Open Access

ARTAG in the basal forebrain: widening the constellation of astrocytic tau pathology

  • Alan King Lun Liu1,
  • Marc H. Goldfinger1,
  • Hayleigh E. Questari1,
  • Ronald K. B. Pearce1 and
  • Steve M. Gentleman1Email author
Acta Neuropathologica CommunicationsNeuroscience of Disease20164:59

DOI: 10.1186/s40478-016-0330-7

Received: 27 April 2016

Accepted: 1 June 2016

Published: 13 June 2016

Tauopathies are disorders characterised by the abnormal accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau protein within neurons and glial cells. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of tauopathy, features a stereotypical, staged progression of neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) and neuritic tau pathology through the brain [1]. However, age-related NFT and neuritic tau pathologies have also commonly been identified in cognitively normal and ‘tangle-only dementia’ cases in the absence of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) pathology. This has now been given the term ‘primary age-related tauopathy’ (PART) to distinguish it from AD [3]. Furthermore, astroglial tau aggregations have been increasingly recognised to be present within the aging brain independently of any co-existing neuropathological disorders or cognitive impairment. This unique astroglial tau pathology has been termed aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG) [6]. ARTAG exists in two distinct morphological forms as thorn-shaped astrocytes (TSA) and granular/fuzzy astrocytes (GFA). In addition, these tau immunoreactive astrocytes show a unique distribution within the brain, with TSA and/or GFA commonly found in subpial, subependymal and perivascular locations, as well as in clusters within the white and grey matter.

In a large population-based cohort study, Wharton and colleagues attempted to elucidate the relationship between astroglial tau pathology and neuronal tau and to correlate it with dementia status in aged brains [12]. Although no significant correlation was identified, astroglial tau pathology was found to be prevalent, with TSA present in 40 % of the cases. In particular, the authors mentioned that TSA are commonly found in a subpial location inferior to the substantia innominata but no detailed quantitative or morphological assessment was described.

As part of our ongoing research related to basal forebrain pathology in Lewy body disorders (LBD), we noted incidental ARTAG pathology in a significant number of cases. We surveyed 702 consecutive cases from the Parkinson’s UK Tissue bank at Imperial College London and 83 cases from Brains for Dementia Research (BDR) tissue bank from Newcastle University, excluding those with incomplete clinical histories, vascular pathology and significant co-existing neuropathological comorbidities. We selected 199 cases with a neuropathological diagnosis of pure LBD (BrainNet Europe Braak tau stage <4) or AD together with 26 age-matched controls. Basal forebrain sections containing the nucleus basalis of Meynert were immunostained for tau (AT8) and 76 cases (33.8 % of total) were found to display ARTAG. Our cohort is different from that in the Wharton et al study in that the mean age of our cohort is younger (78.8 vs 85.9) and we have a greater number of LBD cases compared with their study. Out of 155 cases with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), 48 (31.0 %) displayed ARTAG pathology in the basal forebrain, compared with 25.0 % in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) cases, 41.7 % in AD cases and 50.0 % in controls (Table 1). However, ARTAG within the basal forebrain does not seem to correlate with cognitive decline as 29 out of 78 cases (37.2 %) without cognitive impairment showed ARTAG compared with only 47 out of 147 (32.0 %) in those with cognitive impairment (Chi-square test p = 0.432), and the two groups are age-matched (mean age 78.69 vs 78.90, t-test p = 0.854). ARTAG pathology appeared to be more common in males (65.8 % of ARTAG-positive cases) although this did not reach statistical significance (Chi-square test p = 0.082). Consistent with the existing literature, the presence of ARTAG pathology increases with age, from the age of 60 (Table 2). As a result, the seemingly higher prevalence of ARTAG pathology in control and AD cases may be due to the higher age at death (mean = 87.75) compared with PD (mean age at death = 77.25) and DLB cases (mean age at death = 79.55). The perivascular distribution of ARTAG pathology is of particular interest because a weakening of the blood-brain barrier has also been associated with increasing age [11].
Table 1

