kondo, T., Funayama, M., Miyake, M. et al. Modeling Alexander disease with patient iPSCs reveals cellular and molecular pathology of astrocytes. acta neuropathol commun 4, 69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0337-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0337-0

Keywords

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

ISSN: 2051-5960

Contact us