Demographics and presence of ARTAG pathology of screened cases

Primary neuropathological diagnosis

Control

Parkinson’s disease

Dementia with Lewy bodies

Alzheimer’s disease

n

26

155

20

24

M:F (% male)

8:18 (30.8 %)

98:57 (63.2 %)

13:7 (65.0 %)

11:13 (45.8 %)

Mean age at death (SD)

81.35 (10.159)

77.25 (7.685)

79.55 (6.160)

85.75 (5.848)

Cases with presence of ARTAG in basal forebrain (%)

13 (50.0 %)

48 (31.0 %)

5 (25.0 %)

10 (41.7 %)

Table 2

Presence of ARTAG pathology among different age groups

Age group

Cases with presence of ARTAG (%)

Cases with absence of ARTAG (%)

50–59

0 (0.0 %)

4 (100.0 %)

60–69

7 (25.9 %)

20 (74.1 %)

70–79

21 (28.0 %)

54 (72.0 %)

80–89

40 (38.5 %)

64 (61.5 %)

90–99

8 (53.3 %)

7 (46.7 %)

Morphologically, astrocytic tau pathology seen in our cohort was distinct from the tufted astrocytes seen in progressive supranuclear palsy [13] and LBD [4], and the astrocytic tau-positive inclusions in corticobasal degeneration and Pick’s disease [5]. 67 cases (88.16 %) had only TSA, 3 (3.95 %) had GFA and 6 had both (7.89 %) TSA and GFA. In terms of distribution of pathology, ARTAG in the basal forebrain is most commonly found perivascularly (42.53 %), and subpially (34.48 %) (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S1). However, within the anterior basal forebrain (at the anterior commissure decussation level, as previously delineated [8]), ARTAG is most prevalent in the subpial location (39.13 %) followed by a perivascular distribution (30.43 %). Using the severity of deposition parameters suggested by Kovacs et al [6], ARTAG was most commonly identified focally at the intermediate (54.05 %) and posterior (51.61 %) levels of the basal forebrain, but only occasionally at the anterior level (41.38 %) of the basal forebrain.
Fig. 1

Characteristic ARTAG astrocytic tau pathology seen in the basal forebrain around large vessels (a,b), in the subpial area at the ventral surface of the brain (b) and periventricularly (c). Corpora amylacea around large vessels in close proximity to astrocytic tau pathology. Arrows pointing to corpora amylacea (d). Scale bars = 50 μm for (a-d). H&E image of the human basal forebrain (adapted from [8]) with common areas for ARTAG tau pathology outlined in dashed circles (e). Abbreviations: AC, anterior commissure; Cd, caudate; GP, globus pallidus; IC, internal capsule; Ins Ctx, insula cortex; Pt, putamen

ARTAG pathology in the aging brain shares a similar distribution and morphology to that seen in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative sequala of repeated traumatic brain injury [9]. Co-morbid neurodegenerative disorders have also been identified within CTE cases [10]. Within a large cohort of neurodegenerative diseases and controls, Ling et al reported evidence of CTE pathology in 32 out of 268 (11.9 %) screened cases and in 12.8 % of age-matched controls, and 30 (93.8 %) of CTE-positive cases had history of traumatic brain injury [7]. However, in another study where CTE pathology was screened in cortical brain sections of 198 controls and 66 individuals with a history of involvement in contact sports [2], CTE pathology was only identified in 21 of the 66 individuals at risk but not in the control group. This conflicting finding could be due to the different age ranges of the cases screened in these two studies. The 32 CTE-positive cases identified in the Ling et al study were all over the age of 60 (mean age = 80.97), and the 6 CTE-positive control subjects had a mean age of 92.17 which is considerably higher than the all cases screened in the Bieniek et al study (mean age ~75). This suggests that CTE and ARTAG possibly share a common aetiological pathway. The predominance of ARTAG pathology in males in our cohort is similar to that seen in CTE. Detailed retrospective clinical note analysis was not performed but a number of cases had a recorded history of head injury, participation in contact sport or military service. Furthermore, CTE pathology may reflect advanced aging or injury induced ARTAG or both. Wharton and colleagues noted the presence of corpora amylacea in close proximity to astroglial tau accumulations [12], and we report a similar observation in the basal forebrain (Fig. 1d). The accumulation of corpora amylacea is hypothesised to be involved in a disposal pathway of tau aggregates, which might further explain the close proximity of these bodies to tau pathology. Further work in a large cohort is needed to examine the relationship between CTE and ARTAG pathology throughout the brain and further clinicopathological research will add to our understanding of the pathogenesis of CTE and ARTAG in relation to the process of normal aging and neurodegenerative disorders.

Ethical considerations

The work conducted on human tissue was under ethical approval held by the Parkinson’s UK Brain Bank at Imperial College London (Registered charity in England and Wales (258197) and in Scotland (SC037554); Multicentre Research Ethics Committee approval reference number: 07/MRE09/72). Parkinson’s UK Brain Bank is an approved Research Tissue Bank by the Wales Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No. 08/MRE09/31 + 5). Further tissues were provided by the Newcastle Brain Tissue Resource, which is funded in part by a grant from the UK Medical Research Council (G0400074) and by Brains for Dementia research, a joint venture between Alzheimer’s Society and Alzheimer’s Research UK.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Alzheimer’s disease

ARTAG: 

Aging-related tau astrogliopathy

BDR: 

Brains for Dementia Research

CTE: 

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy

DLB: 

Dementia with Lewy bodies

GFA: 

Granular/fuzzy astrocytes

LBD: 

Lewy body disorders

NFT: 

Neurofibrillary tangle

PART: 

Primary age-related tauopathy

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

TSA: 

Thorn-shaped astrocytes

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Parkinson’s UK, registered charity 258197, for their continued support as well as the donors and family for their invaluable donation of brain tissue to the Parkinson’s UK Tissue Bank and the Brains for Dementia Research (BDR) Tissue Bank.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neuropathology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital Campus

References

  1. Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Al-Sarraj S, et al. Staging of neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: a study of the BrainNet Europe consortium. Brain Pathol. 2008;18:484–96. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00147.x.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bieniek KF, Ross OA, Cormier KA, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology in a neurodegenerative disorders brain bank. Acta Neuropathol. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1502-4.Google Scholar
  3. Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, et al. Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128:755–66. doi:10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hishikawa N, Hashizume Y, Yoshida M, et al. Tuft-shaped astrocytes in Lewy body disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;109:373–80. doi:10.1007/s00401-004-0967-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Komori T. Tau-positive glial inclusions in progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration and Pick’s disease. Brain Pathol. 1999;9:663–79. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.1999.tb00549.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kovacs GG, Ferrer I, Grinberg LT, et al. Aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG): harmonized evaluation strategy. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:87–102. doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1509-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ling H, Holton JL, Shaw K, et al. Histological evidence of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a large series of neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Neuropathol. 2015: 11–13. doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1496-y.
  8. Liu AKL, Chang RC-C, Pearce RKB, Gentleman SM. Nucleus basalis of Meynert revisited : anatomy, history and differential involvement in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1392-5.Google Scholar
  9. McKee AC, Stein TD, Kiernan PT, Alvarez VE. The neuropathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain Pathol. 2015;25:350–64. doi:10.1111/bpa.12248.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. McKee AC, Stein TD, Nowinski CJ, et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain. 2013;136:43–64. doi:10.1093/brain/aws307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mooradian AD. Effect of aging on the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Aging. 1988;9:31–9. doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(88)80013-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wharton SB, Minett T, Drew D, et al. Epidemiological pathology of Tau in the ageing brain: application of staging for neuropil threads (BrainNet Europe protocol) to the MRC cognitive function and ageing brain study. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4:11. doi:10.1186/s40478-016-0275-x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yamada T, McGeer PL, McGeer EG. Appearance of paired nucleated, Tau-positive glia in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy brain tissue. Neurosci Lett. 1992;135:99–102. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(92)90145-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement